Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $8.02
trailerWatch trailer

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Peter Jackson.
The second film in Peter Jackson's series of screen adaptations of J.R.R. Tolkien's internationally popular Lord of The Rings trilogy, The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers literally begins where The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring ended, with the Fellowship splitting into three groups as they seek to return the Ring to Mordor, the forbidding land where the powerful talisman must be taken to be destroyed. Frodo (Elijah Wood), who carries the Ring, and his fellow Hobbit Sam (Sean Astin) are lost in the hills of Emyn Muil when they encounter Gollum (Andy Serkis), a strange creature who once carried the Ring and was twisted by its power. Gollum volunteers to guide the pair to Mordor; Frodo agrees, but Sam does not trust their new acquaintance. Elsewhere, Merry (Dominic Monaghan) and Pippin (Billy Boyd) are attempting to navigate Fangorn Forrest where they discover a most unusual nemesis -- Treebeard (voice of John Rhys-Davies), a walking and talking tree-shepherd who doesn't much care for Hobbits. Finally, Aragorn (Viggo Mortensen), Gimli (John Rhys-Davies), and Legolas (Orlando Bloom) arrive in Rohan to discover that the evil powers of Saruman (Christopher Lee) have robbed King Theoden (Bernard Hill) of his rule. The King's niece Éowyn (Miranda Otto) believes Aragorn and his men have the strength to defeat Saruman, his henchman Wormtongue (Brad Dourif), and their minions. Éowyn soon becomes infatuated with Aragorn, while he struggles to stay faithful to the pledge of love he made to Arwen (Liv Tyler). Gandalf (Ian McKellen) offers his help and encouragement as the Rohans, under Aragorn's leadership, attempt to face down Saruman's armies, but they soon discover how great the task before them truly is when they learn that his troops consist of 10,000 bloodthirsty creatures specially bred to fight to the death. Most of The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers was shot in tandem with The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring and The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King during a marathon 18-month shooting schedule, overseen by Peter Jackson. ~ Mark Deming, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

tjl30tjl30 In the Name of the Kind: I can' ...
by tjl30 in tjl30 Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Ok where do I begin to describe this movie called In the Name of the King: A Dungeon Siege Tale… Well I decided that I wanted to see this movie because it has Jason Statham who is a complete bad ass and I have yet to see a movie he was in that wasn’t great, well until now. In the Name of the King seemed to have the budget and special effects from the Hercules TV show with Kevin Sorbo (the acting was almost as bad as well). But what do you expect when you cast people like Burt Reynolds as a heroic king and Matthew Lillard as the Duke Fallow (whenever I see this guy I can only think of Brock Hudson from another great movie She's All That. Oh I forgot, the movie starts out the same as the Hercules: The Legendary Journeys (well similar), the Farmer’s (Jason Statham’s) family is killed by these beasts called Crug. The Crug are basically a rip off of the Orcs from Lord of the Rings, and are created by the Maji (Wizard) Gallian. Anyways the farmer whose ... " [More]
downwestdownwest Once it takes hold of us it nev ...
by downwest in downwest Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"A beautifully epic installment to one of the greatest tales ever written. Everyone that made the preceding installment great made this one great in its own right, along with a few new additions to the cast. " [More]
Hoss75Hoss75 Overrated
by Hoss75 in Hoss75 Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"I used to think I was the only person in the world that didn't like the LOFTR trilogy. Then I was watching Kevin Smith talking about the movie. He described at 9 hours of people walking, and with the last movie not ending as early as it should have. That pretty much summed it up for me. I'm not trying to cause controversy, just wanted to tell anyone that didn't like the first film, don't expect it to get better. " [More]
JakeStevensJakeStevens The Epic Continues...
by JakeStevens in JakeStevens Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"What can I say that hasn't been already said? Continuing the greatness of the first film, the plot thickens (and worsens for our heroes ala The Empire Strikes Back) and the battles get more ferocious. Golum is completely believable as a 'real' character (the personal 'battle' he has is a treat), even though he is fully CGI. When I saw this in the theater, I couldn't believe I had to wait a whole year for the final chapter. " [More]
myrdynnmyrdynn Frodo the Failed Hero
by myrdynn in myrdynn Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the RingLord of the Rings: The Two Towers Lord of the Rings: The Return of the KingI think it is fair to say that Peter Jackson's trilogy of the Lord of the Rings is one of the best trilogies ever made. If not the best! Of course I am writing this because I spent all day yesterday watching the three movies! (regular, not extended, editions) and once again I was amazed about how big a failure Frodo turned out to be. Of all the original Fellowship I don't think you can doubt the heroic qualities of Gandalf, Aragorn, Gimli and Legolas. Even Boromir, the most flawed of the Fellowship attains redeemed hero status with his final act of sacrifice in trying to save Merry and Pippin. Speaking of which, of the four Hobbits in the Fellowship, Merry and Pippin, as well as being good comic relief, consistently showed their heroism and intestinal fortitude throughout. That only leaves Sam and Frodo. Sam, having pretty much whined his way through a ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: Books into Movies: Lord of ...
by Risselada in CinLit
liked it.
"I had read The Lord of the Rings several times before seeing the new movies, as well as The Hobbit, The Silmarillion, and a number of other Middle Earth stories and works. For many many, years it was my favorite book, and it may still be. For a time I indulged myself in everything Tolkien and Middle Earth. The stories, the lore, the mythology, the morality, the history, the races and creatures, the geography, the languages (creating the different languages and histories of languages was really Tolkien's main reason for creating the world and stories of Middle Earth).Seeing these movies gave me one of the most unusual, conflicted feelings I'd ever had with a movie. The book creates such spectacular scenes and goes into such detail about the way things look and feel that I knew it could be great material for such a large scale movie. Yet the book is so literary, so long, that it would not be able to fit on the screen in so many ways. I knew this. I was still angered an ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Co-writer and director Peter Jackson continues his Oscar-winning, box-office blockbuster adaptation of the classic fantasy novel from author J.R.R. Tolkien with a second installment that plunges the fictional setting of Middle-earth into a vicious war. Welcome additions to the action in the sophomore adventure include the CG-created Gollum, moving front and center as a major character who is simply amazing in his ability to entertain and move the viewer emotionally. The most pathetic creature in the trilogy, he's a schizophrenic nightmare but heartbreakingly human and poignantly, dazzlingly realized by a combination of actor Andy Serkis's physical skill and Jackson's special effects experts. Gollum puts the similar Jar Jar Binks character of the second Star Wars trilogy to shame. Also thrilling are a climactic battle between Ents (living "trees") and the evil wizard Saruman (Christopher Lee) that brings to mind any number of breathtaking sequences from The Wizard of Oz (1939), and the final clash between humans and invading enemy forces at Helm's Deep, a lengthy but thrilling clash of bows and shields that recalls the superb fight sequences from Braveheart (1995). Less persuasive are some storytelling elements that fall victim to the filmmakers' effort to condense the story into a three-hour running time: several gaps in the action occur and a few developments are left unexplained or vague, such as how the forces of Éomer (Karl Urban) grow from a few dozen to thousands, how the defenders of the realm of Gondor manage to defeat their attackers, why the Ringwraiths have suddenly switched mounts from horses to dragons (why did they use horses at all in the first film?) -- and why Tolkien felt the need to give every location, character, and object in his work at least three utterly confusing names (those who haven't read the books may be left wondering what the difference is between Éomer and Faramir or Gimli and Grima). However, the simple fact that a novel as dense and detailed as this one hasn't been turned into a labored bore is a miracle; that Jackson has fashioned such a triumphant success is a real artistic achievement. Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers (2002) may be imperfect in its occasionally frustrated effort to squeeze every significant plot element into the mix, but it's a visual marvel and a definite raising of the artistic bar for its entire genre. No filmmaker will ever be able to create a sci-fi or fantasy epic again without comparison against it. ~ Karl Williams, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
liked it.

Other opinions

pippin06
pippin06
loved it.
chesterfilms
chesterfilms
loved it.
JakeStevens
JakeStevens
loved it.
crossfertilization
crossfertilization
is not interested.
BigA
BigA
is not interested.
fa531
fa531
is not interested.