Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

A Time to Kill
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $9.81
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Joel Schumacher.
Carl Lee Hailey (Samuel L. Jackson) takes the law into his own hands after the legal system fails to adequately punish the men who brutally raped and beat his daughter, leaving her for dead. Normally, a distraught father could count on some judicial sympathy in those circumstances. Unfortunately, Carl and his daughter are black, and the assailants are white, and all the events take place in the South. Indeed, so inflammatory is the situation, that the local KKK (led by Kiefer Sutherland) becomes popular again. When Hailey chooses novice lawyer Jake Brigance (Matthew McConaughey) to handle his defense, it begins to look like a certainty that Carl will hang, and Jake's career (and perhaps his life) will come to a premature end. Despite the efforts of the NAACP and local black leaders to persuade Carl to choose some of their high-powered legal help, he remains loyal to Jake, who had helped his brother with a legal problem before the story begins. Jake eventually takes this case seriously enough to seek help from his old law-school professor (Donald Sutherland). When death threats force his family to leave town, Jake even accepts the help of pushy young know-it-all lawyer Ellen Roark (Sandra Bullock). ~ Clarke Fountain, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

pippin06pippin06 Re: Total Film's Greatest Direc ...
by pippin06 in Directors
loved it.
"Schumacher also directed A Time to Kill, and that's a decent film. It's not artsy, or anything, but it's pretty true to the Grisham book it's based on, if you go in for that sort of thing. Again, he's not universally bad, though I don't know as I'd call him apple to Shyamalan's apple. They are two different directors with their own individual set of faults, I think, though I vastly prefer Shyamalan to Schumacher (and Batman and Robin is a very good reason why). " [More]
pippin06pippin06 Re: Books that never should hav ...
by pippin06 in CinLit
loved it.
"Actually, the original Grinch is really the book on screen. You'd watch the cartoon version, wouldn't you? Dr. Seuss endorsed it, after all.Of the Grisham fare, I would say that they have pretty much all been disappointing with the notable exception of A Time to Kill. Why they keep being made into movies is beyond my reckoning too. I stopped reading them after the Client.So, you're a Tolkien purist, eh? The Lord of the Rings novels are my absolute favorite in the history of all books, but I thought the movies were wonderful. I see them as two experiences. Reading the Tolkien is totally different because you get his writing style, his affection for the hobbits, all of the great songs and poems, and if you have the nice illustrated edition like me, those awesome drawings and pictures. Viewing the Peter Jackson movies are equally as enriching. Yes, there were divergences from the books, but as translations to film go, they're some of the best I've seen. M ... " [More]
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
are neutral about it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

pippin06
pippin06
loved it.
littlemole
littlemole
loved it.
slonroberta
slonroberta
loved it.
sohamahos
sohamahos
is not interested.
rica5tully
rica5tully
is not interested.
FastBoat710
FastBoat710
is not interested.