Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love
"When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro"
Personal statement: I work part time in a Blockbuster and I take a degree in Film Studies.  You might say I quite like films.  
In that I watch way more than I think is good for me.  

I have seen way too many films to write reviews on them all so I will be rating most and then filling in reviews of them as and when I get time to do so.  

I suppose thats pretty much it really.  I've already got a myspace page and to be honest, I'm too lazy to do a whole new thing here.  
[more]

Go-Ape's movie tags

Advertisement
  • On every street in every city, there's a nobody who dreams of being a somebody

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Taxi Driver  (1976)

    It still shocks me today the amount of people who are yet to see this film.  You can ask almost anybody if they know the lines from it and they will, but have they all seen it? Hell no.  
    Someone asked me to reccommend a good film the other day, so I said how bout Taxi Driver....'What's that then?'.  This film is awesome.  I'm not saying that The Departed was bad, far from it, it was brilliant, but if any Scorsese film was going to win an Oscar, it SHOULD have been this one.
    I personally consider this film to be at the top of Robert De Niro's acting career as he plays Bickle so well.  This film is a classic, but I think that goes without saying seeing as it produced some of the most iconic lines in cinema and has affected so many films and film makers throughout time.  The score composed by Bernard Herrmann, was his last before he died and is a monument to his talent and may he never be forgotten.  The diegetics of this film shaped it as much as the direction and the acting abilities of an amazing cast.   

  • This land will be civilized

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Proposition  (2006)

    Brilliant modern Western.  Another genre film, completely unashamed of it's roots and quite rightly so.  Graphically violent (exploding heads anyone?) and gratuitous in pretty much every sense of the word, this film is a cinematic feast whether you are or were a fan of the Westerns originally.  
    The visuals are rarely less than amazing and the whole concept of the film is brilliant to be honest.  One brother must kill his older, more volatile brother in order to save his younger, more innocent brother from death.  There are some truely brutal sequences in this film so if you are of a delicate nature then it might not exactly be the best film for you, but it is amazing so I'd advise you watch it.  It is also something to behold as Ray Winstone  plays a somewhat decent and loving character which I am yet to see him play in any other film - he's generally a bad guy or and arsehole.  The film has some great acting in it and they all suit thier roles perfectly with some people cast wonderfully against thier usual characters.  No longer typecast, the performances are strong and the film gives you an experience that most other films won't in this day.  

  • NOT a treasure

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I think that for every bad film Nicolas Cage makes, somebody should burn one of his fingertips on a stove.  
    Perhaps he will learn eventually.  
    This film was crap.  Don't watch it.  Read a book.  It's better for you.  

  • They had nothing. They risked it all

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Commitments  (1991)

    This is a brilliant piece of Irish Cinema, based on the masterpiece novel by Roody Doyle and adapted perfectly by Alan Parker.  
    It is such a shame that so few of the actors involved in this went on to do anything else.  But that is the industries loss I suppose.  The film has an outstanding soundtrack with some truely staggering vocals.  I love the character of Deco because he is just such a total bastard but he is a great point of comedy within the film as the person everybody loves to hate.  This is a laugh out loud film, and also maintains Doyle's original points about the unemployment in Dublin what with the arguement that "we're a fuckin' third world county".  
    This is masterpiece of cinema, and well worth a view.  I would say that this film is one of the top 50 films and possibly the best film (that I've seen) that's come out of Ireland.  

  • Nice planet. We'll take it!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mars Attacks!  (1996)

    A film made back when Tim Burton was still brilliant.  He's lately gone very much downhill as I have expressed before.  
    But this was when he was on top form and I am inclined to say that this film is better than brilliant.  It is just so fantastically a B movie that there is nothing I can fault it on.  Wait.  Actually yes, I can fault it on one thing - it has Tom Jones it.  That's not too cool, but aside from that this film is great.  I love the design of the flying saucers.  
    I really don't know how to describe or explain this film so I'll just leave it at that  This film is great fun with not one, but two great performances from jack Nicholson.  Watch this film.  

  • Call me if you ever feel too old to drive

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I really liked this film, but it's another one that I have to be in the right frame of mind to watch.  It is a very endearing film with well fleshed out characters who hit all the right nerves and create a real connection with the audience.  This is like a more indie Lost In Translation really.  
    It is witty and funny in places but it also deals with some more interesting themes and issues such as the internet culture and chat rooms etc. wherein his very young son makes a date with a woman who is into some rather strange things through something he saw as a joke.  I like how the relationships between the characters build throughout thr film, especially the bond between the two kids cause the older brother takes time to help his younger brother and messes around with him - supplying some support that seems missing from his father.  
    All in all, I think it's a good film that's well worth a watch but be aware that it is not an overly cheerful film, but it is interesting and heart-warming.   

  • Can a full grown woman truely love a MIDGET?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Freaks  (1932)

    I saw this film by accident.  I was watching an old VHS that had The Three Amigo's on it and when it finished, it just sort of switched over to Freaks.  First thought was turn it off, just watched one film, don't want to watch another.  But I am so glad that I did cause this film is fantastic.  
    It was filmed in 1932 with a cast of real 'freaks' as they were known and considered to be at the time.  The film deals with the treatment of those different from ourselves back when it was considered acceptable to make someone an outcast based on thier physical attributes.  This is seen clearly right at the beginning when two men walk into a small group of 'pinheads' and tell the woman with them to exercise them somehwere else.  The film can be harsh in those respects but that is implied I think by it's tagline with the exclamation of 'midget'.  
    It is terrible the ways in which these people were treated and the film exemplifies this with the woman's attitude and attmepted trickery of a 'midget' to get his wealth.  But the revenge enacted upon her and her strong-man lover are adequate to create an essentially, happy, ending.  
    An outstanding film.   

  • ...look closer

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    American Beauty  (1999)

    I must say that this is an amazing film.  I love the ideals and thier portrayals in this film such as the white picket fence and the roses, all perfectly symetrical.  I'd be lying if I said I'd seen Kevin Spacey in a bad role but I also have to say that I think this might be his best role to date.  I absolutely love it when he loses it and just starts doing whatever the hell he wants to do.  
    I also love all the techniques that Mendes uses to express the feeling of entrapment.  In many of the shots of Spacey you will notice that there are often shadows cast over him or windows or blinds - anything that simulates bars, helping to express his feelings of powerlessness and entrapment in both his home and his life.  
    This film examines the concept of beauty and popularity in society as well as the mundane aspects of life and our seeming inabilty to escape from them.  This is simply an amzing film which I think that pretty much everybody should see.  It may not be to your personal taste but I'd still say go see it cause it might be and you will never know until you try.   

  • Music was his passion. Survival was his masterpiece

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Pianist  (2002)

    I gave this film a miss for a long time, partly because I think you need to be in the right frame of mind to watch a film that is this heavy, but mainly because of my dislike of Roman Polanski.  I mean he's a great film maker but we all know what he did, but I don't need to go into that here.  
    This film was amazing.  I think that this film should be compulsary viewing in schools.  I took History, we studied World War 2, I don't remember this film being mentioned let alone watched.  Not only would this film be very educational, but it might just stir up a sense of compassion which Britain seems to be lacking at the moment, espeically in it's youth.  So I think that the compulsary viewing of this film in schools would be hugely beneficial.  
    This film, like I said is one that you really need to have a set head for because it does deal with such a heavy content.  If you aren't in the right frame of mind, you may get bored, or you may just turn it off as being too depressing.  But either way, you should stick with it.  It is a truely inspirational story about a man who withstood pretty much everything that the world could throw at him and stood up to it.  
    I would really reccommend that you see this film, it is an inspiration and a truely amazing film.  

  • I was 27 years old the first time I died

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Jacket  (2005)

    I absolutely loved this film.  I had been reading about it all over the internet and in all of the film magazines that I was reading, but when it came out, nobody wanted to see it.  I tried everyone I knew and nobody was interested. Also, it was difficult to track it to a cinema that was showing it.  Eventually (cause I couldn't drive at the time) I persuaded my parents to drive me about 35 miles away to the closest cinema that I could find that was playing it.  
    If you were in the same position regardig a copy of the DVD or something, then I'd advise you go out of your way to see this film.  Aside from the fact that it is a brilliant film with an interesting and intricate plot, whilst at times can be a little bit disturbing, it is amazing.  The cinematography involved in this film and the editing.  The two combined make the drawer scenes feel so overly clostrophobic that you'll walk away convinced that you've never liked confined spaces.  
    Supposedly, Keira Knightly went for the role stating that if she didn't get it, she knew she'd be in period dresses forever.  Apparently that has happened despite the film.  But oh well, she certainly puts on an impressive performance here and her American accent doesn't slip too much.  
    Overall, this is a really impressive film.  Even if you can't get into the story or you don't like the acting, or even if you don't like the content, I don't think anyone can argue with how good the editing and cinematography involved in this film are.  

  • Nothing is what it seems at Miller's Crossing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Quite oddly for me, there seems to be a large gap in my memory of this film.  I remember it, and I very much enjoyed it, but for some reason I can't remember all of what occurs in it.  So bear this in mind cause I'm most likely not the best person to listen to in that case.  
    I thought it was a good film, a good old fashioned genre film without all the attempts to alter genre in some way.  It just exploited the gangster genre faithfully.  I know the word exploited doesn't make the film sound that great but it is actually meant in a god way.  Most films today, regardless of thier content and context, will attempt to mix genres and it does work, and works well too.  But when you see a proper genre film, with nothing to hide and nothing to change.  well, it makes a nice change - I suppose it feels a little bit more like going back to when genre was all-important.  
    I think this is a great film, and the performances are good too.  The Coen's regular John Turturro puts in an especially good performance in my opinion and if you are a fan of the Coen Brothers, then this film has to be required viewing.   

  • Hey, give the film a break...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Wild Hogs  (2007)

    Wow.  
    I just looked at some of the reviews below this and it doesn't look like people are taking too kindly too it.  However, I will say that I liked it.  It's not a great fim that deals with tough issues or anything like that.  It is just a film that I think is perfect to just stick on in the background really.  It is a film that I can watch and completely turn off.  Every once in a while I like to watch a film that I don't have to really think about and follow, so I watch films like this.  They are 'switch off' films to me. 
    Also, this film really has no right to be as tolerable as it is, especially given that it contains John Travolta AND Tim Allen.  Considering this, I think the film was pretty good.  Though I have to say that I flinched each time one of those bikes got damaged.  Makes me shudder just thinking about it 

  • If you wanna be a big cop in a small town, fuck off up the model vilage

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hot Fuzz  (2007)

    I have heard people say over and over again, how although this film is funny, it isn't as good as Shaun Of The Dead.  I personally think it is a hell of a lot better.  I'm not saying that Shaun was a bad film, far from it, but I don't think it was as funny as this film is.  
    The entire concept of this film just cracks me up.  It's essentially a large number of gun weilding pensioners led by Jim Broadbent.  The film is written perfectly with all the snappy little one-liners you would be expecting, as well as the whole buddy-cop theme being explored.  It plays on conventions without over using any and whilst maintaining a little twist for you at the end.  The laughs are constant the whole way through and the ending almost had me in tears - 'the greater good' - Certain aspects of the film may not appeal to an American market as much, although for all I know, they could have a different cut out there.  But many of the jokes may not hit out there because of the differences.  
    But overall, I loved this film.  It got me on the verge of tears (of laughter) and was entertaining throughout.  It is well worth a watch, especially if you are a fan of Pegg and co.  

  • If you want to be understood, listen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babel  (2006)

    I was a little sceptical about this film because it was getting such good reviews that I wasn't sure that it could live up to the expectations that I had for it.  So I finally saw it on a very, very, very small screen on a plane and I have to say that I was unimpressed.  
    But they may have been the lack of sleep and the tiny screen as I then saw it a second time and really appreciated it.  It is a very moving film with some beautiful visuals and a brilliant set of interlocking stories.  I like the concept of the film in itself about the tower of Babel crumbling because there were so many different languages all trying to communicate and each not understanding what the other was saying.  So I am especially fond of the stories surrounding Japan and Mexico and the barriers facing them.  
    This is a fantastic film although a little dragging in places, it is one that I would thoroughly advise seeing, even if it is just so you can say that you've at least given it a try.  
    Please see this film, it is absolutely amazing.   

  • Everyone, just pretend to be normal

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I absolutely love this film.  
    This film is the one that hits the top spot on my list of favourite films.  Obviously, everybody has thier own tastes, but for me, you just cannot beat this film.  It has everything you could need in a film.  
    It is funny, it's witty, it's acted superbly by a fantastic cast, it's got a great soundtrack, it is heartfelt, it is touching, it is a fantastic film.  I don't really know how to keep talking about this film really because whatever I say can only really serve as an injustice, you'll need to see it for yourself.  But suffice to say that I know this film too well.  I saw it in the cinema twice and pre-ordered the DVD the day it's release date was given.  I've seen this more times than I care to think and I don't regret it.  I will advise this film to anybody and everybody.  So please, go see it, rent it, buy it, I don't care.  Just make sure you see it.

  • Welcome to your worst nightmare

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hostel  (2006)

    This is a really appropriate tag for this film.  Cause it is a total nightmare.  It's awful.  
    I hate this movie and I cannot lie, it makes me hate Eli Roth.  he's number 2 on my list of Celebrites I'd Like To Punch (no. 1 is Nic Cage if you're wondering) and I don't care how much Quentin Tarantino likes him and how cool everybody seems to think he is.  I think this film is appaling, and to be honest, deserves to have it's reels buried.  
    If you like pointless gore and gratuitous nudity, or gornography to be precise, then by all means go see this film.  But I for one think that it's films like this that are killing cinema.  

  • Do you want lies with that?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Fast Food Nation  (2006)

    I found this to be a clever, witty, affecting film.  I love the mixture of the genres it portrays.  Somehow blending comedy, drama and documentary together without having one as it's true stand-alone genre description.  
    I have seen a lot of people who were disgusted by this film, but in a positive way.  It is a film that is fairly discouraging in it's portrayal of the fast food industry so if you eat a lot of the stuff it isn't something I'd advise watching, as one of our customers will be more than pleased to tell you I am sure (he liked McDonalds and didn't like what the film said).  
    I don't tend to eat much fast food cause I'm veggie, but if I did eat a lot of it, this film would seriously out me off.  The ending scenes are what seem to get most people but I won't ruin it for any of you.  As much as I liked it, there was one thing that I didn't like in this film and that was the amount of 'names' involved in it.  I'm not saying that anyone involved played thier parts badly, as everyone in fact played thier parts very well.  It's mainly the fact that it sort of feels that people are just jumping onboard to get thier faces out there.  The material probably spoke to each of them individually, but for me it just felt a little bit wrong with so many people in it.  
    At any rate, it is worth seeing, more so if you DO eat a lot of fast food cause if you do, you're eating crap.  Literally.   

  • She drinks. He drives. Together it's the trip of a lifetime

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Driving Lessons  (2006)

    I was a tad sceptical when I saw this advertised.  As far as I was concerned, it had the ginger guy from Harry Potter in it.  But on the other hand, it looked really good, was getting good reviews and it had Julie Walters in it.  
    So I checked it out and I have to say that I loved it.  It is one of my favourite films, one that always manages to make me smile no matter what.  I also feel that I have to say that Rupert Grint has more than proved himself to be a good actor in this film, he is now in my opinion, one of the best young English actors that we have produced.  
    He gets brutally underused in the HP films and lets be honest, is a far better actor than Radcliffe, which is reportedly why he was given the role so I suppose that I can't complain because if he was employed to his full potential in those films, he might never have made this.  However, having said that, the film is heavily dominated by Julie Walters as would be expected given what a great acting force she is.  
    I think that this is one of the best films that England has produced in recent years and I would thoroughly reccommend it.  It will always make you laugh and the performances are brilliant.  It has an awesome soundtrack too now that I come to think of it.  
    Go see this film, it's better than I can ever make it sound.  

  • A comic tragedy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Love Liza  (2002)

    As much a I liked this film.  I can't say that I completely agree with it's tag.  
    It is a tragedy, yes, but it doesn't rank too high on the comic side for me.  
    It is slightly funny in places, but they are fleeting moments.  
    It was a very touching film about how a man copes with his wife's suicide and how he develops a habit for huffing gas.  But essentially that's it.  It does deal with some raw emotions and tug at your heartstrings.  But if you are feeling even slightly down on the day that you plan to see this, then I wouldn't advise it as it is easily one of the most depressing films I have ever seen.  I see a lot of depressing films, but this was something else.  
    But if you're in a fairly good mood, then why not give it a watch.  It might just make you appreciate how good you got it.  

  • Lassie in 1904

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rescued by Rover  (1904)

    I personally like this film.  
    It was like watching Lassie from days long gone.  Very entertaining and a very early example of how editing can be used to create a story.  
    This is the story of a baby who is kidnapped by and old gypsy woman whilst the nanny doesn't pay attention, then the dog goes and finds the baby and upon being driven from the place, returns to it's master, the childs father, and brings him to the house where the baby has been taken.  
    This film was so hugely popular upon it's initial release that it had to be reshot several times because all of the original negatives wore through.  Seeing that the film is told entirely through editing and monstration, it is an early example of what film was capable of, even when it was still new.  
    This has on occasion, been called "the last great British film" although I cannot for the life of me remember who said it.  But they may well be right in terms of it's employment of editing and of camera techniques in the terms of thier being new and unprecidented.  We haven't produced much since that has been more impresive.  Yes we have CGI etc. but this was a classic example of how something new was portrayed properly.  

  • Ramsay's gritty portrayals

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Gasman  (1997)

    This is quite a harsh short film, which deals explicitly with the mundanities of life and is set in Scotland in a depression.  It centers on 2 children being taken by thier father to a Christmas party, alongside his other children, who are unbeknownst to one another.  
    The film encapsulates it's audience in a story with no explicit plot or backstory, it merely allows you to sit back and spectate.  Whilst never quite gathering itself up to it's full potential it is still a great short and at times quite affecting.  Ultimately, the little girl loses her innocence, or perhaps it is her being introduced into the world of adults, a world of lies.  I like how the film plays out with a surrealist quality in places such as the scene in which the man dressed as Santa is dancing merrily with the children and shortly after this, he is seen staggering his way across the dance floor with a pint in his hand.  
    Ultimately, it is an interesting piece, but it never quite reaches what it should have.  I would say that it is one to watch, but only in passing

  • Desire is a danger zone

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Crying Game  (1992)

    This was a film that was suggested to me, and I generally take suggestions when it comes to films because if someone has liked something enough to recommend it to me, then I think It's worth watching and do try to see the films that people suggest.  
    So i bought it and I was not sorry.  It is a very good film despite what I considered to be a fairly poor British Accent from Whitaker.  I, seemingly unlike most of society saw this without any clue as to what the film was even about so when the 'secret' of the film hit I was shocked.  For once, there was something that was totally unexpected for me in a film.  Generally, most major twists and turns can be figured roughly if you think a little but this one caught me totally off guard.  
    The performances in this film were particularly strong with an outstanding performance from Stephen Rea as a man trying to escape his past and do right, whilst getting entangled in things beyond his control, such as his emotions.  This is definately one of the best British films and I would advise that if you do intend to see this film, that it's probably best if you don't read much more into it as most sites seem to reveal the twist.  

  • Reasonable? You're parked on a sidewalk!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is one of the films that lives in my top 10 films list and I'm fairly certain that it has no intention of moving any time soon.  I now have 4 copies of the film in verious different forms as well as the book, posters etc.  
    This combines so much, to become such a film as I cannot find words that seem fitting enough.  Immense perhaps.  This may well be one of the craziest films you'll ever run the risk of seeing.  But if you've read the book you'll know all about it's contents and none of the actions will shock you.  I am a big fan of Terry Gilliam and this is quite possibly his masterpiece, in my opinion at least.  
    Depp and Del Toro seem to put in the performances of thier lives in this film and as dark and twisted as things can get in the film, I think that they must have had so much fun making it, getting to act drunk and stoned in the Circus Circus, isn't that everbodies dream!
    Thanks to this film, Vegas has never looked so cool and Vegas has always been cool.  I want nothing more than to rent a fire-apple red convertible and cruise round Vegas.  If you're offended by drug abuse and swearing and other acts of the crude variety then this is most likely not the film for you but if you think you can stomach all that then it is worth a watch.  I know people who hate the film beacuse of it's portrayal of drugs ad I know people who love it for the same reason.  The truth is that it is a fatastic film and it should be watched because whether you love it or you hate it, you've probably stopped yourself from watching something worse in that same time frame.  Just think, you might've ended up watching Number 23.  Pick Fear and Loathing, eve if you hate it it's still better.  

  • A comedy with balls

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Caddyshack  (1980)

    Well as a Bill Murray fan I am obliged to like this regardless of whether it is fantastic or terrible.  
    Fortunately it is an absolutely outstanding film that cracks me up each and every time I watch it.  Everyone in the film is amazing but Bill Murray steals every scene regardless of who's sharing the screen with him.  His attempt at plastic explosives and the subsequent performances his creations make prior to thier detonation leaves me laughing a good ten minutes after it has passed.  
    This is a classic film and I think that if you don't like this film or find at least 5 moments in it to be hilarious, then you were born without a sense of humor.  Sorry, but thats that.  
    This film is pure gold.  Plus, it has the King of cheesey films, Chevy Chase in it.  How can you argue with that?

  • Raab had a little fender bender...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Haggard  (2002)

    I love this film.  It is a film that never fails to make me laugh, though I know it can be, shall we say, a tad immature.  
    I still love it and it has one of the funniest soundtracks ("I've come into your house..oh no") and some great one liners, which if you're anything like me, you'll find yourself repeating if not in your head, out loud to your friends.  If you don't like Bam Margera or the whole Jackass way of humour, then the film is probably not for you.  But I think it is outstanding.  Some of the things in this such as the Garbage Juicer and the Reverse Microwave will have you in stitches (or it at least had me laghing) and I don't think you'll walk away from this film without a smile on your face.  

  • What happened to Tim Burton?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This was just not worth my time, but of course the fact that it is a Tim Burton movie means that not only do I have the 2 disc edition of the DVD, but I have a bloody huge poster on my ceiling too.  It also means that upon it's first day of release, I went to an old fashioned cinema, the closest to me at the time, and saw it at the first showing of the day in the midst of a large number of over excited, screaming children.  I could have lived with that, had the film been enough to impress me.  
    I know that this was not strictly speaking, a remake of the original film, rather a second adaptation of the book.  I am also well aware that this film sticks far more closely to the book than the 1971 version ever did.  But I still love that film and I still dislike this one.  The film looked great, but I was expecting so much more from Burton especially seeing as he was working with Johnny Depp again, Sleepy Hollow, Ed Wood, Edward Scissorhands...these were such excellent films and then they go and make this!
    I don't know what I was expecting when I went to see this film, but I don't know that I had any right to expect it given the Planet Of The Apes fiasco.  But I'll still be eagerly waiting for Sweeny Todd, another Burton-Depp colaboration, and I'll be seeing it on the day of release and keeping my fingers crossed that it takes Burton back to his roots and that he'll have something fantastic hidden up his sleeve for us. 

  • The night is hot as Hell...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sin City  (2005)

    This film is a masterpiece, to put it simply.  
    Quite obviously, it is not going to be to everyone's personal taste but as a fan of the Sin City graphic novels and an even bigger fan of Robert Rodriguez I can safely say that it was perfectly to my taste.  I love the films contrasts, they represent the aspects of the books so truthfully that I can't fault it at all.  The make up and costumes were outstanding and the performances that were put in were fantastic, Nick Stahl was particularly good as the Yellow Bastard.  But best of all in this film is the adaptation of The Big Fat Kill.  
    The use of colour in otherwise black and white shots is really effective in drawing attention and adding emotion to a scene but I love the effect in The Big Fat Kill especially of the painting under ultraviolet light such as on Becky's necklaces.  I love the contrasts these create.  I find the film very impressive in the way in which it was shot too.  The film shot entirely against green screen and I really enjoyed seeing it played back at about 100 times it's original rate without any effects, just the green screen.  
    This to me, is a film that I think everybody should see whether they think they might like it or not.  When it came out I thought it looked good stylisticaly but I wasn't sure of it, now I am awaiting the second film with open arms.  

  • 250km of asphalt, 9 thirty-something travelers, 4 cars, 1 destination

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Quebec-Montreal  (2002)

    I stumbled upon this film accidentaly in a HMV in Canada and couldn't resist it.  
    I really like this film, although it can lag at times, however these moments rarely last long.  It is quite a slow paced film anyway so if you're not into slower paced films, it's most likely not for you.  
    It deals with different groups of people, all of whom are trying to get Montreal for one reason or another and as they go they discuss the concepts of ideal love romance and they bicker and Highway 20 becomes a great backdrop for these interlocking stories that deal with many aspects of relationships and life.  
    In places it can be a very funny film although it is far from being just a comedy.  I would class it more as a drama, with comedic elements.  It is entertaining and often quite heartfelt in its explorations but it appears that it is not a widely known film which is a shame as it does deserve to be seen.   

  • The store, with more

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    As good as this film is, it is the one example I can find where the remake is actually better than the original film.  
    This film is funny in a B movie way with a few mild laughs too but it doesn't compare to the 1968 Frank Oz version.  The now legendary Jack Nicholson was probably the best thing about this film for me as he is very rarely seen in a bad role and his sequence does provide more laughs than the rest of the film.  
    It is a good film and like any remake, you should see the original preferably before you see the remake but failing that, just see it at some point.  It is worth a watch if you like or even dislike the 1968 version.  

  • This is between me...and the vegetable

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I have been thinking on this for about 2 or 3 days now I have come to the conclusion that this will be the one and only time that I will ever say that a remake is better than the original.  
    Remakes are awful, don't get me wrong.  I hate remakes, which is why I don't like having to admit that this is actually better.  I love this film, I watch it as often as I can and I have even shoved it on at work to show people what a good film looks like (they keep renting Epic Movie and Number 23).  This film has me in stitches every time and I love the soudtrack.  The songs are amazing.  
    The cast is so well picked as well, Steve Martin is at one of his funniest roles as Orin Scrivello.  He seems to thrive almost too well as a masochistic dentist with a song that will have you gasping for breath through your laughter, although not of course, if you are a dentist.  In which case, you may well find it a little offensive.  
    For me however, Bill Murray steals the show with the scene in which he appears for around 4 or 5 minutes.  I can't help but laugh as he's playing with all the brutal looking equipment in the office.  Yes I know that this was role originally filled by Jack Nicholson but as good as he is, I still can't find anyone to beat Bill Murray.  This is a great film with great music, and great laughs.  Anyone who hasn't seen it, I would recommend that you see it as soon as possible.  

  • A White-Hot Juggernaut At 200 Miles Per Hour!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Death Proof  (2007)

    Well I have pretty much just got home from seeing this.  I caught the last showing of it's first day of release here in the UK.  Having seen it I can now completely confirm my resentment that we don't have the opportunity to see Grindhouse as it was originally intended.  Thanks to the poor turn-outs of American audiences, we get 2 seperate films and we are not happy about it I can tell you.  
    This was a great film, Ionly found one part of the film to drag and that only lasted about 3 minutes before things sped up again.  I loved the old style of the film, the editing and the scratches and the blips.  It gives it such an authentic feel and somehow manages to refrain from overusing these thus keeping the film from becoming an annoyance.  
    I thought the film was hugely enjoyable with a fast and furious pace and an awesome ending (which I won't ruin, don't worry).  This film shows how wrong they were to force two films upon us rather than the one we want.  As a fan of both Tarantino and Rodriguez I can only imagine that it would have been genius and will hold onto hope that it will be re-released over here as it was intended.  

  • Sometimes you have to go halfway around the world, to come full circle

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is such an amazing film.  I am a huge fan of Bill Murray but this is easily his best role to date.  Everything about this film is subtle and quiet and there is humour and style and I cannot even think of ways in which to explain just how good it really is.  
    I have been to japan, I went to 5 locations that were used in this film just so that I knew that I'd been somewhere where such a fantastic film was made.  The performances in this film are brilliant despite the fact that Murray and Johnasson apparently hated each other, and there seems to be such a chemistry that it is hard not to get completely drawn into the film and into thier lives.  
    The film is also complimented by some beautiful visuals.  Tokyo is a beautiful place and Coppola captures it at it's best.  I haven't yet met a person who hasn't liked the film which is rare, although I am sure there are people out there who don't like it, but I loved it and I think that most people will.  So I'd say that it is a film that everyone should see at some stage because there are very few films produced today that come up to these standards.  

  • Why?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Wicker Man  (2006)

    Dislike and disinterest are in no way strong enough to describe this film.  There seems to be no button to click to label it as 'garbage' so I'll have to type it instead.  
    This film was God awful.  They chose to remake a classic and they screwed it up big time.  This film was altered beyond repair and just should never have seen the light of day.  Nic Cage used to be make good films.  What happened?
    I mean, aside from ridiculously altering the plot, was it really necessary to beat up that many women?  I will say one thing for this film though, the only defining factor in this film that brings any kind of audience satisfaction - you get to hear Nic get hobbled - the only thing that brings any kind of entertainment from this 'film'.

  • You suspect foul play? I suspect murder!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Wicker Man  (1974)

    This film is a classic.  It was a gem and then they remade it.  I think remakes are a waste of time mostly anyway, but of all the films to choose to remake, why pick this one?
    This is an amazing film and whilst not being an outright horror, is in some ways horrifying.  It has what must be one of the best endings in film history.  I spent 3 months actaully studying this film for my A level Film class and to be honest, now it has become a fantastic joke between the people who were in that class.  Despite how good it was, 3 months left it at a point of overkill and I can no longer manage to watch it in one sitting.  
    But that is not because it is a bad film, merely that I have seen it too many times in too short a period of time and have had it tainted.  This is a classic film and if you are thinking of seeing (or have seen the remake and know how bad it is), then please give this one a view as it is so much better.   

  • Everything is the same, even if it looks different

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This film is astounding.  The first time I watched this film I was so absorbed by it that I put it on a second time the moment it finished and watched it twice through.  
    I have since watched it probably a dozen times.  It is something to behold that I have managed this as usually I cannot forgive mark Wahlberg for being in the remake of Planet Of The Apes.  But even I have to admit that in this film he is amazing.  The "pure-being ball thing" cracks me up every time and I'd be lying if I said that Jude Law (an actor I just plain cannot stand) didn't play his part brilliantly.  
    This is a fantastic film and it brings so much more than most other films do today.  Jason Schwartzman, whilst always good, is on top form here in a role that seems tailored just for him.  
    I absolutely love this film and cannot get enough of it.  I would encourage you to see it, as soon as possible.   

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go