7/15/2008 8:24 AM
posted awhile ago
Re: AFI's 100 Funniest - Comedy and the Oscars (a List in Progress)
I thought I'd revive this discussion, even though I am the only one who seems to have been having it. I just watched Some Like It Hot again (for the second time), and I'm still baffled as to why this gets top honors on AFI's Funniest List when it fails to make me laugh. I sort of chuckle at Jack Lemmon, but it's not the roll-on-the-ground-clutching-your-sides-type-funny you would expect it to be for such a high ranking, at least not to me (but I know I'm not the only one who feels this way). Which makes me wonder if I've even got it right. Is my sense of humor out of wack? Or do I not appreciate the finest sensibilities of art versus comedy? Can't comedy be an art form? If comedy can be artsy, does the artsy quality detract from the funny? What's the perfect balance? And is there a film that strikes it - and if that film is Some Like It Hot, let's talk about why.
A SpoutBlogger raised a similar question here: http://www.spout.com/blogs/spoutblog/archive/2008/1/3/23470.aspx
Talking about filims such as Superbad and Juno, successful comedies of 2007, versus arguably classier fare (nevermind that Juno was nominated for Best Picture, but the point is made).
And one of the commenters provided an indepedent film society's annual ranking of what they consider to be the funniest films:
http://www.chlotrudis.org/favorite/funny.html
Here, Some Like It Hot is rated #4, while Monty Python and the Holy Grail, a film I personally find gutbustingly hilarious is #1 (and that film never even made the AFI list!).
How does comedy get measured? What criteria go into deciding what constitutes a funny film (and the funniest of all, no less)? I compiled that Premiere magazine list in 2006 (pop culture mag yes, but a good gauge of non-hoity toity institutions like the comedy-snubbing Academy or the AFI), which didn't even bother to rank their list of 50 funny films. Maybe that's the way to go.
So how do we do it? How can this classification be anything but suggestive? Is it a matter of classifying the craft of comedy versus the response of whether or not the film makes you laugh?
I invite the group to discuss this. What do you think?
|