Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

The Hills Have Eyes
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $15.22
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Alexandre Aja.
Alexandre Aja directs this remake of Wes Craven's film The Hills Have Eyes. In this update, a family is taking a cross-country road trip when their trailer breaks down, leaving them stranded in the desert of New Mexico. There, they find themselves under attack by the savage "hill people," who were deformed by radiation during nuclear testing. ~ Cammila Albertson, All Movie Guide

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

notkevinbaconnotkevinbacon Re: Re-makes.......
by notkevinbacon in HORROR MOVIES 101
liked it.
"I have to agree with just about everything on your list there (and I am totally stoked to see The Blob mentioned... which starts off so amazing that I could always ignore the fact that it doesn't quite keep it up to the end ). The 1978 Invasion of the Body Snatchers is my favorite flavor of that film. Though I think the Dawn remake is pretty slick I dislike how they handle the pregnancy arc (much better plotting in the original IMHO) and I wish it was titled differently so it was seperated from the Dead series (since Romero gets no money from the name I've been told). The NOTLD remake by Savini is good, but surprisingly gore less. I am not very impressed with Rob Zombie so far, but I'll see the remake of Halloween... Hills Have Eyes - the original never really did it for me, but I think the Aja remake is pretty good and I put it into the same camp as The Fly and The Thing as better than the original. I am pretty excited for the Piranha remake Aja is helming. I lov ... " [More]
AlienLazerAlienLazer In response to... slipofthetongue
by AlienLazer in AlienLazer Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I really liked the mutant design and yeah the gore and violence was totally called for. Yes, I called for it, and so did all the people like me who has a twisted sence on humor as I do. This movie did us good, and I've never seen the original decades old version; but now I'd like to check it out. Well, maybe I will. :p " [More]
MovieBabeMovieBabe Following Sean - The Hills Have ...
by MovieBabe in MovieBabe Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"By Tricia Olszewski When Sean Farrell is asked, “Do you turn on?” he replies, “No. I smoke grass.” He then goes on to say that he eats grass, too—which he actually prefers—that other drugs are scary, and that you can tell a speed freak by how skinny he is. He knows that people get busted for weed but doesn’t believe it will happen to him. It’s not because Farrell believes he’s smarter than everyone else, as those who break the law often do. Rather, it’s because he’s “too little.” See, when this interview took place, in 1969, Farrell was 4. Following Sean is writer-director Ralph Arlyck’s second movie about Farrell, the sharp, chatty son of his one-time upstairs neighbors. Arlyck, a native New Yorker, was living in San Francisco’s Haight-Ashbury when he decided to turn Farrell into a film-school project. He used a skateboard to track the restless kid as he ran around the neighborhood, and he ... " [More]
slipofthetongueslipofthetongue Ugly Hills
by slipofthetongue in SlipOfTheTongue Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"This film doesn't deserve more than a couple of sentences.  It's absolute garbage - pretentious, stupid, slow, derivative and full of gratuitous violence.  The actors appear lost.  The scenes are ineptly staged.  The mutants are a ridiculous (and again) derivative blend of styles.  Even the foley and the ADR is heavy handed (insert diabolical off-screen mutant chuckle here).  This film absolutely sucks and so does Alexandre Aja for doing such a lousy job when he had Craven's startling original as a starting point.Can you believe they have already made a sequel. " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
lost interest.
The year was 1977 and the the Vietnam War had just ground to a slow and painful halt. The definition of "family" in America was changing as shell-shocked troops -- considered "lucky" by the naïve for having survived the horrific atrocities viewers at home only glimpsed on the nightly news -- were attempting to return to their families and loved ones and make sense of life in the serenity of the suburbs. But there was no going back; America had changed, and after two excruciating world wars and an extended quagmire in which the nation's youth were fed into the war machine and spat out in chunks, the culture of violence was flowing through her veins like an all-consuming disease. Ambitious horror filmmaker Wes Craven had absorbed the death and destruction that had become too much to bear for the numbed masses, and proceeded to shatter the senses of moviegoers with the boundary blasting sadism of Last House on the Left. As horror fans ached with curiosity to see what terrors he would bring to the screen next, Craven was cooking up a nihilistic tale of raw survival set against the scorching sun of the Nevada desert. Politically, Craven's sophomore vision personified the growing chasm between the right and the left while simultaneously serving to explore the differences between where we thought we were as a culture, and the contradictory reality so painfully obvious to anyone who still had the stomach to keep up with current events. Flash forward to the year 2006 and another war is going on. This time it's the "war on terror" and, much like its mid-20th century counterpart, it seemed to have no end in sight. Over in Hollywood the remake trend was on fire, and whose catalogue better to raid than Hollywood horror franchise factory himself, Nightmare on Elm Street and Scream creator Wes Craven? Fresh-faced French filmmaker named Alexandre Aja's had just delivered what many considered to be one of the most unforgiving mainstream horror efforts in the last decade, and he needed a winning follow up to cement himself as a true master of the genre. Though the first half of the new The Hills Have Eyes seems to follow Craven's original screenplay almost to the letter -- including the harrowing initial raid on the family caravan that nearly recreates the original atrocity shot for shot -- the heavy handed second half takes an ill-advised turn off the main road to offer a none-too-subtle commentary on the destructive capabilities of the American machine that paints in broad, reactionary strokes where a steady, subtle hand may have been a bit more effective. In terms of surface aesthetics, Aja's flick is retro-hip thanks to Maxime Alexandre's hyper-saturated palate, Daniel Glicker's throwback costume design, and Alessandra Querzola's sparse sets. Composers Tomandandy's unconventional use of discordant, tune-bent strings is strikingly effective in creating a mood of ill-ease early on before inexplicably, and somewhat tragically, swelling to an overbearing eagre of faux-triumphant horns in the final scenes. On the civilized side of things, the performances are generally strong thanks in large part to Ted Levine's turn as the jingoistic, praise-the-lord and-pass-the-ammo patriarch, a pacifist-to-pit bull transformation by unrecognizable X-Men alum Aaron Stanford, and a nurturing, heart-rending show by matronly Kathleen Quinlan, whose suffering at seeing her family butchered before her very eyes is only the beginning of her agonizing trauma. In the end though, Alexandre Aja wants it both ways; he wants to remain staunchly faithful to the original while altering the proceedings to take on new meaning in a new era, and he wants to turn in an inventive, viscerally grating, nuevo-grindhouse epic that will subvert the multiplex experience while simultaneously getting sucked into the creatively exhausted remake trend. While the resulting film could certainly be considered reprehensible in its relentless pursuit to torment the audience, the exact same could be said for Craven's original back in 1977 -- and for viewers looking to be run through the ringer, the new Hills certainly obliges with ruthless abandon. For audiences who hunger for some form of intellectual nourishment amongst the bloody chaos, however, Aja's ponderous, ham-handed evisceration of the American swagger may prove a bit too bombastic to truly drive home his point effectively. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
lost interest.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

blinktom_182
blinktom_182
loved it.
glowbugg
glowbugg
loved it.
The1TheOnlyJP
The1TheOnlyJP
loved it.
radiogerbil
radiogerbil
is not interested.
achance42
achance42
is not interested.
QFLW
QFLW
is not interested.