Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

WarMovieBlog Blog

  • Heaven & Earth (1993)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Heaven & Earth  (1994)

    Heaven & Earth (1993)

    ***oo

    Heaven & Earth is Oliver Stone's final entry in his Vietnam Trilogy, and likely the most controversial of the three.  Following the trials of a Vietnamese girl, Le Ly (Bussaro Sanruck) from a young girl at the outset of the war, all the way through to far after.

    Le grows up in a small village in rural Vietnam, far from the politics the rest of the world.  Honestly, I'm sitting here trying to think about how to summarize the first part of this film in a nice neat package, and there just isn't a good way.  It's just that complex, taking Le from the village, to fighting for the VC, to being the VC's enemy, to having a her rich boss' baby...  And much more inbetween.  This is the best part of the film, showing how she copes with life during the war, trying to make the best of a bad situation.  The relationships with all of her family members, including her mother (Joan Chen) and father (Haing Ngor) are complex, sad, and wonderful.

    And then she meets Marine Steve Butler, an American looking for some company.  She winds up falling for him, and manages to escape the fall of Saigon with him back to America.  And then film takes a turn.

    We go from her life in Vietnam, to being some sort of statement about fat, lazy, stupid Americans living life to excess with problems that she doesn't understand.  Butler is in dire straits, and has some psychological problems of his own it seems.  Things go from bad to worse, as the abuse starts, they split up, she tries to save him, but its just too late.  Throughout she remains a strong and excellent character, dealing with ignorance and prejudice, but the contrast is just too over the top.

    Life after Steve returns her to Vietnam, where she's reunited with her family along with her now grown children.  Here the film regains its sanity as they discuss the problems they faced after she left.

    If it wasn't for the "trip to Oz" that she goes through, I think this would be an absolutely stellar look at an alternate viewpoint of the war.  As it is, it just goes from dead serious and thoughtful, to a sad comic episode that doesn't belong.

    Heaven & Earth could be a top notch movie, in fact it might make you rethink your attitudes towards the war, and think about what things were like for the people on the other side.  But you'll have to endure things like the wide-eyed trip to the supermarket, and the unreal Thanksgiving dinner episode to get there.

    Heaven & Earth (1993) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Soldiers of Change, aka The Painting (2002?)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Painting  (2002)

    Soldiers of Change, aka The Painting (2002?)

    ***oo

    Alright, lets just get this out in the open right bloody now.  Soldiers of Change is not a war movie per se.  Despite the cover image, and the descriptions.  But its still a good, yet little known movie.

    What it is though, is a thoughful look at racism and overcoming it during the late 1960's.  Atlanta rich white boy Randy Barrington (Heath Freeman) falls for the niece of his father's driver (Clifton Davis), one Hallie Gilmore (Stacey Dash).  He's got to overcome prejudices on both sides before either side will accept this relationship, and ultimately he ends up going to Vietnam to escape his father's disapproval.  He's killed, and its not until his father (Charles Shaughnessy) meets his grandson does he overcome it.

    So yes, there is a brief foray into Vietnam, but its by no means the central aspect of the movie.  The war is at home here.  Since it's not really a war movie I won't even attempt to explain it in great detail.  All I can say is you really should see it, just because.  I found myself spending the first half going, "hmm, ok, so when does he get shipped off?" then I started actually liking it for what it was.  Yeah its not exactly a top notch production, and the acting, while good, is certainly not oscar material... but I found it compelling and interesting nonetheless.

    War movie? No.  Movie about struggle and the fight to overcome prejudice? Yes.  I'm only giving it a 6 because I was duped by the cover! :)  But I still recommend it.

    Soldiers of Change, aka The Painting (2002?) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Born on the Fourth of July (1989)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Born on the Fourth of July (1989)

    ****o

    Born on the Fourth of July is Oliver Stone's second entry in his "Vietnam Trilogy" (Platoon, Heavan and Earth) and in my opinion, is the most powerful of the three.  In fact, I would say it's even more relevant to today than any of them, and maybe that's why.

    While Platoon seems a bit cliche for my tastes (but still good), and Heaven and Earth is just too preachy (and other reasons, but also still good), Fourth of July makes a strong statement about the sacrifice the veterans of Vietnam made, and the struggles they endured after they came home.

    Ron Kovic (Tom Cruise) is your average all-american boy from Long Island, instilled with a strong sense of patriotism and a need to do what is right.  It's this which drives him to enlist, and of course, is sent off to fight in Vietnam.  He's critically injured, and winds up confined to a wheelchair.  From there he has to come to terms with, well, everything.  Everything from reconciling his condition, the things he did and saw in Vietnam, re-examining his patriotism, and just plain getting through it.  Eventually he ends up a part of the anti-war movement, speaking at the 1976 Miami Democratic national convention.

    The first part of the film simply builds up Ron Kovic's character, and while it does run on a bit, it is necessary to contrast what he becomes later.  The "All American Family(tm)" he comes from is probably typical, and the picture that is painted is one I think most of us can relate to.

    His world changes, though, as he takes part in a raid on a village that kills civilians, and he himself kills one of his own in the heat of battle, and has to live with that guilt.  Then he's shot, paralyzing him from the chest down, and spends time in terrible conditions in a VA hospital.  From there he goes home, and has to deal with how everyone else deals with him, including his kid brother who doesn't share his patriotic views.

    He quickly spirals into depression and alcoholism, causing no end of grief for his family and others around him.  Coming to terms with the fact that he'll never walk (among other things) again, sends him off of the deep end, basically.

    Eventually Kovic winds up in Mexico, in a sort of community for other disabled vets.  Thinking he's found a home, he realizes that everyone else is just as messed up as he is.  After a humorous and sad event which leaves him stranded, he come back to the states, and finds his old girlfriend (Kyra Sedgwick) who is part of the anti-war movement.  He comes to realize that he can make a difference at last.

    OK, so maybe the film is a bit too long, but it is well worth it.  Cruise pulls off a fine performance, and really everyone else is relegated to supporting roles of various kinds.  But what's the point of it all?  Part of it is Stone asking for some respect for these guys, part of it hints at the sacrifice they and their families endured, part of it leans heavily toward the anti-war slant.

    I especially found it relevant given the events of today, where we get reports of veteran's hospitals being closed due to dreadful conditions.  I couldn't help but think of that as Kovic lies upside down in traction staring at a pile of his own puke.  Has anything really changed in the system?  At least the public view towards today's veterans has changed, but I don't think the government really has, and that's a shame.

    Some other reviews I've read blast Born on the Fourth of July for being a bit oversimplistic, just too long, or various other things.  While that might be true, I don't think it hurts it any at all.  In fact, I'd hazard to say it's because of these things that it excels.  It doesn't try to sneak its meanings under the table like Platoon, it just paints a clear understandable picture.

    The only real trouble I had with it was the ending.  I dunno, it just didn't seem to really resolve anything.  So he speaks to a large group of people making a difference like his mother dreamed about....  but at what cost?  And for what gain?

    Born on the Fourth of July (1989) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<March 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement