Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love
"I like to keep my life simple and my mind complex."
Personal statement:

Well, to start things off, my name is Ryan. I live in a small village in Wisconsin. Thankfully, there's a few independent theaters not too far from me and through the magic of Netflix and the internet, I'm able to see quite a bit of films. I'm into all sorts. I don't discriminate against decade, language, or genre. Well, maybe romantic comedies I could do without. I'm still not quite sure what I'd like for myself in regards for the future. I think either a film critic or a film maker would fit quite aptly. I'm here to get to know more of you and find some new films to check out so if you'd like, talk with me. I'd love to carry on a good conversation.

[more]

CaptainRyannn's movie tags

Advertisement
  • Seven Pounds Review

    0 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Seven Pounds  (2008)

    When I first saw the trailer, I must say, I wasn’t too impressed with it. It didn’t really feel like a movie that I would be moved by despite its overt advertising as a moving film. I then watched an interview with Will Smith on Jay Leno and from the way they were talking, it really seemed like they were onto something here. Now, I’m not sure if it was that which finally pushed me to see this, me wanting to see as many 2008 films as I can in order to create a ‘Best of’ year end list, or the fact that I’ve been listening to DJ Jazzy Jeff & the Fresh Prince’s album, Homebase, almost every morning for the past week. (Man, that’s such a great album.) Whatever it was, I went into it with neither high nor low expectations.

    We enter the film with a shot of Ben Thomas, played by Will Smith, on the phone with 911. He calls for an ambulance and reports a suicide. When the paramedic asks who the victim is, he says in a crisp, decisive voice, “I am.” We then cut to a scene where Thomas gets into contact with a blind meat salesman, Woody Harelson, and pretty much verbally assaults him in what could perhaps be one of Smith’s darkest scenes he’s ever done. Afterwards, immense regret and sadness come over him and along with the suicide introduction; we are left to ask “Why?”

    The premise of the film is Thomas going around to seven different strangers, the salesman being one of them, and evaluating their life situation. He then has to decide whether they are really are deserving enough for his help. He utters to one old woman, “It is within my power to drastically change his circumstances, but I don’t want to give that man a gift he doesn’t deserve.” as he attempts to deem the worthiness of another man.

    Much of the film, perhaps too much of it, relies on the viewers’ lack of knowledge. From the opening scenes and throughout much of the film, we are left almost completely in the dark as to what Ben Thomas’ motives are and what has happened in the past that has left his face scarred with sorrow. We are forced to ask ourselves why he has brought a jellyfish into his cheap motel room and why he’s even in the cheap motel room to begin with. I can understand why director Gabriele Muccino, also responsible for The Pursuit of Happyness, did this; to keep audiences in their seats because frankly, it doesn’t have a whole lot of story going for it other than a theme that’s been done plenty of times before.

    The one concrete thing that remains here is Will Smith’s portrayal of Ben Thomas, a man who’s haunted by his past and searches for redemption. While I may not enjoy all of Smith’s films, I can definitely admire him as a person. Having an album out by 17 and winning a Grammy at 21. Then going on to do a hit television show and following that up with a career in the film industry, he’s definitely made a name for himself. With one of his most complex characters yet, Smith displays a whole spectrum of emotions that are nothing short of believable.

    There was so much that could’ve been more thoroughly examined and so many ideas that should’ve had more screen time but were pushed into the background as a victim to the over-attention paid to the romance between Thomas and Emily Posa (Rosario Dawson). While still a pretty decent relationship, there were far more interesting aspects to Seven Pounds that didn’t receive as much notice as they should have.

    Overall, Seven Pounds is a decent film about an attempt at redemption masked by acts of altruism. His motives aren’t explained until the very end and those motives are perhaps one of the few things that carry the viewer’s interest throughout the film. Now that that’s settled; seven pounds of what?


  • Into the Wild.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Into the Wild  (2007)

    Being one of my most anticipated films of 2007, Into the Wild held up to my high expectations. Robbed of a Best Picture nomination at the Oscars, Into the Wild was possibly on of the most poetic movies I’ve seen that has dealt with teenage angst, human and nature interactions, and the idea of ultimate freedom in such a beautiful way. Chris McCandless (Emile Hirsche) is sick of living by society’s rules. After graduating from college, he hits the road in a quest for absolute freedom. He burns his social security card, cuts up his credit cards, and gives his life savings away to charity. He then sets out on the road where he meets a bunch of people that support him and his quest to reach Alaska. Along they way, he runs into a hippie couple who are on the road like him, a farmer who puts him to work, and an old man who wishes he was young again. While the ‘present’ of the film is set on the Magic Bus in an Alaskan forest, the bulk of the film is through flashbacks of his journey and childhood. Although many people, including myself, claim that Chris McCandless was self-centered and arrogant, one cannot help but admire his courage and determination that he had in order to achieve pure happiness. With great supporting performances from Marcia Gay Harden, William Hurt, Vince Vaughn, Jena Malone, Catherine Keener, Kristen Stewart, and Hal Halbrook, Sean Penn’s Into the Wild is a film that will most certainly be remembered years and years and years from now.


  • Bland Tale of Revenge.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Battle Royale  (2001)

    Death Race  (2008)

    I’ll admit, the only reason I went to go see Death Race is because I wanted to get out of the house and my dad just so happened to want to go see this, so I agreed. I knew I wasn’t going to get anything mind-blowing or revolutionary, but rather some dirty, bloody entertainment. Unfortunately, I didn’t get much of that either. Jason Statham is back in, surprise surprise, another bland cliché action role. He plays Jensen Ames, former professional racecar driver, turned loving father / husband. That is until his wife is murdered and he is put to jail for it. (You know, just once, I’d like to see a protagonist actually go to jail for a crime he / she did commit. Enough with this “I was setup.” bullshit.” Anyway, he lands himself into a prison where an annual race is held where prisoners have the chance to earn their freedom. They compete in a three-part race and the first to win five races in a row gets to walk free. The event is broadcasted over pay-per-view and millions of people buy. Why? Because Americans love violence. The movie was pretty predictable from start to finish and didn’t have anything new to offer. I’m also getting sick of the plot where ‘prisoners fight each other for their freedom’. It’s getting to the point where it’s overdone. But that’s kind of the only way you can get people to go one on one with each other without deep back-stories. It allows the viewers to be unsympathetic towards them because they are prisoners. If everyone was innocent such as in 2001’s Battle Royale, it wouldn’t get released in America. Anyway, I’m getting off topic. Bottom line: If you’re looking for cheap thrills, go for it. If you want anything deeper than that, pass on it. It’s not that great.


  • A Pimp's Tale.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hustle & Flow  (2005)

    You know it’s hard out here for a pimp, when you’re trying to get the money for the rent. For the Cadillac and gas money’s spent, there’s a whole lot of bitches jumping ship. In the Oscar-winning song “It’s Hard Out Here for a Pimp”, the lyrics tell the viewer the very essence of the film. This is the story of a hustler and a drug dealer, Djay (Terrence Howard), who is having a mid-life crisis. Tired of the same routine, he buys a keyboard and discovers that he wants to become a rapper. With his old high school pal, Key (Anthony Anderson), and the white boy with beats (DJ Qualls), he builds a make-shift home studio and begins his quest to become the next great thing. With hardships and hoes working against him around every corner, Djay struggles to maintain his “mode” and push that “good shit out” in time for a party that famed rapper Skinny Black (Ludacris) will be at in town. The reason I liked this movie so much is because offered a human dilemma. Not a black dilemma. Not a rapper dilemma. Not a drug dealer dilemma, but a universal human dilemma; the struggle for change. Even though I may still be young, I’ve felt the need to accomplish something with my life and not know how to go about doing it. The music in this movie is pretty awesome. Everything from Djay’s original songs to the rest of the soundtrack had me bouncing…and I don’t even care for most rap! So if you’re down for a good movie with some sweet music, check this one out.


  • Not Quite a White guy in the 1700's.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Undertow  (2004)

     After falling in love with David Gordon Green’s Undertow, I checked out some of his other films. George Washington was first on the list because I saw that it was also part of the Criterion Collection. George Washington is not about a white man from the mid-1700’s, but rather a group of children set in a small, rural southern town. With not much to do, they spend their days wandering around the broken community and have conversations that form into a collage of innocence. After a tragedy happens amongst the group, they all come together and attempt to cover it up which leads to their individual quests for redemption. In one of the most poetically beautiful films I’ve seen recently, David Gordon Green tells the heartbreaking story of kids who are forced to enter the adult world early and make decisions that they shouldn’t have to make. Although I’m sure not everyone has had to go through what the kids in the film had to go through, I believe it is the perfect metaphor for teenage friendships. A group of kids who are as tight as can be part away from each other for something or another or perhaps no reason at all. Green manages to create some of the most real characters I’ve seen on film in everyway from their dialogue to their simple hand gestures and reactions. I think I might’ve been close to tears because of how magnificent this one was. Damn, it was good.


  • Hot Fuzz not hot enough.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hot Fuzz  (2007)

    After reading all the great reviews and quite the high rating on IMdb (8.00 / 10), I decided to give Hot Fuzz another chance. Unlike Bonnie and Clyde where my mind was completely changed, my thoughts on Hot Fuzz did not. I found the humor cheap and the plot annoying. It starts off with Nicholas Angel (Simon Pegg) who is literally too good and seems to make the rest of the London Police Department look bad. Solution? Send him off to the country. Once he gets there, he discovers that the town has the lowest crime-rate in the country which he feels is pretty suspicious. Soon, people start dying off in gruesome ‘accidents’ but Nicholas is convinced that things aren’t really quite what they seem to be. It’s a plot that has been done many times before and many times better. But I feel like I’m in the minority of this so perhaps I just don’t “get it” but if you’re down for a pretty flat action / comedy, check it out.


  • Two Crime Legends.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Bonnie and Clyde  (1967)

    Considered by many to be one of the groundbreaking films of the 60’s, Arthur Penn’s Bonnie and Clyde offers a romanticized vision of two of the most famous outlaws in American History. A bored, small-town girl, Bonnie Parker (Faye Dunnaway), meets up with recently released bank robber, Clyde Barrow (Warren Beaty), and they set off across the Midwest robbing banks and on the run from the law. They team up with gas station clerk, (Michael Pollard), Clyde’s brother, Buck (Gene Hackman), and his nuisance of a wife (Estelle Parsons) during the journey and that’s when things start to turn bad. Ultimately, this is a road movie. It’s about average people caught up in the life of crime and on the run from authorities. When I first saw this a few years ago, I hated it. I couldn’t understand for the life of me what made this thing so special. Like many movies however, you have to mature into the right state-of-mind and after a second viewing, your mind could change completely.  One of my biggest complaints lies in the film’s climax. Many of you probably already know what happened of the notorious outlaws, but some of you don’t so I’ll refrain from spoiling it for you here. Anyway, it features a series of quick cuts that pretty much ruin the entire mood and build-up for me. I once watched a program on the History Channel on the life of these two and I’m pretty sure that if they would’ve stuck to what had actually happened, it would’ve made for a much better ending. Despite all the violence, which was pretty graphic for the 60’s, the movie carries quite a light mood. If the soundtrack hadn’t been filled with cherry bluegrass music, we’d have a much different movie. The characters are all pretty solid. Every one of them did a great job. Although if you get annoyed easily, I’m going to warn you, because Buck’s wife is possibly one of the most annoying characters I’ve ever seen on screen. All she does is nag. So check this out if you’re down for an adventure movie about two of the most famous criminals this country has ever seen. I’m against a lot of remakes but if one were to come from this, I’d be the first in line.


  • Burn After Reading

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Blood Simple  (1984)

    Raising Arizona  (1987)

    Fargo  (1996)

    The Big Lebowski  (1997)

    The Ladykillers  (2004)

    Well, let me start off by saying that I originally saw this two weeks ago and loved it. So I decided to go back and see it again. The Coen Brothers seem to have formed a pattern that has worked for them over the years. After putting out a serious film, the switch gears to a comedy one. Blood Simple brought Raising Arizona. Miller’s Crossing brought The Hudsucker Proxy. Fargro brought The Big Lebowski. The Man Who Wasn’t There brought Intolerable Cruelty and The Ladykillers (both of which kind of sucked.). Now, it is fitting that after their most acclaimed film, they up the ante for their newest comedy, Burn After Reading. With the zoom-in effect used to open the film, we are given the impression that something important is happening. Well, it is important in the sense that without it, we would not have a film. But it’s so trivial because of it’s cause. CIA agent Osbourne Cox (John Malkovich) gets demoted for too much drinking. We immediately get a glimpse into his hilarious character that is somewhat of an elitist. He gets to come home to his bitch-of-a-wife, Katie (Tilda Swinton) and decides to write some memoirs, or as Osbourne likes to call them, “mem-wah’s”. Well his darling Katie happens to be cheating on him with Harry Pfarrer (George Clooney) who is not only cheating on his wife (Patricia Clarkson) with Katie, but also the kind-hearted Linda Litzke (Frances McDomand). Confusing, I know. Well, in an attempt to ‘prepare’ for the divorce, Katie copies Cox’s financial as well as his memoirs. Through a couple of plain-forgetful actions, the disc containing these items is found on the floor of Hard Bodies, a gym that is run by Linda, Chad Feldheimer (Brad Pitt), and the well-mannered sensitive man, Ted (Richard Jenkins). Chad and Linda end up thinking that they really have something important and demand a ransom from Cox. Chaos and hilarity ensues as the term ‘making a mountain out of an anthill’ comes to life. But in this case, the anthill has actually become a mountain forged out of stupidity, infidelity, and murder.


  • Hatchet.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hatchet  (2007)

    Sometimes, I don’t know whether to rate a movie based on how good it was or how much I enjoyed it. If the latter were true, it’d be a 25 / 10. This movie had me screaming ‘**** yeah!’ more than most anything I’ve seen this year. Since it’s release, the tagline for it has always stuck with me; Old School American Horror. I wasn’t quite sure that that meant. I must admit, I was initially turned away from it because it was listed as comedy / horror for its genre and previous titles with this listing such as The Tripper and Severance just downright sucked. I decided ‘what the hell’ and watched it anyway. It opens with a pretty recycled scene, two characters having a good time in the middle of nowhere. These two characters happen to be horror legend, Robert Englund and some other guy and the location; a swamp. We see something come out of the water and pretty much tear them to shit. As most horror movies, this is the initial set-up. It is Mardi Gras weekend and after getting dumped, Ben (Joel Moore) just doesn’t feel like being around the festivities. Him and faithful, but complaint-filled buddy, Marcus, find a little ‘Haunted Swamp Boat Tour’ and think it might be a nice time. Once there, we meet the rest of the characters for our nice little outing: the slutty girls, the horny guy, the nice, elderly couple, the mysterious woman. And of course, we’ve already met the innocent guy and the “token black guy” as Not Another Teen Movie would put it. As Hatchet went on, I realized that the comedy was in the actual humor itself, but rather in how intentionally bad the movie was. I suppose one could classify it as a ‘spoof’. Anyway, through a series of events, our comrades end up onshore in the middle of the island and are faced with a deformed man who was accidentally killed by his father with a hatchet when he was younger. (The man is played by another horror icon, Kane Hodder.) Actually, it is pretty cool that 4-time Jason portrayer and Mr. Freddy Kruger appear in the same film that has nothing to do with either one of these characters. So, people in the middle of nowhere, killer butchering them. This movie has some of the best gore scenes I’ve seen recently and would definitely receive an NC-17 had this version been turned in to the MPAA. Here's an example of the kind of gore you can expect from Hatchet. I guess it would be only proper for me to post a spoiler warning, but shouldn't you expect everyone to die from the type of movie this is anyway?Like I said, Hatchet is in no means a good movie, but it wasn’t meant to be. If you take it seriously, you’ll dislike it. The constant “homage” to the horrible acting, larger-than-life killer, stereotypical characters, and buckets of blood of the 1980’s is something of a “thank you” for being a horror fan for all these years. And to director Adam Green and this wonderful cast, I’d like to say “No, I insist, thank you.”


  • All the Real Girls

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The more and more I watch the films of David Gordon Green, the more I realize that he’s one of the best directors of his generation right now. He manages to portray character in the most genuine and sincere way. His plots aren’t filled much except human emotions. All the Real Girls is no different. Paul Schneider plays Paul, the ‘Don Juan’ who has seemed to get into every girl’s pants who lives in the small, sleepy town. The fact that Schneider’s physique and face is nothing extraordinary tells us something about the setting itself. The fact that such an average-looking man is ‘sex-icon’ of the town is a way of showing how much the town, and the people in it, have going for them. Paul’s best friend is Tip. Tip’s little sister is Noel (the always pretty, Zooey Deschanel), who has just recently returned to town. Frustration amongst Tip erupts when he sees his best friend flirting with his little sister. We meet these two characters within the first scene of the film as they share awkward romantic dialogue with each other. As the time-frame rewinds a couple of weeks back, with the introduction in mind, we can’t help but wonder if Paul was being genuine with Noel or not. This is the core of the film. It is the story of a man who needs desperately to prove that he’s overcome his reputation for the sake of true love. However, just as true love exists, so does heartbreak and there’s plenty of that within these frames. The continuous, soft, trance-like music throughout the film as well as the honest and real-life characters place us in the same town as them. Whether we are in Glidden, Iowa or New York, New York, we are there with the people of All the Real Girls and are able to experience each and every emotion as if they were our own.


  • North by Northwest

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I’m actually rather upset with myself for not getting into Hitchcock earlier. I’ve long considered myself a somewhat ‘fan of cinema’ but I just never got around to watching the works of one of the most revered directors of all time. I’ve seen Psycho but that’s about it. So now, it seemed natural to check out North by Northwest after seeing it mentioned quite a bit over the internet the past few days. So I finally got it from Netflix and popped it in. I pretty much loved it right as the credits started rolling. The film stars Cary Grant as Roger Thornhill, an advertising manager who captures the same smoothness as any James Bond. During a meeting one morning, his identity gets mistaken in such an innocent way that one cannot help but feel bad for him. He gets taken back to a mansion where he insists that he’s not the man they’re looking for who happens to be named George Kaplan. They liquor him up and send him off driving in hopes that he’ll kill himself and the whole thing will be settled. Instead, he gets taken in by police and tells them the story that they think is too far-fetched to believe. Throughout the film, we are taken across the country on a search for a man who might not even be real. Behind this search is another race to catch a man who may be the key to it all. If that’s not reason enough to watch this, then do it for the crop-duster scene. Hitchcock has always been known to create suspense but man, this was top-notch.


  • Snow Angels.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Snow Angels  (2008)

    While most films introduce us to the characters as the drama begins, David Gordon Green's Snow Angels places us right in the middle of it. Annie (Kate Beckinsale) and Glenn (Sam Rockwell) have just split up. While Glenn attempts desperately to win her back, he fails to realize that the relationship has run its course. They share a little daughter whom they share custody over. One day, that daughter goes missing. The whole town gets involved in the search including Arthur, who used to get babysat by Annie. The rest of the film deals with how each character deals with the situation much like his debut film, George Washington. The best part about the film, the story and characters. The worst, how quickly the meat of the film ended. I felt like the climax had concluded before the half-way mark hit. Nonetheless, another hit from David Gordon Green.


  • So-bad-it's-good. (Almost.)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I really have no idea how to rate this film. It was quite possibly one of the worst movies I’ve ever seen. Despite this I can recognize how much I enjoyed it. Earlier this week, I spent a good amount of time researching cheesy horror movies for a movie night I’m going to host next weekend. With going through all of these movies, I eventually just became in a mood for them. I saw ‘Return to Horror High’ on TV and decided to give it a watch. The premise is that a bunch of students were killed at a high school once upon a time. Now, 20 years later, a low-budget film crew is attempting to shoot a slasher film at the abandoned school to tell the story. During the shooting, however, yup, you guessed it, peoples’ heads begin to roll and the blood begins to spray. This movie was so incredibly cheesy that I began to think that it could perhaps be a spoof of B-horror movies. The gore wasn’t too bad well, I guess in this case wasn’t too good. Hmm, let’s just say that there wasn’t a lot of it. As cliché as the movie in general is, I did not see the ‘twist’ ending coming. Once it happened, I kind of thought that the movie as a whole was rather lame. One of the nice things about this movie features an early performance by George Clooney. It’s always nice to see famous actors in early roles. Another mildly-famous person is Marcia Brady. (I don’t know here real name and I don’t care enough to look it up.) She had a pretty funny role as a police officer trying to figure out what happened. If you’re down for a cheesy horror movie from the 80’s give this one a shot.


  • Ghost Dog.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    What does rap music, a samurai sword, a few birds, and the Italian mafia all have in common? They are all a part of Ghost Dog’s daily life. Who is Ghost Dog? Well, he is an African American assassin for the mafia who happens to practice the ancient traditions of the samurai. Talk about a cultural blend! When I first rented this from Blockbuster back when I was 13, the clerk had told me it was campy. I didn’t know what that really meant. Hell, I still have no idea. But whatever it is, if this Ghost Dog defines it, then sign me up as a fan of campy films. Ghost Dog (Forest Whitaker) is a humble man who vowed to work for Louie, a member of the mafia after he saved his life. Through a series of betrayals, Louie hires Ghost Dog to kill a ‘made’ member. Outraged, the bosses order a description of this assassin and laugh when he tells them that he’s a black man who lives on a roof that communicates solely through messages tied to the legs of a bird. They laugh when they hear this, as they should. The premise of this character is something so absurd but works in only the way that Jim Jarmusch could make it work. Now, the mafia has put out a hit on Ghost Dog and he must fend for his safety. Forest Whitaker’s character is actually quite impressive. He defies cultural stereotypes and has us cheering for him despite the fact that he kills people. With very little actual speaking, Ghost Dog invites us into his mind through a series of quotes from The Hagakure, a book that depicts how a samurai should live, as well as some kind-hearted interactions with a French-speaking Haitian ice cream vendor and a little girl. This is a story about morals and what it means to hold true to your word. Something we all can learn just a little bit more of.


  • Synecdoche, New York.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    I’ve sat here for a while now trying to think about how I’m going to begin this review. I have concluded that there really isn’t any conventional way to do such a thing. I suppose the best thing to do is just to lay out my thoughts and emotions exactly as they occurred. What happened that night wasn’t merely a viewing of a film, but rather a complete experience. To be able to write a proper review of the film itself, I have to go beyond that and share that experience.

    On November 21st. four friends and I spent three hours and took four different buses to get to the Oriental Movie Theater in downtown Milwaukee. It shouldn’t have taken that long but our route got messed up and we were left boarding buses and not quite sure if it was the right one. It was the most work we’ve ever done to get to a movie, and as luck would have it, it would also be the most rewarding.

    After dinner at a charming organic restaurant, we walked around the area for a bit and entered the theater. The five of us took the front-row, center seats as means of receiving the image before anyone else in the room. It was as if we somehow believed that if we weren’t behind anyone, we can truly take the film for what it is and not be affected by the reactions of those in front of us. The lights dimmed down. The credits began. I was filled with excitement.

    On the surface, one could describe writer / director Charlie Kaufman’s Synecdoche, New York simply as a depressed man who spends much of his life putting together a massive theater piece that deals with his life and those around him. As I think about it now, could it really be much more than that? In one perspective, no, that’s all there really is to it. In another perspective, there’s so much more than that. Life in general is a lot like this. (I do not believe this to be a coincidence.) When one looks at life, from a simple standpoint, they see that the only thing they really need to (or should) do is get educated, become successful, find a spouse, have kids, retire, and then finally, die. Rarely, can any one person think about life with a solely simplistic outlook. Each and every mind veers off and asks themselves the meaning of life and question their existence. Now, it may seem like I’m getting off-track here, but I assure you, this is the epitome of ‘relevance’. Much like life, Synecdoche, New York explores the complexities of not just the basic process of theater production but the very core of being.

    Caden Cotard, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman, is an average man. He’s unhappily married to Adele, played by Catherine Keener, and has a four year old daughter, Olive, who is the essence of innocence. With virtually no support from Adele, his production of Death of a Salesman has just completed and critics are raving it. Despite this, Caden remains unhappy and unfulfilled. He feels as though he hasn’t really accomplished much of anything in his life. After an accident regarding a bathroom sink pipe, he is sent to various doctors for various reasons. Without any clear explanation, he becomes under the impression that death will soon face him. Due to the success of his play adaptation, he has received a MaCarthur grant in which he decides that it’s time to create something honest and meaningful. In response to this challenge, he buys out a massive warehouse in which he attempts to recreate his life and everyone in it in a way to be remembered for something profound once his time on Earth has ended. He sets up stages to resemble buildings and rooms from his own life as he hires actors to play people that he’s crossed paths with once, people that he’s known all of his life, and even himself.

    Life moves very quickly, whether you want it to or not. In the opening scene, on the surface, we have Caden wake up and go through his routine as any man or woman would. If you look a little closer, you’ll see that this in fact isn’t just one morning. He wakes up to the radio announcing it to be the first of September. He then proceeds to walk downstairs and reads the October 1st. edition of the obituaries. He sets the paper down and takes out a carton of milk which he tells his wife expired on October 20th. By the end of the scene, it is November. Within four or five minutes, we have experienced two months of Caden’s life even though it appears to have taken place over one morning. Much of the film acts like this as does life. Any routine can have the effect of making each and every day blend together with the same monotonous actions.

    There is so much going on in this movie and I’m pretty sure essays, and even books could be written about all of the symbolism and metaphors. I really would like to cover all of that here but I feel as though it’d be unfair for you to hear it from me instead of experiencing it for yourself. I’d like to perhaps explore just one thing though; a burning house.

    In one scene, one of the main women in Caden’s life, the box office woman / Caden’s love interest, Hazel, played by Samantha Morton, buys a house that’s on fire. She walks through the home with the realtor and contemplates on whether or not she’d like to live inside of a burning house. She eventually buys it and exists as she normally would, except for the fact that she’s living in a house that is continually on fire. This is probably one of the clearest metaphors of all. She begins the process of developing a home, and what is a home? It’s the place where you feel safest; the place where you can escape your troubles of the outside world and just relax. Home is also one of the things that hold you back from truly experiencing the world. Though you are comfortable with a current type of lifestyle, everyone should really step back and ask themselves if it is in fact for the best. Hazel’s home is a burning house and Caden’s home is a massive theater. Is there really a difference?

    The screen faded to white and the credits began to roll with the song “Little Person” playing. This song is something special. It embodies the core themes of the film and really forces you to relate the lyrics to what you just saw. Even after the credits, my four friends and I sat there and stared at the screen. I turned to one of them and said “We need to discuss this but not yet. We’re not ready.” Indeed we weren’t. The emotions that filled me as I was walking out of the theater were something that I have never experienced before in my life and doubt that I’ll ever experience again. During the car ride back to one of their houses, we barely spoke and most definitely didn’t speak about what we saw. Once we got there though, we sat in a circle and scraped the surface, but even this didn’t justify the experience.

    I felt as though I needed to see it again so the one whom I spoke with right when the credits faded and I ventured out there once again several days later. I was actually anticipating the second viewing more than I was the first. Going in there with all of these ideas about all of the symbolism, meanings, and metaphors was something that genuinely excited me. Much to my surprise, after the re-watch, I felt as though I understood it less and that many of my ideas were shattered; and that is the beauty of it.

    Synecdoche, New York is something different for everyone. Not one life is the same and neither is each interpretation. For someone who is young and hasn’t experienced many years, it is a warning, urgently saying not to waste your life away on figuring out the meaning of it all. If you do so, everyone and everything will pass by and leave you. For those who have had many years behind them, it is a reminder saying that it isn’t too late to focus on what’s important. For those who’s hair is grey and bones are brittle, it could perhaps be a sorrowful tale that bears much similarity with their own life.

    Once it is all said and done, the film is about the average life. Caden Cotard isn’t just Caden Cotard. He is me, he is you, and he is everyone that you know. His surface may not be the same but throw away the letters of his name and the title of his job. Disregard his age and the city in which he resides. If you take away the skin, you’ll still find blood, muscle, bones, and most of all emotions. Caden Cotard is the representation of each and every human being who dares to question his own existence and the symbolism for anyone who attempts to find meaning in life.


  • What else is new?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Shining  (1980)

    The Messengers  (2007)

    As we were watching The Messengers, a friend of mine said “I think I’ve seen this before.” My response was, “You probably have. It’s been released under about a hundred different names over the past five years or so.” Now, I’m not sure she has seen The Messengers before we watched it that Friday night, but I do know that it’s basically a copy of almost every other PG-13 horror movie that has come out for the past half-decade. Here is how I think it works: Executives hire people to go though recent Korean / Chinese / Japanese horror films and have them pick out which ones they think could be the most “Americanized”. They then take out whatever actual substance and depth it could have because they think that teenagers will find it boring. To “spice” things up a bit, they add cheap, cliché scares such as a character turning a corner during an ascending ominous music tone only to have the music abruptly stop when we find out that what we ‘thought’ was around the corner turned out to be a friend or family member. Some may describe what I’ve said to be pretty specific, but seriously, go through ten recent PG-13 American horror movies and see how many time that technique is used. Onto the actual movie. Jess, played by Kristen Stewart, just moved into a farmhouse with her family in North Dakota. As soon as they get there, “creepy” things begin to happen and are unexplained until the very end. Of course, her parents don’t believe her and the only one that can actually see what’s going on is her little baby brother. The whole movie is filled with ‘shock’ moments rather than actual scary events. Movies such as The Shining and The Blair Witch Project are movies that actually hold an eerie tone all the way through instead of some textbook cheap thrills thrown in here and there. One thing I will give The Messengers, however, is that it did have some really nice shots. Although the fact that it takes place on a sunflower farm could attribute to that. If you’re looking for a good horror movie to watch, pass on this, it’s nothing new. It’s been done plenty of times before and it’ll be done plenty of times again.


  • Vengeacne is Mine

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

         The whole time while watching Shohei Imamura’s Vengeance is Mine, I couldn’t help but think ‘Man, there could be essays written about this film.’ Within the film’s first three minutes, we are able to get properly introduced to Iwao Enokizu, but far from understanding him. We know he’s done something bad. (He’s in a police car that seem to have the entire force following him.) The date is clearly shown to us in white letters. This let’s us know that something prolific is happening. Despite this, Iwao sings and jokes around. We begin to get a glimpse at what kind of man he is. We go back about 79 days earlier where Iwao’s killing spree begins. We aren’t really given any reason for these brutal deaths and the shock of it really sets the tone to the film. While on the run, we witness a series of flashbacks that help us slowly understand this killer. We attempt to feel some sort of sympathy for him but after our initial reaction to him we’re unable to. In one situation, he poses as a bail bondsman who meets up with the family of a girl who has just been sentenced. He suavely pretends to be the real thing and after a few meetings with the girl’s mother, he dupes her into giving him money in order to see her daughter again. The casualness and deceptiveness of his actions are perhaps more terrifying than the murders themselves. Through the film, he meets a series of people who he befriends, tricks, swindles, betrays, and kills in order to get what he wants. He does so without remorse or second thought.  Vengeance is Mine is perhaps one of the best studies of a serial killer I’ve ever seen, but much like reading my Psychology text book, I’ve learned nothing. No matter how deeply we try to delve into the mind of Iwao, we still come up short and are unable to fully understand his actions; and that is the beauty of it.


  • Unexpected Surprise.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Felon  (2008)

    Initially, when I had heard about this film, I was wary due to a no-name cast, aside from Val Kilmer, and an inexperienced director. To go along with this, the majority of Val Kilmer’s films past 2000 have been pretty bad. Not to mention that it was a straight-to-DVD release. Then I read some reviews claiming it to be a masterpiece.  Its rating shot up on IMDb and I was curious. I got it in the mail from Netflix a few days after coming to video and I watched it right away. Wade Porter(Stephen Dorff) is an average family man. He has a little son and a loving fiancé. One night there is a break-in and Porter accidentally kills the intruder. He is sentenced to three years in prison. If this were your average prison, it might not be so bad. But unfortunately for Porter, it’s not. Here, the guards run place. They place the prisoners in a cell about as big as a racquetball court and force them to fight each other. Racism divides them up into hate-fueled cliques and gives them even more reason to fight one another. To add to the mix is notorious serial killer, John Smith (Val Kilmer) who strikes fear and commands respect into everyone despite their race. Porter must find away to survive his time in prison while still managing to maintain a relationship with his family. Although I wouldn’t label it a “masterpiece” by any means, Felon did definitely come out of nowhere and pleasantly surprise me. It was an intense drama about a guy who will literally fight or die trying. The almost unrecognizable Val Kilmer does a great job in his role as well. This is definitely one of those films where you can’t help but imagine yourself in the protagonist’s shoes no matter how much you don’t want to. Before the film played, a “based on a true story” came up onto the screen. I cannot imagine how this can go on in official government-regulated prisons. But then again, theirs is a lot of stuff going on in this world that is hard to imagine.


  • Week 30.

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Titles in bold represent a first time viewing.


    346. Magnolia (Anderson, 1999)
    ----------I thought that this was a pretty great collage-type film with the likeness of a more familiar title,
    Crash. Aside from Julianne Moore's performance, one of the few things I didn't like was the fact that the characters didn't connect with each other other than the bizarre finale at the end of the film. (7.5 / 10)

    347. Stuck (Gordon, 2007)
    ----------Based on a true story, stuck follows a wannabe-ghetto woman (Mena Suvari) after she hits a homeless man and drives him into her garage. The acting was terrible, the premise was good though. Towards the end, it began to pick up in terms of entertainment. (6 / 10)

    348. Equilibrium (Wimmer, 2002)
    ----------Christian Bale? Sweet. Reviews relating it to
    The Matrix? Awesome. This is why I initially checked out Equilibrium. The action was pretty sweet but every few minutes, I couldn't help but see a blatant plot-hole. Also, can someone answer me why do the people have dust fly out of them when they get shot? (7 / 10)

    349. The New World (Malick, 2005)
    ----------It seems that whenever Malick puts out a new movie, I become less and less interested. To me,
    Badlands was his best and his vast collection of movies since then have just seemed to have gone downhill. I appreciated the beautiful cinematography and music along with the great acting. But the pacing was just a little too slow for me. (7 / 10)

    350. The Terminator (Cameron, 1984)
    ----------It's funny to think that The Terminator, one of the most masculine movies of all time, came from the same guy who made Titanic, one of the most popular love stories of all time. I basically watched this for mere entertainment and it satisfied that. (7 / 10)

    351. Terminator 2: Judgment Day (Cameron, 1991)
    ----------Again, I just watched this purely for entertainment. I think it did a better job at doing that than the first one. The best thing about watching these movies is just pausing it at certain testosterone-filled moments and thinking, This is the governor of California. (7.5 / 10)

    352. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines (Mostow, 2003)
    ----------This got quite a bit of negative reviews. I wouldn't say that it was especially bad, but rather on par with the first one. The best part was how they ended it. It got me excited for
    Terminator Salvation. (7 / 10)

    353. A Home at the End of the World (Mayer, 2004)
    ----------Although the subject matter may not be something many of us can relate to, the themes definitely are. The overall mood and and portrayals of friendship and love make this worth watching alone. (7 / 10)

    354. Undertow (Green, 2004)
    ----------When I first watched this, it was decent. Once I delved into some reviews and analysis' I watched it again and fell in love with it. The story follows two brothers who live with their dad out in the southern forests. Their mysterious uncle comes around and suddenly a game of cat-and-mouse begins. The tone of the film stays consistent and I think that that is it's strongest point along with great performances by Jamie Bell and Josh Lucas. (8 / 10)

    355. Antikörper / Antibodies (Alvart, 2005)
    ----------Antibodies is a film that follows closely in the footsteps of
    The Silence of the Lambs. Our protagonist is a village cop and the antagonist is a serial killer whose finally been caught. The cinematography was good and the acting was average. The basic story-line is something that's been done plenty of times before but the sheer intensity that this takes it to puts Antibodies a little bit above the rest. (7.5 / 10)

    356. Cidade de Deus / City of God (Meirelles, 2002)
    ----------I've seen City of God countless times as it is my favorite film along with
    Once Upon a Time in America. It takes us through two decades in the lives of a handful of children / teenagers in the slums of Rio de Janerio. Most grow up to be hoods and murder and robbery isn't something uncommon in their lives. Our protagonist, Rocket, is an aspiring photographer and just so happens to be there as all of the violence breaks out. If you're okay with subtitles, be sure to check this one out. (10 / 10)

    357. Harold & Kumar Escape from Guantanamo Bay (Hurwitz, 2008)
    ----------The whole 'Escape' part only really lasts about five minutes. The rest of the film is basically slapstick comedy executed in an non-comedic way. (5 / 10)

    358. Shotgun Stories (Nichols, 2007)
    ----------I have been looking forward to seeing this one for quite some time. After falling in love with the trailer, I had to see it. There are two sets of step-brothers. Their father just died. One set knew him as a loving man and the other knew him as a violent, neglecting one. A feud erupts between them and their egos don't allow themselves to stop until irreversible damage has been caused. This movie had some of the most real characters I've ever seen portrayed and it was as if I were watching this unfold in real life. (8.5 / 10)

    359. My Bodyguard (Bill, 1980)
    -----------I rented this based off of Roger Ebert's shining review but found it to be just average in comparison to other tough-time-in-high-school films. The main kid is a rich boy who starts going to a public school. The bullys don't like this and pick on him. After getting pushed around he gets the tough-guy bodyguard and they become friends, but not after finding out a few secrets about each other. (6 / 10)

    360. Kicking and Screaming (Baumbach, 1995)
    ----------Unlike the 2005 comedy, this one is actually good. But it's not about a children's soccer team, but rather a group of friend who have just graduated from college and don't know what to do next. This has some of the most subtly humorous dialogue I've ever experienced and I couldn't help but laugh virtually the entire way through. The plot really isn't there, there's no character development or twists. This movie basically stands up on the dialogue and it's characters. The friendship that exists reminds me slightly of that of the
    American Pie trilogy. Great movie. Worthy of its Criterion stamp. (8 / 10)

    361. Schizopolis (Soderbergh, 1996)
    ----------What did I just watch? (?? / 10)

    362. Children of Men (Cuarón, 2006)
    ----------Featuring probably some of the best camera work and choreography in film in recent years, Children of Men was superb. To be able to shoot such busy scenes all in one shot takes a certain amount of skill. Watching the special features and commentary definitely gave me an idea of how much work went into this. Children of Men takes place about twenty years in the future where women are infertile and no one knows why. Immigrants are killed and the world is in chaos. An immigrant is found bearing a child and Theo (Clive Own) is in charge of getting her to safety. (8 / 10)

    363. The Chumscrubber (Posin, 2005)
    ----------Set in a 'Desperate Housewives' kind of neighborhood, shy-boy Dean, through a series of events, is in charge of getting drugs for the popular kids. With an all-star cast, The Chumscrubber is entertaining, dark, and comedic all at the same time. (7.5 / 10)

  • Week 29.

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Breathless  (1960)

    Casablanca  (1943)

    Cool Hand Luke  (1967)

    Vanishing Point  (1971)

    La haine  (1995)

    Battle Royale  (2001)

    Fat Girl  (2001)

    Phone Booth  (2003)

    The Breed  (2006)

    C.R.A.Z.Y.  (2005)

    The Dark Knight  (2008)

    Teeth  (2007)

    Son of Rambow  (2008)

    21  (2008)

    Death Proof  (2007)

    Heima  (2007)

    Since January 1st, 2008, I've been keeping track of all the films I've watched. Because I don't feel like taking the time to highlight each movie up until this point, I will start at the previous week, Week 29 and continue from now on.

     

    328. The Dark Knight (2008)

    -My second time seeing it. Such a great movie. Although not good enough to be considered 'best film of all time'.

     

    329. Teeth (2007)

    -The storyline attracted me to it. Within the first 20 minutes I wanted it to be done. I hated this thing so much.

     

    330. Heima (2007)

    -Such a beautiful documentary for such an amazing band; Sigur Ros. Check them out if you haven't yet.

     

    331. La Haine / Hate (1995)

    -One of the best French films I've seen. If there's one thing I'll remember about this movie years from now, it'll be the ending and how shocked I was after it was all said and done.

     

    332. À ma soeur! / Fat Girl (2001)

    -There was something sad in the way that the relationship between Anais and her older sister works out. I can't quite place my finger on it. The whole mood of the story is it's strongest part. Even a week after watching it, it still lingers with me.

     

    333. C.R.A.Z.Y. (2005)

    -I had heard much about this before but now finally got around to watching it. I enjoyed this quite a bit. It deals with real people and real family issues.

     

    334. Me and You and Everyone We Know (2005)

    - When I first saw this when it came out, I really liked it. After viewing it for a second time, I can't remember why. It's filled with unrealistic dialouge and characters I didn't care about.

     

    335. À bout de souffle / Breathless (1960)

    -What had been hailed to be the 'crown jewel' of the French New Wave was also the last thing I saw before I feel asleep on Thursday. I think I'm going to have to give this another try.

     

    336. Son of Rambow (2007)

    -After the rave reviews and catchy trailer, I had been looking forward to this. But after finally viewing it, I was left unfulfilled and wanting something more.

     

    337. Phone Booth (2003)

    -Are there plot holes? Sure. Is the story likely? Nah. I mainly watched this for mere entertainment and nothing more.

     

    338. Dazed and Confused (1993)

    -Immediately reminded me of American Graffiti except this took place in the 70's. I always fall for the movies that focus on how familar characters interact with one another. Although American Graffiti played this out much better, I thought this was pretty alright.

     

    339. Batoru rowaiaru / Battle Royale (2001)

    -Although the dialouge seemed kind of cheesy, I can look past that because this was one hell of a ride. A group of 9th. graders put on an island and ordered to kill each other. Man, if only America had the balls to put something like that out.

     

    340. Dazed and Confused (1993)

    -Yes, I watched it again.

     

    341. Cool Hand Luke (1960)

    -My dad told me I would like this film. I did more than like it. Although many of us have never worked on a chain gang, the theme and spirit that this movie has is something that we can all relate to.

     

    342. 21 (2008)

    -The only reason I watched this is so I could have an opinion about it when I hear kids talking about it in the hallways. I thought it was decent. Although it had many cliches, it was a little better than I expected it to be.

     

    343. Vanishing Point (1971)

    -One of the first movies from the 70's that I fell in love with. Probably one of the best road chase movies out there, it's easy to tell why Quentin Tarantino decided to use it as his inspiration for Death Proof.

    344. Casablanca (1942)

    -Classic, classic, classic. What else can I say?

     

    345. The Breed (2006)

    -Such a horrible movie. Don't ever watch it.

     


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go