Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

Crossfire
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $14.19

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Edward Dmytryk.
This drama was one of the first major-studio efforts to confront anti-Semitism (beating the Oscar-winning Gentleman's Agreement by several months), and it features a standout performance from Robert Ryan as a bigoted soldier on the run. Monty Montogomery (Ryan) is a violent and unstable soldier who, while out on a pass, goes on a drinking spree with three buddies, Floyd (Steve Brodie), Arthur (George A. Cooper), and Leroy (William Phipps). While boozing it up in a tavern, the four men meet Joseph Samuels (Sam Levene) and strumpet Ginny (Gloria Grahame)\, who invite the soldiers back to their apartment for a party. Monty, however, has a fierce hatred of Jews, and he later goes into a drunken rage in which he beats Joseph to death. Monty's friends can barely remember the incident through their liquor-shrouded memories, but they recall just enough to make themselves scarce when police detective Capt. Finlay (Robert Young) begins making the rounds looking for information on Joseph's murder. Sgt. Kelly (Robert Mitchum), a soldier who knows the four men, begins to suspect that something is up, and he works with his wife and Finlay to help ferret out the killer in his ranks, while Monty kills Floyd when he becomes convinced that he's going to talk to the authorities. While director Edward Dmytryk showed real bravery in bringing this story to the screen, it had greater repercussions than he might have expected; the film's controversial themes led to Dmytryk's denunciation by the House Un-American Activities Committee during the McCarthy-era investigations of the 1950s; luckily, unlike other filmmakers who suffered similar accusations by HUAC, Dmytryk continued to work steadily through the '50s and '60s. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

WindbreakerWindbreaker CROSSFIRE
by Windbreaker in Windbreaker!
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I'm plowing through the 2nd Warner Bros noir box, and I agree with JimBell that this is not noir. In fact, I agree with JB's overall comments too. Something interesting from the short featurette was that budgets in those days were basically 80% for lighting, sets, etc. and 20% with the cast. The director pulled his lighting expert aside and said he wanted to reverse the traditional budget and spend 80% with the cast. I think that's why we see such strong performances (except the flat Robert Mitchum, who appears bored throughout) and poor cinematography. Shadows weren't used expertly for effect, there just wasn't money to buy more bulbs!One other thing from the featurette. There was a comment that the director and producer didn't work together anymore after Crossfire because of their "involvement in the Communist witch hunt". I don't know the specific history of these 2 individuals, but I hate how noir commentaries on recent DVD releases ... " [More]
JimBellJimBell Re: What's your favorite noir?
by JimBell in Noir
liked it.
"Thanks very much, Sar, for your comments. I never realized until you said it that the characters in The Good German appeared flatter than they need have because they were so concerned about style that they "weren't playing off each other." Excellent observation. I don't have an answer, but it is tantilizing to ask why modern directors have such a tough time capturing classic film noir. That's a topic for another time, perhaps, but it reminds me of the ah-ha! moment I had a few years ago when I heard the Barney Kessel jazz quartet from 1957 and I realized that no one--and I mean no one--can duplicate that feel today. There was something about being a white, male, American, with a certian musical heritage in the mid-50s that resulted in something that we cannot duplicated today. BUT I hear very close approximations occasionally. Just watch the movie Good Night, and Good Luck and listen to Dianne Reeves and her group in the background. They've got the feel. But it is ... " [More]
JimBellJimBell Crossfire
by JimBell in JimBell Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Crossfire (1947) is a good movie, but it takes some tenacity to stay with it. In a sense, there are three plots in a row. Who murdered the Jewish man: We figure out who the murderer is before half way. Then the principal plot element is whether the innocent artist, Mitchell, will escape false accusation. Then when the police investigator figures out who the murderer is, the question becomes how to prove the murderer actually did it. Besides these three substantial plot shifts, the film may confuse or disappoint viewers who expect a classic film noir but get instead a film that has many elements of noir that do not try to coalesce into a film noir. The detective (Robert Young), instead of being outside the action and/or corrupt (as are traditional in noir), is central to the movie and an usual fact-oriented father figure. There is no femme fatale, although Gloria Graham appears as a gin-hall dance girl showing a flicker of interest in the good looking artist. There is no noir protag ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Edward Dmytryk's classic noir on anti-Semitism in the military was adapted from a Richard Brooks novel, The Brick Foxhole, whose actual subject was homophobia in the army, which RKO found too hot to handle at the time. Like many noirs, it's steeped in the malaise of returning GIs, still recovering from the trauma of war and trying to adapt to a changed world. Dmytryk evokes a miasma of angst with the noir vocabulary of looming shadows, oblique angles, and low-key lighting. Robert Young's professorial detective leads the investigation, which takes on a collective quality as Robert Mitchum's sergeant becomes involved, the film counterpointing their quiet sanity against the disorientation of the mustered-out soldiers and the raging paranoia of the murderer. Robert Ryan is most impressive as the latter, a matrix of festering resentments of which his anti-Semitism is only one. The residue of the original story remains in a slightly off-kilter scene, apparently detached from the narrative, in which a GI (George Cooper) discusses his alienation with a sympathetic stranger (Sam Levene). The first film to address the subject of anti-Semitism, it remains effective despite moments of preachiness. Test screenings of the film for Jewish audiences revealed their well-grounded concern that the association of such blatant pathology, as the murderer's with anti-Semitism, would allow viewers to ignore the far more commonplace and insidious forms of that prejudice. Due to the film's content, in October 1947, producer Adrian Scott and director Dmytryk were called to testify before HUAC and became the first two members of the famed Hollywood Ten, a group of producers, directors, and writers, including Ring Lardner Jr. and Dalton Trumbo, all of whom initially refused to testify against their colleagues, and were sentenced to prison terms. In return for an early release in 1950, Dmytryk identified former colleagues as Communists, and in 1951, named Scott, his friend, and the producer of his three best films, as a member of the Communist party. Scott never produced another film, while Dmytryk resumed his career, never to repeat the quality of his earlier work. ~ Michael Costello, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

ocvella
ocvella
loved it.
JimBell
JimBell
liked it.
Windbreaker
Windbreaker
liked it.
marincat
marincat
is not interested.