Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

WarMovieBlog Blog

  • Straight Into Darkness (2004)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Straight Into Darkness (2004)

    **ooo

    If you've ever wondered what would happen if you crossed a war movie with Tales From the Crypt, and added a little bit of LSD-induced weirdness... you'd probably wind up with Straight Into Darkness.

    Two Allied prisoners manage to escape the MPs escorting them, and wind up on a sick and twisted journey into hell that, while ultimately isn't that interesting, is a visual nightmare that will leave you sitting there going, "WTF was that?!"

    As Losey (Ryan Francis) and Deming (Scott MacDonald) battle each other's problems, they come across various disturbances in the balance of humanity, such as the cannibal priest and the group of bodies who have seemingly hung themselves in the forest.

    The real fun doesn't begin until they come across a seemingly abandoned building.  But it really isn't.  The inhanbitants are a band of disfigured and "special needs" children who have been turned into a capable fighting unit by their keepers, led by "Deacon" (veteran David Warner.)

    And who would show up, but an entire column of German infantry, led by a tank.  See, they're after the loot stashed in the basement of the building, and as such, are hesitant to just blow the thing up.

    Well, the "last stand" happens, and all hell breaks loose.  All I can say is WTF were they thinking?  Because there isn't much about Straight Into Darkness that makes any sense whatsoever.  I really failed to see the point.

    From the twisted kids, to Losey's constant flashbacks to his girl, to Deming's psycho personality, I just didn't get it.  It just got more laughable in its sickness as the thing went on, and ultimately the ending was such a letdown, that you just have to go, again, WTF?!

    Straight Into Darkness
    might make for a good late night B-flick, but steer clear otherwise!  I almost wish I had!

    Straight Into Darkness (2004) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Beaufort (2007)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Beaufort  (2008)

    Beaufort (2007)

    **.oo

    Beaufort puts us in the middle of a conflict not many of us on this side of the planet really know much about, or understand for that matter.  Set in 1990 during the Israeli-Lebanon war in the border outpost of Beaufort, which the Israeli's are preparing to abandon, and thus destroy, after holding it for 18 years.

    Truthfully, I have my suspicions that if I had grown up in the midst of this conflict I might understand Beaufort a little, OK, a lot more.  This really isn't your typical war movie per se, but rather a look at the people holed up in this underground fortress, and how they deal with it, mostly our main character, the squad leader Liraz (Oshri Cohen.)

    If there was ever a film which showed the entire military concept of "hurry up and wait" this would be it.  The entire picture seems to embody this concept.  Periodically the outpost is shelled, as the guy on the loudspeaker seems bored to tears announcing "Incoming!" and "Impact!"  The game changes, though, as they start getting attacked by much more accurate rocket fire, and the men start dying because of it.

    The pointlessness of it all is quite apparent also, as Liraz starts to question his purpose as they rig the entire place for demoliton.  18 years of  holding the fortress only to destroy it.  The lives of all his men lost for apparently nothing.  It's a common war movie theme, that really hits home here.

    But good grief its incredibly dull.  I wasn't really expecting it to be so, but the 126 minute run time seems to last bloody forever, as Liraz and his men sit hunkered below discussing all manner of subjects, from their life on the outside, to what their next job is....  Like I said, maybe its a matter of perspective, I don't know.

    Nobody really stands out as putting on an excellent performance either.  Everyone seems equally dulled, jaded, and downtrodden, which they rightly should be, but by the end, well, see the last paragraph.

    Beaufort might provide a unique perspective on a war most of us only hear about briefly on the evening news, but unless you're really interested, I would just not bother.  The movie is also entirely in Hebrew with subtitles...  FYI.



    I viewed Beaufort via Netflix's Instant Watch on my new Roku Netflix player, and was fairly pleased with the presentation, but as such didn't get any extras that might have been on the disc.  It was also in 16:9 aspect ratio on the player, but the trailer looks like it may have been a full 2.35:1...  Hard to say. 

    Beaufort (2007) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Black Book, aka Zwartboek (2006)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Black Book  (2007)

    Black Book, aka Zwartboek (2006)

    ****o

    Black Book is a gritty tale of intrigue set in Holland during World War II.  Director Paul Verhoeven (Basic Instinct, Robocop) pulls no punches here, and the result is a really, really good picture.

    A young Jewish girl, Rachel Stein (Carice van Houten) finds herself without a hiding place after an Allied bomber ditches its load on her barn.  She ends up on the run with the help of an old family friend, but things take a turn for the worse as the entire group of Jews she is with gets gunned down by the Nazis.

    She joins the Dutch resistance, and infiltrates the local Nazi headquarters as a secretary to one of the chief officers, Muntze (Sebastian Koch.)  Also stationed here is the man who killed her family, Franken (Waldemar Kobus.)

    Under her new identity, Ellis de Vries, she falls for Muntze, who really isn't such a bad guy it turns out.  During a botched prisoner rescue attempt, she's framed for being a double agent, and goes on the run with Muntze.

    Well, of course she's found again, and the real conspirators are revealed and revenge enacted.  I've left a lot out of the plot, because to tell you any more would completely spoil it, and for a film this good I just can't bring myself to do it.  You'll just have to see it for yourself!

    Verhoeven doesn't hold back anything here.  There's a lot of frank nudity and sex here, along with a lot of to-the-point violence.  You'll also be spending a lot of time with subtitles, unless your German and Dutch is up to snuff, but that's beside the point.

    Black Book is the kind of movie that is at the same time attention-keeping and suspenseful, but also difficult to watch.  It's really a moving picture at times, and takes some wicked twists and turns that you really don't expect.  A few of them are quite obvious, though, and that only makes the final reveal even more of a shocker.

    van Houten puts on quite the performance, as does the resistance leader Hans (Thom Hoffman) and Koch as Muntze.  Kobus is just amazing as the slimy dirtball Franken.  Every time you see him your skin will (and should) crawl just a bit.

    Production-wise the movie is quite good as well.  Never was there a moment I wasn't buying into the entire situation, either with the sets or the characters.

    The ending also makes quite the anti-war statement, as we leave Rachel/Ellis many years later in Israel as the rockets and bombs start falling around the town/compound she is teaching in.

    I couldn't find any decent clips from Black Book, but this trailer should give you an idea.



    I watched Black Book via Netflix's Instant Watch on my new Roku Netflix player, and was quite pleased with the presentation, but as such didn't get any extras that might have been on the disc.

    Black Book, aka Zwartboek (2006) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • The Dirty Dozen (1967, Blu-ray)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dirty Dozen  (1967)

    The Dirty Dozen (1967, Blu-ray)

    ***oo

    OK, we all know The Dirty Dozen is one of the best war movies ever made, right? Just accept the fact.  It's awesome blend of action, humor, and 1960's cynicism make it an eternal classic.  What better than to watch this masterpiece on Blu-ray!!

    The transfer is good.  I won't go so far as to say great, because I think it could be digitally cleaned up a lot more than this.  There is a lot of film grain, which isn't necessarily bad, sure its what was there, but I think we can do better.  It's clean, and there aren't any scratches lines or blemishes really.  The audio isn't anything spectacular either.

    And the extras on the disc mirror those of the two-disc DVD edition, which leads me to believe that this might just be a repackaging of that, and that we're not really looking at a full-HD 1080p transfer.  Hard to say.  There are a lot of extras on the disc, the usual 'making of' features, the trailer, Marvin's final role in a Marine Corps training film, and the 1985 TV sequel, Dirty Dozen: Next Mission, which reunites Marvin, Borgnine, and Jaeckel in a ho-hum rehash.

    If you've got Blu-ray, by all means shell out for The Dirty Dozen on BD.  If not, I don't believe you'll be missing a whole lot by just going with the 2-disc edition.

    This rating and review only covers the Blu-ray version of the movie, my full review of the glorious Dirty Dozen goes into more detail about the movie....

    The Dirty Dozen (1967, Blu-ray) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • The Last Samurai (2003, Blu-ray)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Last Samurai  (2003)

    The Last Samurai (2003, Blu-ray)

    ****o

    The Last Samurai takes us back to a time of change in Japan.  Where the traditional governmental systems and military traditions were giving way to Westernized concepts.  Where the old guard, the Samurai were finding themselves irrelevant, and weren't willing to go out without a fight.

    First, the movie does have some basis in fact.  I suggest you read up at the Wikipedia page for The Last Samurai, in particular the historical background section of the article.  I won't go into the details here, because as far as the movie is concerned, its not really relevant. 

    Former American Army Captain Nathan Algren (Tom Cruise) is enlisted by the Japanese to train their army in the ways of western military tactics.  Which at the time was the dreadful 'line em up and shoot' style of battle, fought with muzzle-loaded guns and bayonets.  He reluctantly agrees, fighting his demons from his previous battles with the Indians on the American plains.

    Upon arriving, he learns who they'll be fighting.  One Katsumoto (Ken Watanabe), the "Last Samurai" and his band of men insistent upon carrying forward tradition and the samurai code.  During the first encounter with Katsumoto's men, Algren is captured, and held at the Samurai camp over the winter.

    During that time he "goes native" for lack of a better term, and comes to understand the motives and traditions he was brought here to fight against, eventually joining their side.

    Katsumoto is later arrested, and then rescued by Algren and the rest of the rebels, and goes on to fight the Imperial army in one last battle....

    So yeah, its not exactly historically accurate.  So what?  Cruise gives one of his best performances ever here, as a PTSD victim turned alcoholic, who in a moment of clarity realizes what its all about.  Watanabe is equally good, as the noble warrior who treats him as a near equal.

    The battle scenes are at the same time intense, bloody, well choreographed and executed, if a bit cliche.  Lots of the usual horseback slashing and melee fighting, but with very few laughable moments of extraordinary gore.  The work Cruise put into the role really shows during the fight scenes.

    Another strong point is the cinematography.  There are some shots which are just amazing.  Whether they are real or not (such as the wide shot of 1870's Tokyo) they are indeed impressive.  Especially on Blu-ray.  Just, wow!  Also on the disc is the usual complement of 'making of' extras, including a not very satisfying History Channel pulp piece.  It purported to be an explanation of the facts behind the film, but wound up giving only a mention of the actual Samurai rebellion.  The audio was equally impressive, although it seemed a bit low in the center channel for my tastes, and I had to keep messing with it to find a decent setting.

    What you will find is an in-depth exploration of the meaning of honor, and respect, and for tradition. You'll also find a decent but indirect look at a man suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. You'll just have to see if you can figure it out.

    One thing that did bug me though, was the Japanese in the film.  The language I mean.  As a student of the language there were some points I was like, WTF?  Especially in the realm of people's order in society and how they would speak to each other.  I think some errors were made here.  Although Cruise's stuttered and incorrect usage was well written, and well acheived.  Just a minor nitpick on my part, but I didn't mind all that much.  There also seemed to be a lot of the usual cultural 'stereotypes' displayed here, which was either intentional to reflect an 1870's mindset or not, I don't know, but they are there.

    The Last Samurai is a fine epic of a war movie.  It's no Lawrence of Arabia or Saving Private Ryan, but nevertheless should leave you satisfied.  Here's a clip of that first encounter between Algren's not-ready-for-primetime army and Katsumoto's Samurai.  Yeah, its about like that....

    The Last Samurai (2003, Blu-ray) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission (1985, TV)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission (1985, TV)

    **.oo

    The Dirty Dozen will live as one of the quintessential war movie classics.  Its unique blend of action and humor, along with an incredible ensemble cast ensures it will always be on the top of any war movie list.

    Then there's the sequel, The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission.  Unfortunately everything that made the original what it was is just not here.  Sure you reunite an aging Lee Marvin, Ernest Borgnine, and Richard Jaeckel in their respective roles, but the end result comes nowhere close.  Granted this was probably a Saturday night movie on one of the big three networks, but still, come on.

    The plot follows more or less the same.  Major Reisman enlists the help of thirteen (this time) convicts in order to assassinate a German General, who (get this) has plans to kill Hitler.  Well, no, we can't have that, can we?  Huh?  Yeah the reasons given kinda sorta make sense, but still.  The plan involves hijacking his train, knocking him off and then using the French resistance to get back out again.

    But this time nothing goes as planned.  They finally find the general, and let me spoil it for you, they carry out their mission, after a lot of hemming and hawing as the big guy himself shows up.  Good philosphical argument, yes.  Good bit of movie, not so much.  Then they just barely manage to steal a plane and barely land back in England.

    The big problem is that Marvin is just too bloody bored with it.  You can tell.  So many of the same lines and situations from the first movie, how could he not be?!  At least Borgnine looked happy to be there for whatever reason!  Jaeckel pretty much does as good a job as he did before as Sgt. Clyde.  But the rest of the supporting cast, just didn't really do it for me.  (But hey, Wolf Kahler gets cast as a Nazi yet again, go Wolf!)  You might recognize Ken Wahl and Larry Wilcox though.

    But was The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission really all that bad, not so bad as I wouldn't recommend it for a Saturday afternoon popcorn muncher.  It just in no way lives up to the Dirty Dozen name.  At least its a damn sight better than the Marvin-less other sequels!!!

    The Dirty Dozen: Next Mission (1985, TV) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<February 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement