Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love
""Yeah, but the book was better...""


Group Owners (1)

Description: Movies for people who like to read. Victorian novels, short stories, comic books, magazine articles! If it was adapted from a previously published work, it's fair game for discussion.
[more]

Advertisement
3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?
Note: you must join this group to add to this discussion.
Sort discussion:

seely
seely
Posts 402

3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



I was a little surprised not to see a thread on this here, but I have to say, I think the latest adaptation of 3:10 to Yuma could be one of the best paper-to-film adaptations, ever.  Every role seemed flawlessly cast (and I don't even really like Russell Crowe), and the dialogue was delivered beautifully and accurately. 

Now, granted 3:10 is a short story, so therefore I think it naturally works better for a 2hrs adaptation than say, 400 pages of Lord of the Rings , which I feel were excellent given their constraints--but definately strayed from the original story in more places than one and sometimes lacked what I felt when I read the original books.  I'm not sure quite what it was about 3:10, but it just seemed flawless.  I felt as though I were re-reading the story and picturing the scenes in my mind, and not sitting in a theatre watching it on a big screen.  Brilliant.  Anyone care to agree/disagree?  Curious to see what others have to say...



     
Under discussion:

3:10 to Yuma  (2007)

            
TheWorkingDead
TheWorkingDead
Posts 273

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



seely:

I was a little surprised not to see a thread on this here, but I have to say, I think the latest adaptation of 3:10 to Yuma could be one of the best paper-to-film adaptations, ever.  Every role seemed flawlessly cast (and I don't even really like Russell Crowe), and the dialogue was delivered beautifully and accurately. 

Now, granted 3:10 is a short story, so therefore I think it naturally works better for a 2hrs adaptation than say, 400 pages of Lord of the Rings , which I feel were excellent given their constraints--but definately strayed from the original story in more places than one and sometimes lacked what I felt when I read the original books.  I'm not sure quite what it was about 3:10, but it just seemed flawless.  I felt as though I were re-reading the story and picturing the scenes in my mind, and not sitting in a theatre watching it on a big screen.  Brilliant.  Anyone care to agree/disagree?  Curious to see what others have to say...

 

I haven't yet seen 3:10, and I have to admit I wasn't even aware that it was a short story first. But you've really piqued my interest, so I'm going to make a concerted effort to see this one, and because I'm like this, I'll probably hunt down the original story, too.

Welcome to the group!



     
Under discussion:

3:10 to Yuma  (2007)

            
seely
seely
Posts 402

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



Definately worth making the effort to see it... I've seen it four or five times now and even saw it twice in the theatre--something I NEVER do (mostly because I'm poor), but I just enjoyed it that much.  I'd read the story first, perhaps... its pretty short and a good read.

 

TheWorkingDead:

I haven't yet seen 3:10, and I have to admit I wasn't even aware that it was a short story first. But you've really piqued my interest, so I'm going to make a concerted effort to see this one, and because I'm like this, I'll probably hunt down the original story, too.

Welcome to the group!



     

            
TheWorkingDead
TheWorkingDead
Posts 273

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



seely:

Definately worth making the effort to see it... I've seen it four or five times now and even saw it twice in the theatre--something I NEVER do (mostly because I'm poor), but I just enjoyed it that much.  I'd read the story first, perhaps... its pretty short and a good read.

TheWorkingDead:

I haven't yet seen 3:10, and I have to admit I wasn't even aware that it was a short story first. But you've really piqued my interest, so I'm going to make a concerted effort to see this one, and because I'm like this, I'll probably hunt down the original story, too.

Welcome to the group!

Strangely enough, when a movie based on a book comes out, and I have interest in reading the book, I usually try to watch the movie first. It's something I've been doing over the last few years. If I read a book and love it, then go see the movie, chances are I'll dislike the movie, or at least compare it unfavorably to the book. But if I see the movie, I'll have a blank slate to write my opinion on, and then I have the sure-to-be-superior book to look forward to.



     

            
seely
seely
Posts 402

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



Thats a good point--now that I think about it, its also a lot less time commitment to view a movie than it is to read a book.  I probably spent 6hrs on each LOTR book, but the movies are only 3hrs-ish.  Hmm, maybe a good way to screen my reading :-D

 

TheWorkingDead:

seely:

Definately worth making the effort to see it... I've seen it four or five times now and even saw it twice in the theatre--something I NEVER do (mostly because I'm poor), but I just enjoyed it that much.  I'd read the story first, perhaps... its pretty short and a good read.

TheWorkingDead:

I haven't yet seen 3:10, and I have to admit I wasn't even aware that it was a short story first. But you've really piqued my interest, so I'm going to make a concerted effort to see this one, and because I'm like this, I'll probably hunt down the original story, too.

Welcome to the group!

Strangely enough, when a movie based on a book comes out, and I have interest in reading the book, I usually try to watch the movie first. It's something I've been doing over the last few years. If I read a book and love it, then go see the movie, chances are I'll dislike the movie, or at least compare it unfavorably to the book. But if I see the movie, I'll have a blank slate to write my opinion on, and then I have the sure-to-be-superior book to look forward to.



     

            
Risselada
Risselada
Posts 2068

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



seely:
Thats a good point--now that I think about it, its also a lot less time commitment to view a movie than it is to read a book.  I probably spent 6hrs on each LOTR book, but the movies are only 3hrs-ish.  Hmm, maybe a good way to screen my reading :-D

Only 6 hours!!  Goodness!  I takes me like a couple months!



     

            
SkyPilot
SkyPilot
Posts 576

Re:3:10 to Yuma: Best adaptation ever?



Risselada:

seely:
Thats a good point--now that I think about it, its also a lot less time commitment to view a movie than it is to read a book.  I probably spent 6hrs on each LOTR book, but the movies are only 3hrs-ish.  Hmm, maybe a good way to screen my reading :-D

Only 6 hours!!  Goodness!  I takes me like a couple months!

No kidding!

But 3:10 to Yuma is very, very good. It really got me thinking, "What is worth  sacrificing for? What is worth dying for?" And I don't want to give any spoilers away to TheWorkingDead or anyone else, but the "cursed gun" theme is amazing.

Anyone here seen the original 3:10 to Yuma with Glenn Ford and Van Heflin?



     
Under discussion:

3:10 to Yuma  (1957)

3:10 to Yuma  (2007)

            
1-7 of 7
 
RSS