Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

The Hunchback of Notre Dame
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $15.22

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

Directed by William Dieterle.
Few will argue with the contention that RKO Radio's 1939 adaptation of Victor Hugo's The Hunchback of Notre Dame was the best of the many screen versions of the Hugo classic. We say this even allowing for certain liberties taken with the source material-liberties calculated by scenarists Sonya Levien and Bruno Frank to draw parallels between 15th century Paris and 20th century Europe. Thus, Claude Frollo (Cedric Hardwicke), the villain of the piece, is no longer merely a religious hypocrite unable to control his own carnal desires. Instead, Frollo is a bush-league Hitler, warning that the invention of the printing press is dangerous in that it will encourage the rabble to think for themselves, and plotting the persecution and destruction of the "undesirable" gypsies. In the same vein, Gringoire the Poet (Edmond O'Brien in his film debut) has been transformed into an agit-prop "Group Theatre" activist, bent on bringing the unvarnished truth to the ignorant Parisians. Many of Hugo's subplots have been dispensed with, the better to concentrate on the grotesquely deformed Quasimodo (Charles Laughton), bell-ringer of Notre Dame Cathedral, and his puppylike loyalty towards imperiled gypsy dancer Esmerelda (Maureen O'Hara, in her first American film appearance). The schism between the haves and have-nots in the walled city of Paris is illustrated in broad, visually dynamic strokes by director William Dieterle. ~ Hal Erickson, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

RisseladaRisselada Re:The Invisible Man
by Risselada in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"Yes, I have been watching many of these lately, and I have been enjoying some of them. So far those three directed by James Whale are definitely my favorite.I have not yet watched The Hunchback of Notre Dame, although I have been meaning to. I have been thinking I'll like it a lot actually. One because it's rated so well on sites where people can rate movies, but also because it's directed by William Dieterle. And although I've only seen one other movie by him so far, The Devil and Daniel Webster, it's one of my very favorite movies.I notice that there is also a version of The Hunchback of Notre Dame that was released in 1923 staring Lon Chaney. Have you seen this one? How does it stack up?Well the featurette on the The Invisible Man DVD mentiones The Invisible Woman, Invisible Agent, and The Invisible Man's Revenge as all being sequels. And they were all made by Universal. Have you seen any of them? They say the effects in the last one were some of ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re:The Invisible Man
by Dr_Gor in HORROR MOVIES 101
loved it.
"I cannot let this one just go by ... The Invisible Man was a GREAT movie! Directed by the same insane genious who gave us Frankenstein and The Bride Of Frankenstein . The title character was played by a very young Claude Raines who later went on to become Lawrence Talbot's father in The Wolf Man . I am happy that you enjoyed this movie, Rizzo, and I notice that you have been watching a few of these 'oldies-but-goodies' of late and you seem to be enjoying them.... I have to ask you about this. Do you think these movies are pretty cool or what? Have you watched The Hunchback Of Notre Dame yet? Anyhow, I think there was only one official 'Universal' sequel to The Invisible Man and that was The Invisible Man Returns . I think there were a few remakes and TV shows but those don't really count as 'sequels'. Unfortunately, or rather Fortunately, The Invisible Man was never included in any of the great 'monster-mash' mov ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re:Movies that surpassed the book
by Dr_Gor in The Film Library
loved it.
"The first one that pops into my mind is JAWS . The Peter Benchley novel was quite popular among us school-kids in about the 5th or 6th grade... a couple of years before the movie came out... It was quite a bit different from the movie. There were some extremely nasty sexuall parts which led me to believe that none of the teachers or adults had read this novel, as we were all allowed to read it sitting at our desks... (same with The Exorcist !) ... (and Helter Skelter !) ... Anyhow, in the novel, Chief Brody's wife, Ellen, has a very brief but torrid affair with Matt Hooper (!) , from the time he arrives on the Island untill the three men get in the boat together... Chief Brody finds out about this affair just before the men set sail... which leads to much tention aboard the ship tosay the least... Thankfully, all of this is missing from the movie... Also, the ending was quite different and the character of 'Quint' was quite a bit different as well ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor The Hunchback of Notre Dame
by Dr_Gor in Dr_Gor Blog
loved it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"The 1939 version of "The Huchback of Notre Dame", starring Charles Laughton, is absolutely the BEST version of this story ever filmed. (I did not much care for the Lon Chaney silent version...) This is one of my favorite movies of all time. And, yes, this is considered by most people to be one of the classic Universal Horror Movies although you are correct in assuming that it is not really "horror" per se... This IS listed as one of my favorite Horror Movies in my Horror Movies 101 group. It is difficult to think of the tragic figure of Quasimodo as a "monster"... he is actually the HERO of the story! The "villain" is the evil Preist 'Frollo' who is The Hunchback's 'foster father' of sorts. Although this film takes great liberties with the original novel (one of my favorite books), as do all of the film versions of this story, the basic premise is still there ... It is the story of the beautiful gypsy girl ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re: Horror/Thriller/Mystery Cla ...
by Dr_Gor in HORROR MOVIES 101
loved it.
"Whenever I am talking about the 'true' classics, I am talking pre 1950 ... aka 'The Golden Age' ! In or around 1950, Horror movies suddenly changed (!) into 'sci-fi, radiation (we had just won The War by 'nuking' Japan!), and giant bugs, etc.!" ... About 1960 it changed again... back to the more 'old school' Horror film! Then, about 1970, it changed AGAIN.... And '80... And '90... and on and on through EVERY decade! Ok... back to the 'golden age'! I have a few 'stand out favorites' that I ALWAYS recomend to EVERYBODY... 1. "The Hunchback Of Notre Dame" (1939: starring Charles Laughton) 2. "The Black Cat" (1934: Karloff and Lugosi) 3. "The Bride Of Frankenstein" (there is only one!) ... There are more... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re: Oldies But Goodies
by Dr_Gor in Black And White
loved it.
"The 1939 version of "The Huchback of Notre Dame", starring Charles Laughton, is absolutely the BEST version of this story ever filmed. (I did not much care for the Lon Chaney silent version...) This is one of my favorite movies of all time. And, yes, this is considered by most people to be one of the classic Universal Horror Movies although you are correct in assuming that it is not really "horror" per se... This IS listed as one of my favorite Horror Movies in my Horror Movies 101 group. It is difficult to think of the tragic figure of Quasimodo as a "monster"... he is actually the HERO of the story! The "villain" is the evil Preist 'Frollo' who is The Hunchback's 'foster father' of sorts. Although this film takes great liberties with the original novel (one of my favorite books), as do all of the film versions of this story, the basic premise is still there ... It is the story of the beautiful gypsy girl 'Esmarelda' and all of the men w ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: Oldies But Goodies
by Risselada in Black And White
hasn't rated it.
"Have you seen William Dieterle's The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939)? I heard that's pretty phenominal. I figured it might fit into the same category as the classic monster flicks, not sure though. " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re: When I think of GORE, I thi ...
by Dr_Gor in Gorrible
loved it.
"First for Puhnner... 'implied gore' goes back to the very beginning of the motion picture industry... We have previously talked about the 'classic' Universal Films of the 30's and 40's, FRANKENSTEIN and THE WOLFMAN are prime examples of this... some other 'implied gore' movies from the early years include The Phantom Of The Opera, The Hunchback Of Notre Dame, BEN HUR, and several of the great 'Hammer' films from England in the 60's... but, I think the all time KING of 'implied gore' movies would be the original TEXAS CHAINSAW MASSACRE (!) ... if you re-watch this masterpeice of modern horror, you will notice that there is virtually NO on-screen gore (!!!)... And now for 'serioussmoker'... OK, how many of THESE serious 'GORE-FILMS' have you seen? ... Suspiria (1977) - Details - Spout Deep Red (1975) - Details - Spout The Beyond (1981) - Details - Spout The House by the Cemetery (1981) - Details - Spout Don ... " [More]
Dr_GorDr_Gor Re: "I Bid You Welcome...& ...
by Dr_Gor in HORROR MOVIES 101
loved it.
"Don't lose faith. There are still some of us out there! Thank You, Micha, for your response! It is an honor and a privelege for me to have such a beautiful and young "True Horror Movie Fan" in my humble group! Thank You, Again! Here are a couple of "oldies-but-goodies" that might interest you... I hope you will take the time to check them out one day... The Black Cat (1934) - Spout The Hunchback of Notre Dame (1939) - Spout The Bride of Frankenstein (1935) - Spout Please let me know if you enjoy these movies... they are some of my favorites! And there are many, many more like them! Again, it is a pleasure to have you here, Micha... keep enjoying the HORROR! < GOR > " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
liked it.
Set in fifteenth century France, The Hunchback of Notre Dame captures the medieval era's tumult, as superstition and prejudice war with progress, both material and intellectual. Church and state unite to attempt to hold back the waves of change sweeping over Europe, as it rides the crest of the Renaissance. Charles Laughton's performance as Quasimodo, the misshapen protagonist, is every bit as moving as Lon Chaney's work in the earlier silent film. Overcoming his physical deformity and status as social outcast, Quasimodo represents all that is most noble and heroic about mankind, while the physically commanding Frollo, a man of immense political and religious power, acts as his morally corrupt and sexually repressed counterpoint. Maureen O'Hara's film debut is also memorable; the passions she inspires in the men around her are wholly believable. The recreation of medieval Paris is an awesome achievement, and the elegance of the production values is indisputable. Director William Dieterle manages a difficult task well, creating a film of both great sweep and remarkable intimacy. The film takes some liberties with the source material, but it captures the essence of Victor Hugo's novel very well. It was nominated for two Academy Awards (music and sound); Laughton's definitive performance was overlooked by the Academy. ~ Dan Jardine, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
liked it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

Dr_Gor
Dr_Gor
loved it.
divinemsjunebug
divinemsjunebug
loved it.
chesterfilms
chesterfilms
loved it.
marincat
marincat
lost interest.
Serena07
Serena07
is not interested.