Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

Catch-22
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $6.72
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Mike Nichols.
Director Mike Nichols and writer-actor Buck Henry followed their enormous hit The Graduate (1967) with this timely adaptation of Joseph Heller's satiric antiwar novel. Haunted by the death of a young gunner, all-too-sane Capt. Yossarian (Alan Arkin) wants out of the rest of his WW II bombing missions, but publicity-obsessed commander Colonel Cathcart (Martin Balsam) and his yes man, Colonel Korn (Henry), keep raising the number of missions that Yossarian and his comrades are required to fly. After Doc Daneeka (Jack Gilford) tells Yossarian that he cannot declare him insane if Yossarian knows that it's insane to keep flying, Yossarian tries to play crazy by, among other things, showing up nude in front of despotic General Dreedle (Orson Welles). As all of Yossarian's initially even-keeled friends, such as Nately (Art Garfunkel) and Dobbs (Martin Sheen), genuinely lose their heads, and the troop's supplies are bartered away for profit by the ultra-entrepreneurial Milo Minderbinder (Jon Voight), Yossarian realizes that the whole system has lost it, and he can either play along or jump ship. Though not about Vietnam, Catch-22's ludicrous military machinations directly evoked its contemporary context in the Vietnam era. Cathcart and Dreedle care more about the appearance of power than about victory, and Milo cares for money above all, as the complex narrative structure of Yossarian's flashbacks renders the escalating events appropriately surreal. Confident that the combination of a hot director and a popular, culturally relevant novel would spell blockbuster, Paramount spent a great deal of money on Catch-22, but it wound up getting trumped by another 1970 antiwar farce: Robert Altman's MASH. With audiences opting for Altman's casual Korean War iconoclasm over Nichols' more polished symbolism, the highly anticipated Catch-22 flopped, although the New York Film Critics Circle did acknowledge Arkin and Nichols. Despite this reception, Catch-22's ensemble cast and pungent sensibility effectively underline the insanity of war, Vietnam and otherwise. ~ Lucia Bozzola, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

TheWorkingDeadTheWorkingDead They Got It Right
by TheWorkingDead in The Film Library
hasn't rated it.
"Until fairly recently, I've been known to have a knee-jerk, negative reaction to films based on books I love. Hell, even books I mildly dislike would usually rate better with me than the film version, and not always based on pure quality. A lot of that was snobbishness, a way to feel superior by telling myself the experience I had was better than the one most people in the theatre had. Of course, I've lightened up a bit, and now tend to go the other way. Where once a filmmaker changing a small detail from the book would get my ire up, I now hope for these deviations. In the end, I'll always have the book I read, and the movie should provide it's own unique experience.The movie that brought me to this way of thinking was actually the third Harry Potter movie, Prisoner of Azkaban. I'd seen the previous two, but part three was the first one I saw after reading the books. My girlfriend, and many of my friends who had read the books, disliked the movie because of how ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Catch-22
by Risselada in Risselada Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Catch-22Would I have liked this as much if I hadn't read the book? That's hard to say.In some situations where you've read the book before you see the movies, you sense that you would have liked the movie more if you hadn't. Sometimes you get the sense that you would have liked the movie less. And it doesn't seem to have anything to do with how much you actually liked the book. Oh well it's an old argument.In this situation I LOVED the book. It's one of the best books I've read in a while. You know I'm maybe even thinking it's the best book I've ever read. It blends absurd humor and gritty realism in the most affecting way. I feel like I'm tapping into the core of humanity when reading it. It takes repetitive events and pushes the repetitiveness so often that it goes from amusing and silly, to unbelievable and annoying, back to something endearing and brilliant. I've never felt such strong duel emotions as the horror and ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: Top 5 'Fight The Power' Movies
by Risselada in Filmspotting
loved it.
"Brazil. Mr. Smith Goes To Washington. The Shashank Redemption. Catch-22. One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest. Falling Down. Gattaca. I Stand Alone. The Fugitive.More when I think of them... maybe. " [More]
HairyLimeHairyLime Post Oscar Breakdown
by HairyLime in HairyLime Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Kudos to Alan Arkin - complete surprise in this category, but an often underappreciated actor (my favorite Alan Arkin roles: Grosse Pointe Blank, Wait Until Dark, Catch 22, Edward Scizzorhands, Glenngerry Glen Ross, Little Miss Sunshine)Kudos to Ennio Morricone, one of my favorite film composers, and a tribute long overdue (my favorite Morricone scores: Once Upon a Time in America, Tie Me Up Tie Me Down, Once Upon a Time in the West, Untouchables)Kudos to Martin Scorcese, long overdue for a TON of work equally worthyoverall show quality - give Ellen the boot, those sillouette dancers the boot, bring on much more film clip montages, when is Hollywood going to understand that film is the medium they excell in, not stagecraft - leave that to the Tonys -- I'd also appreciate more attention on the scores to the films and much less attention to the 'original song' categoryNot a Jack Black or Will Ferrell fan, but their segment was the funniest thing of the night. (besides th ... " [More]
HairyLimeHairyLime M*A*S*H
by HairyLime in HairyLime Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"In a discussion group recently the topic of 'book adaptations' has been brought up, and while I was watching this last night it occurred to me that this one is another good example of a successful 'book to movie' transformation that is neither too literal of a rote retelling, and stands on its own as a film.Caught the final third of this one a couple weekends ago while flipping channels, and then watched the rest of the movie yesterday evening. Not the first time I'd seen it (I've actually lost count how many times), and it struck me how very fresh and innovative it still seems 30 plus years after the fact. There wasn't really anything like it seen before, with its overlapping dialog, meandering storyline and counter-cultural viewpoints.Those brought up on the television series may find the flavor a little hard to digest, no neatly tied up plotlines, no laugh track, a subtler brand of humor.Gould and Sutherland are a great pairing, and would go on to cos ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
No film could do complete justice to Joseph Heller's acclaimed novel, which in the early 1960s provided a prescient shorthand for an era of official duplicity. But writer Buck Henry's adaptation is faithful to the book, and director Mike Nichols pulls no punches. This biting black comedy and military satire is comparable in some ways to Robert Altman's MASH, if not quite as funny. The story follows Heller's anarchic structure so closely that at times a viewer can get lost. The fine cast reads like a roster of popular late 1960s male stars, including Alan Arkin, Martin Balsam, Jon Voight, Richard Benjamin, Martin Sheen, and Henry himself. ~ Michael Betzold, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

wonga
wonga
loved it.
HairyLime
HairyLime
loved it.
Risselada
Risselada
loved it.
razordead
razordead
is not interested.
rica5tully
rica5tully
is not interested.
mikehedge
mikehedge
is not interested.