Join the Comic-Con group
Advertisement

The Exorcist III
  • 0
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Rate this movie.

Buy it now on DVD
Starting at $6.21

Rent it, watch it, find it

Advertisement

William Peter Blatty, author of The Exorcist, directed this intriguing, deliberately-paced thriller based on his novel Legion. Ignoring the events of John Boorman's disappointing Exorcist II: The Heretic (1977), the film moves ahead 15 years from the end of the original, when Georgetown is being plagued by occult murders bearing signs of the long-dead Gemini Killer, James Venamon (Brad Dourif). Although the killer was executed 15 years earlier, a young boy is horribly mutilated and the ailing Father Dyer (Ed Flanders) is drained of blood in his hospital bed. George C. Scott takes over the role of dedicated police Lt. William Kinderman, who is convinced that the key to the killings lies in an amnesiac mental patient who looks exactly like the dead Father Karras (Jason Miller) at some times, and like Venamon at others. It appears that Venamon was executed at the exact moment that Father Karras became possessed by the killer/devil and hurtled from the window at the end of the first film. Kinderman slowly comes to accept that the patient is Venamon and enlists an exorcist, Father Morning (Nicol Williamson), to free Karras' soul and stop the murders. The Exorcist III is heavy on dialogue, but contains some fine performances and some chilling moments, particularly the haunting opening in a Georgetown church. George DiCenzo, Viveca Lindfors, and Zohra Lampert also appear in this underrated, low-key horror film. Award-winning makeup artist Greg Cannom contributed to the special-effects, Gerry Fisher's cinematography is excellent, and the cast includes some notable bit parts by Samuel L. Jackson, Patrick Ewing, and Tyra Ferrell. ~ Robert Firsching, All Movie Guide
[more]

Reviews and discussions

Write a review

CinemaRianCinemaRian The Exorcist III (1990, USA, Wi ...
by CinemaRian in CinemaRian Blog
hasn't rated it.
Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
"The Exorcist III is the kind of movie that makes the star rating system sort of irrelevant. This is the movie that does pretty much what it sets out to do. It is one of the rare horror films that I found genuinely eerie and unsettling. But when the movie was over, I found myself questioning whether the creeps where at the service of something worthwhile and I was forced to answer no. In a sense, this is an effective film, but a ultimately, a pointless one. The film is directed by William Peter Blatty, who wrote the novel on which the original Exorcist was based. Part three is based on Blatty's own sequel novel, Legion, which I learn from Wikipedia was Blatty's original choice of title. That probably would be more appropriate, because this film seems to be set in an alternate universe from the original. Part of the reason for this disconnect is that many of the characters are played by different actors from the original. Part III follows Lt. Kinderman, the detective from the origina ... " [More]
RisseladaRisselada Re: The Exorcist
by Risselada in HORROR MOVIES 101
hasn't rated it.
"How is the second one? I heard Exorcist III is very good and scary. Did Blatty write those too?That Pazuzu is tricky though. At one point he says he is Satan himself. Othertimes he calls himself Legion in like the incident in the Bible which implies there are many demons. And he does use many different voices including those of real people who have passed away. But Father Merrin warns that there is only one demon using tricks. I did notice that when they were evaluating Regan the doctor said her problem was that she had a "lesion" in here brain, which obviously sounds just like Legion. So the doctor was inadvertently saying the real cause of her troubles without realising it. " [More]
Review by All Movie Guide
All Movie Guide
lost interest.
Exorcist author William Peter Blatty exhumed the demonic possession tale -- 17 years after the original and 13 after the monumentally disappointing sequel -- for a walk on the frightfully disturbing side. This film, largely ignored and perhaps lost on a new generation of filmgoers, is as chilling as modern horror gets. While not worthy of the original's "classic" status, this rendition is full of flesh-crawling moments -- base horror hopped up by the addition of graphic gore. The film deals with the eternal battle between God and the Devil, generally digging deeper in the collective horror psyche and generating a more primordial sense of fear. Such metaphysical horror must be done well and Blatty succeeds in scaring the innards out of the viewer. George C. Scott gives a thoughtfully inspired performance, and an unheralded Samuel L. Jackson and Patrick Ewing make cameos. Although the film borrows a bit much from the Omen and Amityville traditions, overall it is authentically frightening in its execution. ~ Mike DiBella, All Movie Guide
 



Community ratings

mavens
Spout mavens
are neutral about it.
most people
Most people
are neutral about it.

Other opinions

cindiekitty
cindiekitty
loved it.
belladonna2054
belladonna2054
loved it.
digitalconquest
digitalconquest
loved it.
awkwardj
awkwardj
disliked it.
mercurial
mercurial
is not interested.
Alonzoc23
Alonzoc23
is not interested.