Sundancehttp://www.spout.com/groups/Sundance/532/discussions.aspxen-USSpout RSSRe:10 Worst Sundance Sensations?http://www.spout.com/groups/Sundance/Re_10_Worst_Sundance_Sensations/532/39568/1/ShowPost.aspxThu, 15 Jan 2009 19:46:46 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:39568SkyPilot1<p>I'm torn on <a href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/01/13/10-worst-sundance-sensations/">what Chris says about <em>The Blair Witch Project</em></a>. On the one hand, calling something "easy to do" isn't necessarily a criticism. Rock doesn't get much easier to play than <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wx-8_GI4d2c">"Louie, Louie"</a>, but it's still kicks the sh*t out of most rock songs.</p> <p>On the other hand, my friend Kevin Buist (<a href="http://www.spout.com/members/5471/default.aspx">porcupine</a>) has claimed he's seen a student-created, 10-minute version of <em>Blair Witch</em> that mopped the floor with the original. What do you have to say about that, porcupine?</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>10 Worst Sundance Sensations?http://www.spout.com/groups/Sundance/10_Worst_Sundance_Sensations/532/39566/1/ShowPost.aspxThu, 15 Jan 2009 19:34:28 GMTcdd0f780-13db-4d93-b0f4-ada579d02ae7:39566SkyPilot1<p>Reading Chris Campbell's <a href="http://blog.spout.com/2009/01/13/10-worst-sundance-sensations/">10 Worst Sundance Sensations</a> is sort of like listening to someone bash your old friends. My affection for some of these films makes it hard to say whether I agree with any of his picks, which include <em><a title="Napoleon Dynamite (2004)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/Napoleon_Dynamite/239684/default.aspx">Napoleon Dynamite</a></em>, <em><a title="Garden State (2004)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/Garden_State/239794/default.aspx">Garden State</a></em>, and <a href="http://www.spout.com/films/Brick/256853/default.aspx"><em>Brick</em></a>.</p> <p>I can't argue with someone who says <em>Napoleon Dynamite</em> isn't funny, but I will argue with Chris when he says "<em>Napoleon Dynamite</em> is not comedy. It is merely quirky, which is not the same thing as funny." I don't mean to sound like a philosophy undergrad, but you asked for it, Chris: what <em>is</em> "funny"?</p> <p>He made me smile when he called <em>Garden State</em> a "homecoming of age" movie that spawned a hundred like it. Get this, though: "Any idiot can write a script of this type and fill it with quirky scenery and an obnoxious yet adorable love interest." Obviously Chris knows a lot of talented idiots.</p> <p>I appreciated his writing about <em>Brick</em>, especially the part where he says "Who wouldn't rather watch a double feature of <em><a title="The Big Sleep (1946)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/The_Big_Sleep/3229/default.aspx">The Big Sleep</a></em> and <em><a title="Heathers (1989)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/Heathers/15028/default.aspx">Heathers</a></em>?" Then I thought, 'I liked <em>Brick</em>. I thought it was gritty and exciting. How is Chris changing my mind when he's not even explaining why the movie is bad?'</p> <p>But maybe Chris's oldest selections are a good indicator of his judgment? I haven't seen <a title="Boxing Helena (1993)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/Boxing_Helena/82158/default.aspx"><em>Boxing Helena</em></a> (1993) or <a title="The Brothers McMullen (1995)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/The_Brothers_McMullen/91023/default.aspx"><em>The Brothers McMullen</em></a><em></em> (1995), and I didn't even know Ed Burns was a writer/director! One of my coworkers just told me Burns was a really 'in vogue' filmmaker for a while.</p> <p>What do you guys think, are Jared Hess (<em>Napoleon Dynamite</em>, <em><a title="Nacho Libre (2006)" href="http://www.spout.com/films/Nacho_Libre/269340/default.aspx">Nacho Libre</a></em>), Rian Johnson (<em>Brick</em>, <em><a href="http://www.spout.com/films/The_Brothers_Bloom/295015/default.aspx">The Brothers Bloom</a></em>), and Zack Braff along the same lines? In another ten years, will people be saying, "I didn't know Zack Braff was a writer/director!"</p>