Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

The Tingler
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $6.72
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by William Castle.
As famous for the gimmick with which the film was shown as for its genuinely spine-tingling story, The Tingler follows a pathologist (Vincent Price) as he searches for the cause of a series of deaths and discovers that the victims have a large insect-like creature growing on their spinal chords. The creature attacks when the people are frightened and is only killed when the host emits a blood-curdling primal scream. This is coupled with a subplot to scare the deaf-mute owner of a silent movie house to death. Along the way, a couple of characters are injected with LSD and begin hallucinating like mad. When one of the nasty monsters "escaped" into a movie theater, the film's gimmick would begin. In order to further frighten audiences, director William Castle had certain theater seats rigged with small Army surplus devices that would deliver a mild electric shock to the spine in hopes of inducing terrified screams. Castle also planted audience members who would scream and faint. The house lights would go up, the film would stop and ushers would carry the unconscious person out of the theater. ~ Perry Seibert, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

KarinaKarina In Defense of The M-Word as Off ...
by Karina in Karina on SpoutBlog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Here’s an excerpt from a comment by Variety writer Peter Debruge, left on a SXSW dispatch by Aaron Hillis on Glenn Kenny’s blog: Pretty soon, it all reduces to semantics, but the label benefits those it describes in that it connects films that, on an individual basis, would be too small to register on most people’s radar. Would Hannah Takes the Stairs or Quiet City or Mutual Appreciation have warranted a NY Times piece on their own? (Then again, is the NYT even the right forum to discuss such films, which seem to do just fine with the more selective audience of the blogosphere?) Debruge is here giving us an object lesson in why most applications of The M Word are really, really frustrating: the genre label becomes a polite form of thinly masking the condescending assumption that none of these films can stand on their own without it. Mutual Appreciation is not a film that needs a movement as a prerequisite, especially one which mostly coalesced after its premiere. As resolutely anal ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog In Defense of The M-Word as Off ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Here’s an excerpt from a comment by Variety writer Peter Debruge, left on a SXSW dispatch by Aaron Hillis on Glenn Kenny’s blog: Pretty soon, it all reduces to semantics, but the label benefits those it describes in that it connects films that, on an individual basis, would be too small to register on most people’s radar. Would Hannah Takes the Stairs or Quiet City or Mutual Appreciation have warranted a NY Times piece on their own? (Then again, is the NYT even the right forum to discuss such films, which seem to do just fine with the more selective audience of the blogosphere?) Debruge is here giving us an object lesson in why most applications of The M Word are really, really frustrating: the genre label becomes a polite form of thinly masking the condescending assumption that none of these films can stand on their own without it. Mutual Appreciation is not a film that needs a movement as a prerequisite, especially one which mostly coalesced after its premiere. As resolutely anal ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: They Creep Up On You...
by Risselada in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"The Tingler is being remade as wellhttp://www.imdb.com/title/ tt0935085/ " [More]
divinemsjunebugdivinemsjunebug Re: They Creep Up On You...
by divinemsjunebug in HORROR MOVIES 101
is neutral about it.
"Yes, Froggy, I saw The Tingler a long time ago when I was pretty young. It was a HUG centipede suppose to be brought on my people when they are afraid, that is what makes shivers go up your back. hee hee. I remember seeing it and then I got really paranoid that I actually had one in my spine, you know it looked like vertebrae, how would anyone know. It was a silly movie, but I LOVE Vincent Price, he made it good. The original FLY is pretty funny the ending always cracks me up in a sad sort of way. heeeellllpppp meeeeee (in a teeny little fly voice) The Fly Remake was pretty awesome but it was really gross I STILL cannot watch the arm wrestling scene...UGH. That just freaks me out. I can't remember about the medicine cabinet, did he have body parts that kept falling off? " [More]
FroggyBaBe15876FroggyBaBe15876 Re: They Creep Up On You...
by FroggyBaBe15876 in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"Ahhh. Well, even if he is the Love BUG, he's still a Volkswagon BEETLE. And beetles are bugs, damn it.On the flip-side, I was just wondering, whilst looking at posts on Spout and coming across this one again, The Tingler, I know, has Vincent Price. And Vincent Price is a bad-ass. But that is neither here nor there. I've never seen this one and is it really about a centipede dealy like the picture of the cover alludes to? Don't think I'm stupid! I'm just...lazy.Oh oh oh! And The Fly! The remake and the original! Being a youngster, I saw the remake first and then thought the original was a bit lame, but still creepy and scary. Does anyone know what Jeff Goldblum has in his medicine cabinet? Besides his fingernails and teeth? " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
So much has been made of The Tingler's gimmick -- theatre seats outfitted with tiny electro-shock devices -- that most people don't know that it's actually a pretty good horror movie. It's no classic like The Exorcist, but it's enjoyable, even at its cheesiest, and delivers more than its fair share of tense moments along the way. Without the interactive electro-shock gimmick, and experienced in one's living room rather than in a theatre, the climax simply doesn't work, but the basic, admittedly silly premise is interesting enough to make most viewers overlook this flaw. There's also some atmospheric lighting and camerawork that make an asset of the film's budgetary constraints, and an outrageous insertion of color into one sequence that's so ridiculous that one can't help but enjoy it. The script has its saggy expository moments, but these are relatively few, and the excitement of most of the set pieces makes the wait worthwhile. Most of all, Tingler has Vincent Price, more restrained than in many of his films, but clearly in control of the film. It's easy to make fun of Price -- and well justified -- but he had an undeniably unique presence, and it's the rare Price thriller that isn't buoyed by his participation. Tingler is a cheap, lowbrow horror flick, but it's professionally made and quite watchable. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

Puhnner
Puhnner
loved it.
Dr_Gor
Dr_Gor
loved it.
Phantasma-gore-ia
Phantasma-gore-ia
loved it.
QFLW
QFLW
disliked it.
halo1205
halo1205
is not interested.
Alonzoc23
Alonzoc23
is not interested.