Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
S*P*Y*S
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement
Directed by Irvin Kershner
In 1974, flanked by such filmic monuments to paranoia and corruption as Chinatown and The Parallax View, Elliott Gould and Donald Sutherland tried to re-create the screwball nonchalance of their earlier M*A*S*H performances in this lightweight spy spoof, directed by Irvin Kershner. Gould and Sutherland play two CIA agents -- Griff and Bruland -- who are marked for death by their own agency after botching the defection of a Russian ballet dancer (Michael Petrovich). As they repeatedly mess up their assignments and wriggle out of tight corners, they not only find themselves pursued by the CIA, but also by the KGB, the Chinese Communists, and a terrorist group that wants to destroy the CIA. ~ Paul Brenner, All Movie Guide
[More]
All Movie Guide Logo
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
disliked it.
S*P*Y*S is a dull, dull, dull mess of a movie. Intended as a spoof of serious spy movies, and filmed at a time of social cynicism and in which cinematic comedy tended to be a bit "looser," S*P*Y*S wanted to be a hip, more knowing version of Get Smart. Unfortunately, it turns out to be merely a waste of time and talent. The biggest culprit, of course, is the screenplay, which is convoluted, unfocused, and -- most damagingly -- unfunny. The jokes are lame, the set-ups amateurish, the pay-offs practically non-existent. After the first fifteen or twenty minutes, most viewers will be glancing at their watches and wondering when it will ever end. Things are not helped by Irvin Kershner's non-direction, about as poor a job of trying to capture comedy onscreen as one can imagine. Kershner ruins the few decent attempts at situational humor in the film, noticeably in the restaurant scene when he doesn't put enough focus on Donald Sutherland's reaction to some nerve gas -- which should be the reason the scene exists. Sutherland and Elliott Gould come off poorly, despite their talent and chemistry. The material is simply too bad, and neither actor has the kind of star persona that can overcome this challenge. Those asterisks in the title are, of course, meant to evoke memories of the stars' earlier M*A*S*H -- but viewers are advised to skip this one and go with the Altman classic instead. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
haven't rated it
most people
Most people
lost interest.

Other opinions

digitalconquest
digitalconquest
is neutral about it.
razordead
razordead
is not interested.