Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
London After Midnight
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement
Directed by Tod Browning
The most tantalizing of the "lost" Tod Browning films, London After Midnight has gained a near-legendary status in recent years, especially since so many critics of the 1930s considered the film as vastly superior to its 1935 remake, Mark of the Vampire. Clearly inspired by the stage version of Dracula, the story concerns a fog-ridden London neighborhood that seems to have become a breeding ground for vampires. Ever since the mysterious death of wealthy old Mr. Balfour, strange things have been happening, prompting Scotland Yard inspector Edmund Burke (Lon Chaney) to investigate. For a while, it looks as though Burke is as stymied as the local authorities, especially when heroine Lucy Balfour (Marceline Day) is confronted with the "living corpse" of her father. But it soon develops that both Burke and Lucy are working in concert, staging an elaborate hoax to trap her dad's murderer into a confession. It is giving nothing away at this late date to reveal that Burke and the mysterious, fang-toothed "vampire man" Mooney are one in the same; indeed, this plot revelation hardly took anyone by surprise in 1927. A shooting script for London After Midnight still exists, suggesting that, if anything, the much-maligned Mark of a Vampire (in which the main "detective" role was split between Lionel Barrymore and Bela Lugosi) was an improvement on the original. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[More]
A shame I'll never get to see t ...
by in DejaVecu Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I caught the recreation version of Browning's London After Midnight and it made me very sad that the only knwn version of the film was lost in a fire during the 1960s. This recreation, shown on AMC, is based on the script, production photos, and interviews with people who saw the film when it was released. (Seriously, how sad is that?)Even with this tragically incomplete version, I still have to rate Browning and Chaney's work quite highly. Let's face it, Chaney wa " [More]
More reviews ]
Re:Classic Horror
by in HORROR MOVIES 101
"[quote user="Risselada"] Gor, I was wondering if you've ever seen the old silent French film version of The Fall of the House of Usher. ... [/quote] I haven't seen that one yet but it certainly looks interesting and I have added it to my list. Thanks, Rizzo! I have a passion for the old silents and have several in my collection. One of the earliest I have is a 1918 German film called Eyes of the Mummy . While there " [More]
All Movie Guide Logo
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
It's possible to "view" London After Midnight, the most successful (in box-office terms) collaboration between director Tod Browning and actor Lon Chaney, in only one form, a "photographic reconstruction" by Rick Schmidlin, who was also responsible for the reconstruction of Erich Von Stroheim's legendary Greed. The difference here is that no motion picture elements still exist; the last known print was lost in a fire in the mid-1960s. Despite the loss of many hours of footage from Greed, the core action remains available on film. Schmidlin assembled stills and added a musical score by Robert Israel, using a shooting script to recreate the intertitles. It's a heroic effort, but the effect of the film is severely blunted by the lack of motion. Although Schmidlin does try to compensate for movement by panning across or zooming in on the stills, the story never really comes to life. It's missing not only the actors' movements but the sense of atmosphere that creative cinematography and production design can provide. Chaney's makeup as the vampire is as always fascinating, but because of the limitations of the plot, he isn't given much to do; he's more an apparition than a flesh-and-blood ghoul. This version, which premiered on Turner Classic Movies in 2002, clocks in at 48 min., considerably shorter than the film's original running time. ~ Tom Wiener, All Movie Guide
 

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
disliked it.
most people
Most people
lost interest.

Other opinions

DejaVecu
DejaVecu
liked it.
Dr_Gor
Dr_Gor
is neutral about it.
Hawkmage
Hawkmage
is neutral about it.
rik_tod
rik_tod
is not interested.