Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

Windbreaker!

  • STARDUST

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Pan's Labyrinth  (2006)

    Stardust  (2007)

    Unless you have an outrageously large DVD collection, just rent this.  It's good, but probably won't have you craving too many repeat viewings over the years.  I've seen so many ads for fantasy flicks in the post-Lord of the Rings era that just try too hard.  They figure the grander the scale, the more satisfying the adventure.  Oh how I long for the days of Princess Bride (not that there were many small scale movies like Princess Bride back then... but I can fantasize).  Stardust is somewhere in the middle of the fantasy film spectrum.  It isn't real close and intimate like Pan's Labyrinth (instant classic), and also isn't 4 hours long with 18 primary characters.  Some of the camera shots get out of control.  I don't need all the sweeping space-to-earth type shots in a story like this.  Show me the journey, not an accidental blooper of Sputnik orbiting over Utah.

    So, what's Stardust about?  Glad you asked.  It's about a town in the horse-n-carriage era where most people use toothpaste 2 times a day, women's skin looks great, men use body spray, and farm animals are just for show.  The name of the town is Wall, which is English for the Hamptons (watch the special features and you'll learn something). 

    Tristan, a nice boy from the Hamptons who may or may not have been conceived through the use of magical powers is in love with snooty Victoria.  She's full of self-love, but that doesn't matter because she clearly uses Oil of Olay, Mary Kay foundation and blush, and doesn't have any split ends on those blonde locks.  She's hot.  Trouble is, she's being courted by a dorky metrosexual who has a fascination with rods. 

    So Tristan sets out on a fun-filled and sometimes scary 90-minute adventure to win the love of Victoria, the chick that 8 out of 10 men would marry in a heartbeat even if she was shallow as a baby pool.  Because it's a baby pool of smooth skin, a nice smile, and tight buns.  But I digress...

    Along the way we get boys turned to goats, goats turned to men, an FBI age-progression experiment with Michelle Pfieffer, a bunch of brothers dying off as angry kings-to-be and being transformed into happy-go-lucky spirits.  Oh, and Robert DeNiro in drag.  Yeah.  Umm... maybe if the acting all around was 100% believable and the script was tight this would be fun.  Instead we get an authentic look at how Robert DeNiro would act in his bedroom if a camera crew was allowed in.  He'd be a bit shy, but would eventually share his love of cross-dressing and perform a little number for us.  The End.

    Go rent it.  You'll like it... once.


  • TWIN PEAKS (tv pilot)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Twin Peaks  (1990)

    Thank God for DVD reviving old TV shows!  Well... I could do without Life Goes On or Weird Science, but Twin Peaks is a treasure.  Rewatching the pilot in gloriously restored picture and audio is a treat.  Even with all the shock-filled shows brought to TV over the past decade, Twin Peaks still manages to hold its own as innovative, provocative, and downright mesmorizing.  I love it.  Everyone knows the show surrounds the death of Laura Palmer, which could have easily been trivialized in the pilot.  But even knowing what's coming, the viewer's heart will be wrenched.

    And hats off to David Lynch for his input into the soundtrack.  Without it, my 9/10 goes down to a 7, I'm sure.

    If you never saw the show, don't bother yourself with researching the plot, actors, etc.  Just rent or buy.  I just checked with myself and I'm never wrong.


  • curse phil collins for putting me to sleep

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Disclaimer:  I don't own a single Phil Collins or Genesis album.  But I can enjoy the pop goodness of most of his catalog, which is why I queued The Final Farewell Tour.  That, and I've heard he's a great live performer.  There were good arrangements, but for the most part I was overwhelmed with a feeling of... meh.

    Avoid this disc.


  • THE COMPANY (part 3)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Company  (2007)

    Part 3, the "how the hell can they wrap this up in 90 minutes" act of The Company.  Let me say, as far as TV movies and minis go, this may be the best I've ever seen.  My only complaint is that in order to wrap up the story with the fall of the Soviet Union, some big leaps in time were required. 

    Now, given the theme of the entire mini -- battle of good vs. evil, freedom vs. communism -- the fall of the USSR was fitting.  But a filmmaker is out of his mind to think that you can wrap up without so much as a MENTION of Ronald Reagan.  Who?  Oh, I don't know, maybe the guy who won the freakin Cold War??!!!  Unacceptable oversight. 

    The cynic in me says it wasn't an oversight at all, that the storywriter (book or screenplay) thought the most important man of the 20th century was too offensive or polarizing.  Or maybe the director new that Ted Turner wouldn't fund anything portraying Reagan in a positive light. 

    I hope the writer just isn't old enough to realize Reagan's importance and I'm overly paranoid...


  • THE COMPANY (part 2)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Company  (2007)

    Part 2, the full-on action act of The Company.  The primary plot-thread is the Hungarian revolution with all sorts of crazy war-time filming that is usually reserved for the big screen.  Also, we get some torture sequences by some folks who aren't as skilled with their craft as Jack Bauer. 

    Back at the offices, Michael Keaton's James Angleton is thoroughly explored.  Chris O'Donnell may have the series' lead character, but Angleton is by far the most compelling.  A master spy experienced with intelligence agencies across the world, he heads up the counter-intel group and tirelessly pursues a mole within the CIA's upper ranks.  He's an isolated, quirky, self-righteous guy, and yet you want him to succeed.  Keaton steals all the scenes he's in.


  • "whadya mean no? do you like girls?"

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Logan's Run  (1976)

    I hadn't seen Logan's Run since pre-DVD era.  It's not quite as entertaining as I remembered, probably for the reasons explained quite well by the All Movie Guide review below.  I love sci-fi movies, but so many of them make a huge unbelievable leap setting up the current year's scenario and the viewer is just supposed to accept it.

    Logan's Run is set in the 23rd century.  So sometime between 1976 and 2276 no human knows what a marriage or family is, what individual committment is, what purity might mean -- artificial intelligence takes care of everyone and no one asks questions. 

    The tough sell with Logan himself is that you never can tell exactly what his motives are.  He *seems* to truly side with the rebels early on but then alerts the authorities to his location.  Then a minute later he seems on board with the rebels again.  Because Michael York's acting is so intense and over-the-top, you feel like you should believe the obvious.  He says he's with Jessica, then he must be with Jessica.

    Still, it's a fun post-apocalyptic film and I'll still recommend it.  I can't wait to see the remake since word is it'll be more focused on the book than the 76 feature.


 


Advertisement