tadiv
Posts 101
|
11/25/2008 6:27 PM
posted awhile ago
Slumdog is a "Blockbuster"?
I don't want to alienate anyone or seem rude, but what justifies Slumdog Millionaire being in the "Blockbuster" section of the new (nice design, by the way) home page? Was it the amazing $360K it took in from 10 screens its opening weekend?
Don't get me wrong - I don't want to slam this film that I LOVE, but "Blockbuster"??? Oh, yea, the listing here on Spout reports release in 2009, but I'm pretty sure that that is out of date...
Somewhat sarcastically submitted,
Tom
|
|
seely
Posts 402
|
11/26/2008 9:37 AM
posted awhile ago
Re:Slumdog is a "Blockbuster"?
Hey no need to apologize. This forum exists so people can point out what we're doing wrong or need to do better :-) As far as Slumdog goes, I'm not 100% sure why it would be listed as a blockbuster, but I know we have been having some issues getting the right content to the right place on our site from our connection with AMG. Frankly, I don't understand how it works, but I'll definitely pass this along to someone who does! Thanks (and I'll pass along your compliments on the redesign to those responsible--always nice to hear something positive!).
 tadiv:
I don't want to alienate anyone or seem rude, but what justifies Slumdog Millionaire being in the "Blockbuster" section of the new (nice design, by the way) home page? Was it the amazing $360K it took in from 10 screens its opening weekend?
Don't get me wrong - I don't want to slam this film that I LOVE, but "Blockbuster"??? Oh, yea, the listing here on Spout reports release in 2009, but I'm pretty sure that that is out of date...
Somewhat sarcastically submitted,
Tom
|
|