Telluride 2008 Festival
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
This Film Is Not Yet Rated
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement
Directed by Kirby Dick.
In a rare and refreshing reversal of roles, filmmakers put the powerful Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA for short) under the microscope for inspection in Academy Award-nominated director Kirby Dick's incisive look at stateside cinema's most notorious non-censoring censors. Compelled by the staggering amount of power that the MPAA ratings board wields, the filmmaker seeks out the true identities of the anonymous elite who control what films make it to the multiplex. He even goes so far as to hire a private investigator to stake out MPAA headquarters and expose Hollywood's best-kept secret. Along the way, Dick speaks with numerous filmmakers whose careers have been affected by the seemingly random and sexual-content obsessed judgments of the MPAA, including John Waters, Mary Harron, Darren Aranofsky, Wayne Kramer, Kevin Smith, Matt Stone, and Atom Egoyan. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

SpoutBlogSpoutBlog 10 Best Masturbation Scenes
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Andrew Sarris may be one of the most influential American film critics, but here’s a claim, located within his recent review of In Search of a Midnight Kiss, that may not hold up to some of his better-remembered theories: “Even when we confront 40-year-old virgins of either gender, movies refuse to show them compensating for the lack of a sexual partner. There is lasting shame involved in this spectacle.” Not to ever, ever profess superiority over Sarris, but I’ve nonetheless compiled today’s list as a way of proving the man wrong. There are actually tons and tons of masturbation scenes found in non-porn movies, from the low brow to the high brow, from as indirect as the boy wizard playing with his wand under the covers in Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban to as direct as the non-simulated masturbation in Michael Winterbottom’s 9 Songs and John Cameron Mitchell’s Shortbus (which would probably feature my #1 pick, from the sound of it, if I ever bothered to see it). The follo ... " [More]
JJ79JJ79 This Film is Not Yet Rated (2005)
by JJ79 in JJ79 Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Released: January 25, 2006 (Sundance)Director: Kirby Dick*****The board which doles out movie ratings, the Motion Picture Association of America, was founded in 1945 and the G-PG-PG 13-R-NC 17 ratings we all know and love came into being in 1968 as a way to head off government involvement in the film industry. Over the years, some ratings have changed (X morphed into NC 17), but one thing has remained the same: no one knows what goes on behind the Ratings Board doors.(Since this film was released, the MPAA has changed some rules on the appeals process and the transparency of their members. We'll talk about that in a minute.)Filmmaker Kirby Dick explores the mysterious ratings board in the documentary This Film is Not Yet Rated, which includes interviews with various other directors who have seen their films go under the knife when faced with an NC 17 rating. In addition to being a quick history lesson on the evolution of the organization, it also becomes a pseudo-sting operation ... " [More]
mythmanmythman I Wonder if I Would Write This ...
by mythman in Watch Everything and Still See ONLY What Is Good
lost interest.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Watching This Film Is Not Yet Rated--a film complaining about the power wielded by the MPAA's anonymous rating-council (the supposéd "parents of children between 5 and 17" who collectively decide upon an American movie's 'G,' 'PG,' 'PG-13,' 'R' or 'NC-17')--and the complaint that stood out is that they are 'anonymous'—unlike any other parental-rating council in the world.My defense of that anonymity is "peer-pressure," like I mentioned in the title. It's not the raters' job to think about whether anyone would be "offended" about a movie, but rather "whether the typical American parent ought to allow his/her children to see the movie."Love the Sinner, Hate the SinOf course, the result is rather different ... the raters are like popular search-engines; they aren't there to decide what gets seen and what does not, but they end up deciding indirectly.So the anonymity is necessary to keeping the ratings purely-parental. The search-engines don't have the anonymity, so any anti-social scu ... " [More]
oOCarolinaOooOCarolinaOo Scary Bananas
by oOCarolinaOo in oOCarolinaOo Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"All I have to say is the MPAA are a scary bunch and until watching this film I had no idea they operated the way they do. I reccomend this to anyone who loves movies it is definetly a great insight into the way some our precieved freedoms are trampled over by an underwraps organization. " [More]
JezcabJezcab Expose
by Jezcab in Jezcab Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I really had no idea what the MPAA was up to. Despite the stalker type element, this was an enlightening documentary. I felt as though I was a spy along with the creators of the film. I am fairly disgusted with the MPAA at this point, I knew they were trouble for film makers when it comes to 'mature themes' but not with violence, but this really puts it all out there! " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog New ratings are not yet rated
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Our regular guest writer, Dodd (moviedodd at spout.com), tells us what's the latest in movie rating news, and shares his mixed feelings about the proposed changes. Dodd is finishing up a Master's degree in Film Studies at Ohio University. Recently, there has been a lot of discussion about the current film rating system implemented by the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA). Filmmakers have raised hell about it all on their own for the past few years, but now the documentary This Film Is Not Yet Rated has served as an expose on the selective standards of MPAA members. The film seems to have had an affect already. Since its release, MPAA head honcho Dan Glickman has admitted to the organization's vague guidelines for what sets an R picture apart from an NC-17 one, and that proper actions would be taken to fix that problem. It seems that Glickman was not just throwing words around for publicity purposes. According to a recent Variety article, Dan Glickman has announced th ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Fans of the short-lived ABC sitcom Wednesday 9:30 (8:30 Central) - if there were any - will find a similarly self-reflexive industry joke in the title of This Film Is Not Yet Rated, Kirby Dick's illuminating documentary. Not only does the film target the MPAA's esoteric and top-secret ratings system, but its title also speaks to the ratings limbo that inevitably greeted a film like this, with this agenda. This Film Is Not Yet Rated shows just how funny guerilla filmmaking can be, as Dick repeatedly dangles fresh meat over the MPAA crocodile pit, daring the jaws of its legal apparatus to snap shut. Dick's exposé alternates between moments of outrage, hilarity, and utter disbelief - this last a result of how closely Dick's surveillance team (a pair of plucky lesbians) flirts with seemingly illegal behavior. However, once the audience has reviewed the capricious procedures of this ratings board, Dick's take-no-prisoners unmasking seems more than justified. While Dick is undoubtedly a courageous figure for engendering such powerful enemies, so too are the filmmakers who agree to testify on camera about their own experiences. It's clear how a group tied to the most oppressive wings of religion and government can really make trouble for these directors' future projects. The bulk of the discussion surrounds the kiss-of-death NC-17 rating, and how the board employs a preposterous double standard regarding graphic violence and graphic sex. By including examples of these controversial images, Dick's film earns its own NC-17 - which the MPAA issues with almost incomprehensible detachment. Not submitting his film to the MPAA, and therefore remaining unrated, might have been a better return on the titular joke. But Dick wears the NC-17 as a badge of honor - proof both of the inescapability of the process, and his refusal to be intimidated by it. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide
 

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
are neutral about it.
most people
Most people
liked it.

Other opinions

Jezcab
Jezcab
loved it.
halo1205
halo1205
loved it.
Risselada
Risselada
loved it.
mythman
mythman
lost interest.
rica5tully
rica5tully
is not interested.