Frem Here To Awesome Festival
Advertisement

Jane Eyre
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $10.59

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by Robert Stevenson.
Director Robert Stevenson collaborated with novelist Aldous Huxley and theatrical-producer John Houseman on the screenplay for this 1944 adaptation of Charlotte Bronte's gothic romance Jane Eyre. After several harrowing years in an orphanage, where she was placed by a supercilious relative for exhibiting the forbidden trait of "willfulness," Jane Eyre (Joan Fontaine) secures work as a governess. Her little charge, French-accented Adele (Margaret O'Brien), is pleasant enough. But Jane's employer, the brooding, tormented Edward Rochester (Orson Welles), terrifies the prim young governess. Under Jane's gentle influence, Rochester drops his forbidding veneer, going so far as to propose marriage to Jane. But they are forbidden connubial happiness when it is revealed that Rochester is still married to a gibbering lunatic whom he is forced to keep locked in his attic. Rochester reluctantly sends Jane away, but she returns, only to find that the insane wife has burned down the mansion and rendered Rochester sightless. In the tradition of Victorian romances, this purges Rochester of any previous sins, making him a worthy mate for the loving Jane. The presence of Orson Welles in the cast (he receives top billing), coupled with the dark, Germanic style of the direction and photography, has led some impressionable cineasts to conclude that Welles, and not Stevenson, was the director. To be sure, Welles contributed ideas throughout the filming; also, the script was heavily influenced by the Mercury Theater on the Air radio version of Jane Eyre, on which Welles, John Houseman and musical director Bernard Herrmann all collaborated. But Jane Eyre was made at 20th Century-Fox, a studio disinclined to promote the auteur theory; like most Fox productions, this is a work by committee rather than the product of one man. This in no way detracts from the overall excellence of the film; of all adaptations of Jane Eyre (it had previously been filmed in 1913, 1915 and 1921, and has been remade several times since), this 1943 version is one of the best. Keep an eye out for an uncredited Elizabeth Taylor as the consumptive orphanage friend of young Jane Eyre (played as child by Peggy Ann Gardner). ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

RisseladaRisselada Re: The Zombie Phenomenon
by Risselada in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"Oh yeah, guess my inclination wouldn't be to make them gory either, but earlier you used the word "graphic" which for some reason I associated with "gory". Although I know those don't really mean the same thing necessarily. " [More]
divinemsjunebugdivinemsjunebug Re: The Zombie Phenomenon
by divinemsjunebug in HORROR MOVIES 101
loved it.
"It would be that far off. Wuthering Heights really has a lot of classic gothic horror elements. Although those elements are usually tied up with something romantic in that genre. You could probably turn up the gore on the horror aspect if you'd like.[/quote]I don't know, I think with Wuthering Heights and Jane Eyre both, I would do the creepy, dark shadow, eerie scenes and play them up a lot more. Make Kathy's spirit sad and wanting and desperate for him. Have more of the ghostly aspects instead of the horror/gore. That would be an awesome movie to really pump up the spookiness. Jane Eyre could be the same way, his crazy insane wife could be played to the HILT (and you could do a bit of a gorey/horror thing with her), she could take a bite out of somebody before she sets fire to the house, etc. Anyway, both of those movies would be a very cool remake, actually I think Tim Burton would do a fabulous job with movies like that. Another movie that would be soooo co ... " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Jane Eyre is a marvelous adaptation of the Charlotte Bronte classic. While it necessarily has to leave out portions of the novel, it does an excellent job of capturing its flavor, as screenwriters Robert Stevenson, John Houseman, and Aldous Huxley have been careful and judicious in selecting the most important elements to transfer to the screen. Stevenson's direction is among the best of his career, creating senses of atmosphere -- from the oppressive soul-breaking of the orphanage to the strangely beautiful terror of the moors -- that practically fly off the screen. He is greatly aided by George Barnes' expressive, evocative cinematography and Bernard Herrmann's haunting and emotional score. His biggest help, however, comes from stars Orson Welles and Joan Fontaine, both individually and together. Welles' is the more obviously impressive performance, possessed of an overpowering broodiness that masks his character's tortured soul. Calibrating his role with moments of great tenderness, Welles conveys the contradictions in Edward Rochester with ease. Fontaine's role is less flashy, but she brings a quiet conviction to the part that helps anchor the film; her Jane may not bluster and storm as Rochester, but she is every bit as powerful in her own way. Together, the two display a welcome chemistry without which the movie would fail. ~ Craig Butler, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

badthing
badthing
loved it.
divinemsjunebug
divinemsjunebug
loved it.
momoko78
momoko78
loved it.
Arconna
Arconna
is not interested.
rica5tully
rica5tully
is not interested.
hthundar
hthundar
is not interested.