Telluride 2008 Festival
Advertisement

Whore
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Ken Russell.
Russell's avowed purpose with Whore was to avoid the glamorous depiction of prostitution common to such slick Hollywood products as Pretty Woman. As played by Theresa Russell (no relation to Ken), the eponymous character lives a hellish existence. Relating her story directly to the camera, Russell introduces us to her no-good former husband (Jason Saucier), her brutish pimp (Benjamin Mouton), and the kinkiest of her "johns." Her one true friend, a bag man named Rasta (Antonio Fargas), also saves her life -- but not her soul. The film exists in three versions: an 82-minute R cut, an 82-minute NC-17 cut, and the 92-minute European version, which sometimes carries a rating, sometimes merely a disclaimer. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Be the first to review this movie!

Write a review

Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
lost interest.
Ken Russell invited plenty of ill will upon Whore with its in-your-face title and so-gritty-it's-downright-bleak approach. The world's oldest profession has typically been prettied up for the cinema (the "whore with the heart of gold" being one of its oldest archetypes), but Russell bucks that trend with such belligerence that it's nothing more than off-putting. Theresa Russell's dehumanization is so unyielding that the performance quickly becomes a caricature. She tussles with pimps, johns, and cops, she spouts disinterested dirty talk while rolling her eyes during intercourse. Ken Russell spends so much of the movie cramming home his message, and his agenda becomes abundantly clear so quickly, it's the viewer who's likeliest to become disinterested in no time at all. In some ways it's an update of Russell's equally polarizing Crimes of Passion (1984), which provided a pretty dingy glimpse into this world in its own right. Apparently convinced he wasn't hardcore enough back then, Russell strips even more soul from his characters for this go-around. The viewer gets backed into a corner in which all he or she feels is the contempt, none of the sympathy that might naturally arise from a true documentary, rather than a maverick attempt at ruthless fiction filmmaking that emulates the documentary form. By the end, the viewer just wants to cleanse the pallet and clean the VCR heads, but from feeling sullied, not shaken or moved. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
haven't rated it
most people
Most people
liked it.

Other opinions

halo1205
halo1205
liked it.