Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Personal statement: If someone who was in Caligula can win an Oscar, there is hope for any actor or actress!
[more]

Interested in: No particular genre

tadiv's movie tags

Advertisement

  • Like finger food before a grand banquet

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Sun Dogs  (2007)

    Palm Pictures in association with Dog Leg Media presents Sun Dogs, a movie directed and produced by Andrea Stewart.  It includes several local Jamaican personalities and officials along with performer and sponsor of the team, Jimmy Buffett.  Also featured is the brainchild of these projects (the Dog Sled Team and the movie), Danny Melville.  Sun Dogs runs 90 minutes and is presented as not rated by the MPAA.

    Sun Dogs follows the development of the Jamaican Dog Sled team program.  This program (the Dog Sled Team) is both a fund raiser and promotional tool for the island nation’s tourism economy.  Following a documentary style, the movie introduces several players in the Dog Sled Team, and follows the training process and the people who will be the team’s competitive representatives.

    Sun Dogs is professionally filmed and edited.  The production quality is sound and a review of the credits shows that Palm Pictures was involved early in the life of the project.  The movie includes stock film components and except for an item that is clearly a promotional television advertisement for Jamaica, it is difficult to determine what shots are stock films and what was shot specifically for the film.

    The most profound thing I can write about Sun Dogs is that my Jack Russell Terrier, Buster, found the film very interesting.  Such is always the case when dogs are presented on screen; so really it is not stating anything of much substance that he was interested.  Early in this movie Danny Melville, the man behind the Dog Sled idea, comments that early in the development of the project he thought of a promotional film.  At the time he was thinking of an animated film and some animated clips are a part of this movie, but they are not from Pixar as he originally envisioned.  Instead, the animation is provided by a smaller house called Little Engine Moving Pictures.  This movie seems to be the result of that original animated promotional film idea.

    Sun Dogs is fine for something to watch while passing the time, waiting for some more serious fare to become available, say Letters From Iwo Jima, for example.  Its lack of an MPAA rating is no big deal – the producers probably did not want to pay any associated fees.  Sun Dogs, much like a made-for-TV movie, is suitable for the entire family.


  • Evil hidden within great beauty.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Blood Diamond  (2006)

    Manda Bala  (2007)

    Out of Balance  (2007)

    City Lights Pictures, in association with Whitest Pouring Films and Kilo Films, presents Manda Bala (Send a Bullet), a film by Jason Kohn. The film runs 85 minutes and is not rated by the MPAA.  Based upon some of the hostage video content, this film would likely be rated NC-17 by the MPAA.

     Manda Bala is a documentary film covering several social and economic issues in modern Brazil.  These issues include political corruption, the kidnapping of the wealthy by the poor, and resulting industries such as frog farming, specialized plastic surgery, Helicopter taxi service, and the retrofitting of automobiles to make them more or less bullet-proof.

    Very well photographed and cleanly edited, Manda Bala, to a great extent, lacks a central theme.  This picture has a good, complimenting soundtrack.  Because of a mixture of translation and subtitles, the presentation is at times awkward for the viewer.

    Manda Bala greatly benefits from stunning cinematography.  However, while watching this film I recalled a scene from Finding Forrester where the audience reads criticism that says “Where are you taking me?”  And so, while there is stunning cinematography, there is a similar magnitude debt in the way of communicating the central point.  There is a lack of content that ties everything together. 

    Stunning cinematography is the highlight of this picture.  Without making a study of Brazil, one would never imagine that its modern cities are so very beautiful.  To contrast the beauty of the modern high-rise buildings and seemingly clean streets, we see the slums at the edge of the metropolis falling away from the center like the crumbling slopes of a pillar in Monument Valley.  Suburbia does not seem to exist around these mountains of wealth, just poverty and squalor.  All of this is richly photographed and presented.  The only portions of the film that do not stand out from a cinematic perspective are some of the views of the frog farms and some views of the poorer areas of the country. 

    The picture, after a view of a modern Brazilian city, starts in the country at a frog farm.  One of the two who run the farm is interviewed and is reluctant to talk about “the scandal”.  Farther in the presentation we find that the scandal was a corrupt politician’s alleged embezzlement of public funds intended to be seed money for new frog farms in poorer areas of the country.

    From the frog farm, we are transported into the city of Sao Paulo to meet “Mr. M.”  He is identified as a businessman and sounds like a transplanted American.  He tells of being robbed at gunpoint on the streets of Sao Paulo while stopped in traffic.  He discusses the crime faced in the city every day and methods used to foil the criminal.  These include carrying his real wallet in a hidden pocket and a criminal’s wallet that has only a bit of cash in it.  Also in his defense, he has a bullet-proof car.  His car is a turbo-charged Porsche 911 – maybe he would less of a target were he driving a Ford Taurus…  The Porsche, it seems, cost Mr. M about $415,000 US.  I don’t know why we are not told how much ear reconstruction surgery costs.

    Moving on, we meet a pretty young woman who was a kidnapping victim.  Then we meet the plastic surgeon who replaces severed ears.  It seems that removing an ear is the kidnapper’s method of choice in making their point that they are not fooling around.  Then we meet a policeman who is part of the eighty-strong anti-kidnapping squad.  Then we meet a civil lawyer who has had the fortitude to sue an alleged corrupt politician, then back to “M” again.  He explains that the really wealthy travel by helicopter since nobody can walk up to you and demand money at gunpoint, and so we see the world’s largest fleet of privately-owned helicopters. 

    On and on it goes – we move between the Dr, the victim, Mr. M, an assistant Attorney General, the policeman, a kidnapper, and, of course, the frog farmer.  During one of the frog farm sequences, we see a huge shipment of live frogs departing for JFK.  With a hint of related guilt, as in Blood Diamond, there is an inference that the United States supports the political corruption in that it purchases the product from the frog farms. 

    While Manda Bala is a technically high-quality production, the presentation falls short in connecting the themes addressed.  We meet many Brazilians.  While they all have stories to tell, there is not a complete thread connecting them all.  Is the problem the political corruption? Or is it the crime that the leadership seems to choose not to address?  A presentation is made on the colonization of Brazil – is there an ingrained culture of raping the wealth?  Like Out of Balance, Manda Bala ultimately fails to pinpoint the issue; it fails to deliver a summation of the issues presented.  While it is very worth seeing, I’m not sure that it really gets the job done when it comes to making a solid point.  So there is evil hidden within the great beauty of modern Brazil – what a surprise!


  • A delightful little short about being funny and being in love.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    El Violin  (2006)

    This short film is included on the Film Movement DVD release of The Violin.  This delightful short tells the story of a gradeschool boy class clown who is in love with one of his classmates.  This top-quality production is truly "short and sweet".


  • Hindsight adds clarity with a little extra info.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Forrest Gump  (1994)

    Summer Palace  (2006)

    Palm Pictures presents a film directed by Ye Lou.  Summer Palace was written by Ye Lou, Feng Mei, and Ma Yingli.  This picture stars Lei Hao as Yu Hong in the lead role.  Supporting roles are cast with Xiaodong Guo, Ling Hu, Xianmin Zhang, Long Duan, Lin Cui, and Xueyun Bai.  Summer Palace runs 140 minutes and is not rated by the MPAA though the content would clearly receive an “R” rating from the board.  None of the content seemed to be beyond that of the “R” rating.

    Yu Hong, a pretty young woman from a small peasant town in rural China, is accepted into Beijing University in the late ‘80s.  The next 18 or so years of her turbulent life unfold on screen as she struggles with her political, social, economic, and romantic situations. 

    Well-filmed and edited, Summer Palace was an official selection for the 2006 Cannes Film Festival. 

    Summer Palace seems to be the story of a woman who just can’t decide what she wants to do.  Yu Hong’s life is a mess.  Beyond entering Beijing University, she does not seem to make any good choices.  Her story, like that told in Forrest Gump and its portrayal of notable events in recent US history, follows the major social milestones in Eurasia following the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.  While the film covers this unsettled timeframe, Yu Hong is more an observer than the participant that Forrest Gump was in his film. 

    I like going into a film knowing as little as possible.  Prior to seeing Summer Palace I knew almost nothing of the story line.  Hindsight, so it is said, is 20-20.  At the end of my DVD screening, I thought to myself “What a mess.”  Then I watched some of the bonus material and the metaphorical light bulb turned on. 

    I’m probably not as good as some in recognizing a “reflection of the current climate.”  Also, I have to admit that I have not kept up on the last twenty or so years of change in China.  However, given a hint or two I can see the allegory between how Yu Hong’s life unfolds as compared to the recent changes in China.  Given that I required some hints from the bonus material to “get it”, I have to count the film not as effective as it might have been.  The filmmakers should have devised a mechanism or technique in the storytelling to bring the allegory forward.  Perhaps it was there and I missed having not lived through the times and events depicted.

    Summer Palace, given the benefit of the bonus material, is better in hindsight than I initially thought.  Should you recommend this film to your friends, give them the little bit of information that Yu Hong’s life is a parallel to the unfolding of recent events in China and they will have a better appreciation of this film.


  • Clean: A Moving film about one’s ability to change.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Clean  (2004)

    Palm Pictures presents an Olivier Assayas film titled Clean.  Clean stars Maggie Cheung in her Cannes Film Festival Best Actress award winning role as Emily, the junkie wife of a rock star.  This picture also stars Nick Nolte, Béatrice Dalle, Jeanne Balibar, Martha Henry, James Johnston, Rémi Martin, and introduces James Dennis.  Clean is MPAA rated R for drug content, language and brief nudity.  This film runs 111 minutes.

     

    The wife of a has-been rock star struggles with the heroin addiction she and her husband shared.  After tragedy strikes, she fights to regain her footing in life so that she can, maybe, reenter the life of her son who has lived with his father’s parents since the tragedy.

     

    Cinematographer Eric Gautier expertly films this picture, winning the Technical Grand Prize in Cannes, 2004.  The editing is very clean and, of course, the performances are very good – as mentioned above, Maggie Cheung won the Best Actress award in Cannes.  Nick  Nolte also gives a very strong performance in his supporting role reminding us of his real talent.

     

    “I believe in forgiveness, people change.  If they need to, they change.”  Albrecht (Nick Nolte) shares this nugget of wisdom with Emily right about the time in the film when the character development begins to kick in and pay off.  Before this point, I was somewhat apathetic towards Emily.  We see her make mistake after mistake and wonder how she managed to successfully have a child in the first place. 

     

    Albrecht’s statement is in stark contrast to that of Irene (Jeanne Balibar) who, having known Emily for years, says “I’ve heard all your lies… People don’t change”.  But the audience knows that there is at least some truth in what Emily is telling Irene.  As the story proceeds, we see that Emily’s desire to be with her son is changing her.

     

    As Albrecht tells of his faith in forgiveness, he also admits that he has a motive for meeting Emily and arranging for her to meet her son.  Emily understands his situation and makes some good decisions related to seeing her boy and keeping some promises to Albrecht. 

     

    In the end, there is a redemption of sorts.  Some of Emily’s more recent good decisions pay off and while we do not see everything happen, the film closes with the satisfaction of knowing that things are going to work out after all.  Please note this praise – there are no other films referenced in this review – this film is a strong and unique work.  While fiction, Clean is a refreshing and hopeful look at someone making a change for the better and for the future.  


  • 13, then 10, then 6 and as the number goes down, the suspense goes up.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    A Man Escaped  (1956)

    13 Tzameti  (2005)

    Palm Pictures presents 13 Tzameti, a film by Géla Babluani.  The film stars George Babluani as twenty-two year old Sebastian.  Besides the starring role, I am unable to determine what actors played what roles as the film is in French and the dialog does not lend itself to clearly identifying all of the characters.  It is shot in black and white and runs 90 minutes.  The MPAA has not rated 13 Tzameti, but it undoubtedly would be rated “R” for violence.

     

    A roof repairman, Sebastian, overhears a conversation about a possible lucrative job that is to come to the man who has hired him.  When the job offer comes and the original recipient is unable to go, Sebastian decides to seek the paycheck.  Little does he know how much risk is involved in earning this particular paycheck.

     

    13 Tzameti is well filmed and somewhat stylish in its black and white images.  The story starts off a bit weak, but gains strength as it progresses.  The acting is good and the editing is very good.  Based upon the effect the film had, I should say the direction was also very good.

     

    The French seem to know how to make suspense films.  Or at least, some know how.  Like The Wages of Fear, 13 Tzameti starts off somewhat slow and then builds.  It’s not as effective as Wages, but is does a good job of keeping you on the edge of your seat.  A Man Escaped is another French film that effectively builds the suspense until you’re wondering “Will he escape with his life?”…

     

    Though not as effective as those classics of French Cinema, 13 Tzameti holds its own among the competition.  Somewhat slow and not terribly interesting is the setup – our man overhears a conversation about a possible job that pays very well.  The details seem cloaked in secrecy, but by chance, the opportunity lands in front of Sebastian and knowing noting about the job, he embarks on a journey like no other. 

     

    The house where Sebastian has been working, we see, is under surveillance.  Whoever it is that is watching, the other side knows and is one step ahead in the game of cat and mouse.  So it is that Sebastian, unwittingly, successfully arrives at the job location.  Not being who was expected, Sebastian does not get the warmest reception, but those meeting him seem to think “what else can we do but use him?”  Still Sebastian does not understand the job or its possible finality. 

     

    Then it starts.  Like looking in a mirror, we see our horror on Sebastian’s face as we all learn at the same time the nature of this job.  Sebastian’s situation has become like the film stock – black and white.  The story becomes one of win or lose, live or die and the suspense builds with every turn.  See this film and experience the outcome of this most deadly game of chance.


  • Spiderwick - Scary, fun, magical, and a source for mature talking points with your kids

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Paramount Pictures and Nickelodeon Movies present The Spiderwick Chronicles.  Mark Waters directs this family-scare picture.  The stars include Freddie Highmore playing two roles, Mary-Louise Parker, Sarah Bolger, Nick Nolte, David Strathairn, and Joan Plowright.  The film also includes the voice talents of Seth Rogen and Martin Short.  Chronicles runs 97 minutes and is MPAA rated PG*.

     

    A mother, her daughter, and her twin sons move into an old family-owned house after separating from her husband.  This dirty, spooky old house in the country is their only real option after the separation.  There are bumps in the night and soon one of the boys discovers the secrets of the old house and his Grandfather, Arthur Spiderwick.

     

    This is a well-filmed, well-edited and well-acted picture.  It’s a solid story, given the ability to suspend disbelief and accept an unseen world of nice and not-so-nice creatures.  There are some unexplained portions of the story, but they don’t really distract from the main plotline.  The special effects placing Freddie Highmore into the scenes as two different boys are flawless.  Generally the scares are pretty lightweight, but the * by the PG rating above is there for one particularly graphic moment that I'll talk a bit more about below.

     

    This movie was a lot of fun.  It had some small scares for me and more for the large collection of under-ten members of the audience that shared the screening with me.  The crowd with me seemed to take the graphic moment mentioned above in stride.  That either means that kids today are already desensitized -or- the storytelling was clear enough for them so that they understood what was going on and that what we see is not real.  I hope that the later is the case. 

     

    Besides the scares, there are some real Nick moments - like creature spit that, while disgusting, has magical effects and the wide range splattering of tomato sauce.  There are also very magical moments filled with imagination and beauty.  I would recommend this film for most families - it needs a little post-viewing talk about reality and the movies and how very real the danger of a kitchen knife is, but it is fun and it is something that touches on reality as well as fantasy.  Take your family and use the story as an age-appropriate launching pad to talk about some grown-up topics.


  • An interesting mix of content

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Africa Unite  (2007)

    Palm Pictures presents a film by Stephanie Black.  Africa Unite – more a documentary than a concert film – includes Danny Glover in his role as UNICEF Goodwill Ambassador, most or all of the Marley family and a large number of Africans are featured who participate in what Glover calls a symposium.  There is historical footage of Bob Marley, the history of Ethiopia, and clips of old films about Africa.  The film runs 98 minutes.
     
    Africa Unite is a mixture of film and video documenting the 2005 "Africa Unite" event held in Ethiopia to celebrate Bob Marley’s sixtieth birthday, history lesson on Ethiopia and the African continent, and a look at the Rastafarian movement.
     
    The film is somewhat of a hodge-podge of content.  There is very clean and professional filming, there is some filming that has some sort of spotted screen applied to the print, and there is what looks to be cell-phone camera video, poor in quality with smearing motion.  I do not think that this stylization is very effective for the documentary format.  The film swings widely in mood from optimistic about the future of the continent to near revolutionary condemnation of the past treatment of the continent and peoples of Africa.  Thrown into this mix is a historic look at how Western Civilization was (and for a time was successful at) plundering the resources of the continent at the expense of its people and some history on the Rastafarian movement.
     
    It took me several viewing attempts to get through this.  It hops around too much with wide swings in mood and focus.  This makes it difficult for an outsider* like me to gain empathy for the subject and hang on for the ride.  I hate to be so skeptical – and I really don’t think it was like this – but the film left me thinking that the remaining members of the Marley family were using this event to cement a greater legacy for Bob and to cash in on the festivities.  There is really nothing that points to them cashing in, but there is not any content that states otherwise either.  
     
    The strongest points made in the film are in the interviews with the young, determined, and intelligent Africans who traveled to participate in the meaningful events.  They ask serious questions like “Why do our children have to go to bed on empty stomachs?” and, “Why do they have to go to school on empty stomachs?” and, “Why does the West use us for medical experiments?”  These are real and human issues.  These are the issues that are important in addressing the future of Africa, not the ongoing concert given by the Marleys or the Rastafarian movement.
     
    * I say I am an outsider because I am not of African descent.  As it was with Sweet Sweetback's Baadasssss Song (1971), I don’t get it.  Perhaps it is because I am an outsider or perhaps it is that Africa Unite is not designed for a wide audience.

     


  • Big Wednesday meets a small town in Norway - sort of...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Monster Thursday  (2004)

    Film Movement presents Monster Thursday, a film directed by Arild Ostin Ommundsen and written by Gro Elin Hjelle and Arild Ostin Ommundsen.  It stars Vegar Hoel as Even, Silje Salomonsen as Karen, Christian Skolmen as Tord, Andreas Cappelen as Beckstrom, Kim Bodnia as Skip, Iben Hjejle as Sara, and Lasse August Dørum Backer as Karen’s child, Even.  Filmed in Stavanger, Norway, it is in Norwegian and Danish with English subtitles.  Monster Thursday runs 103 minutes and is Not Rated by the MPAA.

     

    Karen and her son, Even, open the film with him wanting to surf and waiting for his father, Tord.  He’s told that the day - his birthday - is a special day and that he might not be able to surf.  Karen thinks back to when she married Tord.  Tord, it seems, had stolen his best friend’s girl.  His best friend – the best man at his wedding, is Even who remains madly in love with Karen.  The film recounts the relationship between Even and Karen after the wedding when business takes Tord away from home.  While Karen is pregnant, Even still tries to win her back and while he has no talent for it, he decides to learn to surf as a way to impress Karen.

     

    Monster Thursday has a reasonable story line and leaves some things vague and open to interpretation.  Much of the film is dark and overcast – a cold and wet environment.  It is well filmed with only a few notable editing goofs.  At one point the strap holding Karen’s pregnant belly in place is visible. 

     

    I liked this film mostly because of the vagueness of the plot at critical points leaving one to wonder who is really the father of little Even and who was it that Karen truly loved.

     
    Pregnant when married, Karen is pretty immature during that time of her life and seems to be looking more for stability than true love.  Beckstrom, Even’s ever-present friend is sort of a Barney character from The Simpsons – a beer or some other alcohol is always present, ready to be served to Even.   Skip is the local surfing legend who agrees to teach Even to surf.  Sara helps everyone predict where there will be good waves and develops a relationship with Skip as she works on a weather research project.  These characters all work to weave a story of love, comic situations, and life in general in this cold, waterfront community.  In the end, Monster Thursday is a comic tragedy that left me quite satisfied.


  • A clear picture is not painted

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Out of Balance  (2007)

    Cinequest presents Out of Balance: Exxon Mobil’s Impact on Climate Change, written and directed by Tom Jackson.  The film is produced by Joe Public Films, LLC and runs 65 minutes.

     

    Hoping to point the finger of blame for global warning squarely at Exxon Mobile, writer/director Tom Jackson presents his case with backing from experts in the field.

     

    With all due respect to Mr. Jackson, he might have started with an outline that would support his idea that Exxon Mobile is the largest contributor to the global warming problem.  Out of Balance jumps around from topic to topic, pulling in clips of experts with their supporting interviews.  It is a hodgepodge of data that is presented more as a pile of information then a compelling argument.  While notable scientists are interviewed and all are identified, less than 50% of the interview clips were the scientists - I counted about 106 interview clips of which about 67 were either authors/writers (about 33) or environmental group representatives (about 34).  On four occasions, it was clear from the film presentation that the interview had been edited to present the desired spoken content.  A letter to the War Department dated July, 1941 is used as evidence that Standard Oil sold oil to the German government “well into 1944”.

     

    How ironic can it be that the first film I viewed after Out of Balance was David Copperfield presented by the BBC and “Exxon Mobile Masterpiece Theater”?

     

    Out of Balance starts with the director stating: “Global warming is real.”  As mentioned above, Mr. Jackson uses over a hundred interview snips to support this thesis as well as the one that Exxon Mobile is largely to blame for global warming.  All of these snips failed to be organized in such a way so as to convince me that global warming is even the result of human activities, let alone that Exxon Mobile is the big bad guy in all of this.  Intermixed with all these interview snips are Mr. Jackson’s own statements of support and commentary. 

     

    The film, based on the interviews presented, appears to be more a rant against capitalism then an argument about environmental responsibility.  What a surprise, a corporation in a capitalist economy is more interested in its bottom line then the well being of those in the path to its riches.  Who Killed the Electric Car presents much more responsible parties than does Out of Balance – their primary guilty parties were the Government (primarily the Bush Administration) and the People (yes, all of us) for not standing by regulation that could have made a successful product acceptable on a large scale.

     

    The Wages of Fear is much more effective at showing the disregard Standard Oil (the implied company in the film) had for human life and the environment.  In defense of Mr. Jackson, this is a huge topic and I fear that even if the presentation had been organized and concise, 65 minutes would not be enough time to make a compelling argument.  This is an issue that is clearly important enough for representation in film and to a broad audience.  However, I’m afraid it needs better representation than given in Out of Balance.


  • And you thought you had it bad!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Palm Pictures presents Asia Argento’s film adaptation of The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things.  This picture stars Asia Argento as Sarah, Jimmy Bennett as young Jeremiah, and Cole and Dylan Sprouse trade off as the older Jeremiah.  The cast includes smaller roles for Peter Fonda, Marilyn Manson, Winona Ryder, and Michael Pitt.  The film runs 98 minutes.

     

    Jeremiah, taken at age 7 from a loving foster family that wanted to adopt him, is delivered by Social Services to his biological mother, Sarah.  From this point forward, his life is one story of neglect and abuse after another as his mother drags him like a rag doll from one deadbeat lover to the next.  The only break is a three-year time jump while Jeremiah lives with, and takes unknown abuse from, Sarah’s Christian Fundamentalist parents and the rest of the residents in their church-like home.

     

    This picture uses sets and/or locations that clearly depict the life of those in poverty in America.  While some of the actors’ performances may not be great, the editing gives strong examples of the power of the cut.  Animated creatures and scenes used to symbolize the most extreme horrors experienced by Jeremiah are as crude as the people in his life.  Argento uses strong visual styles in the portrayal of the drug-induced haze delivered to Jeremiah by his mother.

     

    I knew little of this film and almost nothing of the source material when I viewed it.  I don’t really care about the source material since this is a film review – not a review of the source material or the controversy surrounding it.  I found The Heart Is Deceitful Above All Things effective in portraying what the horrors of a childhood filled with neglect, abuse and poverty might be like.  Often I found myself shifting in my seat and turning somewhat away from the brutality displayed.  I often found myself groaning in disgust over the choices made by Sarah – choices that were self-centered and were neglectful or lead to more abuse.  This is tough stuff and not for the faint of heart or those with a weak stomach.

     

    That the original novel is complete fiction and not a chronicle of one’s life as it was originally marketed does not mean that similar horrors don’t take place.  It only means that in reality, those who survive horrors like the ones depicted in this film don’t grow up to be best-selling authors.


  • Buying Time on a Road Trip to the Inevitable.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grace Is Gone  (2007)

    The Weinstein Company presents Grace is Gone, directed by James C. Strouse and starring John Cusack as Stanley Phillips.  It introduces Shélan O'Keefe as Heidi and Gracie Bednarczyk as Dawn, the Phillips' two daughters.  Original music is by Clint Eastwood.  The film runs 90 minutes.

    This is the story of a man whose wife is a soldier killed in Iraq.  Stanley cannot face telling his two daughters, Heidi, twelve and a half, and Dawn, eight, the news of the death of their mother.  Instead, he takes them on a road trip of distractions – away from the military base community where everyone else knows the sad news.

     The film has a pretty solid plot given the unpredictable behavior of people dealing with the grief of losing a loved one.  It is well shot and nicely edited with smooth cuts that leave almost no continuity questions.  A good deal of time is spent in the family SUV and at times, it seems that Cusack takes his eyes off the road a little too long.

    Grace is Gone spends time letting us get to know the three main characters.  Shélan O'Keefe, in a fantastic performance, steals the show in her role as Heidi – a girl on the verge of adolescence.  When this road trip is proposed, she is suspicious that something is wrong, but the little girl in her goes with the excitement of a trip to a beloved theme park in Florida.  As time passes, we see Stanley’s panic over the situation grow and his grief deepen.  Heidi, while looking forward to fun at the theme park, grows ever more suspicious about what her father is hiding.  In the last few minutes, we see the scene that we know has been coming from the beginning – Stanley tells Heidi and Dawn the tragic news – and it hits them, and the audience, very hard.  This film is effective because of the strong performances by O'Keefe and Cusack and the way the story pulls us into the lives of the characters.  

  • Written art transformed into film art

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    As the film opens, one wonders, “Where are we?”  The male narrative voice also wonders where it is.  We see the world, blurry and blinking, through the eyes of a patient in a hospital room.  For some time, we don’t see the patient, only what he sees.  Someone notices our eyes are open and calls the doctor.  He introduces himself and asks some questions.  The patient answers and we, the audience, hear his voice, but the doctor does not seem to hear it.  He tells us that our patient has had a stroke and it is not uncommon to lose one’s speech for a time.  The patient argues, convinced that he is speaking.  In truth, he is not; we are only hearing his mind’s voice.

     

    So starts the journey of Jean-Dominique Bauby, our stroke victim, as he struggles to communicate with the world outside himself.  Julian Schnabel’s film artfully brings to life the amazing and true story of Mr. Bauby and his life after his stroke.  Based upon Bauby’s novel of the same title, The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, presented by Miramax Films, brings us intimately into Bauby’s life. 

     

    Bauby struggles to understand where he is and what has happened.  He does not remember the events leading up to the stroke.  We learn, as he does, from the doctor that he has a condition called “locked-in syndrome”, a condition that causes nearly-complete paralysis. 

     

    Mathieu Amalric plays the difficult role of Bauby – able only to move his left eye, blink that eye, and with great difficulty, move his head.  The majority of the film is seen through the left eye of Bauby – early in the story he loses the use of the right eye.  As such, it is somewhat natural to feel his frustration, anger, and grief over the situation in which he finds himself.  At first, Bauby is able to answer yes and no questions by blinking his left eye – once for yes and twice for no.  He is frustrated, however, because sometimes his answer is other than simply “yes” or “no”.  In therapy, he is introduced to a method of using the blinking eye to identify letters of the alphabet – thus he is able to spell words.  This type of therapy is believed to assist in the reestablishment of speech.  This dictation of sorts is a difficult process and as Bauby’s self pity deepens, he delivers a very disturbing message to his therapist. 

     

    Bauby’s therapist does not take the message very well and is pretty harsh with him.  Later she apologizes for being out of line.  As we travel with Bauby through this difficult time, we are presented images from not only his eye, but also his mind’s eye.  From that perspective, we see him fanaticize about walking and form a visual analogy to his condition – a man is in a deep sea diver’s suit, slowly sinking towards an immobile death, alone deep at the ocean’s depths.  This image very clearly gives one the extent to which Bauby feels isolated from the world.

     

    It seems that before the stroke, Bauby contracted with a publisher to write a book and he decides that while he cannot prevent his death, he can again contribute to the world outside himself.  He has his therapist contact the publisher and requests an assistant who will take his dictation for the book. 

     

    Time passes as Bauby dictates his work, visits the beach and other locations with his family, and realizes that he took so much in his life for granted.  We see flashbacks that include time with his family and more notably, time with his father (played by Max von Sydow) who is also isolated in a way from the world.  Suddenly there is a turn for the worst – he has developed pneumonia.  As he rides in the ambulance, we see his view of the buildings passing by and what seems to be an homage as the score to The 400 Blows plays.  I truly expected the film to end with the end of that score, but it did not.  We cut to another scene and another familiar score that I am unable to place.     

     

    There is much more to this film than I have described.  It takes its viewers on an amazing and emotional journey as Jean-Dominique Bauby triumphs over extreme adversity and communicates with the outside world again.  Using great determination and drive, he delivers an amazing work of art.  Julian Schnabel takes that written work and transforms it into an amazing visual work on film – The Diving Bell and the Butterfly.


  • Where are we, where should we be?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Crash  (2005)

    Lions Gate Films presents a film directed by Paul Haggis starring Sandra Bullock, Don Cheadle, Loretta Devine, Matt Dillon, Brendan Fraser, Terrence Howard, Larenz Tate, Ryan Phillippe, and Thandie Newton.  Here is a hop-scotch storyline designed to have us ask why we have not progressed as far as we might have.  It also tells us who is to blame.  Crash portrays several story lines that all have a common theme - we who live in America are a prejudiced people.  Be it the African-American television director, his white producer, a seasoned LA Policeman or a rookie on the force or a Persian shop owner - we all have our pre-defined opinions of each other.  Some claim that this award-winning film is heavy-handed in its message.  So be it - the message is a necessary one.  In the end, you realize that we are all to blame for not making as much progress as we might like.  Perhaps the telling of this story will help us take responsibility and move forward!

  • A girls' coming-of-age story

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Carol's Journey  (2002)

     

    Film Movement presents a film by Imanol Uribe staring Clara Lago (Carol), Juan José Ballesta (Tomiche, a local boy), and María Barranco (Aurora, Carol's Mother).  This Spanish-language film brings rich photography and warm characters to the screen.  Carol, who has grown up in Manhattan, travels with her Mother to her Mother's childhood town in Spain after her Father, a pilot, has joined the Spaniards in the resistance against Franco during the Spanish Civil War.  We meet and get to know several characters in this town including Carol’s Grandfather, a retired teacher, several of the town’s boys, and a few of the Franco loyalists.  While there may be one or two predictable moments, the warmth of the characters will pull you into this story and you are sure to enjoy both the warm and sad moments that play out.  Carol changes as the story progresses.  In the events of this small town Carol sees that she is not the center of the world.  She grows and matures and we enjoy watching this change unfold.

     


  • Aboriginal society - not so different from our own.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ten Canoes  (2007)

    Directed by Rolf de Heer (Alexandria's Project), this film screened at the 2006 Telluride Film Festival in a program item that was a tribute to de Heer.  The film tells the story of tribal Aboriginal traditions and the cycle of life in this tribe.  One is quickly obsorbed by the story and and the vivid cinematography.  In Telluride, de Heer explained that these tribal peoples have no concept of fiction.  He was thus required to cast players in their real-life tribal roles.  This film is an intresting look into a culture that, on the surface one would think completely foriegn to us, but as things play out we see that this socialized Human life is all too similar to our own Western societies.

  • Growing up with a love for cricket

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Palm Pictures presents a film directed by Paul Morrison.  Here is an engaging coming-of-age film that revolves around cricket.  David Wiseman (Sam Smith) has a love for cricket that is only equaled by his inability to play the game.  One day David's family gets new neighbors in their rental district in 1960's London - a family of Jamaicans lead by the father, Dennis (Delroy Lindo).  Dennis and his family also love cricket.  They build a cricket net setting off events that teach David how to play cricket, to recognize racism and stand up to that hate and fight it, and how one treats true friends.  Strong performances come from Smith, Lindo, and Elily Woof as Ruth, David's mother.

  • A loving look at family conflict.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Namesake  (2006)

    Director Mira Nair delivers a very well-told story with characters that engage you as you soak in the beautiful imagery.  The story starts with the father (Irfan Khan) as a young man in India and quickly finds him getting married and returning to the United States with his new bride played by Tabu.  It then takes on following the life of their son, Gogol (Kal Penn in a stunning performance), and his struggle living in modern American culture while trying to live up to his parents' expectations that he hold onto his Indian heritage and traditions.  While you may feel the story line is familiar, this film is anything but typical - it draws you in with the wonderful acting and grand cinematography.  It will make you laugh, cry, and feel the bonds between the members of the Namesake's family.
    Posted