Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

gothere's movie tags

Advertisement
  • Part one?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Golden Compass was enertaining and fun to watch. While it seemed to meander and wallow in a kind of self-endulgent way, the film is rich and beautiful. The characters are charming in a Mary Poppins sort of way. I wish however that the film actually had and ending, rather than walking away with the distinct impression that they already have Part 2 almost in the can. Even if they do, a movie should stand on its own. And, was that Kate Bush singing at the end?

  • Toys as movies, movies as toys

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Transformers  (2007)

    Okay, I'll admit that I'm a bit too old to have played with transformers, so perhaps some of that nostalgia is lost on me. Still, I was in the mood, and wanted to like it. Who doesn't like special effects like these? Alas, my good mood didn't make up for a movie that lasted too long, and like Twister and too many others, was in desperate need of a plot.

  • Amazing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Amazing that I'm watching Four Eyed Monsters on YouTube on Spout. Amazing that two filmmakers with credit cards and a camera and a will to make art can create a movie like this. Amazing that I've been working on Spout for more than two years. Amazing how far we've come, and how far it can go. Amazing that it's becoming a reality.

  • A gift

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Titanic  (1997)

    Blood Diamond  (2006)

    Blood Diamond is a very good movie and worth your time. First of all, it's a movie where action actually feels like real violence, and that people wielding guns aren't the heros. It depicts things that people in the West don't want to know about or to think about, the blood diamond trade, child soliders, civil unrest caused by our greed. Blood Diamond lays it on your doorstep – not as the flaming turd like some kinds of social commentary. Rather, it's a gift. A story that is gripping and will move you, if not to action, to no longer turn a blind eye to the truth.

    Leonardo DiCaprio is coming into his own. Having bulked up for this role and sporting a convincing South African accent, we see him as a man. I remember first seeing him in What's Eating Gilbert Grape? and being genuinely unsure if he was mentally challanged. Titanic aside (actually, I liked that movie despite the hype), DiCaprio continues to be an actor worth watching. Djimon Hounsou continues to bring strength to roles that he plays, though I hope eventually he will grow out of a role that's becoming expected of him. Meantime, he's enjoyable and sincere.


  • Quiet surprise

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'm impressed with just about every role Edward Norton takes on, and his tranformation in Down in the Valley from country boy to dangerous drifter is no exception. This film quietly sneaks up and catches you off gaurd. It's a pleasure to watch, well shot and constructed. Noton pulls off a complex character which is hallmark of his best work, where even at the end of this surprising film, it's hard not to feel compassion for the bad guy.

  • Cute

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Lake House  (2006)

    I turned this movie on as background noise for email and found it surprisingly pleasant. Beside being the obvious romance clichés, The Lake House was relatively quiet and highlighted vaguely nostalgic music that was comforting. Or at least allowed me to follow along while checking email – sort of. The plot had some strange, unexplainable twists any time-bending fiction requires. Still, it was cute, and if you're in the mood for a quiet, romantic film with a 60s-esque soundtrack, give it a try.

  • Inter arma silent leges

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Why We Fight  (2006)

    Why We Fight is an incredible, eye-opening, scary look at the United States of America. It's about who we are, who we've become, and how we got here.


  • Krumpin'

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Rize  (2005)

    When I was in South Central L.A. for a photo shoot on the first year anniversary after the 1992 riots, the tension was palpable. Rize documents a new style of dance, of self expression, of coping. Krumpin' captures the violence and joy and intensity of the life and times of those who live there.

  • Language is a virus, or something

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Babel  (2006)

    William S. Burroughs is known to have said that "language is a virus from outer space", to which performance artist Laurie Anderson adds, "that's why I'd rather hear your name than see your face." Babel was really wonderful, but it was hard to watch.

    Though the film is at once beautiful, genius, timely, and important, it's also like emotional nails on chalkboard. As you witness the characters suffer from ignorance and confusion, Babel lets you see just a little more than you want to about how things might unfold. This isn't a bad quality for the film, quite the opposite. It's gripping, but made me want to turn away. Further, I wanted it to lead me somewhere. I can take a lot of salt in the wound if I feel it's doing some good.

    I don't need films tied up in a neat little bow any more than I need a happy ending, but Babel left me longing for some meaning. I wanted to learn something more obvious, to understand what  Iñárritu is trying to say about language, God, and human experience. Besides that languages and cultures collide and cause pain. But are we to learn something about language? Bad choices? Gun control? Human interconnectedness? I wonder if the film's title is too grandiose and possibly confuses the meaning of the story itself. I wonder if the film had a more Altman-esque, less assuming context, whether it would have appeared to accomplish more.


  • I like you, do you like me?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Borat  (2006)

    I've been geared up to see Borat for some time. I had gotten somewhat hooked on Da Ali G show on late night HBO a few years ago. Then the hype surrounding the film added to my anticipation.

    The Ali G features were not as successful as the TV shorts, and I was not alone when I wondered how this would translate to a feature film. Perhaps it's like SNL or Monty Python, which can work better if you're half drunk or half asleep – ("Did they really just do that...?"). Of course at these moments there can be genius! Timing is everything with skit-based (perhaps all?) comedy. Sometimes the shortest scenes are the best. I'm convinced that the main reason MAD TV succeeds at all is it's rapid-fire promos, which are cut so well that they are often much funnier than the skits themselves.

    Indeed, there are moments of genius here, but I'm not sure this movie deserves all the accolades it's recieved. Cohen and crew do a pretty good job of turning random acts into a storyline, an impressive feat. Several moments achieve the same degree of culturally revealing satire that make Da Ali G show popular (and its equivalent in the U.K., as I understand it). Still, at the risk of sounding like other drones out there, satirical skits as a feature-length film can wear you down. Some scenes ended up to be so long that I stopping being in the moment, laughing with Cohen, and feeling sorry for the unwitting extras. Even with their racism, sexism, and bigotry, the film takes advantage of thier politeness. This makes Cohen and film appear less civil overall.

    Don't get me wrong. I'm a fan of this film, and Borat, and Bruno, and Ali G, and I want to see more from Cohen. Perhaps Borat the movie will get better for me if I  see portions as it reruns on cable, like other movies listed in my Spout group Repeat. For now, as much as it cracks me up, I can't help but wonder when Borat asks, "I like you, do you like me?", whether Cohen is telling the truth.


  • More Ferrell

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Punch-Drunk Love  (2002)

    Blades of Glory  (2007)

    As much of a fan of Will Ferrell as I am, I'm starting to think that these movies are getting a little played out. Like other recent SNL alum Adam Sandler and Mike Meyers before him, his SNL schtick can only be extended into so many roles.

    Thankfully, both Ferrell and Sandler have begun to move beyond these one-dimensional roles, as the best comedians do, blurring comedy and tragedy. Both Punch Drunk Love and Stranger Than Fiction are much better films than any of these actors' lighter fare. 

    Still, Ferrell manages to pull it off again, with help from John Heder, and there are many memorable comedic moments here. Figure skating is an easy target, and what makes it most enjoyable is the real skaters who decided to take it in good humor and show up in cameos: Dorothy Hamill, Brian Boitano, Peggy Fleming, Scott Hamilton, and more. One moment not easily forgotten is Sasha Cohen being the lucky fan to catch Ferrell's jock strap.


  • I'm a fan

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Helvetica  (2007)

    Here's a film I want to see. It's hard to explain the importance of Helvetica if  your not a graphic designer. Suffice it to say that before it ruled on emergency signs and bathroom doors, it was (and still is) a kind of movement, a philosophy. Read more here.

    The film highlights many design heros:


    Massimo Vignelli, New York


    David Carson, Portland


    Jonathan Hoefler and Tobias Frere-Jones, New York


    Matthew Carter, Boston


    Michael Bierut, New York


    Lars Müller, London


    Paula Scher, New York


    Stefan Sagmeister, New York


    Michael C. Place of Build, London


    Eric Spiekermann, Berlin


    Wim Crouwel, Amsterdam


    Otmar Hoefer in the Linotype archives, Germany


    Neville Brody, London


    Danny van den Dungen of Experimental Jetset, Amsterdam


    Hermann Zapf, Germany


    Manuel Krebs and Dimitri Bruni of Norm, Zurich


    Leslie Savan, New York 


  • Art school usual suspects

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    While I had hoped for more from this film, Art School Confidential did what I had hoped - both remind me and parody my early years in college. It made me laugh! Though I did not go to art school per se, the first few years of the design cirriculum overlapped the art program. My first few studio classes - life drawing, art theory, etc., reminded me of this cast of self-righteous students and windy professors.

    There were parts of this movie that were too slow, too humorless beneath the surface. More biting parody would've been more interesting to me. The movie got wrapped up in its own adolescent storyline, as if the filmmakers thought suddenly to inject a "serious" plot into an otherwise sketch of a film. Not that I would've preferred no plot, but I wanted it to be smarter, more original. The characters at times were too one dimensional. My memory of art school was that if anything, the people were even more serious, committed, desparite, crazy. More sex and substance abuse. Less squeaky clean. The realities of a group of 20-year-olds each with some sort of god complex.

    Still, the movie depicts all the art school usual suspects perfectly, and though they're all stereotypes, I found myself thinking: I knew that guy! Suicidal girl in a black dress, boots, fingernail polish and makeup; nerdy art boy looking to score; hippe throwback dude; overintellectualized art theorist jerk - you can fill in the blanks. John Malkovich plays a crutial role as the burned out art prof, who spent 25 years figuring out that he was destined to paint triangles ("I was among the first," he proclaims).


  • A modern parable

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Gladiator  (2000)

    I love Gladiator because of its bigness, it's unabashed aim at creating a parable, the beauty and the brutal fantasy of depicting of the Roman Empire, the music - all of which seem to have been copied in many lesser films since. Of course this is not new for Ridley Scott, but I wish more films like this were made - simple, well executed, timeless stories with memorable dialog and heros that appeal to the super-ego. This is contemporary Hollywood at its best.

  • Okay, I admit it

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jesus Christ Superstar formed a good part of my childhood personality, a fault of my Dad's, defining both religion and rock 'n roll... until I learned a bit more. It's still among my favorites.

  • It's hard out here

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    8 Mile  (2002)

    Hustle & Flow  (2005)

    Though they almost could've used the same theme song, Hustle & Flow is  a far better than 8 Mile. Hustle & Flow is more real and more tragic, making it a lot more memorable.

    Terrence Howard is the kind of actor who has the ability to evoke several competing emotions in a sidewise glance. I love a film that capitalizes on such talent, as this one requires.

    Beside the more obviously hip 70's title sequence, catchy hooks, and hip-hop storyline of a pimp trying to make it big, what I like most about this film is its depiction of the creative process. The truth in people creating art from all walks of life in their living rooms, drawing from personal experience and as Howard's character, Djay puts it, that every man has to tell his story. I love that the song they create is an assemblage that crosses boundaries and is equal parts ego, angst, and happenstance. Even though it's hard out here, that this truth previals makes Hustle & Flow an optimistic film which shines through its sad veneer.


  • Warm and appealing

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Muriel's Wedding  (1994)

    The Full Monty  (1997)

    I thought it was a nice little picture. Self contained, self controlled, paced, scripted. Almost like a play.

    Okay, it has that campy, familiar indie feel that can a be a turnoff for some and feel like cliché to others. But for me, who's tired of various Hollywood meathook chichés, I enjoyed not having to work too hard to be entertained without bullets whizzing past my ears in DD Dolby Digital THX batta batta bing bang. The ending reminded me of The Full Monty and Muriel's Wedding, a song and a dance solves everything. That's okay, I liked those films, too.

    You should watch this film, you'll be glad you did. It doesn't feel self-important. Oscar worthy? Frankly I don't care. I do think the director cares for these characters and wants the audience to. I did.


  • I had hoped for more

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Collateral  (2004)

    Miami Vice  (2006)

    I'll confess to being a fan of the TV show. It was cool then, really. So the return of Crocket and Tubbs in an updated, more mature Michael Mann flick sounded very cool indeed. I expected macho brooding set to a rocking soundtrack, which I got, but I had hoped for more.

    I found the characters hollow and the plot hard to follow, or perhaps simply uninteresting. I can't help but like a film that feels like a music video circa 1988, and I can't rember the last time I heard some loud Chris Cornell fueling a scene – oh yeah, that was Collateral, Mann's last film. But that was better.

    I do enjoy Mann's stylish episodes, and wanted to like this one. This update to the cheesy 80's hit could've gone two ways and been successful: either cheese it up even more as a kind of self parody (think Will Farrell and Dave Chapelle, but Mann wouldn't go there), or take it to a whole new level of style, image, sex, color, and music. I think the latter was attempted, but I couldn't get Don Johnson out of my head - which probably should've been the main goal.


  • Dear Ndugu

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    About Schmidt  (2002)

    Have you ever been to Omaha? It's hard to miss the Woodmen building, and I liked this film from the title sequence. I like that Jack Nicholson is reserved and, well, acts his age. I love him in most things anyway, but for so much grit and angst to be bottled up in this character is a thrill. I think it's a wonderful depiction of family, a bit cynical, very funny, and like family, oddly moving.

  • September 11

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    September 11  (2002)

    United 93  (2006)

    I watched September 11 recently, having seen both United 93 and World Trade Center. September 11 is quite a different film, and much better than the other two.

    From the moment the film opens, when you see Afghan children making mud bricks by hand to build a shelter because "the Americans are going to bomb us again",  you know this is going to be different. September 11 ambitiously addresses the events of the tragic event from a multicultural perspective, highlighting short films on the subject from directors all over the world. The film rightly demonstrates the range and complexity of the issue, and implicitly the inappropriateness of simple responses and solutions. I appreciated the depiction of U.S. itself as multicultural, rather than the monocultural nightmare depicted in too many films and T.V. shows.

    The film is ambitious in its breadth, and it's potential for opening too many doors without presenting a cohesive whole. United 93 and Twin Towers had a specific focus, allowing us to relive terrible hours and minutes and examine personal perspectives. September 11 does this, too, but with brevity and greater variety. The memorable contribution by Alejandro González Iñárritu, as much an art installation as cinema, is plenty excruciating and reminds us that we don't need two hours of tears and pain to dust off the brutality of these moments from our memory.

    September 11 is an important and needed film. Some will find it long and parts hard to watch, myself included. It's in several languages and doesn't come packaged with a theme song by Aerosmith. It is, however, an appropriately inclusive and human response to a such an important, multi-dimentional event.

  • The beginning might save Sahara, but I doubt it

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sahara  (2005)

    I've seen the better part (that is, most of) Sahara twice now since it's been on cable, and I didn't like it either time. Okay, I haven't actually seen the beginning, but I doubt if that would save it. I saw it a second time, sort of, because my wife wanted to see it wasn't with me the first time. It didn't get any better.

    This film seems to thrive on two ideas – the first, that Matthew McConaughey is as manly as everyone (at least People magazine) wants him to be, is almost less annoying than the second, that these characters might actually gel with popular culture. That the film might quickly evolve into the first of a beloved series. Move over, Indiana Jones! The action is exciting, but the lame attempts at catch phrases by sidekick Steve Zahn.

    Penélope Cruz is always a delight, but this film is beneath her. It's a tired plot filled with tired characters, and even the fast action can't save this one.



  • And so it is

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Closer  (2004)

    I loved this film. Possibly my favorite Mike Nichols effort since The Graduate. Not sure if this makes me a pervert or a sadist or something, but I loved its rawness, its honesty, its unapologetic look into sex, relationships, dependency, jealously, selfishness. I like all the actors, even Julie Roberts though she's become somewhat annoying in recent years. The characters were intriguing, the dialogue a mahine gun, plot evolution a delight, and the ending perfect. The overlay of Damien Rice's music was icing.

  • Children of Men

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Closer  (2004)

    Children of Men  (2006)

    At first I was shocked, then pleasantly surprised. The film hypothesizes the effect of not having a future on humanity. What a world would be like without the promise of a future generation. How much of what we do is intended to benefit people who follow us? How much of what we do should we intended for our children?

    A depressing movie on many fronts, but more visceral and real than most big-action movies. Not that I'd call Children of Men a big-action movie per se, but there's a lot of it. Bullets that don't just fly around harmlessly; people get hurt. I much prefer weapons that actually inflict pain like they really do. I'm becoming a fan of Clive Owen every since Closer, even though he plays a similar role, sort of. English suaveness but rough around the edges, a flask in his overcoat, an earnest over-sized brute with just enough control to take to dinner. Dangerous but human.

    This film paints a very grim picture of one of my worst fears, breakdown of social order, chaos, selfishness, aimless violence. There are a lot of big-brother-ish overtones and not-so-subtle social critique. People are being carted away to haulocaust-like camps not fit for people in buses labeled "Homeland Security." The character who shows the most compassion is Michael Caine as a stereotypical Hollywood hippy, complete with Beatles and pot. All this seems to scream: Where did we gone wrong? Or, beware.

    All this might be too much for many viewers, too dark, too meaningless and silly. But for me, our protagonists' ultimate objective, trying to get to a fabled boat called "Tomorrow" from "The Human Project", was in the end a saving grace. None of this is explained, or at least not very well. But that' makes it better for me. Rather than being tempted to wrap this up with a contrived, tight, literal ending, the film leaves many questions unanswered. The ship "Tomorrow" as an obvious metaphor gives the rest of the film more latitude. The ending allows the film to be a broader metaphor, posing more questions than it attempts to answer. I left the theater thinking about the message rather than the details.

  • The Good Shepherd

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    At first I wasn't sure what to make of this film. At a run time of 2:40, it was going to chew up a lot of valuable babysitter dollars. So, okay, I was skeptical to begin with. Then it was a little confusing at first, jumping forward and back in time and a lot of closeups of Matt Damon unable or unwilling to crack a smile. Then it started to grow on me. I began to enjoy its subtleties and playful back and forth cutting. I felt I learned something, or at least made me think about early CIA, its relationship to World War II, and more established intelligence groups in the UK. How soon the cold war could've been predicted (the film suggests while WWII bombs were still smouldering). Why CIA is isn't preceded by a "The". Plus, editorials about work/life balance that makes yours look just silly, a running editorial about Yale's Skull and Bones Society, and decent scenes with William Hurt, Robert DeNiro, Alec Baldwin, and John Turturro. Angelina Jolie is tolerable. Damon does a good job expressing a lot emotion without changing his facial expression. His hunched shoulders and solemn demeanor is justified by the end of the film. DeNiro does a good job with the film, using his own character to personify the effect of this secret life, eroding his physical and psychological being.

  • Fun but forgettable

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Devil Wears Prada is fun, but forgettable. Not that I was looking for something profound in a movie with Prada in the name, but it could've been well, more fun. Meryl Streep is predictably excellent.

  • Prairie Home Companion

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I thought this was a good film, what one comes to expect from recent Altman films. It's an audio-visual collage and a study on character and acting that captures random and poignant moments on film, seemingly only loosely based on a script. I like Garrison Keillor, and if you do, you'll probably like the film. You have to hand it to a guy for writing a screenplay about his own show's demise. I enjoy his introspective observations and meanderings on American culture in his real radio program, much more than his way-down-yonder-in-the-yankety-yank music selection, which can seem forced. I do enjoy Keillor's bold throwback orientation on music, that it's to be performed and enjoyed, not just downloaded and worshiped. He sings from the heart, but he's no singer. The film focuses on both observational character sketches and music from the heart, like the real Prairie Home Companion. And like the actual show, the film has spiritual overtones, but so overtly Christian that it might turn some away. It comes off like the radio show and like many of Altman's films, almost like improv, where at times it seems cluttered and excessive, and others it seems unusually genuine and liberating.

  • Nicotine ethics

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I thought this was a wonderfully engaging film, with a great script and acting. I'm reminded that my father, a smoker of many years with roots in the Bronx and the Air Force, quit smoking when my oldest brother was young after seeing a TV commercial about the effects of smoking. My brother is 40 now, and my father says there isn't a day that goes by that he doesn't think about smoking. His sister smoked for 50 years until she was forced away from it after one of lungs collapsed. Nicotine is powerful stuff and gives one pause when considering the nature of freedom and free will.

    The part of the film I didn't like was characterizing, however comically, the alcohol, tobacco, and firearms industries (and at the end, others) as conspiring together somehow against the public and bragged about the damage they contribute to. The most redeeming part of the fim is how the main character, brilliantly played by Aaron Eckhart, is a thinking man, seemingly aware of the social and ethical issues at stake, but an advocate for free speech or more broadly about the value of debate (and let the best man win). He's nothing but a pawn and a bouy, but Eckhart plays the role with conviction, not with cynicism, but - dare I say - integrity? Confronting basic, important questions about what an indivdual is accountable for beyond putting bread on the table, as a role model for a child or a social agent on talk shows, is far more interesting than cartoonish conspiriacy theories.

  • Another inconvenient truth

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    This is a good film, and Gore comes across in a less wood-like manner than usual. The information is compelling. At times it seems like it's an ad for Apple's PowerPoint-like Keynote, as if we have to be reminded of the demographic for this film. Still, it's a good film, worth seeing, discussing, and acting upon. Interesting to note that Jimmy Carter, in a recent Charlie Rose interview, suggested that if Gore really wants to affect change, he should run for president again and not make films.

  • New pedigree?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Casino Royale  (2006)

    I liked it. At first I wasn't sure, even after having read a few reviews and knowing more or less what to expect, I was still geared up to see the usual frivolity and glibness. It's what I've grown to expect, having been originally introducted to In Theaters Bond by Moonraker and ever since. TV Bond is different. But alas, no Jaws, nothing too superhero-like. Even turning its back on "shaken, not stirred." Yes, it was more gritty, Bond gets bloodied, it rains. But more than that, it actually seemed like a movie that could exist on its own, as a theatrical release today, without the pedigree. Which is saying something.

  • Smart People

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Smart People  (2008)

    Just got an email from my alma mater, Carnegie Mellon. This new movie starring Dennis Quaid as "an eccentric Carnegie Mellon English professor" and Sarah Jessica Parker. Also filmed there: The Mothman Prophecies, Dogma, and Flashdance .

  • Basquiat

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Basquiat  (1996)

    Caught part of Basquiat on TV tonight. I've been listening to the soundtrack for years, but I forgot how much I loved this film, how it reminded me of how much I love what art wants to be. Insanity, authenticity, hypocrisy, beauty. Just living.

  • Hollywood Man

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grizzly Man  (2005)

    One of many fascinating parts of this film was the explaination of its subject, Timothy Treadwell, and his days as a would-be actor in California. Before he re-invented himself as a natualist, filming himself in the woods tempting bears and fate, before he changed his name, he was runner to the Woody Harrelson's part in the TV series, Cheers. I'm not sure what to make of this except that Treadwell wanted first to be a star of the Hollywood persuasion. It's not the only part of the story. He was an alcoholic who believed found himself in nature, got clean, worked for nothing, entertained children, and found a cause. And a talent for survival. This film is quite amazing and beautiful and terrifying and sad. I liked it a lot.

  • Meathook

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Cobra  (1986)

    The Shining  (1980)

    I was 16 when Cobra hit the big screen. This was the era of Tipper Gore and the PMRC, and my mother was worried about her son's appetite for gory pictures - not that I really watched all that many. She fretted over my enjoyment of The Shining because of Jack Nicholson's relentless pursuit of Shelley Duvall, despite my being a Stephen King fan in previous years, and Kubrick's overall accomplishment.

    At the end of Cobra, Sly impales the bad guy on a meathook of some kind. I think I was watching it on video at home with some of my adolescent buddies when this scene came on and my mother walked in. It cemented her view of a category of film she simply referred to as "meathook." To this day, she'll talk about how she never cared for "those meathook movies" or that something may be "too meathook" for her taste. Browsing through the video store, she's quite likely to lean over to me and utter, "meathook," as if to say, "let's move on."

    I think I'll start using "meathook" as a tag now.

  • Kevin Alone

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Home Alone  (1990)

    Home Alone was in theaters in Europe when I was in school there. My name is Kevin, and when introduced, people would often say, "Kevin, yes, like the movie."

    Not able to speak anything but English, and having no money or television, I wasn't aware of what was playing in theaters. For the longest time I had no idea what they meant. Finally I asked one of my friends what was up, and they said, "you know, Kevin Alone, the film?" From my knowledge it was Home Alone, I said. Then we put it together. In German (I was in the German-speaking part of Switzerland), one can't have an implied subject as in "Home Alone." Pre-Michael Jaskson Macaulay Culkin played the little boy, whose name in the film as it turns out is Kevin. When distributed in German-speaking areas, they had to add the subject: Kevin. So it would have to be "Kevin Alone" (or perhaps it was "Kevin Home Alone" - I don't recall).

    As a result I was always associated with this movie while away from home, and this movie to my time in Switzerland, where I was in fact, alone.

  • My Spout name

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    I chose a name for my Spout identity with no intention to be controversial. I happen to know Spout member Paul personally, and he has brought to my attention that my name can be interpreted as 'got here' or 'go there.' I hadn't even considered it until Paul brought it up, and had of of those in mind when I started my relationship with Spout. But now I'm enjoying the mystery. Are others similarly perplexed (or do you care)? What do you think my Spout name is, or ought to be?

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go