Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love
The Mouse on the Moon
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement
Directed by Richard Lester
From Richard Lester, the director of 1980's Superman II and the 1964 A Hard Day's Night, comes this less-successful sequel to the The Mouse that Roared. The Prime Minister of the Duchy of Grand Fenwick (Ron Moody) is in a bind because he has no money to renovate his castle and there is a serious problem with his small country's main export, wine. The stuff tends to explode. So the Prime Minister asks the U.S. for aid to develop space research, knowing full well they are not going to give him money to remodel his castle. Once the U.S. grants a cool million to the country, Russia adds in a used rocket, and things start popping. Like it or not, the Duchy is suddenly involved in space research and contributing to the madness is the discovery that its unique wine makes good rocket fuel. ~ Eleanor Mannikka, All Movie Guide
[More]
 
All Movie Guide Logo
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
A very disappointing sequel, The Mouse on the Moon is not improved by the passage of time. In 1963, not only was the precursor, The Mouse That Roared, still fresh in the public's mind, but the whole space race that is being satirized herein was on everyone's minds. Now that it is not so au courant, parts of Moon will seem rather rather foreign to modern audiences. This would be less of a problem if the rest of Moon were better, but it largely is not. Somehow, the wit and charm of Leonard Wibberley's novel are totally missing, despite a surface similarity between the film and the book; but the film lacks heart and soul, and even worse, humor. There are plenty of attempts at humor, but they almost all fall flat. True, when Margaret Rutherford is around, a few laughs are bound to bubble forth; but Rutherford, despite being top billed, is not around nearly enough. Instead, Ron Moody is given far too much time, and instructed to go far too far during that excess of time. Bernard Cribbens similarly overacts to a shameful degree, and if David Kosoff is better, he's still not good. Terry-Thomas is the same as usual, which is either a good thing or a bad thing, depending on one's feelings about the actor. Richard Lester's direction is scattershot. It has movement and kineticism, but manages to lack energy and rhythm. It also far too often kills the jokes it is trying to set up. Lester would do much better work in other films, sometimes reaching brilliant comic highs. Suffice it to say that this is very much not the case here. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
haven't rated it
most people
Most people
lost interest.

Other opinions

aidanbrack
aidanbrack
loved it.
vanbto8
vanbto8
is not interested.