Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement

Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $8.78
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Tim Burton.
Director Tim Burton brings his unique vision and sensibility to Roald Dahl's classic children's story in this lavish screen interpretation. Willy Wonka (Johnny Depp) is the secretive and wildly imaginative man behind the world's most celebrated candy company, and while the Wonka factory is famously closed to visitors, the reclusive candy man decides to give five lucky children a chance to see the inside of his operation by placing "golden tickets" in five randomly selected chocolate bars. Charlie Bucket (Freddie Highmore), whose poor but loving family lives literally in the shadow of the Wonka factory, is lucky enough to obtain one of the tickets, and Charlie, escorted by his Grandpa Joe (David Kelly), is in for the ride of a lifetime as he tours the strange and remarkable world of Wonka with fellow winners, media-obsessed Mike Teavee (Jordan Fry), harsh and greedy Veruca Salt (Julia Winter), gluttonous Augustus Gloop (Philip Wiegratz), and ultra-competitive Violet Beauregarde (AnnaSophia Robb). Over the course of the day, some of the children will learn difficult lessons about themselves, and one will go on to become Wonka's new right hand. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory also stars Christopher Lee, James Fox, and Noah Taylor; the book was famously adapted to the screen before in 1971 under the title Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory, with Gene Wilder as the eccentric candy tycoon. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

mercurialmercurial Weekly Theme for July 7: Foodie ...
by mercurial in Weekly Theme
is neutral about it.
"Moving along from the depressingly bleak visions of man struggling to survive after the apocalypse, let's spend some time examining films that revolve around humankind's love of food in all it's myriad forms. We all know at least one scene from a film that involves food (from the orgasm sandwich in When Harry Met Sally to the beggars feast in Viridiana or the Chinese restaurant Christmas dinner in A Christmas Story etcetera), but let's discuss those lesser in abundance films in which the entirety of the plot focuses primarily on food. Recently, Ratatouille seemed to bring out the gourmand in a lot of people (similar to what Big Night did more than a decade ago) while No Reservations just seemed to turn everyone's stomachs. Waitress brought about renewed interest in the realm of baking (pies in particular) and Tim Burton's re-imagined Charlie and the Chocolate Factory once again sent everyone's sweet tooth into a diabetic coma. While it could be argued that every zombie movie could ... " [More]
JJ79JJ79 Charlie and the Chocolate Facto ...
by JJ79 in JJ79 Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I was morbidly curious about this re-imagining by Tim Burton, considering I can't get certain songs from the original out of my head no matter how much I try. "Cheer Up Charlie", "The Candyman Can" and "Pure Imagination" are the highpoints to the original film, along with the first glimpse of the chocolate room we get. Willy Wonka is not a family film; it's dark, it's potentially scary, it promotes bad behavior. But it is a staple of television. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory still isn't a family material. It's supposedly closer to the novel, but in this case, I don't think it's better. To be sure, I think the original movie has zero flaws, no reason to remake it. This seems like Burton threw everything in the same pot just because he could with little regard as to whether he should. Johnny Depp, one of the truly great actors of our time, plays the candy maker so completely over the top that everyone else has to run to keep up. Not just the actors, but also the set designers, ... " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Finding Fanning
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"MTV asks the question: Who is the next Dakota Fanning? Because now that the Princess of Precociousness is growing older (she recently turned 14), we apparently need to find a little girl to fill her old kid-size shoes. The most obvious suggestion is Dakota’s little sister, Elle, but MTV also mentions Little Miss Sunshine’s Abigail Breslin and Charlie and the Chocolate Factory’s AnnaSophia Robb as possible contenders. However, considering that Robb is actually a couple months older than Dakota, she makes the least amount of sense. The truth is, the next “Dakota Fanning” (or “Jodie Foster” or “Drew Barrymore” or “Shirley Temple”) will come along when we aren’t necessarily looking, just as Dakota did with I Am Sam. But that is mostly a moot point anyway, because the conclusion of this MTV story is that Dakota hasn’t actually gone away — she is, herself, the new Dakota Fanning, or at least still the same old Dakota Fanning, alive and acting. While she had seemed to disappear after the ... " [More]
usesoapusesoap The Nines': Know thyself
by usesoap in usesoap Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"A brief, deliberately vague review of 'The Nines' I have always been interested in this philosophical concept, as well as Plato's 'Cave Parable, 'which has been worked into some of my most re-watched cinematic outings of the past few years (The Matrix, Fight Club, Old School -- OK, maybe not that last one).As a writer, I love the kind of Charlie Kauffman-lite vibe this film has going for it, much like 'Stranger Than Fiction,' but I think much more complex. Ryan Reynolds, who I know many are hot-and-cold over, really displays some heretofore untapped range in three separate roles. Hope Davis is always a welcome addition to any film, but --wow -- where did Melissa McCarthy come from? Have not seen an episode of Gilmore Girls, I suppose I am late to the game, but she is amazing in situations that must seem heart-breakingly true to life for her.John August, who previously wrote Go and is a frequent Tim Burton collaborator (Big Fish, Charlie and the Chocola ... " [More]
MSWallackMSWallack Review: Charlie and the Chocola ...
by MSWallack in MSWallack Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"This was a very well done movie that succeeded just right in approaching the beloved original without forcing a viewer to constantly compare new to old. Yes, it is essentially the same story as Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory but the additional plot elements thrown in that really change the focus of the film so that, paradoxically, this movie is much more about Willy Wonka. Also, Johnny Depp's portrayal of Willa Wonka is very, very different from Gene Wilder's (incidentally, too many people forget the air of crazed malice that Wilder's Wonka evidenced several times in the original) and isn't nearly as creepy as it might appear from some of the trailers. Depp was absolutely fabulous. We took our 5 1/2 year olds and they loved it (there were a few brief "scary" moments for them, but not enough to detract from their enjoyment). " [More]
Go-ApeGo-Ape What happened to Tim Burton?
by Go-Ape in Go-Ape Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"This was just not worth my time, but of course the fact that it is a Tim Burton movie means that not only do I have the 2 disc edition of the DVD, but I have a bloody huge poster on my ceiling too. It also means that upon it's first day of release, I went to an old fashioned cinema, the closest to me at the time, and saw it at the first showing of the day in the midst of a large number of over excited, screaming children. I could have lived with that, had the film been enough to impress me. I know that this was not strictly speaking, a remake of the original film, rather a second adaptation of the book. I am also well aware that this film sticks far more closely to the book than the 1971 version ever did. But I still love that film and I still dislike this one. The film looked great, but I was expecting so much more from Burton especially seeing as he was working with Johnny Depp again, Sleepy Hollow, Ed Wood, Edward Scissorhands...these were such excellent films and then ... " [More]
jaysproutjaysprout When Do We Get Glass Elevator?
by jaysprout in Film & Video Are My Life
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"It had been well over 20 years since I saw a movie this many times at the cinema at full price. I realize most kids probably wanted to be Charlie but I want(ed) to be Willy. It's impossible to say Depp or Wilder play the character better. Wilder's portrayal was certainly mischevious and mysterious but Depp's downright naughty - almost malevolent and sadistic in a way that borders on Hannibal Lecter ... another character we somehow root for. Like the original, this is a masterpiece. It is not a remake, however, so if whether you loved or hated the version with Gene Wilder, you still want to give this a try. This totally redeemed Tim Burton for that Planet of the Apes piece of shit. Last, but certainly not least, this is the latest in a recent streak of greatness for Christopher Lee. I hope that doesn't mean he's going to die soon. He's certainly a national treasure (yes, I'm claiming him for the USA). " [More]
MovieBabeMovieBabe Charlie and the Chocolate Facto ...
by MovieBabe in MovieBabe Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"By Tricia Olszewski A story in which kids are sucked up pipes and torpedoed down to incinerators sounded like the perfect project for Tim Burton and his frequent freak collaborator, Johnny Depp. But the trailers and entertainment-mag hype pieces for Charlie and the Chocolate Factory weren’t so promising. The Oompa-Loompas looked all too human. And Depp seemed kind of effete, even when you couldn’t hear his squeaky-voiced delivery. Nothing about this adaptation of the 1964 Roald Dahl novel seemed terribly unsettling—which was, well, unsettling. It doesn’t take long, however, for the film to reassure that it’s not another toothless Big Fish. There’s Danny Elfman’s anxious, Hitchcockian opening music, for one. And the cold saucer eyes of the rotten children—excepting, of course, warm, lovable Charlie—who get their grubby hands on golden tickets. And better still is the greeting Willy Wonka (Depp) gives visitors before they enter ... " [More]
MullyMully Charlie and the Chocolate Factory
by Mully in Mully Blog
liked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Tasty little film 7/10 I didn't have any high hopes after seeing the film's trailer, but once I sat down and the opening titles ran (those were damn impressive, Elfman at his best) it had me. It's a movie that can clearly be divided into two parts : before the factory and in the factory. I actually liked the part before the factory better. The crooked little house was a great set and Freddie Highmore (Charlie) was enchanting. Once they're in the factory it all turns into the Johnny Depp show, and even though if there's someone out there who could carry his own show, it's Johnny Depp, it was a bit of a bummer to see the other characters disappear into the background. The Oompa Loompas have some great moments and the chocolate river with the boat ride is a joy to watch, but the other factory sets didn't really amaze me as much as I had hoped they would. They all look nice and original, but just didn't really blow me away like Burton sets usually do. The squirrel room was just a round ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: Classics thrown into the pr ...
by Risselada in PulpFiction1975
is neutral about it.
"A remake of a remake? Go figure. But what would be more interesting, Will Smith as The-Man-With-No-Name or Yojimbo. Will Smith and the latter both seem more excitable. Now I wouldn't call Charlie and the Chocolate Factory a remake of Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory as you seem to be implying. If the the "Charlie" movie had been obviously derived from screenplay of the "Willy" movie, I may agree with you. But they both seem to be totally separate adaptations from the original novel. However, I'm not saying that just because it isn't technically a remake means that they should have filmed another movie based on a book that already had such a memorable film already made of it. Mary Poppins was also originally a book too. Or maybe a series of them. Whatever that means. Although Psycho was also originally a book, from what I hear the newer version was obviously a remake of the original screenplay. I also hear one of the most strictly shot for shot remakes as well. Planet ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Charismatic and visually stunning, Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is a bizarre and funny take on this well-known and well-loved morality tale. While the film is an adaptation of the book by Roald Dahl, it remains difficult to avoid comparing it to the 1971 film by Mel Stuart, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory. This more recent adaptation was not meant to be connected to the story's earlier incarnation, however, and that may be problematic for fans who are looking for Gene Wilder's coy interpretation of the eccentric candy man. Johnny Depp makes his Willy Wonka less of a slyly charming eccentric and more of a true-to-life shut-in--with a healthy shot of cartoonish fun thrown into the mix. Depp's Willy Wonka isn't a quick-witted father figure with a good-natured plan to teach a lesson to naughty children; he's genuinely shocked and disgusted by the behavior of these greedy youngsters and their maligned parents. His fantastic characterization and charm overpower the absurd comparisons to Michael Jackson, not least because his Wonka doesn't even seem to particularly like kids. Freddie Highmore's performance as Charlie is a breath of fresh air in child-acting, as he remains the only good-hearted kid of the bunch without so much as approaching saccharine. And of course, some mention must be made of Tim Burton's genius take on the Oompa Loompa(s): how many times the awesome Deep Roy had to shoot each scene to create his many alter-egos, we may never know. All these well balanced parts fit together for a compelling story that balances the viewer's need both for dry, unforgiving humor and for childish wonder and hope. Charlie and the Chocolate Factory is not nearly as suitable for children as its predecessor--the scene in which Veruca Salt is pinned to the floor Gulliver's Travels-style by a group of angry squirrels would be terrifying to a small child. This isn't a strike against the film, however, as this isn't so much a children's movie that's enjoyable to adults, but rather an adult film that will be loved by children. Even actual fans of the book should be delighted as the movie, above all, achieves the bizarre, otherworldly quality of Roald Dahl's work, seducing even the most jaded and corrupt grown-ups to its message with laughter, fantasy and awe. ~ Cammila Albertson, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
are neutral about it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

Phantasma-gore-ia
Phantasma-gore-ia
loved it.
The1TheOnlyJP
The1TheOnlyJP
loved it.
csprague
csprague
loved it.
FastBoat710
FastBoat710
is not interested.
fa531
fa531
is not interested.
xBenjaminMichaelx
xBenjaminMichaelx
is not interested.