Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

A Child Is Waiting
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by John Cassavetes.
Produced by Stanley Kramer, A Child is Waiting is set in an institution for the mentally handicapped, with many actual residents playing supporting and bit roles. Doctor Burt Lancaster and instructor Judy Garland often find themselves at odds over teaching methods, with Garland preferring an intense one-on-one approach with her students. Bruce Ritchey, a non-developmentally challenged youth, plays the retarded son of Gena Rowlands and Steven Hill, whose intellectual and social progress becomes the focal point of the film. The most uplifting sequence in A Child is Waiting takes place during a play staged by the genuinely handicapped children for their parents; while director John Cassavetes gilds the lily with close-ups of the teary-eyed audience, the kids themselves are earnest, engaging, and totally devoid of self-pity. According to Stanley Kramer, Judy Garland left her best work in this film on the cutting room floor; whenever completing a scene in which she'd exercised professional restraint, she'd insist upon a retake, then resort to the sobbing and breast-beating that her fans had come to expect. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Be the first to review this movie!

Write a review

Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
Produced by Stanley Kramer, A Child Is Waiting is one of his trademark "social problem" pictures. Somewhat dated now, it still is a powerful look at mental illness among children, the best methods of reaching and teaching developmentally challenged individuals, and the role they should play in society. It is also the most mainstream of the films directed by John Cassavetes, and perhaps for this reason -- or perhaps due to the rumored offscreen disagreements between Cassavetes, Kramer, and Burt Lancaster -- it is somewhat uneven, veering close to soap opera and melodrama, and featuring a climax that, while undeniably powerful, also comes across as a bit manipulative. Lancaster and Judy Garland are quite good in traditional "opposites that come to an understanding" roles. Lancaster conveys both the "solid steel," unyielding aspects and underlying warmth of the character, and Garland's vulnerability and underlying unhappiness are used to great effect. Bruce Ritchey is extremely convincing and engaging as the child around whom most of the story revolves. The look of the film is fine, but it isn't distinctive; that would all change with Cassavetes' next directorial effort, Faces. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
haven't rated it
most people
Most people
lost interest.

Other opinions

brescio1
brescio1
liked it.
peasantgirl
peasantgirl
is neutral about it.
Hotarubi
Hotarubi
is neutral about it.
mikehedge
mikehedge
is not interested.
marincat
marincat
is not interested.