Spout's Scavenger Hunt
Advertisement

12 Angry Men
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $5.29

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Sidney Lumet.
A Puerto Rican youth is on trial for murder, accused of knifing his father to death. The twelve jurors retire to the jury room, having been admonished that the defendant is innocent until proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Eleven of the jurors vote for conviction, each for reasons of his own. The sole holdout is Juror #8, played by Henry Fonda. As Fonda persuades the weary jurors to re-examine the evidence, we learn the backstory of each man. Juror #3 (Lee J. Cobb), a bullying self-made man, has estranged himself from his own son. Juror #7 (Jack Warden) has an ingrained mistrust of foreigners; so, to a lesser extent, does Juror #6 (Edward Binns). Jurors #10 (Ed Begley) and #11 (George Voskovec), so certain of the infallibility of the Law, assume that if the boy was arrested, he must be guilty. Juror #4 (E.G. Marshall) is an advocate of dispassionate deductive reasoning. Juror #5 (Jack Klugman), like the defendant a product of "the streets," hopes that his guilty vote will distance himself from his past. Juror #12 (Robert Webber), an advertising man, doesn't understand anything that he can't package and market. And Jurors #1 (Martin Balsam), #2 (John Fiedler) and #9 (Joseph Sweeney), anxious not to make waves, "go with the flow." The excruciatingly hot day drags into an even hotter night; still, Fonda chips away at the guilty verdict, insisting that his fellow jurors bear in mind those words "reasonable doubt." A pet project of Henry Fonda's, Twelve Angry Men was his only foray into film production; the actor's partner in this venture was Reginald Rose, who wrote the 1954 television play on which the film was based. Carried over from the TV version was director Sidney Lumet, here making his feature-film debut. A flop when it first came out (surprisingly, since it cost almost nothing to make), Twelve Angry Men holds up beautifully when seen today. It was remade for television in 1997 by director William Friedkin with Jack Lemmon and George C. Scott. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

Macabre_FilmNutMacabre_FilmNut Re:Who's your favorite horror m ...
by Macabre_FilmNut in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"[quote user="Risselada"] Wow, Rizzo. I had never heard of that movie before but it looks pretty freaking cool! I have added it to my list of 'must-see' movies! Thank you very much! Is there any nudity?[/quote] Ooooh, I'm quite interested what you will think of it. Like I said, I'm not sure if I would even classify it as a horror movie. Then again I expect you probably would since you have a pretty broad definition. I simply love the dialogue in this movie. Hopefully you'll be fascinated by the monster as well. There is no nudity, but it does feature Sarah Polly in that bondage looking dress you see in the graphic there. Hartley's actresses also have a very distinctive kind of beauty to them. I do have to disagree with you there. I doubt anything in Cobb's career (or any actor's career ever) can rival his performance in 12 Angry Men. I always think of it as the greatest. [/quote] Well you both have my interests peeked with No Such Thing (2001). I am amazed it go ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re:Who's your favorite horror m ...
by Risselada in HORROR MOVIES 101
loved it.
"Wow, Rizzo. I had never heard of that movie before but it looks pretty freaking cool! I have added it to my list of 'must-see' movies! Thank you very much! Is there any nudity?[/quote] Ooooh, I'm quite interested what you will think of it. Like I said, I'm not sure if I would even classify it as a horror movie. Then again I expect you probably would since you have a pretty broad definition. I simply love the dialogue in this movie. Hopefully you'll be fascinated by the monster as well. There is no nudity, but it does feature Sarah Polly in that bondage looking dress you see in the graphic there. Hartley's actresses also have a very distinctive kind of beauty to them. I do have to disagree with you there. I doubt anything in Cobb's career (or any actor's career ever) can rival his performance in 12 Angry Men. I always think of it as the greatest. " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Trailer of the Day: 88 Minutes
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I know star power isn’t what it used to be, but doesn’t it seem like we still give Al Pacino more credit than he’s worth? Despite his receiving an Oscar fifteen years ago, the guy hasn’t been a completely dependable actor in more than two decades. And yet a lot of people write about his upcoming movies as if they could maybe, possibly, hopefully be on par with the actor’s ’70s work. I’m not denying that he’s excellent in a few films of even the past ten years (particularly The Insider), but let’s not forget he was also in Gigli, so it isn’t like he’s making the same smart choices he was making as a younger man. And now here’s 88 Minutes, another movie that attempts to give us a thrilling plot in real time, a la 24. But despite such a gimmick working with old films like High Noon and 12 Angry Men, when it’s presented as a gimmick, and clearly as the only reason a movie is made (as in the cases of Nick of Time, Timecode and Phone Booth), it always comes off as forced and (obviously) ... " [More]
JakeStevensJakeStevens Like A Fine Wine...
by JakeStevens in JakeStevens Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Wow. Having just seen this one AMC or TCM (I can't remember which), I must say I'm angry at myself for never having seen this before. This is a theater lover's dream - the performances are top notch and the script is taut and keeps you interested until the very end - even if you do see it coming a mile away. I'm told it didn't make a dime in it's theatrical release, resulting in Henry Fonda never producing another film - an unfortunate loss, because like a fine wine, this film just gets better with time. I'm hoping to add this to my already bloated collection very soon. " [More]
eagle795eagle795 #98
by eagle795 in eagle795 Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"There are no fancy sets or big stunts here. Almost the entire movie takes place in one room. It’s just a dozen guys sitting around talking, debating a court case. At first glance it sounds boring, but it’s extremely well written and has a very talented cast. " [More]
GradysGhostGradysGhost Re: Top 5 movies that take plac ...
by GradysGhost in Top 5
loved it.
"Mully - Roman Holiday is an excellent movie, one of my favorite Audrey Hepburn flicks, but it does not take place in one day.By the way, I've never seen High Noon, but I understand it has this 24-hour thing going on. I can't stand John Wayne movies, so I probably wouldn't like it.I totally agree with 12 Angry Men and Magnolia and would like to add one that I think should be pretty obvious: The 25th Hour. Is that cheating? " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: Top Five Movies with Budget ...
by Risselada in Top 5
loved it.
"Lumet's first puts me in mind of Kubrick's early career. "The Killing" was made in 1956 for $320,000. [/quote]And not only that, Kubrick and Lumet were making a movie at the same time that had pretty much the exact same plots. Dr. Strangelove and Fail-Safe. " [More]
joem18bjoem18b Re: Top Five Movies with Budget ...
by joem18b in Top 5
hasn't rated it.
"Lumet's first puts me in mind of Kubrick's early career. "The Killing" was made in 1956 for $320,000. " [More]
JymkataJymkata Re: Top Five Movies with Budget ...
by Jymkata in Top 5
loved it.
"interesting topic, I must admit I like a lot of films with higher budgets but here is my top 5 without spending too much time looking up the numbers- 1. 12 Angry Men - $350,000 in 1957, about $ 5.6 mil. in today's dollars according to your rules. This is one of my favorite films. Yeah, the setting is a couple of rooms, but the direction is taut and wow, what a cast!2. Mad Max - est. $350,00 in 1979, about $ 2.8 mil. Amazing low budget film. They got a steal with an unknown Mel Gibson, but it's pretty gutsy to make a futuristic movie with this scale.3. City of God - This movie looks like it was made with $ 50 mil. thanks to the direction and cinematography, but can you believe it only cost Miramax $ 3.3 mil. ?4. Donnie Darko - This is another one that looks like it cost a lot, but it was made with $ 4.5 mil. and I loved it 5. Reservoir Dogs - I know it's hip to trash Tarantino as just a hip poser, but he made an outstanding debut for $ 1.2 millionin 1992. Big budgets, sm ... " [More]
rlpolo04rlpolo04 12 Angry Men
by rlpolo04 in rlpolo04 Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"12 Angry Men- **** (Classic Movie)Directed by Sidney LumetJune 25, 2007Twelve men walk into a smoldering, small, fan-less room. They are a jury and have to make their decision on whether or not an 18-year-old boy who stabbed his father to death is guilty or not guilty. We only see outside of the small room for 3 minutes (secondhand learning of the case, never any flashbacks) and one of the scenes it shows the judge telling the jury to make their decision in a bored tone voice. He knows that the jury is going to vote “not-guilty” but he’s wrong. Most of them are thinking that this is going to be a half-hour meeting. Some light up their cigarettes, open the windows to get a whiff of fresh air, and sit back ready to make their vote. The foreman of it all then lays the rules that there has to be a unanimous decision and then asks to hear everyone’s verdict. Eleven hands go up for guilty that would lead to the boy getting sentenced to the electric chair and one l ... " [More]
[More reviews]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Twelve Angry Men is a tightly wound top of a movie. Each scene ratchets up the tension another notch as Henry Fonda's character tries desperately to open the minds of his fellow jurors. The setting -- a claustrophobic jury room in the dog days of summer -- superbly augments the suspense. Operating within the constraints of a small budget, first-time director Sidney Lumet tightens the noose by accentuating the throbbing pulse of the ceiling fan and slowly narrowing his shots on his characters as the film approaches its climax. Based on Reginald Rose's well-known play, which had been adapted to the television screen three years earlier, Twelve Angry Men boasts a series of excellent performances by young actors who would soon become household names, including Jack Klugman, Jack Warden, and Martin Balsam. However, it is the film's established stars -- Lee J. Cobb, E. G. Marshall and most importantly Fonda -- who play the leads, delivering the goods like seasoned pros. The film has instructional value as a study of the inherent strengths and weaknesses of the jury system, but its real value is how it allows each member of the cultural mosaic of a jury to develop into distinct, damaged, and interesting characters. In a well-crafted metaphor for the broader outline of society, the jury members must confront their prejudices in order to see that justice prevails. Nominated for three Oscars, Twelve Angry Men ran into the juggernaut of Bridge on the River Kwai and came up empty handed. ~ Dan Jardine, All Movie Guide
 



Spout's Scavenger Hunt

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
liked it.

Other opinions

Risselada
Risselada
loved it.
chesterfilms
chesterfilms
loved it.
spout
spout
loved it.
achance42
achance42
is not interested.
peterfecteau
peterfecteau
is not interested.
rubywoo
rubywoo
is not interested.