Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

Interested in: No particular genre

Phantasma-gore-ia's movie tags

Advertisement

  • Saw it too late, perhaps

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Black Christmas  (1974)

    Because this movie was made in '74 and I wasn't made until '82 and didn't see it until last week, its characteristic, inspired themes became passe and considerably old hat in just the ensuing years, i.e. the end of the 70s, much less into the great-great-great-great-(etc.)-grandchildren: I Know What You Did Last Summer, Wrong Turn, et al.  The core ideas (the killer being in the house, gatherings of nubile, vulnerable girls, obvoius distractors (red herrings like Keir's character) and such became textbook lesson, sure-fire blueprints for a killer movie a long time before I saw it, and consequently I just didn't get jived by it.  The discordant voices on the phone were unnatural and haunting, but the killer being in the house was suggested aready by the fact that he used the same phones the girls had.  I hated how we didn't see this "Billy" nor understand why in heaven's (or hell's) name he tore into his deadly rage.  Had I seen this in '74, however, it would look and sound different today, but I missed it by...33 years.

  • Leave a doctor no choice...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Article 99  (1992)

    An engaging tale of renegade doctors (not so because they're unlicensed hacks but rather they flout the system), Article 99 describes John Q style what happens when lives are on the line and a bureaucratic system with knots like macrama threatens to impede the process.  Yes, the titular stipulation is fictional, but the medical drama experienced is indeed real.  ;)

  • About as quirky as it gets

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Around the Bend  (2004)

    This decidedly offbeat flick starts with a man taking his disjointed family to KFC, leaving them clues to a kind of treasure hunt of sorts left in ever-smaller bags like fast-food Chinese nesting boxes.  As they embark on his peculiar odyssey, they start to weld bonds that bridge the gaps they let grow in preceding years.  An unsual sort of family film, it's my idea of a cool way to spend an hour and a half.

  • Big-scale, epic, lavish love story

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    All that and more, this heartfelt story of a philanthropic altruist (she likes people and wants to do good things for them) in love with a bullheaded ruler.  Talking to him is like "talking to a brick wall" I believe her words were, but eventually she melted his icy heart and, as Chuck Woolery would say, a love connection is made.  Heart-warming and very artistic, this movie has a particular spot in my collective film memory and I hope it will in yours...provided you don't "lose interest."  ;)

  • Brilliant, complex, a winner

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Just that.  Like any Christie masterpiece, it's a total guessing game with a frustrating lack of answers for its hapless cast of characters.  Essentially, ten people find themselves on an island with a record that accuses them individually of varying crimes.  They get knocked off successively with an ending that, while not in keeping with Agatha's original story due to the dictation of the Hayes code, is still a "wow" moment.  It's similarities to Identity (2002) can't be ignored, but that doesn't mean by any respect that the latter isn't a great movie or even derivative, managing to devise new and smart connections between the characters as reasons for them all to be held down and picked off, one by one.

  • Time travel trouble in an otherwise good film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Jacket  (2005)

    This movie was cool, but it committed an error that beset Minority Report and is in fact a common hitch in time travel (henceforth TT) stories, namely causality and the fact that even in TT, something has to happen after the action that gave rise to it.  One can't go back to the beginning if it hasn't occurred at least once.  Unless interdimensional issues are seeded into the script, one traditionally hops back and forth only in a single continuum and because of that the rules of natural order will still apply.  The problem this movie and MR had was that they violated this and gave both characters an effect before there was a cause, the effect thereby being the cause.An event cannot, even in the most futuristic and imaginative sci-fi setting, cause itself, as it does in the two under discussion.  Here, Kris's character gives Adrien's information only because Adrien gave it to him first, years ago.  That itself was only because...get this...Kris told him!  In other words, Kris tells Adrien a list of patients’ names in the future.  This is only because in the past, Adrien rattled them off after a stay in the jacket.  Because it's the past, it's the first Kris has heard of it.  Now, logically, how can this be?  Where did it start?  If Adrien, in the past, tells Kris things that Kris told him only because Adrien said that Kris told him, we find ourselves in a self-devouring loop with no beginning and no end.  Essentially, each character knew the information because the other informed him.  TT is all well and good, but it would be pure if one would address rather than sidestep such problems.Despite this, it’s a very good movie with an ending that lets a little hope leak into the bleak narrative, letting you leave on a good note.  ;)

  • Your basic high-altitude terror

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Air Panic  (2001)

    Not overly spectacular but not terrifically bad, this fare (ahem) was a good time at the movies, if you can get a hold of it.  Expect similarities to Turbulence and Turbulence 2: Fear of Flying, Die Hard III and, to a degree, Red-Eye.  ;)

  • Awesome movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Miracle Mile  (1989)

    For a different kind of thrill, check out this dark action flick based on reception of privileged information regarding an imminent nuclear beatdown and the predictably chaotic reaction.  The story starts with a nobody (E.R.'s Anthony Edwards) who happened to answer that phone at that time and then accelerates through his sweat-soaked, fevered attempts to win over the populace and drive home the message that they're all about to be erased off the face of the earth.  Add to that the love of his life (whom he just, I mean just, met) with whom if he is to die in an hour and a half he would love to spend those concluding moments.  Mix in a seasoning of truly hard moments (Edwards' seeing his parents for the last time as they drive off together to their favorite restaurant to go out in style) and the very last frames, this uncompromising film examines human nature and true love.


  • A truly grim collection

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Living up to the decidedly fatal and morbid appeal of its namesake, the Tales series, this anthology mix features five stories that explore the lives and deaths of as many new souls as inducted into hell.  They are firmly in keeping with the structure of the show in that they are ultimate examples of dire poetic justice and no one getting away without recieving their final comeuppance.  If you liked this title, I recommend Tales from the Darkside and Necronomicon, also collection-style flicks.

  • Brilliant thriller

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Inventive and well-filmed, a highlight moment in this film is the construction, assembly and operation of John's character's plastic gun he fashioned by hand from his own molds and the concealment of the ammunition in a rabbit's foot keychain, complete with several keys so it would be set aside and never go through the detector.  If you're an Eastwood fan or not or a Malkovich fan or not, I would like to think it would earn a decent place in your collection and general estimation.

  • A dire movie, it absolutely skewers reality TV

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    About as grim and bleak a movie as you could get (people conscripted into a goverment-run game show where contestants must kill each other to be the only to survive), it completely works and, if I may be so blunt, sticks it in and breaks it off for reality TV, something years overdue when this movie came out, much more so now.

  • On a party line with Phone Booth

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dialing almost the same number, this thriller is just as tense and engaging as PB, though the circumstances and environment are different: Liberty is handcuffed (rather, told at gunpoint to do it herself) to a hot dog cart and kept on a cell phone wired to a bomb in said cart.  PB on the other end is a man held down under sniper fire in a, well, phone booth, tied to a land line.  They're both tightly-wrapped mind games that I would think are sure to be enjoyed.

  • #10 terrible movie on http://bloodgutsandgore.com

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    "There really isn’t much to say here critically except that this is a dreadful movie that has nothing to say, nothing to prove and nothing to mean.  I watched it out of curiosity, and that was satisfied a while back, the FFW button becoming a close friend for the remainder.  A glacial pace, irritating and grotesque characters, an impotent and miserable shot at a story and an inferior, irrational conclusion even given the fracas gone before landed this a sure place on my Worst Films Ever Made list in Top of the Heap elsewhere on the site."

  • #9 worst on http://bloodgutsandgore.com

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Monster Man  (2003)

    Nuff said.  ;)


  • Dreadful, revolting, stupid movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Slime City  (1989)

    Fifth worst on http://bloodgutsandgore.com and it's not worth saying any more than that.

  • Awful, terrible, no good, very bad movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Basket Case  (1982)

    Just that...#4 worst on http://bloodgutsandgore.com and one of the most pointless cult hits I've ever seen.  I'll see 2 and 3 for absolutely no other reason than to chronicle the gore, then I'll discard them as I have this one.  That's all.

  • Nothing new, but still cool

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Severed  (2005)

    Just that...Severed adds nothing to the genre, using a tried technique of altered chemicals to drive the dead bonkers (other mainstay methods are lightning strikes and extraterrestrial influences, i.e. meteors), leading them to chew the scenery and the characters they share the movie with.  It's filmed in a 28-Days-Later style, herky-jerky format that makes for an interesting atmosophere, spicing up an otherwise standard throat-ripping, gut-munching horror flick.

  • Odd movie, strange charm

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Quick Change  (1990)

    It's hard to say what it is that provokes me to enjoy this movie, but I do.  It has a peculiar draw from somewhere that amuses me sufficiently to keep coming back.  Ignore the "lost interest" types and sit back, taking in this offbeat feature with every facet of genuine Murray, Davis and Quaid comic ability.  ;)

  • Dreadful, terrible, hugely bad

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Item  (1999)

    Let me quote myself from http://bloodgutsandgore.com:

     

    "Stupid.  Insane.  Asinine.  Terrible.  Disjointed.  Pointless.  Irrelevant.  Brainless.  Sloppy.  Miserable.  Disastrous.  Repulsive.  Off-putting.  Confusing.  Revolting.  Pathetic.  Ridiculous.  Retarded.  Wasteful.  Idiotic.  Moronic.  Juvenile.  Artless.

    "Every one of those adjectives and a fair number more are qualified for this picture, none of them able to be overstated.  It’s always a guaranteed night to remember when one sits down and dares to take in something like this for its putridity, senselessness and sensationally low quality utterly mesmerize that they made it out, i.e., managed to escape from their misguided creator’s hands.  Empires collapse, races are wiped out, movies like this are made.  You were dragged through Carnivore like through hot tar and glass shards.  You were abused with Skinned Deep like being beaten with a cat-o’-nine tails.  Now, for your viewing displeasure, we bring you The Item.  Consider yourself warned to no end.  You just won’t believe how bad it is."

  • #2 worst on bloodgutsandgore.com

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Carnivore  (2000)

    Wheeee-hew!  Somebody open a window!  I've let out farts that smell better than this.  There is nothing positive to say about this, so let's get to the dirt, quoted verbatim from the aformentioned http://bloodgutsandgore.com from its original post over a year ago:

    "Wow.  That’s the first thing I thought of to say about this movie.  I’m no Roger Ebert but I’ve watched a lot in my time and I can safely say that this is one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen.  I can usually dig low-grade fare but this feature was so very sub-par it’s clear it was made with the same budget one would reserve for going to Dunkin’ Donuts.  The entire thing is grainier than any home movie ever was, the acting was abominable and the production values were below those of even the campiest 50s monster flick.  Not one likeable or sympathetic character exists and you find yourself not caring one bit about who lives and dies.  A government project to create a more savage way of killing is kept in a containment situated in an abandoned house in a normal suburban neighborhood.  Supervised by one guy, the creature that manages to look hokier than even a Halloween costume accidentally kills him and thereby has free reign of the place.  The cheesy and atrocious acting talents of the four living snacks for the creature would be amusing if it weren’t so sad.  It looks as though an aspiring film student with no knowledge of how to make a movie grabbed his camcorder and set out to make a hopeless, flaccid sci-fi slash horror flick.  The very lowness of the quality of the entire product from the risible premise to the dazzlingly feeble acting, cinematography and editing utterly amazes me that junk like this could have been made in these modern times.  Watch and be very amazed that it ever saw the light of day and do your best to keep in mind that somebody actually paid for this, that these guys were given money to put this together.  What they ever hoped to accomplish, what they ever wanted this movie to do or to mean is one of the great mysteries of cinema.

     "I’m not done – I just felt like starting a new paragraph.  The film has an MPAA rating, which means that an organization such as they actually watched this and didn’t destroy it on sight.  In the scene selection menu, the caption for chapter 2 says Connie.  The name of the creature is Carnie.  You can plainly hear this, yet the title says Connie.  The thank-you list is a jaw-dropping long one with over thirty people/companies/corporations that I find wholly unbelievable were parties to this.  It stuns, simply stuns, that it could take that many people to create this mess.  I’ve tried, boy I’ve tried, yet I can’t strain myself to figure what there ever could have been for that many people to do, the film looking like not even four people were involved (four people who were apathetic about the idea at that), and maybe that’s true.  Maybe they wanted to impart some semblance of cooperation and make it look like they could find others to share in their incompetence.  There was some weakly sentimental drivel about thanks to those whose undying dedication and love (or something) made this film a reality.  Whatever possibly went wrong to make this a reality should be banned from appearing in public and/or ever picking up a camera or other piece of filmmaking equipment again.  The Special Features list on the back cover is a completely shameless fabrication: Director’s Commentary – on something like this?  “Carnivore Kills!” Featurette?  That would tell what?  There was nothing about the production that wasn’t terribly clear (or just terrible) and there could be nothing additional that would make this more interesting.  Wide-screen Presentation is a total joke and the Trailer is just nowhere to be seen.  Optional Spanish Subtitles aren’t even there, the only guaranteed items being the Scene Selection and “Interactive Menus.”  I don’t apologize for my lengthy griping because I feel compelled by my sense of duty to my readers to clue them in to what is in my own estimation one of the very worst films yet made.

     

    "The mathematical AR was four, but the grungy, useless feeling that pervades this miserable exercise in bad filmmaking tears it down to a 3.  Note that out of the enormous body of films reviewed for this site that this is the only case where I’ve knocked a rating down because it was just that bad.

     

    "I recently discovered, long after writing this originally (this is in fact a re-visit), that it was done in 1989 and shelved for 11 years.  elevenyears.  Probably because it was buried under an accumulated shell of dust and rat feces and was discovered only because someone lost a bet and had to clean the vault.  Unfortunately it’s here now and we have to deal with it.  Or it could be like anything else, any other egregious mistake: you can hide it for only so long and eventually, no matter how intently you try to cover it up, your soul will crave confession and the resultant purity will set you free.  Thus, I guess, it was necessary to drag this out to clear the filmmakers’ dirtied consciences in hopes for redemption.  All I can say is that I hope it worked."


  • Wins the award of Worst Movie I've Ever Seen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Skinned Deep  (2004)

    On my website http://bloodgutsandgore.com, this is the #1 poorest, most awful, despicable, amazingly incompetent and mentally handicapped movie I've ever seen.  What follows are direct quotes from this pile of dung's entry on said site:

    "This has got to be one of the most painfully insipid piles of garbage ever put together."

    "What a simple-minded, asinine exercise in stupidity and incompetence."

    "Dying is the best thing to happen to this cast of miserable characters."

    "The dialogue is inane; the characters simply stupid, the situations are as logical as picking your nose with a fire poker and the whole meaningless adventure is a true test of will to sit through."  (It's not perfectly punctuated, but I was angry when I was typing that.)

    "It's an inexcuable, disorganized, hapless miscellany of half-baked ideas."

    and

    "It's a personal belief that a bad movie starts with a bad idea.  The idea here, apparently, was to make as little sense as possible and upset more people than John Waters.  Skinned Deep is a putrid, godforsaken pile of excrement.  As I always like to say," and do often on the site, "I'm no Roger Ebert but I've seen a lot and this 1.5hr+ mistake undisputedly wins the joint awards of STUPIDEST MOVIE I'VE EVER SEEN and WORST MOVIE EVER MADE."


  • Wins the award of Worst Movie I've Ever Seen

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Skinned Deep  (2004)

    On my website http://bloodgutsandgore.com, this is the #1 poorest, most awful, despicable, amazingly incompetent and mentally handicapped movie I've ever seen.  What follows are direct quotes from this pile of dung's entry on said site:

    "This has got to be one of the most painfully insipid piles of garbage ever put together."

    "What a simple-minded, asinine exercise in stupidity and incompetence."

    "Dying is the best thing to happen to this cast of miserable characters."

    "The dialogue is inane; the characters simply stupid, the situations are as logical as picking your nose with a fire poker and the whole meaningless adventure is a true test of will to sit through."  (It's not perfectly punctuated, but I was angry when I was typing that.)

    "It's an inexcuable, disorganized, hapless miscellany of half-baked ideas."

    and

    "It's a personal belief that a bad movie starts with a bad idea.  The idea here, apparently, was to make as little sense as possible and upset more people than John Waters.  Skinned Deep is a putrid, godforsaken pile of excrement.  As I always like to say," and do often on the site, "I'm no Roger Ebert but I've seen a lot and this 1.5hr+ mistake undisputedly wins the joint awards of STUPIDEST MOVIE I'VE EVER SEEN and WORST MOVIE EVER MADE."


  • Poor, hopeless, fatally boring

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mystery Train  (1989)

    Just that.  There is literally nothing to say about this dreadful, tiresome, keenly overworked yawn-fest except that's it's as terrible as the other terrible movie of his I was forced to see for film class in college, to wit Down by Law.  The only worthy scene in this miserable thing is an interesting sequence where the girl in the cover image takes out and lights her boyfriend's cigarette with her bare feet, manipulating the pack and lighter with her prehensile toes.  See if you dare, but don't say I didn't warn you about this hack's dismally vapid drivel.  He might be able to operate a camera, but the typewriter should have been taken away from him years ago and in fact used to beat him severely about the head and shoulders.  That I would pay to see.

  • Get over yourselves, this is funny

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mystery Men  (1999)

    This film is good, very good.  Much better than it's given credit for and monumentally more worth it than anything Will Ferrell, Steve Carell, Martin Lawrence, Kevin Smith (the list is virtually endless) will ever do and is much better designed, thought-out and executed than the perverse and brain-free American Pie series and eclipses just about every vacuous, flimsy excuse for a "comedy" that's come out in the last ten years.  Many fondly remembered movies didn't find their public until years after release and I think this has potential to become such a movie.  It's not remotely as crass and sorry as, say, Road Trip and has much more to say and to mean than the sophomoric, unoriginal dreck that passes as comedies today.

  • Off-beat and duly brilliant

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Gray's Anatomy  (1996)

    This movie was a strange experience.  I had never seen a filmed monologue and wasn't sure what to expect when, save for the B & W anecdotal interludes, this crazy man kept engaging his unhinged theatrics sequence after sequence.  However, the more I thought of it and the closer I examined it, I noticed it wasn't just a Monk-style head case pontificating about his wildly diverse experiences, but rather all that and more.  It was a decidedly non-standard exercise in artistry and aesthetic gymnastics chronicling the larger-than-life, manic-depressive, keenly erudite observances of a complicated, cultured life and a haywire, pinball-machine mind.

    Eminently enjoyable and not a little bizarre, this unplugged documentary probes the conceivable limits of hysteria and nueroses to the event horizon, the core point being that an eye condition drove this man, Spalding Gray, through several countries over the course of many months along thousands of miles with a dollar for every step of the way , all in a remarkably fever-pitch case of avoiding surgery at all costs.  The ultimate last thing in the world he wanted was someone probing around in his eyeball, especially after several less-than-encouraging horror stories he'd heard from family and friends.

    Touted as the "high priest of high anxiety," Spalding Gray is as unapologetic about his approach and delivery of as he is candid about the panoramic spectrum of his uncommon experiences, quirky choices and the almost mythic magnitude of the odyssey avoiding the scalpel had propelled him to commit himself to.

    Spalding Gray (R.I.P. 2004) was an asset to the performing world, a capital writer and a uniquely expressive sort.  If you get the chance, see this, buy it, see it again and then see where it leaves you.  If you so choose, contact me either through my email at thehonestpoet@aol.com or through my website http://bloodgutsandgore.com and let me know what you thought.  Over and out...:)


  • Short blurb by bloodgutsandgore.com guy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    American Psycho  (2000)

    Grim as can be, this film is slicker and tighter-wound than the blustery, florid, magniloquent language of the book, but it tells the same allegorical story of 80s greed and vanity, with a scintilla of brutality and only a hint of maniacal multiple-murdering.  Out of sheer morbidity, I list the instances when Bale's character (Patrick Bateman) loses control and gives in to his animal instincts on my horror site: http://bloodgutsandgore.com.  Check out this and over 360+ others, rated and explicated to help you get more blood for your buck.  ;)

  • Not the first, but still good

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rarely, noticeably so, are sequels on par with their originals and even more so have sequels trumped the original.  This is neither case, but it's still a good watch with good dialogue and workable characters.  Check out a full write-up of the gore at http://bloodgutsandgore.com for more on this and 360+ others.  ;)

  • Short blub by bloodgutsandgore.com guy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Land of the Dead  (2005)

    Appropriately gory, gruesome and with cameos from Shaun of the Dead's main troublemakers, this 4th volume in the Dead series pushes things another few notches by giving the zombies, if you will, brains.  A pump jockey, of all of them, starts to get ideas and develop plans, ones his mindless entourage are all too happy to follow.  The unrated cut has some staggering visuals such as a man getting his face ripped off over his head like taking off a ski mask and a zombie reaching up a guy's throat and yanking out fistfuls of guts.  If you're a big fan of heavy gore, not only watch this, but visit http://bloodgutsandgore.com to find many more examples of extremely graphic bloodshed.  :)

  • Short blub by bloodgutsandgore.com guy

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Land of the Dead  (2005)

    Appropriately gory, gruesome and with cameos from Shaun of the Dead's main troublemakers, this 4th volume in the Dead series pushes things another few notches by giving the zombies, if you will, brains.  A pump jockey, of all of them, starts to get ideas and develop plans, ones his mindless entourage are all too happy to follow.  The unrated cut has some staggering visuals such as a man getting his face ripped off over his head like taking off a ski mask and a zombie reaching up a guy's throat and yanking out fistfuls of guts.  If you're a big fan of heavy gore, not only watch this, but visit http://bloodgutsandgore.com to find many more examples of extremely graphic bloodshed.  :)

  • One of the all-time best, a most endearing film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Cats  (1998)

    There are good movies, great ones and those that stand alone.  For me, this is the last of them, one that touches so many places in my heart that to attempt to articulate what it truly means would be an exceptional task, so I shall leave it at this: it is a truly wonderful, touching, exhilarating look into the world of our feline friends and a memorable trek through a mesmerizi