Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

King Kong
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $9.29
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Peter Jackson.
One of the greatest adventure stories in Hollywood history gets a new interpretation in this action drama from Academy Award-winning director Peter Jackson. In the early 1930's, Carl Denham (Jack Black) is a daring filmmaker and adventurer who has gained a reputation for his pictures documenting wildlife in remote and dangerous jungle lands; despite the objections of his backers, Denham plans to film his next project aboard an ocean vessel en route to Skull Island, an uncharted island he discovered on a rare map. Correctly assuming his cast and crew would be wary of such a journey, Denham has told them they're traveling to Singapore, but before they set sail, his leading lady drops out of the project. Needing a beautiful actress willing to take a risk, Denham finds Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), a beautiful but down-on-her-luck vaudeville performer and offers her the role; cautious but eager to work, Darrow takes the role, and onboard the ship she strikes up a romance with Jack Driscoll (Adrian Brody), a respected playwright hired by Denham to write the script for his latest epic. When Denham and Company arrive on Skull Island, the natives react with savage violence, but they happen to be the least of their worries. Skull Island is a sanctuary for prehistoric life, and lording it over the dinosaurs and other giant beasts is Kong, a twenty-five-foot-tall gorilla who can outfight any creature on Earth. The natives kidnap Darrow, giving her to Kong as an offering to appease the giant beast; Denham and his men set out to find her, with Driscoll bravely determined to save the woman he loves. Eventually, Driscoll finds Darrow and Denham outwits Kong, intending to take the giant ape back to New York for display. But Kong has bonded with Darrow, and his attraction to her proves to be his undoing. Andy Sirkis, who provided the body movements for Gollum in Peter Jackson's Lord of the Rings pictures, performed similar duties on King Kong, studying gorillas so he could mimic their actions, which were then used as the basis for the special effects crew's digital animation of the great ape. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

SpoutBlogSpoutBlog 15 Cartoons Calling for CGI/Liv ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I don’t know what is the worse idea, an all-CGI 3-D Smurfs movie, as Paramount had planned, or a CGI/live-action mix, as Sony Animation is now planning for our beloved blue communists friends. I guess if we only think back to Alvin and the Chipmunks and Underdog, it’s easy to think Sony’s new plan for The Smurfs is a terrible idea. But I think the second Scooby-Doo movie worked pretty well as far as cartoon adaptations go, and there’s a chance Hollywood could do a good job again, despite the majority (including Garfield: The Movie, The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle, the first Scooby-Doo) being on the bad side. That said, I’m still no fan of the trend. However, if it must continue, I think it would be interesting to see any of the following 15 animated series, all of which feature the necessary mix of talking animals (or inanimate objects) and humans, turned into live-action movies with CGI characters: The Yogi Bear Show - I feel it’s inevitable that we’ll be seeing this one ... " [More]
kickstandsupkickstandsup The King is not bad!
by kickstandsup in kickstandsup Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"King Kong movie was.... interesting... Special effects, especially when the big ape fought the T-Rex's - incredible... The story line pretty much followed the original movie. Jack Black did a good job and the movie entertained me for the entire movie. If you have an adversion for heights, the ending of the movie can make ya a little bit queazy.. You know the feeling you get when you are on a roller coaster and you are lifted a little bit out of your seat? Some of the slips on the top of the building gave me a similar feeling.Not a bad flick, glad I did not pay full price in the theatre, but would rent on DVD. " [More]
SpoutBlogSpoutBlog Big Budget B-Movie Trend Contin ...
by SpoutBlog in SpoutBlog on spout.com
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Eventually Hollywood will learn it doesn’t make sense to spend millions of dollars on a B-movie. It may just take awhile. But if the road towards re-education didn’t begin with Grindhouse, it will possibly start with Roland Emmerich’s 10,000 B.C., the trailer to which is now available courtesy of CHUD.com. The $75,000,000 movie follows a tradition of cheesy Saturday afternoon flicks like 1940’s One Million B.C. and its 1966 remake One Million Years B.C. Of course, back then the B.C. stood for “before computer (effects)” and featured the spectacular — and silly, maybe — visual effects of Roy Seawright and Ray Harryhausen, respectively. Sure, in terms of effects and spectacle, 10,000 B.C. looks cool, just as Emmerich’s The Day After Tomorrow looked cool, but it also has the potential of being unintentionally funny, in the same way the primitive people in Battlefield Earth came off as ridiculous. Emmerich may as well have put in dinosaurs, despite the historical inaccuracy, because th ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re:Re:Re:Re: Total Film's Great ...
by Dr_Gor in Directors
hasn't rated it.
"Ok. Here I am, late to the party as usuall! I was pleasantly surprised by this 'Total Films' list. I was pleased to see ALMOST all of my favorite Horror Movie directors represented! Carpenter, DePalma, Romero, Kubrick, Raimi, HITCHCOCK, Hawks, Siegel, Tarantino, Freidkin et al. I like all the films of Shyamalan, most notably 'Signs', and I think his spot on the list is well deserved. Most noteably missing are Wes Craven and Tobe Hooper.... but then what else would you expect coming from me? .... Anyhow, I was VERY pleasantly surprised to see Peter Jackson at number 9! This is a well deserved honor for this underestimated little director from New Zealand! I thought 'King Kong' was a failure but I saw that coming a mile away! You can NOT remake a 'masterpiece' and expect it to be better than the original! When will these guys figure this out? And if you dismiss his earlier, splattery 'gore-fests', or exploitat ... " [More]
ShaunHustonShaunHuston Directors and remakes
by ShaunHuston in Directors
hasn't rated it.
"Over on the Top 5 group, tmoney mentioned the forthcoming remake of 3:10 to Yuma in one of his contributions to the Westerns thread. This got me thinking about other directors who have, seemingly at least, chosen to cash in their chips from a particularly good year or stretch of years on a remake. In this case it looks as if James Mangold is turning Walk the Line around into 3:10 to Yuma. I also thought of Peter Jackson and King Kong, Gus Van Sant and Psycho, and Steven Soderbergh and Ocean's 11. This got me wondering if there are other examples of filmmakers choosing this path, and, if so, who and what was the film, and also why a director might choose to do this. Remakes are, more often than not, greeted with growns and skepticism, even though the record is actually mixed (Soderbergh's Ocean's 11, for example, is a much better film than the original, which is almost painfully bad and boring). But, given the widespread perception that remakes are jokes or wrong somehow ... " [More]
MovieBabeMovieBabe King Kong - Brokeback Mountain
by MovieBabe in MovieBabe Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"By Tricia Olszewski When an ape loves a woman, it turns out that he likes to woo the object of his affection the same way upright-walkin’ dudes do—the more sensitive ones, anyway. The beast will cuddle up to his sweetie and peacefully enjoy the sunset. Or gaze into her eyes in the middle of a quiet, snow-dusted street. And when the animal gets confused and frustrated while gallantly trying to walk on ice with her in his arms, he will just fall down and start gliding in circles with his girl, both giggling—yes, giggling—the whole time. At least that’s how it goes in the Hobbit King’s mind. And goes and goes—for 187 minutes, Peter Jackson's King Kong is nearly double the length of the 1933 original. How did Jackson and co-writers Fran Walsh and Philippa Boyens stretch Merian C. Cooper and Edgar Wallace’s relatively simple story to such epic proportions? Well, the movie is first a smaller-scale Titanic, then a ballsier Jurassic Par ... " [More]
IndianagirlIndianagirl King Kong
by Indianagirl in Indianagirl Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I have to say this has to be the saddest,most depressing movie that I have ever seen. I mean, they go to his homeland,capture him and continue to torture him, all because he thinks he's procecting the only thing he's ever loved. This movie is definatly not for the soft hearted. I wanted to cry the entire time. I could'nt even finish watching it. I thought the movie was well made & had great effects but was just TOOOO SAD for me!!! " [More]
slipofthetongueslipofthetongue Look out! It's a reverential r ...
by slipofthetongue in SlipOfTheTongue Blog
is neutral about it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"It sucks being a guy.  They bite you, shoot at you, gas you, knock you down, strangle you, tear at your flesh and finally shoot at you again (this time causing you to fall off a tall building), all while you are trying to protect your girlfriend!  How f***'d up and belligerant a world we must live in for mankind to create this movie about a giant gorilla with whom we must empathize because most of the human race is so opportunistic and knee jerk violent.  Jackson's remake can be thrilling but unfortunately here are the drawbacks...too long, too bloated, too much CGI, feels like a Universal Studios ride.  Not enough grace.  Not enough wit.  Not enough artistry.  Not enough true scares.  Jack Black is the wrong note.  Really wrong.  Mealy mouthed writer as our only human protagonist?  I like Adrian Brody, but are we really supposed to root for this character? However...here are the positives.  Depression era Manhattan glows.  It's beautiful.  There are some good scares.  ... " [More]
urtown2urtown2 So it was long- if you only see ...
by urtown2 in urtown2 Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"King Kong was a beautiful film. The rich attension to historical detail, the dark color pallet, the acting in accordanace to the 1933 film era it tributes- I really enjoyed this film. The most common complaint was that the movie was too long. For a movie, I have to agree that one eight of your day is too long. However I feel that this film was epic. Like a great novel there are some parts that add certain aspects to the over all story which are not essentail to the main plot. The time on the island could have taken a simple half an hour. The movie could have been much shorter. The parts added, however worked to turn the film into roller coaster alternating with spine tingling drops into giant bug filled pits and building ascents to the top of Kongs natural paradise. I also think that Peter Jackson worked to make his film a tribute to the original. The scene in Jackson's film where Niami is preforming for the "movie" Jack Black is filming, the dialouge was taken from t ... " [More]
davisfreebergdavisfreeberg King Kong Big Gorrilla For Fema ...
by davisfreeberg in Female Hysteria
hasn't rated it.
"I would be willing to bet that there are a lot more classics that feature female hysteria then current films. Maybe it's the change in popular thought, but many of the original Hollywood hits featured the screaming damsel in distress and the popular hero who saves the day. I guess it should be no suprise to me then that Peter Jackson's remake of the classic King Kong would follow the same formula.The problem with Jackson's remake though was that it was so long that the screaming really got old after a while. In the end there was only so much that I could take before the effect lost it's impact. A much more subtle approach to female hysteria would have been a much better route. In the end, the screaming had all bark and no bite for me. " [More]
[More reviews]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Peter Jackson's King Kong is a spectacle of big-budget adventurism that indulges in flashy childhood monster movie fetishes while upping the original's sentimental quotient to new grandiose levels. Filled with furious action and exotic locales, the film gives Kong a much broader canvas to wreak havoc upon in this retooled version of the famed story. The big screen's largest primate has also been given more time to do so, with a three-hour-plus running time weighing heavily on the audience's shoulders as each act is expanded to mixed results. Needless backstories take center stage in the beginning, just as the middle tends to blur into one long chase sequence that is downright excessive in its scale and endless barrage of thrills. Viewers might find themselves caught up in the breathless imagery, but one senses that Jackson isn't flexing his storyteller muscles as much as he's fulfilling his own boyhood dreams of the prehistoric rock 'em, sock 'em material. In that way, the director momentarily ceases to involve his audience in the drama, opting instead to deliver fast-paced action with multiple icky, gooey, ferocious creatures filling the screen to dizzying degrees. Ironically, the picture's strongest moments are its quietest, as Kong and Naomi Watts build a sincere and touching bond that goes far beyond the creepy unrequited love of duo in the 1933 original. It's this relationship that fuels the bravura third act that opens with a lavish and witty recreation of the villagers from the original, as dancers cavort Broadway-style in front of the broken and battered giant ape. What follows is a miraculous recreation of one of the most famous scenes in movie history that is as heartbreaking an experience as any. Time will tell how the film will be viewed years down the road, but one thing is for sure -- this isn't the King Kong that Peter Jackson would have made before Lord of the Rings (which was originally the plan). The film might benefit from the sensitivity gleaned from Tolkien's trilogy, but on the flip side of Hollywood's cursed coin, his unlimited power and success no doubt bloated what was once a slim tale of beauty and the beast and turned it into a personal journey of obsessive boyhood dreams come true, not unlike the film's monomaniacal filmmaker Carl Denham. ~ Jeremy Wheeler, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
lost interest.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

Phantasma-gore-ia
Phantasma-gore-ia
loved it.
rik_tod
rik_tod
loved it.
TheWorkingDead
TheWorkingDead
loved it.
QFLW
QFLW
is not interested.
EveLibertine
EveLibertine
is not interested.
PammyK
PammyK
is not interested.