Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Lady in the Water
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $8.02
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
M. Night Shyamalan writes and directs this self-proclaimed, grown-up "bedtime story" about an apartment building superintendent named Cleveland (Paul Giamatti) who discovers a magical sea-nymph named Story (Bryce Dallas Howard) who's been transported to this world and is living in the building's own swimming pool. As this bizarre revelation sinks in, Cleveland becomes enraptured by her other-worldly charm. As he shelters her in his apartment, other inhabitants of the building begin falling into place as representations of characters from an Eastern myth in which these mermaids, or "narfs," co-exist unhappily with more beastly and violent characters. In human reality, the forces of darkness that threaten the heroes of a fairy tale prove to be much more terrifying, and the victory of good over evil is by no means guaranteed. Jeffery Wright, Jared Harris and Mary Beth Hurt co-star, as well as Shyamalan himself, playing the visionary writer Vick. ~ Cammila Albertson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

divinemsjunebugdivinemsjunebug Re:How has horror scarred (yes, ...
by divinemsjunebug in HORROR MOVIES 101
liked it.
"I really liked What Lies Beneath, I will admit it, I like Harrison Ford. This movie gave me great goosebumps and I liked the atmosphere in it. Yes, I have to say that when I draw a bath I hope I don't see anything in the tub and it is a flash from that movie AND from the Changeling (one of my favorite movies)...shiver. I liked Signs too, it's a very quiet movie and has a lot of suspense. The Lady in the Water - to me- I thought was one of his WORST movies. I just thought that ending was very stupid. [/quote] I am going to talk about this again in another discussion in reply to our 'Divine Ms Junebug'. I actually like the fims of M. Knight Shyamalan. 'Signs' is my favorite but it is not a 'great' movie by any means. As for 'The Village' , I saw that one shortly after it's release and I deliberately didn't read anything about it or the 'surprise ending' ... * SPOILERS HERE >>> ... I saw that ending coming from about 100 miles away. I pretty much had it figured out from ... " [More]
usesoapusesoap Very little Night music
by usesoap in usesoap Blog
hasn't rated it.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
"M. Night Shyamalan, coming back from a critical and commercial pummeling for his fairy tale “Lady in the Water” that was nightmarish for all the wrong reasons, has attempted to trumpet his return to tension in a new film called...hmmm...what was that title again? Perhaps I should look at some of the dialogue to help me remember: “There is an event happening.” “...whenever this is happening.” “Whatever is happening is happening in smaller and smaller populations.” “Why is this happening?” “Nothing's happening yet.” “There's something happening in a few states.” Oh well, maybe it will come to me later. Touting its R rating like a badge, the film promises to be a darker Night than we are accustomed to, but a few bloody deaths aside (most are shot at a distance), the proceedings are structurally similar to his 2002 outing “Signs.” The film begins so promisingly creepy, with peo ... " [More]
TenenbaumsTenenbaums The Shyamalan Report Card
by Tenenbaums in Tenenbaums Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"M. Night Shyamalan's career is coming to a halt. But before the film community sends the Philadelphia writer/directer off, let's take a look at his works."The Sixth Sense" is masterful; "Unbreakable" is an underrated comic book gem; "Signs" is frustratingly dumb, then kills any chance of lingering suspense by doing the anti-"Jaws" and showing the wimpy water-allergic aliens; and "The Village" is an intriguing experiment that is far deeper that its apparently simple conclusion.Then there's "Lady in the Water." Possibly attempting to switch up his style or be exceedingly philosophical, Shyamalan's latest released film was critically panned and made little money. Disney, who had financed the director's previous four films, passed on the script, and with good reason. Seeing an opportunity to profit off of Shyamalan's name (perhaps despite the quality of the material), Warner Bros. bankrolled the project and attracted an impressive cast.As with any director of great works, it's clear wh ... " [More]
CinemaRianCinemaRian Lady in the Water (2006, USA, M ...
by CinemaRian in CinemaRian Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"The Village was bad, but Lady in the Water is pathetic. It is one of the worst movies I ever seen. It is one of the most obvious and stupid movies ever made. Every single point or statement is made completely obvious, and almost two hours of precious screen time is wasted a bunch of characters try to help a fairy in a swimming pool and figure out who is the Guardian of the Narl or who is the Healer of the Narl, and how to prevent her from being killed by the worst CGI special effect I have seen in a studio film. Even before the movie was made, it is was in trouble. Disney, who financed all of Shamylans previous films, refused to finance the project because they thought the script was stupid. Shamylan took the project to Warner Brothers, and, according to a newspaper article I read last week, apparently lost his mind in the process, pulling crap like complaining to Warner bosses that they had put a Dumpster next to a scrub because it destroyed the shrubs artistic integrity. Maybe he ... " [More]
slipofthetongueslipofthetongue E.T. Swim Home
by slipofthetongue in SlipOfTheTongue Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"M. Night Shyamalan's work is always a juggling act between sentimentality, mystery and credibility. I loved The Sixth Sense, enjoyed Unbreakable, and hung in there for most of The Village. LADY IN THE WATER is his most recent and it makes you wonder whether he is playing some kind of contemptuous joke on his fans. What possible explanation could there be for this poorly conceived, sloppily written, lazy exercise in childlike mysticism?It seems almost impossible that a director with this much imagination could drop the ball so badly. One wonders - did he know it was this bad? Or did he think it was good? Did he try to make it good but give up because he had a shoot date looming? When did he realize it was no good - during production or post production? Or does he still think it's a good film? I find all these questions much more interesting than the film itself.One word for you. "Narf". He should have stopped right there. " [More]
panda9445829companda9445829com Mmmhh!
by panda9445829com in panda9445829com Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"i was disappionted in this movie, although its not the movies fault, its mine. see, i love horror movies and really expected this one to be scary, i actually like the commercails more then i liked the movie. That is only my opinion... so dont take my word for it if you havent seen it. " [More]
kungfu-koalakungfu-koala Nervous at first
by kungfu-koala in kungfu-koala Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"So I first found out about this movie through IMDB while it was in production and became excited to see something a little different from M. Night. However, after seeing the first trailer I immediately lost interest. But after a year I finally had enough courage to spend what little amount of money it costs to rent the film from your local video shop. Before watching the movie I prepared myself... for the worst.Now... I would not recommend this film to any of my friends. But I will be honest. The movie was captivating and very well written. The approach of cinema-photography and script was almost brilliant in the way it captured people as caricatures. Granted the effects at time were a little cheesy, but the story had a youthful spirit. But maybe this is what happens when we face a post-modern world that requires everything to be perfect and a true reflection of reality. Or... maybe my taste is declining. No matter I thought the movie was worth the money and would have taken the ti ... " [More]
JakeStevensJakeStevens Yikes...What A Mess
by JakeStevens in JakeStevens Blog
lost interest.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"It's obvious M. Night put a lot of thought into the script of this film, as it has many hidden meanings and metaphors. So many, in fact, that it makes the film hard to comprehend on the first viewing, which may be why this is regarded as a 'flop'. I will most definitely have to watch this again as I cannot fairly judge this in one sitting. I will say one thing working against him, though, the cinematography in this film is terrible. The out-of-frame, out-of-focus, steady-cam is supposed to induce a sense of dramatic tension and a hazy, dream-like state of mind, I'm sure, but it left me feeling like I was watching a student film, and a bad one at that. As of this review, I deem it not as awful as everyone said it was, and it's probably got a shitload of subtext and quite a beautiful movie if viewed a certain way, but not a favorite right now as it is difficult to comprehend exactly what is going on. Meh. " [More]
GradysGhostGradysGhost Re: Total Film's Greatest Direc ...
by GradysGhost in Directors
hasn't rated it.
"I agree with pippin06 on the vast majority of his points.I kinda see Shyamalan as the new Joel Schumacher. Shall we compare?Schumacher's Flatliners -- A fun movie with an eye for grandiosity about death and the afterlife, whatever it is. It turns into a sort of horror flick with heart as the film wears on. The characters find themselves haunted by the horrors they've commited themselves, but find redemption in the act of apology.Compare to Shyamalan's The Sixth Sense -- A really fun movie with a focus on the individual about death and the afterlife, whatever it is. In the end it's remembered as a horror film, but it has a sort of heart as well. A small child brings realization to a middle-aged man who never realized he'd actually passed away, and brings a sort of redemption to his mother who always doubted her own mother.Schumacher's The Lost Boys -- This makes for one hell of a popcorn flick and it's got a popular cast: The Two Coreys (as they are ... " [More]
erico_77375erico_77375 Lady in the Toilet
by erico_77375 in erico_77375 Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I knew this day would come, but like every filmmaker who works on the outer edges of the imagination, M. Night Shyamalan has finally gone too far out on the edge and fell straight off. Others would say that he did so with The Village (I wasn't one of them, he straddled the edge perfectly in my humble opinion). I have to wonder if he looked at Lady In The Water in post-production and saw just what I saw...a huge mess. But like all great filmmakers, even a huge mess is worthy of attention and respect. I respect this film, but I cannot in good conscience say it better than terrible.Lady In The Water wants to be a children's fairy tale for adults, but is too childish and self-involved to let the audience in. It centers on Cleveland Heap (Paul Giamatti, who I will discuss later), superintendent of The Cove Apartments where wacky neighbors live side-by-side and a mystical water nymph (Bryce Dallas Howard) lives in the swimming pool. Did I mention that this same apartment complex ... " [More]
[More reviews]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
lost interest.
A single brilliant achievement (The Sixth Sense) bought M. Night Shyamalan a career's worth of ill-advised jurisdiction over the content of his films. With Lady in the Water, such self-absorption finally became impossible to tolerate. That point might logically have been reached with The Village, the paean to bloated mysticism that preceded this one. Except Warner Brothers clearly didn't learn the lesson that caused the ugly separation between Disney and Shyamalan during pre-production, allowing him the same vainglorious leeway this time out, with even more disastrous results. It's difficult to find the best entry point to criticize Lady in the Water, because ludicrousness oozes from its every pore. But as good a place as any is Shyamalan's usage of Bryce Dallas Howard, his new muse (taking the baton from Bruce Willis), who also helped deaden The Village. Playing a mystical creature called a narf, who emerges from the pool in a Philadelphia apartment complex, Howard spends most of the movie hugging her knees and looking forlorn. Such passivity makes it impossible to care about her character's plight -- namely, that she's being hunted by werewolf creatures called scrunts. Since Shyamalan's script isn't prepared to explain any of this, the audience hopes the mere presence of Paul Giamatti will bring some sense to the proceedings. But there's not much the talented actor can do with a scene in which Shyamalan has him awkwardly relaying fantastical nonsense back and forth between an old Korean woman and her granddaughter, who's translating on the other end of a phone line. If Shyamalan's only sin were a muddled story, that would be one thing. He does, after all, retain the basic visual flair that's common to his films. But he also casts himself as a writer whose work will one day save humanity. How this relates to narfs and scrunts is unclear, but as an indicator of the director's unwarranted messianic self-image, it's crystal. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
lost interest.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

ilovegarages
ilovegarages
loved it.
Ravie13
Ravie13
loved it.
rjsprague
rjsprague
loved it.
JScott
JScott
is not interested.
wyrdsister
wyrdsister
is not interested.
awkwardj
awkwardj
is not interested.