Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
We Were Strangers
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement
Directed by John Huston.
Set in the Cuba of 1933, We Were Strangers stars John Garfield as revolutionary-minded Tony Fenner. A member of an underground movement dedicated to toppling the despotic Machado regime, Tony supervises the booby-trapping of a cemetery where several top Cuban officials are planning to converge for a state funeral. Also involved in the assassination scheme is China Valdes (Jennifer Jones), whose brother had been executed by the government. As often happens in a John Huston film, the best-laid schemes of the protagonists go tragically awry. Based on a portion of Robert Sylvester's novel Rough Sketch, We Were Strangers was scripted by frequent Huston collaborator Peter Viertel. The film has the curious distinction of being lambasted by both the left-wing and right-wing critics in the U.S. Audiences were likewise underwhelmed, compelling Columbia Pictures to withdraw the film from distribution early on. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Be the first to review this movie!

Write a review

Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
lost interest.
We Were Strangers is a largely ignored John Huston effort which never quite comes together but will be of interest to fans of the director. Part of the problem lies with a script that feels as if it were rewritten to accommodate a studio concerned about insulting anyone. While it is clear that the sympathies lie with the rebels (and even with their willingness to resort to violence that will take innocent lives), everything feels a little too generic. The central romance also seems grafted on, even though it occupies a huge role in the film. This is not helped by the lack of chemistry between John Garfield and Jennifer Jones. Individually, Garfield and Jones are more than adequate, but less than inspired; there's a lot of huffing and puffing from both of them, but it never seems quite real. By contrast, Gilbert Roland comes across as the genuine article, someone who seems to have the revolutionary blood coursing through his every vein. Pedro Armendáriz also impresses, turning in a powerful performance in a role that is fairly two-dimensional. As for the direction, Huston's work is polished and efficient, but lacking in fervor. He just doesn't seem to have his heart in it. The result is a more than respectable film with some thrilling moments that just doesn't come together in the way that it should. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
haven't rated it
most people
Most people
haven't rated it

Other opinions