Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Spider-Man 3
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $11.21
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Sam Raimi.
Your friendly neighborhood web-slinger is back, only this time his sunny outlook has become partially overcast in the third chapter of director Sam Raimi's Spider-Man saga. Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, and James Franco return to reprise their roles from the previous two installments, with Thomas Haden Church, Topher Grace, and Bryce Dallas Howard making their first appearances in the series as Flint Marko (aka Sandman), Eddie Brock (aka Venom), and Gwen Stacy, respectively. Peter Parker (Maguire) has finally leaned to walk the middle ground between being the superhero that his city needs, and the man that Mary Jane (Dunst) loves. All is well in New York City until one night, as Peter and M.J. set gazing at the stars, a falling comet streams across the sky and crashes into the ground close by. But this isn't any ordinary shooting star, and upon impact the mysterious space rock is split open to reveal a shape-shifting symbiote with the power to overtake anything that it comes into contact with. Later, as Harry Osborn acquires his late father's flying board, engineers a powerful new Goblin outfit, and takes to the sky to avenge dad's death, the mysterious space sludge infects both Peter's Spider Man suit and ambitious street photographer Eddie Brock (Grace). His strange new suit giving him a newfound sense of power as it gradually overpowers his personality, Peter discovers that escaped convict Flint Marko was in fact the man responsible for the death of Uncle Ben (Cliff Robertson). Unfortunately for Peter, Marko has recently acquired the power to morph at will and quickly completes his transformation into the dreaded Sandman. As the Sandman gives in to his darkest criminal instincts and the slithering space symbiote transforms Eddie Brock into the nightmarish fanged villain known as Venom, the citizens of New York City must once again call on Spider Man to fend off destructive forces that are far too powerful for the likes of mortal man. ~ Jason Buchanan, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

CinemaRianCinemaRian Spider-man 3 (2007, USA, Sam Ra ...
by CinemaRian in CinemaRian Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"It is a testament to Sam Raimi and his collaborators that the Spider-man series did not run out of material after a few installments, like the Batman and Superman movies did. Although the end of the film leaves room for another adventure, I think that the series should retire after the third installment- all the loose ends with the characters are tied up, and any subsequent film would probably be just a long wrestling match through the skies of New York. All three films have the same pluses and minuses. On the plus side, there is a sympathetic and atypical hero in Toby Maguire's Peter Parker, who, unlike Clark Kent or Bruce Wayne, is close to an average guy. There is also the epic story the Osborn family, with both father and son being infected by mental illness, revenge, but ultimately reaching and a kind of redemption. The drawbacks, however, are what keep the series from being a great superhero film, like Donner's Superman or Mark Steven Johnson's Daredevil. Man ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog CG: Death to Imagination
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"When I saw the title of Olly Richardson’s rant on The Empire Blog asking if CG has killed our imaginations, I presumed he meant filmmakers’ imaginations and how special effects are less creative when done with the ease of computer graphics. But no, he’s really talking about our imaginations, meaning me and you and everyone we know. I’d never given it too much thought, but maybe modern audiences are really losing their ability to believe at the movies: We never used to be so picky. If somebody watches the original King Kong or any of the works of Ray Harryhausen, you will never hear them complain about how the skeletons were a bit jerky or that the big ape’s fur didn’t blow realistically when he was climbing the Empire State Building (if they do complain, however, you should feel free to shoot them on the grounds of wrongness and philistinism). You just watch the film, acknowledge that what you are seeing couldn’t possibly exist, admire the artistry it took to create it and choose t ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re:$7 Champagne
by Risselada in B Movies
hasn't rated it.
"[quote user="porcupine"] Speilberg got too big? Speilberg just became Speilberg. What about former low-budget directors taking the helm of super hero mega-movies? I'm think particualrly of Sam Rami doing the Spider-Man movies and Christopher Nolan doing Batman Begins. You could accuse them of "selling out," but I think that phrase is pretty much meaningless. It's just a different phase of their careers. Personally I think that Nolan is moving into that phase waaaaaay better than Rami. I just watched the first Spider-Man the other day, man that is a bad movie. You talked about Star Wars Episode I, go back and watch Spider-Man, the dialogue is just as bad. [/quote] Well I've still always wondered what Spielberg might do with a challenge to make a movie now on an extremely limited budget. I think the result might be something I would prefer to what he's able to make with his seemingly unlimited wealth. I wonder if sometimes we are more forgiving to a movie when we know it had to wor ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Barry Sonnenfeld Prophesizes To ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"The internet is an evil construct that’s causing us to submissively open our arms to totalitarianism! No, this isn’t another one of my posts about how our society is entering the world of The Matrix. This is the belief and fear of Barry Sonnenfeld, the director of Men in Black, Men in Black II and Wild Wild West, clearly a fan of lighter sci-fi than of the Orwellian sort. Speaking this week at the National Association of Broadcasters Show in Vegas, he lashed out against the internet, because of how it’s threatening democracy: Sonnenfeld fears that children today will grow up with “no concept of the right to privacy and in fact not understand the need for it. Because the Facebook generation is not concerned with what people know about them . . . they will have no problem with additional governmental supervision, spying and intervention. They will be thrilled that the Internet will be able to follow their every move. Bonnenfeld’s main issue, of course, may be with his claim that kid ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Mutant Overload
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Apparently there was no lesson learned from Spider-Man 3. I guess all the criticisms of that movie’s having too many characters didn’t exactly balance negatively enough against its worldwide gross of nearly $900 million. So, prepare for the possibility that other comic book adaptations will make the same attempt for box office gold by saturating their plots with familiar and highly demanded heroes and villains. This week the geek circles have been all abuzz about the all-star casting for X-Men Origins: Wolverine, which has now been confirmed by the trades and so far includes Taylor Kitsch as Gambit, Ryan Reynolds as Deadpool, Black Eyed Peas’ will.i.am as John Wraith/Kestrel, Liev Schrieber as Victor Creed/Sabretooth (I can’t wait to see Schrieber with blond muttonchops), Danny Huston as Col. William Stryker and Lynn Collins as Silver Fox. Also, there’s rumor that the Blob will show up in the film, too. Some of these characters will only be showing up for minor appearances, and it’ ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Venom and the Disappointing His ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Villains are oftentimes more interesting than heroes. So, it isn’t surprising when a villain becomes popular enough to warrant his or her own comic/movie/book/etc. The latest, according to IESB, will be Venom, one of the three villains featured in the horrible superhero sequel Spider-Man 3. For Marvel Comics readers, this isn’t that shocking. Venom received his own comic titles long ago, and disappointingly turned semi-good-guy vigilante. But will the movie spin-off be the same kind of water-down? If we look at the two ways a villain spin-off typically goes, it’s probable. First, there’s the villain origin piece, which includes movies like Hannibal Rising, The Scorpion King, Wicked, the upcoming X-Men Origins: Magneto and of course the Star Wars prequels. They attempt to show how the evolution of a wronged person who becomes the iconic villain we’re familiar with. They try to make us sympathize, but usually they just come close to ruining the character. Rarely there is an origin st ... " [More]
JakeStevensJakeStevens I Wasted My Time
by JakeStevens in JakeStevens Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Wow. I sure wish I could have used that 2 hours and 20 minutes to watch a good film. I just about tossed my Twizzlers when Peter Parker starts dancing to "Staying Alive", and at pretty much every interval after that. And Topher Grace? No offense Toph, but you're no menacing villain. And why all the mask-shedding? Are Spider-Man's audience too stupid to realize who's who? I used to like Sam Raimi's films, now...he'll be lucky if he gets my dollar next time I see his name attached to anything. Sorry, but I really hope this is the last time we have to endure this mindless pap. " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Del Toro’s Hobbit Movies Will B ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"After finally seeing Spider-Man 3 the other day, I’ll be happy to never see another Sam Raimi movie again. So, when it was announced Monday that Guillermo Del Toro, instead of Raimi, was in talks to direct the back-to-back Hobbit movies, I was somewhat relieved. But now with Del Toro himself pretty much confirming he’s on board for the Lord of the Ring prequels (I know in the book world prequel isn’t the appropriate word, but in the New Line film series, and as far as mass audience is concerned, it is), I’m still a bit worried about the look of the films. Will Gollum suddenly have no eyes, like many of the creatures in Del Toro’s recent works? Will he be played by Doug Jones rather than a CGI Andy Serkis? Will Middle-earth now be a more stylized place? One of the great things about Peter Jackson’s LOTR trilogy is that he made it look fairly straight-forward. There wasn’t much of the filmmaker’s personality in it. Sure, some of Middle-earth’s design had its influences (Rivendell loo ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Trailer of the Day: Smart People
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"If you were even slightly irritated by Ellen Page’s too-precocious performance in Juno, then you might want to avoid the trailer for Noam Murro’s Smart People. In the movie, which screened at Sundance last week, Page plays yet another teen who seems too smart for her own good. In fact, it is obvious that the trailer is trying to make this character appear similar to her Oscar-nominated role. Now, I’m not one of the many Juno haters, and I think Page has talent, but doesn’t it take away from her performance in Juno to show us that she’s doing the exact same thing in her follow-up? Never mind the fact that Smart People seems like The Squid and the Whale meets The Ballad of Jack and Rose — I’ve heard that it is pretty funny and smart despite its familiar territories — I’m more turned off by the fact that it’s like Juno II without our favorite Juno I actors (Cera, Bateman and Simmons, of course). Not that you can go wrong with Thomas Haden Church, with or without a catfish mustache (I ... " [More]
FilmFreek2007FilmFreek2007 Action-Packed! Maybe TOO Packed!
by FilmFreek2007 in FilmFreek2007 Blog
is neutral about it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
""Spider-Man 3" is the probably the most entertaining yet sightly congested of the series, which continues to become the most popular film franchise at Sony Pictures. "Spidey 3" follows the further adventures of both the webslinger and Peter Parker (Tobey Maguire) who are on top of the world, Spidey has quickly become a hero in the Big Apple, while Pete has grown more and more closer with sweetheart Mary Jane Watson (Kirsten Dunst) and has plans to propose to MJ. But all that is about to go downhill when Spidey & Pete's darkside is unleashed, thanks to an alien symbiote that attaches to the suit. To make matters worse, his frienemy Harry (James Franco) has taken on the supervillainious responsiblities of his late father, Norman, his father's killer Flint Marko (Thomas Haden Church) has resurfaced, this time as the powerful Sandman, the egostical yet ambitious Eddie Brock (Topher Grace) is ruining Peter's chance of becoming lead photographer, and P ... " [More]
[More reviews]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
Third outings can be a complicated concoction with popular franchises, and Spidey 3 is no different. Crackling with breakneck energy and rousing humor, this entry strives to up the entertainment ante, even if it tends to jump through some hoops to try and get there. First and foremost, this big basket of characters must not have been easy to juggle. This is one bulky storyline that Sam and his brother Ivan Raimi have cooked up, so do they pull it off perfectly? Not really. But is it a fun ride the whole way down? Abso-Spidey-lutely! In a way, it's tragic, since these two (with the help of co-scripter Alvin Sargent) obviously had a lot to live up to. The second film easily earned every bit of its adoring following; it's got heart, soul, and demands respect in so many areas that any follow-up was bound to be somewhat of a letdown. And as far as piecing together the puzzle they cut up for themselves, it's evident that things don't flow quite as organically as the filmmakers would have liked. A good number of convenient plot twists are thrown in the audience's direction for them to either scarf up or heavily frown upon. Side characters are built up, then left in the background, while others suffer the fate of just being pawns in the flick's cinematic playing field. Indeed, if looked at with a critical eye, this sucker has some major blemishes in its structure, possibly lessening viewers' feelings about the overall package. Thankfully for those who can roll with its wild punches, Spider-Man 3 serves as a wonderful popcorn flick that manages to keep enough of the integrity of the series, while still brewing up a new crazy adventure for everyone's favorite wall crawler. Even if the wonky dealing of its cards invites skepticism, there's little doubt that the majority of the players still retain their weight as solid characters. As for the new additions to the cast, again, it's a mixed bag. Topher Grace provides a creepy manic energy to the film as Eddie Brock, a welcome contribution to the ensemble, who'll inevitably attract more grumblings from those who feel that he should have played good old Petey in the series. A bit of saddened humanity is added with Thomas Haden Church as Flint Marko, whose backstory resonates just as much as his monstrous effects work dazzles (see the first appearance of Sandman for heartbreaking proof). Unfortunately, they both get a bit shortchanged by the scope of the movie -- something that Gwen Stacy (Bryce Dallas Howard) knows all too well, thanks to her underdeveloped role in the flick. Comic fans might have a tough time with this, though they might be happy to know that the door is still open for her in the series. The film's treatment of Venom could be another stumbling block for the legion of hardcore fans. As a monster that Spidey has to pummel, he totally works, but gone is the duality that could have been mined if Raimi had cared a bit more about the character and not been begrudgingly forced by the producers to fit him into this entry. As for the returning cast, they've continued to flesh out their roles in the series in an admirable fashion. And while it's not all fun and games for characters like Mary Jane, Kirsten Dunst rolls with the script's punches and sells the drama -- of which there's a good amount. Sadly, one thing that the film lacks is an emotional center in the same way that Aunt Mae (Rosemary Harris) broke everyone's heart in the previous film. With Peter dealing with so much inner guilt and emo-riffic mood swings, the weight of the film lies more with Harry Osbourne's (James Franco) rejuvenated friendships with Peter and Mary Jane, yet their triangle never quite packs the emotional wallop that audiences are used to. That said, Franco's story arc provides the film with another splendid surprise that thankfully puts an end to his tiresome brooding in previous entries. And maybe that's the key to this film -- should every Spider-Man film be as heavy as the one that came before? Is there room for a few errors as long as the newest continuation is an overwhelmingly entertaining one? And, have no doubt, this entry aims to please. It's easily the most outrageous of the series and delivers such a refreshingly humorous punch that it's hard not to love Raimi's return to goofball antics. With broad comedic strokes shared by most of the cast -- including a drop-dead funny cameo by Bruce Campbell -- there are plenty of laughs to go around as Peter learns to deal with his continually growing ego (relayed brilliantly with a Saturday Night Fever gag). Of course, the high-priced action is outstanding as well, with one fight scene after another adding its own flavor to the overall package -- delivering sights and sounds that live up to the spectacle. In the end, despite any stumbles the movie makes, its universe has been kept enough intact so that the film feels like a natural progression for all of the characters, which is the most important thing for a solid series such as this. If the same cast and crew continue on, then this entry hasn't ruined a thing. Maybe a bit of the movie's forgiving theme is in order for those who still yearn for more. A little forgiveness and acceptance can go a long way when dealing with a flick as delectable as this, a moral that could benefit many when looking back on Spidey's third big-screen adventure. ~ Jeremy Wheeler, All Movie Guide
 



Spout's Scavenger Hunt

Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
lost interest.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

superdrive0
superdrive0
loved it.
The1TheOnlyJP
The1TheOnlyJP
loved it.
Jbecher
Jbecher
loved it.
Puhnner
Puhnner
is not interested.
tmoney
tmoney
is not interested.
PammyK
PammyK
is not interested.