Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

Personal statement: The best movies are transportive.  I want to be far away.
[more]

Interested in: No particular genre

Indie's movie tags

Advertisement

  • Haunting

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    My favorite biopic explores the reality and un-reality of famed violinist Jacqueline Du pre'.   The cheeky artistic twist of this movie seems to be Jackie and Hilarys supposedly supernatural connection, the execution of which is (as the title suggests) haunting and beautiful.  Also watch out for the story and perspective as it is split in two.  Once from Hilary (Jackie's long-suffering and less famous twin)  and once again from Jackie's point of view.   

     I don't know if Jacqueline was given to psychic connections to people in real life, and honestly I don't care.  It definitely added elements both thematic and supplied a thriving back light to the story.

    In real life Jacqueline, virtuoso/genius, descends into the depths after contracting multiple sclorosis.   Depressing, though true, and the disease is heartbreakingly portrayed on film.  Scenic and brilliant, Hilary and Jackie is a solid watch; no matter how haunting you find the added elements of psychic phenomina to an other wise straight-forward biopic. 


  • The Funniest Thing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kill Bill Vol. 1  (2003)

    I don't know if I've payed much attention to Daryl Hannah since she did Roxanne w/ Steve Martin.  She was riding high on the 'Splash' wave back in the day, but has since been seen in a lot of ...well check out a movie called Hide and Seek once, you'll see.  I had clearly crossed Daryl off the list.... until  Kill Bill.

    -disclaimer_I have to say that sometimes I am too easily amused, and also sometimes by not much of anything._  That being said, I am comfortable saying that the single most funny/smart thing I have EVER seen in film has got to be Daryl Hannah as Elle Driver walking down that long hall in the hospital, making her way to one miss Beatrix Kiddo. 

    Here is a hitman (or woman) disguised so perfectly in her little white skirt, white stockings and even a smart little white hat.  The accessory that tips it completely over the edge- the little white Red Cross eyepatch.  It is what every nurse with one eye is wearing this season.  The sheer ridiculous audacity of it didn't even hit me right away; bear with me.

    Did she have on a nurse's badge for authenticity or a dapper little clipboard to complete her disguise?  Oh, no she had on her Red Cross eyepatch.   That means she's a nurse; no one stop and question her.  She has on a Red Cross eye patch; she must have gone to medschool.  It has just got to be the funniest thing...

      


  • Argh!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Money Pit  (1986)

    Pacific Heights  (1990)

    May I be the first to say that, although The Money Pit is an interesting movie at times, it is not the least bit funny.  Every time I have seen this film it has become an absolute anxiety-ridden experience. 

    Nobody really should ever have to go through what happens to Long or Hanks in this film (and can I say that the idea of them starring in a movie together is all that I find funny about this film).  That movie makes me want to hunt down that scamming old lady, where ever she is vacationing, and toss a toaster into the pool.  I hate it. 

    I realize that the situation portrayed is not happening or has never happened to me and for that reason I am supposed to take some kind of enjoyment out of watching.  I realize that it is all in good humor and really just a movie.  Everytime I see it, I still just get really pissed.  

    In my mind this movie compares with Pacific Heights and just absolutely tips my unfair quotiant in a film too darn high.  I watch this movie and become my own version of Woody Allen, raving and pacing all over the place.


  • Deja Vu

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Charade  (1963)

    Deceived  (1991)

    Deceived is a dreary thriller in the day when washed out thrillers were a Hollywood standard- The 90's are all about the thriller.   The movie never became popular.   People argue that audiences did not want to see the gloriously mis-cast Hawn in something serious; it could be said that her character was too trusting too naive.  Frankly I think she did a good job at suspending disbelief (acting dumb) until the plot demands, and no matter what anyone says, Hawn back in the day was exceedingly watchable.   Leave it to Hollywood to let a variable like the lead actress take the blame for the entire picture tanking.

    What I find odd though now, looking back on the movie Deceived is my unrelenting sense of deja vu which had me thinking that I may have seen this movie's plot in play before.  That's when it hit me.  Deceived is basically a variation (and consequently un-funny version) of Outrageous Fortune.  A loved one dies, pretending to be someone he is not, is involved in something that is less than above-board involving something that could make him a lot of money.   The loose ends must be tied up, like pesky spouses that become aware of their husband's extracurricular activities. 

    After making a heretofor unseen connection, it took exactly five seconds to realize that both of these movies may just be shake-down versions of Charade with the mildly comic engenue of the day, Audrey Hepburn.  

    Everyone knows that a problem exists in Hollywood of finding truely unique scripts; which is becoming more and more obvious everyday.  But were these coincidences a product of unoriginality or more a function of the statement the studios behind these vehicles were trying to make?  In other words, was Deceived a announcement of movie star ascension? Were they, in fact, saying Goldie Hawn IS this later generation's Audrey Hepburn?  The finer points of that discussion could be argued for quite some time, but the question remains in my mind as comparisons between the two films were likely to have been drawn during pre-production.

    The movie Decieved is still at least a decent watch, as long as you do not anticipate any kind of real thrills.   Even a re-hashed movie starring such likeable characters like John Heard and the afformentioned actress, Hawn, takes on a kind of life after the film.  The climax is engaging, though plots like the deceiving spouse may seem common these days in many people's lives onscreen and off. 

       


  • True and Beautiful

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    When thinking of truely beautiful films in the context of modern day I always first visit this film in my head.  There are many factors that instinctually lead me to this conclusion, not the least of which is of course that it is visually stunning. 

    There is something of an unrealized Michelangelo about this film that is once chaotic yet wonderfully whole.  The best part of the experience for me is to watch the brush strokes literally being applied to the canvas of this film only to be wiped away.  In and of itself this movie doesn't promise much, though it is quite apparent when watching the film that there is an unabashedly masterful hand guiding the brush.  

    Visuals aside there are many common thematic elements about love and the absense of one-ness with another.  The mystery of first meeting and the air of familiarity between strangers is played out.  At once I thought of kismet of deja-vu, and enjoyed the playfullness that the characters enjoyed onscreen.  But as the saying goes, "all good things must come to an end."  Though if you've watched the film, you'd note that the phrase says nothing about it happening again.  

    Yes the immortal enemy of love, dastardly knowledge comes into play in the form of a casette tape stating that the love-lorn couple had loved and lost the battle before.  Ah, there's the feeling of getting in too deep... 

    I loved every moment of it.  It is at once riveting and totally contrary to quite possibly every big budget movie made in the decade before its conception.  It will be a lasting portrayal of a simple love made death-defying, but then again, as the movie illustrates, love may never be truely simple. 


  • Classically Christmas

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rudolph and his friends the dentist elf and the numismatist extra-ordinaire Yukon Cornelius are tops around the holidays, and forget Ugly Betty there's not a better acceptance story out there.     Popularized by the classic christmas song, or maybe vice-versa (its a regular chicken or the egg situation), I can't imagine christmas without hearing Burl Ives warbling Silver and Gold from the soundtrack.  Just hearing that song makes me want to find out how to make egg-nog (and I hate that crap).

    Who has not seen this movie?  It is quite possibly the best made-for-tv movie of all time, yes better than Boy in the Plastic Bubble and waaaay better than any tv movie you are going to find on Lifetime.  Joan Van Ark has yet to do a christmas movie that I want to watch again and again.   It is a christmas classic without compare.  I dare you to find another movie with a nomadic elf that plucks teeth from a gigantic snow-beast.  Why can't everyday be like Christmas?   

       


  • Repeat Viewing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is one of the first movies that I have ever seen that's not only fine for repeat viewing, but demands it.  There are a lot of in-jokes and back-of-action shennanigans, but that's not what I mean by a movie that demands repeat viewing.  On paper I should have loved this movie the first time I saw it.  It is silly, chaotic, spoof-rific, and I already liked almost all of the actors involved.  When I watched Wet Hot American Summer for the first time though, I just didn't get it.  I was stuck outside the bubble wondering how to classify what was going down on-screen. 

    That was mistake no. 1- in order to watch this film, one's mind must be suitably turned to the "off" position.

    This movie would have been completely lost on me, if my roommate had not missed it the first time.  Knowing what was going to go on, I sat back, turned it on and was not really prepared for anything.  It was then that I saw the funny.  The funny is not hidden in this movie, that's not what I mean.  The funny is frightened away by any judgement of any sort. 

    The -in's and out's of this film are all still completely laugh worthy, and I guarantee that upon seeing it a second time, you'll find more to laugh about.  This is one of my favorites now.  I bought it and I could have it playing on a loop in the background all day.  Its about a camp, its campy, its not Meatballs, its fun and mostly profanity free, its not the Parent Trap, its chaotic and its spoofy and its not Airplane.  Please do yourself a favor, shut your mind down and watch.

     


  • Miss Begotten

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Begotten  (1991)

    This film to me marks the death of creativity, and makes a mockery out of its audience.  Please excuse the spoilers but the imagery of this movie can only be related by a few content examples from the film.  This soul-sucking homage to super-8 nonsense starts with mastabatory rape to a chorus of crickets and screaming, and after many minutes more of sights like log-raping, crotch smashing and crusifixtion, I was pleased to see that no one even bothered to explain what was happening and disheartened that no one took the blame for its conception.  Even the back of the box description (which is the only narrative you'll recieve when watching this film) is filled with enough nebulous dialouge to make the journey unrelatable and mean absolutely nothing, lacking the balls to even define the myth it was deficating on. 

    I would suggest that you never watch this film.  And if you still want to, I suggest waiting until there is audio commentary from the creators to back up some of the disgusting choices.  Maybe the message is not about  brutality and more that we as a human race have come to stand for and thereby mean absolutely nothing. 

    Strange note:  If you decide to pick up this movie anyway; mute the movie and play the Schindler's List Soundtrack.  Its kind of a Wizard of Oz/ Dark Side of the Moon relationship; plus that way you won't hear crickets and screaming for over an hour.     


  • A Dark Cloud

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I know this movie is supposed to be some sort of come-back film for Allen, about how comedy is nine parts tragedy and one part laughs, but I didn't laugh at one part.  This is another example of a movie that is a superb idea and completely botched by execution.  I am thinking that when one compares a story through humor against tragedy that one part should at least be uplifting; the combo was clumsy and at points really took me out of  the experience.  

    I really liked the idea of this film and fully expected to be absorbed, but it came off completely cold to me.  The characters were almost completely un-likable, and although sometimes I like that, this was not something done with bravura.  The dischord between characters only served to distance me and by accident.  This is not some planned homage to the tragicomic diety of entertainment; this is an experiment in abject boredom and heartlessness.  There is a deeply cold core to this movie that cannot be expunged by a million inane Will Farrels and quite frankly, if a movie is going to depress me, I think there ought to be some deeper meaning involved.    This is high concept at its worst.  If you want the experience but not the depression this movie gives, I suggest watching the Baxter instead, and I didn't like that movie much either.

     


  • Karma, Past-Lives and Delicious Irony

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dead Again  (1991)

    Not to be confused with Hello Again (starring Shelly Long), Dead Again takes an in-depth and sometimes crazy/ hilarious point of view with the subjects of reincarnation, soul mates, and karma.   Emma Thompson and Kenneth Branagh (pre-divorce) star in this film, which can only be described as a suspense/ melodrama, if there were such a genre.   A modern-day investigation reveals the main characters' past lives and uncovers a murder that's almost a century old.  This alone sounds cool to me, and this is something like what you'll read on the back of the box if you ever have a chance.  But this movie is so much more. 

    This movie has gut-wrenching twists that catch me every time I watch it, and even though it is somewhat of a guilty pleasure, I enjoy introducing this movie to everyone I know.  There are very few people to whom I would not recommend this movie.  If you can find it, I suggest you try it, and while you're at it buy me a copy. 

     

     


  • Sad Farewell

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Season 2 of Dead Like Me has the quiet distinction of being the second and the last season of this great show.  Watching the last couple episodes made me kind of sad, knowing that nothing else was coming.  Though I must say that after watching the whole series in its entirety that it made at least a classy if accidental farewell.  

    I was dreadfully addicted to season 1 and although the first episode of season 2 left me cold, it picked up really quickly with in depth looks at the reapers lives outside of the daily grind.  The season ended with a re-vitalized bang and just enough of the 1st season's jaded wisdom.   My favorite episode belongs to season two.  After being dumped by the guy who took her virginity, Georgia goes on a tirade destroying public property and swearing at any guy she sees.  I know it doesn't sound funny, but this series is at its best when making light of its characters worst moments.  Comedy is tragedy and true tragedy can, in this case, spell comic genius.  I am sad to see it go.  Even though I knew it was all over, as I was watching the last episode; I found myself wondering what the next season would be like.  Such is life.   


  • Death and Middle Management

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Georgia, 18 dies in the first episode, hit and killed by a toilet seat jettisoned by a defunct space station.  She then finds out that she didn't die and in reality must join the reapers who collect souls and ferry them off to the great beyond sans the boat and the river Styx.  Sardonically the only thing she can relate about her death in  hind sight is that it was tragic that the only guy that got to touch her naked body was the coroner. 

    Things get progressively worse for Georgia when she realizes that along with collecting souls she must still hold down an office job in order to live and that she must do this for an unspecified amount of time (maybe centuries).  Tragic, but at least she isn't dead.  She gets to be Undead, and is fitted with another identity.  Oh yeah she also has to meet her boss (played by Mandy Patinkin) and the other reapers everyday at a german waffle house for their assignments.             

    Jasmine Guy plays one of the reapers that helps Georgia along the initial training period, and is remarkable as a  tough reaper/ meter maid.  There are a few other reapers that help the new girl gain some perspective on her afterlife, a shifty brit and a fiery southerner played by ex-noxema girl extraordinare Rebecca Gayheart.   They are all good, watchable and fantastically jaded.  The fun part is that I know I would be too, if I had to ferry souls to their own respective heavens/hells, but never got to see it myself. 

    Georgia's old family plays a role also, as she gets an outside view of what her family is like now that she's gone.  Although going back home to sneak a few peaks is strictly forbidden, like any good teenager, she does it anyway.  Her mother, introduced as a starsign: Virgo is just like a bitchier version of your mother or grandmother, just hide and watch.  Another great addition is Georgia's little sister who is obsessed with toilet seats after her sister's untimely death, and merrily resists therapy.  Oddly enough, toilet seat trees are pretty.  You'll see.  

    Buy this series right away.  It was underrated and brilliant like many things that works years after, it was not truely appreciated in its time.   Unluckily I didn't get to watch it on tv because I don't buy premium channels (Showtime), and I didn't experience it with everyone else.  So if you haven't seen it before, you can watch it now with me. 

     

     


  • Watch This Movie

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The House of Yes  (1997)

    This movie is based on a play of the same name, and there for drew a lot of comparison between the film adaptation and the stage play.  The critics said mainly that it was a good attempt, but the premise does not work as a movie.  They are just wrong, and they smell.  I love this movie.  There are many note worthy performances and actors within the movie, though most notable would be the woman on the box cover, Parker Posey with gun in hand. 

    Parker plays the slightly sadistic and incestuous twin sister Jackie-O (yes, she thinks she's the real one) who goes apes*!t when her brother surprises the "family" at Thanksgiving with his new fiance'.  Oh yeah, and there's a major hurricane coming up the coast to boot.  What ensues is dark but smart, and really funny.  I really like the interactions and the quick dialogue.  It definitely goes places other comedies wouldn't dare, but it stays extremely interesting from beginning to end.  There are a lot of extremes between the dynamics of the characters, too.  The mother is unbelievably cold and hates the very warm and feeling fiance', who is basically her antithesis (Tori Spelling).  The brother Marty tries very hard to keep everything normal for his fiance', but his twin sister is a virtuoso when it comes to warping reality.  The bleeding heart third child is then thrown into the mix, as he claims his love for the brother's new fiance. 

    The movie really made me step back and look at my own family's dynamics.  Comparitively, mine's practically perfect, but not as funny.  

          


  • Witches of Eastwick Book vs. the Picture

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Witches of Eastwick is neither a treasure on film or in literary form.  Both are about New Englander female empowerment, which is played out literally with hushed spells and evil storms.  The book tends to focus on Alexandra more than the others, which may not be true about the film (Michele and Susan may have wanted more ample screen time).  It is a story about an aging witch and her coven, living in a small town discovering powers and new love in mid-life.  In the movie, this new love happens to be Jack Nicholson, who also happens to be Satan.  Yes, Satan, albeit a humerous one, summoned from the depths of Hell by a wayward spell to prey on these poor Ipswitch women so that they may bear him children.  End Scene.  Let's slap together a raunchy Three's Company and Rosemary's Baby. 

    This is the movies greatest failing and highest inspiration, because though the novel, written by John Updike (living legend of American lit.) does not include Satan, the ending is decidedly not Hollywood. In the novel, Daryl Van Horne (merely a man, and an almost broke one) sets up his life in town with borrowed money and not dark powers.  He does have a decidedly pleasing effect on the coven, increasing their power and their libido.  This however, much like the movie, does have an impact on the small town in which they live. 

    At the end of the movie jilted Daryl becomes a titanic-sized demon that literally raises the roof off of the mansion in an attempt to kill the tiny women inside.   At the end of the book, you find Daryl is just on the DL and has skipped town with a male heir to a large family fortune.  -Yes, for the record that would be quite different.  Although they both have their flaws, there is still something positively alchemical about them.  The book, though radiantly anti-climactic is more palpable, and feels a touch more real.  The movie has a boffo ending that I just don't buy.  I like the story, or at least the conflict and the meaty bits.  I wish there were a way to combine the two and come back with something better than both, because when it comes down to it, its all about exacution.  Maybe its time for one of those re-makes....     

     

     

     


  • Best Supernatural Love Story Ever

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Kim Novak, Jimmy Stewart, and Jack Lemmon, need I say more?  This film is one of the few that came out of the beatnick era that I can't help but like.  Instead of glorifying the majesty of the movement, it makes them all out to be witches, a-la McCarthy Era/ Cold War vilification.  Still I love it.  Put the parameters of a political movement aside and what you've got is the best love spells cast between one hot witch (Novak) and one neurotic mortal man (Stewart).  This may sound a lot like some classic tv (Bewitched), but you must remember two things:  This came first, and Samantha never used witchcraft to find love.   

    There are also some darker elements to the story that are surprising for the time period, pushed to the fore by Lemmon's character and his friends.  Stewart's character meets many of them as his world collides with the winsome witch, adding some comic genius to the mix. 

    What I found most impressive about the movie was that it was not showy; no special effects here.  Novak's character never did much hocus-pocus during the film, but you definitely get a sense that she'd be more Wicked Witch of the West than Glenda the Good Witch if she did.  Its a solid watch, if a tad superficial, but I think that it at least surpasses the depth of most romantic comedies these days.   


  • Critically Panned/ Favorite of Mine

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Marnie  (1964)

    Marnie is insane.  She is hard to know, and harder to accept.  She's a repressed cleptomaniac and a totally ammoral smart-ass, and that's why I love her. 

    The movie long considered to be one of Hitchcock's lesser works is by far one of his most watchable for repeat viewing.  It is a guilty pleasure to watch over and over as Sean Connery traps this con-artist and unabashedly stalks her on a trip through the rabbit hole.  As he gets closer to the woman he thinks he loves, he finds that he maybe the one who is trapped. 

    There are a couple great Hitchcock suspense moments in the movie as well. - Pay close attention to the shoe in the bank heist scene.  Even after repeat viewing, it is riveting to watch.  I imagine that Alfred put a lot of himself into this movie, and that he had fun making the film.  He does a fine job twisting perceptions here. I find that even though Marnie is manic and vicious, I root for her every time.       


  • A Very Decent Descent

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I recently watch the Descent at a local theater with a friend.  It is both gory and vicious, yet there is something surprisingly subtle about it when compared to the usual shock glare of House of 1,000 Corpses or The Hills Have Eyes (2006).  The premise is simple, but the execution is superb for once.  I thought it was freaky before any monster came onto the screen, luring you into a sense of all around insecurity before taking off the kid gloves. 

    The only problem about this movie is the part that I should not probably talk about -the ending.  I heard they re-shot for American audiences, as the other ending was too depressing.  As soon as I heard that bit of information I was prepared for the worst, and I may have wrong about that.  The movie makes a couple of hard choices at the end, but I saw the original ending on You Tube and was pleased with the version I saw.  Although the "final scare" cheepens the movie, and consequently is confusing at best. I enjoy the idea that someone got out of the hole; I did not enjoy what may be haunting them.  I'd have been happy with just a fade out on a peaceful ride through the country.  Ending aside, it is definitely worth seeing, if you're into that sort of thing, because it is still smarter, better and more effective than so many others.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go