Comic-Con coverage on Spout
Advertisement

Signs
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $10.07

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by M. Night Shyamalan.
Following the smash hit The Sixth Sense (1999) and the under-performing follow-up Unbreakable (2000), directing phenom M. Night Shyamalan returns to the summer box office landscape that served as the backdrop for his cinematic breakthrough. In Signs, another paranormal outing for the writer-director, Shyamalan explores the eerie implications of a 500-foot crop circle that mysteriously appears on the Bucks County, PA farm of reverend Graham Hess (Mel Gibson). As Hess and his family (Joaquin Phoenix, Rory Culkin, Abigail Breslin) try to take stock of what the sign means, and how its message incorporates into their faith, they start to get the feeling they are not alone in the fields behind their house. Shyamalan re-teams with producers Frank Marshall, Sam Mercer and Kathleen Kennedy, and produces the project in association with his Blinding Edge Pictures banner and Touchstone Pictures. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

divinemsjunebugdivinemsjunebug Re:The Happening - Yay or Nay?
by divinemsjunebug in HORROR MOVIES 101
liked it.
"Okay, I finally saw The Happening and I can agree with ALL of you here. I couldn't believe how bad some of the acting was especially when I have seen them all before in other things and thought they were pretty good, how strange. Any way, he must have given them the direction to act all wide eyed and innocent and whiney...hmmm, I'm not sure. BUT I do have to say that there were some parts I really did like. I thought the beginning was extremely creepy (not when Mark W. was teaching) but especially the construction workers. There were so many very cool scenes that I got a few chills from. The part with the old crazy lady made me jump a few times, good shock scenes. I do agree with Abby too that I thought it was strange how he had to explain some things making me think that he though only uneducated stupid people would be watching this movie...I just don't know. I did have to say that I figured it out instantly from the beginning, I thought I'm sure everyone figured that out ea ... " [More]
usesoapusesoap Very little Night music
by usesoap in usesoap Blog
lost interest.
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
"M. Night Shyamalan, coming back from a critical and commercial pummeling for his fairy tale “Lady in the Water” that was nightmarish for all the wrong reasons, has attempted to trumpet his return to tension in a new film called...hmmm...what was that title again? Perhaps I should look at some of the dialogue to help me remember: “There is an event happening.” “...whenever this is happening.” “Whatever is happening is happening in smaller and smaller populations.” “Why is this happening?” “Nothing's happening yet.” “There's something happening in a few states.” Oh well, maybe it will come to me later. Touting its R rating like a badge, the film promises to be a darker Night than we are accustomed to, but a few bloody deaths aside (most are shot at a distance), the proceedings are structurally similar to his 2002 outing “Signs.” The film begins so promisingly creepy, with peo ... " [More]
TenenbaumsTenenbaums The Shyamalan Report Card
by Tenenbaums in Tenenbaums Blog
disliked it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"M. Night Shyamalan's career is coming to a halt. But before the film community sends the Philadelphia writer/directer off, let's take a look at his works."The Sixth Sense" is masterful; "Unbreakable" is an underrated comic book gem; "Signs" is frustratingly dumb, then kills any chance of lingering suspense by doing the anti-"Jaws" and showing the wimpy water-allergic aliens; and "The Village" is an intriguing experiment that is far deeper that its apparently simple conclusion.Then there's "Lady in the Water." Possibly attempting to switch up his style or be exceedingly philosophical, Shyamalan's latest released film was critically panned and made little money. Disney, who had financed the director's previous four films, passed on the script, and with good reason. Seeing an opportunity to profit off of Shyamalan's name (perhaps despite the quality of the material), Warner Bros. bankrolled the project and attracted an impressive cast.As with any director of great works, it's clear wh ... " [More]
divinemsjunebugdivinemsjunebug Re: Horror Movies Based on Real ...
by divinemsjunebug in HORROR MOVIES 101
liked it.
"Maybe even discuss movies that you hope to GOD are not based on true events but you could see it happening in real life. Identity could be based on a true story...Shadow of a Vampire could be real if an actor really thought they were a vampire. And if you believe in ExtraTerrestrials (I don't know if I spelled that correct) Signs could be true...I am probably just posting because I am very hyper right now. I don't think I'm going to be able to sleep for a while, I had way too much caffeine today plus watching the Descent... Anyway, if these sound really stupid, please ignore me... hee hee. " [More]
KamiKami Re: Guess The Movie Quote
by Kami in Best movie quotes
is neutral about it.
"Signs! " [More]
smallinovsmallinov Re: Guess The Movie Quote
by smallinov in Best movie quotes
hasn't rated it.
"Signs ? " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
is neutral about it.
It's kind of amazing that no one had previously attempted a spooky movie about crop circles, given the ominous portent of these unexplained phenomena. M. Night Shyamalan harnesses that unrealized potential and then some in Signs, his fifth and most mainstream release, which makes the much-revisited topic of alien invasion freshly eerie, yet also showcases a heretofore unseen strength in the director's dour oeuvre: humor. Shyamalan actively bucks the trend of films like Independence Day, shunning pyrotechnics and scenes of chaos in the world's capital cities. Instead he focuses on one rural Pennsylvania family, in turn keeping with his trademark emotional intimacy -- which, when it doesn't consume him, allows the audience to experience the crisis with an equivalent sense of mounting anxiety. Shyamalan makes sublime use of news footage as a means of imparting chilling glimpses of alien avidence, rendered hyper-real through the medium; in fact, the director deepens the impact by drawing a visual link to September 11th, in the form of engrossed viewers huddled around televisions, absorbing the unspeakable. Though Signs is certainly an original vision, boasting a full complement of clever yet unobtrusive camera tricks by Tak Fujimoto, it comes with a price. Namely, Shyamalan travels so deep into the psyches of his characters that he sometimes loses the big picture, dwelling on a past tragedy at the expense of the imminent emergency, and becoming a little too touchy-feely. There's also considerable effort to bear fruit from all the foreshadowing -- as a wise musician once sang, it's "signs, signs, everywhere signs." Still, Mel Gibson and Joaquin Phoenix contribute some of the most naturalistic acting of their careers, and Shyamalan has created a gripping cinematic experience that reminds viewers of when being scared was a kind of intoxication. ~ Derek Armstrong, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
lost interest.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

pippin06
pippin06
loved it.
Windbreaker
Windbreaker
loved it.
chesterfilms
chesterfilms
loved it.
dave
dave
is not interested.
blissful-imagination
blissful-imagination
is not interested.
smithco
smithco
is not interested.