
pippin06
Posts 578
|
1/22/2009 12:41 PM
posted awhile ago
Predictions and Commentary, 2009
NOMINEE LIST (taken from imdb because Oscar.com's printer friendly list is not that friendly)
Best Motion Picture of the Year
Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role
Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role
Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role
Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role
Best Achievement in Directing
Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published
Best Achievement in Cinematography
Best Achievement in Editing
Best Achievement in Art Direction
Best Achievement in Costume Design
Best Achievement in Makeup
Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score
Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Song
Best Achievement in Sound
Best Achievement in Sound Editing
Best Achievement in Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film of the Year
Best Foreign Language Film of the Year
Best Documentary, Features
Best Documentary, Short Subjects
Nominees:
The Witness from the Balcony of Room 306: Adam Pertofsky, Margaret Hyde
Best Short Film, Animated
Nominees:
La Maison en Petits Cubes: Kunio Kato
Best Short Film, Live Action
|
|
|

pippin06
Posts 578
|
1/22/2009 12:43 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
Hi all!
Welcome to this year's edition of Predictions and Commentary, with your hostess Pippin06 aka Kylie. Above is your official nomination list for this year's Academy Awards. What are your predictions? Snubs? Surprises? How do you like that appallingly large font? Here's the place to discuss it. When I'm not bound by the conventions of my day-job, I'll weigh in later myself. In the meantime, Happy Oscar season.
|
|
|

seely
Posts 402
|
1/22/2009 2:16 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
While I'm a little surprised, I'm actually not disappointed to see The Dark Knight being 'snubbed'. It was an exceptional film in the comic-book genre, but honestly I didn't think it was as good as the first, and despite its success and praise, I don't think it really change anyone's life or elevated the art of filmmaking in any way.
I think Heath Ledger is deserving for a nomination of best supporting actor, but beyond that the film just didn't do much more for me than say a Will Smith film would. I guess I just wasn't that impressed by the film.
|
|
|

pippin06
Posts 578
|
1/22/2009 3:03 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
Hi all:
The following titles I'm unable to find and add to the Nominations list in our group at this time because they are either not in Spout's database, or I can't find a suitable enough translation. If you know the translation of the foreign titles, please offer the English title or the link on Spout. Thanks!
The Final Inch Smile Pinki La Maison en Petits Cubes Oktapodi Presto (Pixar short) Manon sur le bitume Grisen Spielzeugland
|
|
|

JimBell
Posts 149
|
1/23/2009 5:48 AM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
Great idea to host an oxcars converstaion.
I'd like to set my parameters by asking three things:
First, why are we focusing on 2008? Well, because we have seen all the movies that went before and we wait anxiously for what is new. (Not true of me.)
Second, I have seen all the Oscar contenders, but how do I make up my mind? (Not true for me. This year for the first time, I actually tried to se all the oscr nomination, but our local cinema has carried maybe half.)
Third, who wins is crucial, n'est-ce pas? Actually, who wins is a pile of -- poliitic -- but who is nominted is a reasonable representation of outstanding movies last year. So once the nominations are announced, we say thankyou, and pay no more attention. Actually , we debate the nominees, but we don't care who actually "wins" as far as the academy is concerned, but only as far as we are concerned.
Dark Knight--I thought it was powerful, overwhelming.
Wall-E--the most over-rated movie of the year. Hackneyed plots, hackneyed themes, etc. It will win. This should not concern us. Rather, look to Bolt, a superb aninmation with a profound theme and lots of engrossing characters.
The Visitor--love and hate this film; great acting adn I love the Diredctor's work, but a subtle thme that does not withstand much scrutiny
Get Smart--hilarious; also an astute update of the old Get Smart; but who pays attention to comedy when there is a holocaust?
I thank the Academy for their nominations. I have added all films to my list. I do not care when I see them. I do not care who wins. Thanks.
|
|
|

pippin06
Posts 578
|
1/23/2009 8:55 AM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
JimBell:
Great idea to host an oxcars converstaion.
I'd like to set my parameters by asking three things:
First, why are we focusing on 2008? Well, because we have seen all the movies that went before and we wait anxiously for what is new. (Not true of me.)
Second, I have seen all the Oscar contenders, but how do I make up my mind? (Not true for me. This year for the first time, I actually tried to se all the oscr nomination, but our local cinema has carried maybe half.)
Third, who wins is crucial, n'est-ce pas? Actually, who wins is a pile of -- poliitic -- but who is nominted is a reasonable representation of outstanding movies last year. So once the nominations are announced, we say thankyou, and pay no more attention. Actually , we debate the nominees, but we don't care who actually "wins" as far as the academy is concerned, but only as far as we are concerned.
Dark Knight--I thought it was powerful, overwhelming.
Wall-E--the most over-rated movie of the year. Hackneyed plots, hackneyed themes, etc. It will win. This should not concern us. Rather, look to Bolt, a superb aninmation with a profound theme and lots of engrossing characters.
The Visitor--love and hate this film; great acting adn I love the Diredctor's work, but a subtle thme that does not withstand much scrutiny
Get Smart--hilarious; also an astute update of the old Get Smart; but who pays attention to comedy when there is a holocaust?
I thank the Academy for their nominations. I have added all films to my list. I do not care when I see them. I do not care who wins. Thanks.
I know probably much of this is rhetorical, but I can' t stop myself! That's what this thread is here for, after all :-).
Some people like the Oscars, as in the actual Oscars. And some people like to predict who wins because of the politics. This group has two purposes: to discuss the Oscars themselves (if you enjoy that sort of thing, which I do) and to discuss what is actually the Best, usually based on what you've seen, best of lists, etc. Either one is fair, even if you prefer one to the other because you find the other distasteful. So! Let's revisit this one, eh: who likes the Oscars hoopla and who doesn't?
First, this thread is devoted to 2008 because it is an annual thread. I've started a new one each year since I started the group, way back when in Spout's beta test. They focus on the broadcast of the year listed. Simple as that.
Second, you can make up your own mind on what you want. The Oscars are a load of tripe or a fun distraction. The movies they nominate are quality or not. The process they use is legitimate or seriously rigged. Whether you see all the movies or not... it depends on how you look at it, and all opinions are valid here. Some group members don't really care a whole whit for the Oscars themselves but are still game to discuss the films. All are welcome to this, the Oscar-lovers group.
Third, some people like to debate what will be nominated. I (and others, I hope) like to dissect the choices that eventually get chosen because, to me, the nominees will always be foregone conclusions. That's why I started to list other awards show nominees and winners, like the Critics' Choice and Golden Globes, which get the first stab at nominating films and pretty much form how Oscar's going to nominate, with the notable difference that the former two nominate a wider berth of films for more awards. Some people like to guess at what will be nominated and then react violently when their guesses are wrong. That's ok too. It's all open here. Some people just want to know what would be a good sampling of films to watch. Some people do actually care who wins, so they can react violently if they thought something else should win. That's why Oscar hoopla is so fertile for conversation.
So, taking the films Jim highlighted because he liked or disliked them vis-a-vis what was nominated or not (and here's some of my commentary; more to follow later).
--Everyone's up in arms that The Dark Knight got snubbed. I'm here to tell you, devotees, that it never had a chance at being nominated for Best Picture. I like-loved The Dark Knight myself, but when was the last time you saw a comic-book movie or action-adventure movie get nominated for the top category? I mean, it happens, like, every 25 years, and the last time we saw something close was Lord of the Rings. The critics and the Hollywood Foreign Press nominate more films, but the film didn't win their top honors, and if they were restricted to five films for any category, combining comedy and drama, I would venture to guess that Batman wouldn't have been up for them either. Now, if Heath Ledger wasn't nominated, that would have been the true snub. But he was nominated. None of the five nominated Best Pictures were surprises. And they are all dramas with various degrees of edgyness or progressiveness, which is what Oscar has always nominated and will continue to nominate until they revise the rules. That's why some people don't like Oscar. They're predictable - though not always when it comes to the winners. Hence the predictions thread. Feel free to start making any for those who like to do it. Now, who wants to lambast the Academy for this decision because The Dark Knight was the.best.film.ever. Come on, you know you want to :-).
--Wall-E: Jim thinks it's overrated because it's generally "hackneyed" in the story department. I think it's a masterpiece of technical achievement (and revisited plot themes/devices or no, they work in this film). So, too, does Oscar. It's a shooin for the Animated Feature award, which focuses on the combination of story and visual presentation; there was an outsider's chance that it would have been nominated for Best Picture, but, again, not a drama, and it's a fancy cartoon. Not every film is going to please everyone, but I haven't met many who've disliked this one, and the Academy doesn't exactly pull for the minority. Just sayin'.
--I haven't seen Get Smart. I want to. But, since I've heard widely mixed reviews from just people I know, since I haven't seen it on any "best of the year" lists, and since it's at 53% on Rotten Tomatoes (which is considered rotten, by the way), I'm going to propose that maybe you should cut the Academy a break on this one, Jim. It's not everyone's cup of tea, comedy or no. Now, for me personally, because of my undying love for Steve Carell, I'm still going to see it. Who wants to talk about this one? It's way down on my Netflix queue; anyone want to talk me out of seeing it?
Anyone else care to comment? This is the place to do it!
|
|
|

seely
Posts 402
|
1/23/2009 10:02 AM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
JimBell:
Dark Knight--I thought it was powerful, overwhelming.
Wall-E--the most over-rated movie of the year. Hackneyed plots, hackneyed themes, etc. It will win. This should not concern us. Rather, look to Bolt, a superb aninmation with a profound theme and lots of engrossing characters.
The Visitor--love and hate this film; great acting adn I love the Diredctor's work, but a subtle thme that does not withstand much scrutiny
Get Smart--hilarious; also an astute update of the old Get Smart; but who pays attention to comedy when there is a holocaust?
I thank the Academy for their nominations. I have added all films to my list. I do not care when I see them. I do not care who wins. Thanks.
I completely agree on Wall-E... I saw it, enjoyed it, but did not think it was the profound ground-breaking landmark everyone seemed to think it was. The plot was good, and one I resonate with, but all the same it was used and tired. I honestly think the public confused "cute film" with "landmark film" and were amazed at their own ability to enjoy a film with a nearly mute main character. I also think the enamoration had something to do with the robot lead--something that was heavily en vogue in the mid-eighties into the early nineties, but hasn't been seen much since.
However, I need to disagree on The Dark Knight. I posted about it over in Top 5 Most Overrated Films but I think I need to say it again. Its a comic-book movie, and a good one at that, but still a comic book movie. The dialogue through out the film was nothing short of pallid and predicatble, Christian Bale was entirely forgettable, Maggie Gyllenhaal is neither attractive or a capable actress, and Heath Ledger's outstand performance and interpretation of the maniacal Joker completely stole the show--however, one good performance does not make an award-winning film. Give Ledger the Best Supporting Actor award, but let's stop the Dark Knight at that.
Get Smart I also found a bit tedious. I watched the original series religiously after school as a kid and can to this day recall some of the funnier bits. I was very disappointed with Carrell's performance, which I am going to attribute to the director as Carrell is capable of no wrong in my eyes. The movie started out pretty good and reasonably funny, but became more and more tedious and too serious for a slapstick spy comedy. Carrell didn't 'bungle' enough. Thankfully, I got to look at Anne Hathaway for an hour and a half.
|
|
|

pippin06
Posts 578
|
2/13/2009 1:37 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
Here are my predictions for this year. PS, if you pay attention, the British equivalent of the Oscars, the BAFTAs were held recently. They don't really affect American outcomes, but there is a lot of overlap this year, which is interesting.
Best Motion Picture of the Year
Best Performance by an Actor in a Leading Role
Nominees:
Mickey Rourke for The Wrestler (2008)
COMMENTARY: The award is between Sean Penn and Mickey Rourke. I'm going with Penn this year because he's won a majority of previous Best Actor awards, and even though he's already won once, he would be winning for a very PC-progressive character the Oscars can champion as "see, we're not homophobic, and we want to make up for Brokeback Mountain." Also, Mickey is controversial. Now, they may go controversial, but I think Harvey Milk is controversial enough. Plus, it's a character that's very against Penn's type.
Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role
Nominees:
X Kate Winslet for The Reader (2008)
COMMENTARY: This is a tough category to call this year! It's been split three ways from Sunday as far as the winners, but I think the story everyone wants to hear is how poor Kate finally wins one after years of nominations without winning (the new Susan Sarandon, see). And Meryl's already won twice, and she's been nominated 1 million times, and she'll be nominated again, and she'll probably win again at some point. Kate Hepburn won four times, after all. Also, The Reader has been a generally better reviewed picture than Doubt, though both performances are held to be powerful. Also, Kate has already won for this movie previously (though for Supporting Actress). We'll see what happens...
Best Performance by an Actor in a Supporting Role
Nominees:
Michael Shannon for Revolutionary Road (2008)
COMMENTARY: Please. This is a shoo-in, a foregone conclusion. Not only is it, in fact, the best supporting performance of the year, winning all previous awards, but it's a posthumous acknowledgement for a beloved actor.
Best Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role
Nominees:
Marisa Tomei for The Wrestler (2008)
COMMENTARY: Also a tough category to call this year. Nominating Amy Adams for Doubt was a complete surprise (she was generally held to be one of the worst parts of the film). Penelope could get it, even though she's been nominated without a win up until this point as could Viola (the likelier of the Doubt noms). Marisa's already won for My Cousin Vinny (shudder). I think Taraji's performance was charming. Will it win? Probably not, but she squeaked in there, so maybe the Academy wants to give Benjamin Button something! Maybe I just want her to win. So there.
Best Achievement in Directing
Nominees:
Gus Van Sant for Milk (2008)
COMMENTARY: Also a shoo-in. He won the Director's Guild's best of the year award and every other award too. The Academy will not split Picture and Director this year.
Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen
Nominees:
WALL·E (2008): Andrew Stanton, Pete Docter, Jim Reardon
COMMENTARY: Tough call and just a guess. This category has been kinder to comedies, and the praise for this film has generally been high, but really, it could go to any of them, with the possible exception of WALL-E.
Best Writing, Screenplay Based on Material Previously Produced or Published
Best Achievement in Cinematography
Nominees:
Slumdog Millionaire (2008): Anthony Dod Mantle
COMMENTARY: I think Benjamin Button is going to get a lot of technical awards. Cinematography favors best picture candidates (though not always). That eliminates The Dark Knight and The Changeling. Seriously, though, Benjamin Button was technically astounding, and David Fincher's team's use of the camera was quite poetic in this film.
Best Achievement in Editing
Nominees:
X Slumdog Millionaire (2008): Chris Dickens
COMMENTARY: Editing and Picture usually go hand in hand, but Benjamin could break the rule. The Dark Knight SHOULD NOT get it. That thing was not edited so great.
Best Achievement in Art Direction
Best Achievement in Costume Design
Nominees:
Revolutionary Road (2008): Albert Wolsky
COMMENTARY: This category favors period dramas. They're all period dramas. So, I'm just thinking about the diversity of Benjamin. I think The Duchess could get this one too. See also: Marie Antoinette.
Best Achievement in Makeup
Nominees:
Hellboy II: The Golden Army (2008): Mike Elizalde, Thomas Floutz
COMMENTARY: Two words. Brad. Pitt. This is a hard category to call this year, but with 14 noms (the most nominations) and no likely love on the top category fronts, I'm favoring Ben. The make-up involved a lot of aging effects too, whereas Batman had just the creepy Joke, and Hellboy was, well, Hellboy.
Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Score
Best Achievement in Music Written for Motion Pictures, Original Song
Nominees:
X WALL·E (2008): Peter Gabriel, Thomas Newman("Down to Earth")
COMMENTARY: Snub alert! Bruce Springsteen not being nominated for his contribution to The Wrestler is a head-scratching oversight when it's taken all previous awards. Maybe one of Slumdog's two will win, but Oscar hates splitting the different most times, so I think WALL-E might have some leverage here.
Best Achievement in Sound
Nominees:
Wanted (2008): Chris Jenkins, Frank A. Montaño, Petr Forejt
COMMENTARY: While the rule has not held as true in recent years, the Sound awards favor films with big battles. Benjamin has one, and Wanted is probably lots of gun fire, but I think The Dark Knight has as likely shot as any at this one.
Best Achievement in Sound Editing
Best Achievement in Visual Effects
Best Animated Feature Film of the Year
Nominees:
X WALL·E (2008): Andrew Stanton
COMMENTARY: Whether you like the story or not, WALL-E achieves new heights in animation, and that's what this award is about. It's certified fresh among critics on Rotten Tomatoes, it's about a robot, and it's deftly poetic as much as it heavily didactic. Shoo-in.
Best Foreign Language Film of the Year
Nominees:
X Vals Im Bashir (2008)(Israel)
COMMENTARY: It's got some momentum from previous awards shows, but Foreign Language film is always a toss-up category.
Best Documentary, Features
Best Documentary, Short Subjects
Nominees:
The Witness from the Balcony of Room 306: Adam Pertofsky, Margaret Hyde
COMMENTARY: Ah, the short subjects awards. Or, as I like to call them, my shot in the dark awards. Because that's what my prediction is. I have no good reason for picking any of them. So don't listen to me here, k?
Best Short Film, Animated
Nominees:
La Maison en Petits Cubes: Kunio Kato
Best Short Film, Live Action
Nominees:
Spielzeugland (2007): Jochen Alexander Freydank
COMMENTARY: See above
Remember - the broadcast is February 22 on ABC! The host, unfortunately, is Hugh Jackman. So, the awards show itself might be the biggest joke of all this year. Oh well, there's always the fashion.
|
|
|

rjsprague
Posts 407
|
2/13/2009 3:11 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
Vals Im Bashir = Waltz with Bashir
|
|
|

rjsprague
Posts 407
|
2/13/2009 3:37 PM
posted awhile ago
Re:Predictions and Commentary, 2009
The Final Inch Smile Pinki La Maison en Petits Cubes Oktapodi Presto (Pixar short) Manon sur le bitume (Manon on the Asphalt) Grisen (The Pig) Spielzeugland (Toyland)
|
|
|