Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

WarMovieBlog Blog

  • Battle of Britain (1969, Blu-Ray)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Battle of Britain (1969, Blu-Ray)

    ***.o

    This is the first of a new category of reviews, namely Blu-Ray.  Yeah, I finally got a Blu-Ray player to go with my new 1080p LCD (thanks extended warranty!) and I figure what better way to use it than to go back and revisit all these great war films in 1080p goodness, with the help of Netflix of course!

    The first is the 1969 eye-candy epic, Battle of Britain.  You can read my original review of Battle of Britain here.  As such, I won't go into the plot or any of those details, as you can read it on that article, but rather these Blu-Ray reviews will focus more on the format, and what it gives you that plain-old DVD does not.

    The problem with Battle of Britain on BD is that there isn't anything which truly sets it apart.  Matter of fact there is nothing on this disc but the film, which I was sorely disappointed at.  No extras of any kind, save for the remastered 5.1 audio, and a DTS-HD track which I couldn't enjoy since my receiver can't handle it....

    But the 5.1 audio remaster is quite impressive, most notably where it comes to the soundtrack.  The remaining sound effects I really couldn't tell any major difference in, save for a few deep-bass explosions.  A big huge flaw though, is that the German is not subtitled by default.  You have to switch on the subtitles for these scenes, and switch them off again during the English sections... a big faux-pas on the disc producers' behalf.  Maybe it was just my player, but I'm thinking not.

    And the picture was absolutely wonderful, albeit a bit grainy, which is no fault of blu-ray.  The details of the aircraft (the real stars of the film) came through beautifully, down to every rivet and stain.  However, the so-so special effects were even more obvious, especially the composited explosions, "duplications," and models.  If ever a film deserved to get a Lucas-ish "Special Edition" this is the one.  I could see some noise and dirt in a few places, but for the most part it looked fairly clean, and the colors didn't appear faded.  I should say that I am not that anal about artifacting and the like as some are, and I just didn't notice any.

    I'm still miffed about the lack of extras on the disk, but the incredible picture and 5.1 remix somewhat made up for it.  If you've already got Battle of Britain on DVD, you'll probably be content with it.  But if you really want to go that extra mile in terms of picture and sound, then Blu-Ray is where its at.

    Battle of Britain (1969, Blu-Ray) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Thirteen Days (2000)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Thirteen Days  (2000)

    Thirteen Days (2000)

    ****o

    The closest the world ever came to all-out nuclear war, when the clock read two minutes to midnight, and the nation held its breath...  Those Thirteen Days
    in October of 1962 will forever live in history as the height of the cold war, and a landmark of a situation never to get into again.

    So, you might be thinking to yourself, how can a movie which primarily takes place behind closed White House doors and is mostly comprised of talking heads be any good?  Well, this one is.  Mainly because its just plain well done, from a production standpoint especially, but also in some well-cast and believable roles.

    I'm not even going to try to outline the plot here, that's a known part of history, and if you're unfamiliar with it, just do a search on Wikipedia for "Cuban Missile Crisis" for starters.  That should tell you all you need to know.  The short version is this:  The Soviet Union deploys medium range nuclear missiles into Cuba, and the ensuing diplomatic battle which ensued basically defined the Cold War as we'll remember it.  The movie basically chronicles in a 'docu-drama' style the entire chain of events, from the first U-2 photos of the missile installations, to the final agreement by the Soviets to dismantle them.

    White House aid Kenny O'Donnell (Kevin Costner) is the "focus" of the story, that is, its through his eyes primarily the story is told, and such, we get to know his family and a look into the feelings of everyday Americans during the situation.

    But the scope of the entire picture is what is amazing.  I will pit this film up against such docu-dramas as "Tora! Tora! Tora!" and "The Longest Day" any time.  From the White House, to the O'Donnell house, to Cuba and the surrounding waters, Air Force bases, the UN... everything in this movie just looks great.

    And the cast.  You'll have to go read up on IMDB about everyone involved, but suffice it to say that every major player in the incident is represented here, from President Kennedy (Bruce Greenwood), Robert Kennedy (an excellent casting move with Steven Culp), Robert McNamara (Dylan Baker), Adlai Stevenson (Michael Fairman)... the list goes on and on.  All of which were mostly good to excellent.  Huge kudos to Culp who pulled off one of the more convincing Bobby Kennedy's I've seen.  Normally I like Costner (yes I said it, I'm a Costner fanboy!) but here I wasn't too impressed with his interpretation of "the" accent.  Greenwood did an OK job most of the time, with a few stellar moments.

    What keeps the movie from getting too dull with all the talking heads is timely exits to other key events, such as actually seeing the crews fueling up the Cuban missiles, the Air Force bases, the U-2 vs. SAM battle, the entire blockade sequence.  Without these I don't think it would have been the movie it was.

    I would highly recommend this film to anyone, especially for a history class or the like.  Apart from a few unavoidable spats of profanity there's nothing in here to keep Thirteen Days
    out of the classroom.

    Speaking of which, here's the U-2 vs. SAM sequence I was talking about.  Which never happened.  Really!



    And the trailer, which should give you a good idea.

    Thirteen Days (2000) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • First Blood (1982)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    First Blood  (1982)

    First Blood (1982)

    ***.o

    Ah, the one that started it all, that introduced us to the now immortal character of John J. Rambo (Sylvester Stallone), ex Green Beret turned ronin samurai, defender of freedom and justice wherever he's needed.

    Only in First Blood, he's not that man.  Really you have to wonder where the entire "Rambo" persona came from after seeing this movie.  But I'll get more into that later.

    We find Rambo walking the earth, looking for the last member of his squad from Vietnam.  After finding out that he's died of cancer, he continues his walkabout.  Where he walks square into the town of Hope, WA (a fitting name) only to find that hope in this town, at least for Rambo, has abandonded him.

    Sheriff Will Teasle (Brian Dennehy) doesn't take to Rambo's "hippie"-ish looks, and escorts him straight through to the other side of town, when all John wants is to stop for a hot meal on his trek.  Big mistake.

    After Teasle takes him into jail, Rambo starts having POW flashbacks, and violently flees into the woods, where he proceeds to do what he was trained to do, survive.  Unfortunately for everyone going in after him, this means, survive through killing.

    Only after Col. Trautman (Richard Crenna) arrives to defuse the situation do things really start to become clear.  He's a cornered animal, a machine who doesn't know how to do anything else.

    Well, I'm sure you've all seen it before, so I don't need to go through the gory details.  Long story short, its the ending here that defines Rambo.  His breaking down in front of Trautman, which like it or not was really a nice bit of work on Stallone's behalf,  probably describes the feelings of a lot of Vietnam veterans, and veterans of any war.

    Which brings me back to the first point.  Its too bad that Hollywood saw fit to turn this character into nothing more than a comic book hero for the next two entries in the Rambo "franchise."  Not until last year's Stallone-produced "Rambo" did we see this person again, at least with any sort of real meaning or purpose.

    You'll also note that this film is pretty much devoid of the gratuitous violence which was present in later chapters.  Director Todd Kotcheff managed to give us a picture without exploding bodies or detaching limbs, which only adds to the suspense and drama of it all.

    If you've never seen the first chapter of the Rambo saga, I recommend you take a look, just to see what started it all, and to get a firm anchor on what the character is all about.  If you have, you might go back and see First Blood again, just to remind yourself of one of the hidden costs of war, and maybe to appreciate your veteran friends and neighbors a bit more.  Not that they'd go all Rambo on you or antyhing...  er, well, you know what I mean.

    Here's the scene that sends John over the edge, and you can see where things are going....



    also keep an eye out for a much younger and non csi-miami-pose-for-the-camera David Caruso...

    First Blood (1982) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Attack! (1956)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Attack  (1956)

    Attack! (1956)

    ***.o

    Attack!, based on the play The Fragile Fox, is one of those timeless officers vs. enlisted men movies that is made about all wars.  Here we pit one Lt. Costa (Jack Palance) vs. Captain Cooney (Eddie Albert), and as usual, much drama ensues.

    It seems Cooney failed to follow through on support for one of Costa's missions, this being one in a long string of incompetent moves on Cooney's part.  Costa now has it in for Cooney, and it takes one of Costa's fellow Lieutenants (William Smithers)  to keep him in line.

    The real story behind Cooney is that the only reason he has a command is due to Lt. Colonel Bartlett (Lee Marvin) who has him there as a favor to "the judge," Cooney's father.

    Another mission comes up, to take and hold a nearby village.  Cooney sends in Costa's squad, without really understanding what the whole situation is, and doing things "textbook style" rather than going off the available information.  Out of his squad of 20 men, Costa and four others, including Tolliver (Buddy Ebsen) and Bernstein (Robert Strauss) get pinned in a house on the edge of town by an SS Panzer division.

    They capture a German soldier and only three of the original five make it back with their prisoner.  Costa is not among them, or so it would seem.  He finally shows up as the Germans start to overrun their position, and the real drama ensues.

    Really, I was worried when this film started.  The acting and script are just way overdone.  Stick a fork in it overdone.  Add to that a healthy dose of 'film noir'-ish lighting and ambience, an overly-triumphant and out-of-place soundtrack, and you get the idea.  Like somebody tried to take the best of the stage, and mix it with the best of film from the early 40's, and wasn't quite sure how it would turn out.

    But as things start to unravel, all the pieces come together, and it really turns out to be a tension-filled drama at the end.  Palance is so freakin' intense throughout the entire thing.  Picture an evil Dirty Harry, most of the time filmed with stark half-in half-out lighting, and that unmistakable Palance growl.  Yeah, that. 

    Albert on the other hand, I had a hard time with him.  Had the role been cast with a younger guy I might have bought it, but he just seemed too out of place in the part.  Don't even get me started on Lee Marvin's part.  That terrible southern drawl and over dramatization just wasn't him at all, and was actually a bit laughable.  Speaking of which, it was nearly impossible to get over Buddy Ebsen's trademark Beverly Hillbilly accent, which was no fault of the filmmakers, but rather a chance coincidence of time that kept popping up.

    The battle scenes are surprisingly gritty and not quite as overplayed as the rest of it.  Couple that with the incredibly convincing scenery and sets, and this aspect of the picture really starts to bring things up a notch.  The "sniper" sequence especially was a fine bit of war movie.  Costa's encounter with the tank is another incredibly intense and surprisingly matter-of-fact scene which adds to the final sum.

    If you can get through all of the problems, then you'll be in for the real treat.  The final "act" in the basement is where the payoff is, make no mistake.  It's a nearly Hitchcock-ian ending that will leave you appreciating this movie, despite its obvious flaws.

    Bit of war movie trivia: Attack! also pairs up Lee Marvin and Richard Jaeckel, who would later team up in The Dirty Dozen.

    Here's the trailer, which also seems to celebrate its 'over-the-top-edness' in style....

    Attack! (1956) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<January 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
28293031123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement