Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

WarMovieBlog Blog

  • Courage Under Fire (1996)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Courage Under Fire (1996)

    ***oo

    I've heard so many good things about 1996's Courage Under Fire, and I finally got a chance to check it out.  But I have to say I was somewhat disappointed with the results.

    Lt. Col. Nat Serling (Denzel Washington) is charged with finding out the full story behind a recommendation for the Medal of Honor on the part of the late Capt. Karen Walden (Meg Ryan).  He manages to find the other parties involved in the incident, including the strung-out medic Ilario (a young Matt Damon), the Rambo-wannabe Monfriez (Lou Diamond Phillips).

    What ensues is replay after replay of the incident over Desert Storm-era Kuwait which leaves Walden dead, but from all the different viewpoints of the parties involved.

    To top it all off, we have to deal with Lt. Col. Serling's problems after his involvement in a friendly-fire incident which left a tank crew dead after he gave the order to fire on them.

    So what's the problem?  Denzel's performance is up to his usual standards, take that for what you will.  But I grew weary of Ryan's 'hillbilly' portrayal quickly.  What was up with that accent!?  Not buying it.  The remaining characters were just a bit too stereotypical for my tastes.  Especially Monfriez.

    Yes of course the truth comes out in the end, both in the Medal of Honor case and in Serling's own life.  But what's the message here?  What's the point of the whole thing?   That the fog of war is ultimately highly subjective and that "the truth" depends on a great many viewpoints and variables?  Sure, I'll give you that.

    But the journey to that realization just didn't do it for me.  Especially in Serling's case.  The way it kept rearing its ugly head just muddied the waters with respect to the main case, the Walden incident.

    Try as I might, I just can't give a huge stamp of approval on this one.  Courage Under Fire might be one of the few Desert Storm movies out there, but I'm not sure what the point of that was, except to wrap a few star names around a murder mystery and wrap it up in a glossy package.

    And wouldn't you know it I can't seem to locate a decent clip or trailer on YouTube...  anyone got a good embed link?

    Courage Under Fire (1996) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Under the Flag of the Rising Sun (1972)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Under the Flag of the Rising Sun (1972)

    ***.o

    From Japan comes Under the Flag of the Rising Sun, a movie which might fall under the category of mystery, or even your average drama, but is still interesting as a picture of Japanese opinion of the war, and the men who served under the flag of the Empire.

    In Under the Flag of the Rising Sun, a war widow searches for the true reason behind her husband's death, and why she's been unable to collect survivor benefits.  It turns out he has been classified a traitor and a deserter, and the exact cause of his death listed as 'unknown'.

    She sets out on a quest to find the people he served with, to determine the real story behind the government smokescreen.  The people she visits give her parts of the story, never quite enough to fully develop a picture, until at last she returns to the first person she visits, who finally reveals the full truth.

    What's that you might ask?  Well, in short, her husband was neither a traitor or a deserter, but was executed along with two other members of his squad after they killed an officer who basically put them through hell.  The remaining member has lived with his guilt over the incident, and has basically gone a little crazy because of it.

    While the movie plays out like a detective story/murder mystery, it is decidedly an anti-war film, as we are dealt cards dealing with the aftermath of combat on the survivors, and the issues of the men enlisted to fight for a cause they don't necessarily believe in.

    We're also witness to some definitely gruesome and squirm-inducing moments as the squad does what it needs to in order to survive, nearly starving to death....

    If you're at all interested in (well somewhat) contemporary views of WWII from a Japanese point of view, then Under the Flag of the Rising Sun is a must-see.

    Under the Flag of the Rising Sun (1972) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Dive Bomber (1941)

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Dive Bomber  (1941)

    Dive Bomber (1941)

    ****o

    Call me a sucker for some good old-fashioned old-time military aviation, but 1941's Dive Bomber is a superb and often overlooked gem of a movie.  I can't say it any other way.

    It's full of that pre-Pearl Harbor optimism and enthusiasm, with just enough bite and bitterness to even it all out.  Not to mention a rare technicolor look at the world of naval aviation, and particularly, aviation medicine.  The "specialization" involved here, in my opinion, makes it even more of a classic.

    Lt. Doug Lee (Errol Flynn) is a doctor in the navy, who has the unfortunate task of pronouncing the pal of pilots Blake (Fred MacMurry) and Griffin (Regis Toomey) dead after a crash of his dive bomber.  This incident pushes him into the Flight Surgeon school, where he quickly becomes the prodigy of Instructor Rogers (Ralph Bellamy).  His goal is to pursue the problems of "altitude sickness" and of blackouts under high G-forces.

    Of course to become a Flight Surgeon, you must first become a pilot, and who should Lee draw as a flight instructor but Blake.  The conflict between these two, and in fact between all pilots and the flight surgeon corps, is heavy throughout.  The responsibility of the doctors to keep tabs on all the pilots vs their willingness and need to fly is made quite evident.

    But where the real meat of the movie is, is the scientific endeavours.  We witness the birth of the modern flight suit, which pushes blood from the lower part of the body towards the brain during high G maneuvers to combat blackouts.  We also see some early attempts at defeating altitude sickness, with pressurization suits, and in fact fully pressurized cabins, which just didn't exist back then.  Maybe its not for everyone, but seeing the experiments and whatnot of the time was something else.

    You also have to give a bit of a chuckle at the sheer amount of chain smoking going on here.  I've got nothing against it per se, especially in a picture of the time, but here it almost becomes humorous the amount of times the main characters are lighting up.  Especially when they jump out of an airplane on the tarmac that just got refueled!! Almost spit out my beer on that one.  I could imagine a rather horrific drinking game based on the amount of Lucky Strikes consumed in this picture....by doctors no less....  what? oh, yeah, the movie.

    The bits with the enlisted man and his ex-wife are somewhat strange, but provide a well-placed and needed bit of comedy relief at points in the film.

    Ultimately Blake and Lee come to terms with each other, and realize that they're both fighting for the same thing.  Blake's sacrifice in the name of science is an honorable tribute to the real men who lived on the edge of discovery and invention during this time.

    Dive Bomber
    turned out to be a lot more entertaining and interesting than I had expected, and I absolutely recommend you see it if you're an aviation buff or at all into the science behind it all....

    Dive Bomber (1941) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Miracle at St. Anna (2008)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Miracle at St. Anna (2008)

    **.oo

    Oh man, how I wanted to like Miracle at St. Anna.  So, so badly.  But I just couldn't.  Most of the time I was left scratching my head, going "What? WTF!?"  Yeah, its kind of like that.  For lots of different reasons.

    First, the plot.  We are witness to one Hector Negron (Laz Alonso), in 1980's New York City, as he pulls a gun on and kills an unassuming man as he walks up to Hector's Post Office window.  When the police investigate, along with the help of a bumbling cub reporter, they discover a marble statue head, which turns out to be a priceless relic from a bridge the Nazi's destroyed in WWII Italy.  Presumably at the nudging of said cub reporter, we go back and see the story which brought Hector to the condition he's presently in.

    We're thrown back to 1944 Italy, where Hector was a part of the 92nd Infantry, the so called "Buffalo Soldiers", an all-black combat unit, which was a rarity in that day.  After a fubar'd attempt to cross a river, he and three of his squadmates run across an injured and seemingly delusional boy, Angelo (Matteo Sciabordi).  PFC Train (Omar Benson Miller) befriends the boy, who calls him his "Chocolate Giant" and they wind up taking him into a nearby village.  Train is also the one carrying "the head" as a good luck charm at this point.  Unfortunately, the back story of "the head" is left up to our imagination, and this is where the head scratching really starts to kick in.

    The villagers take in the four soldiers and the boy, and they begin to feel more at home here than they do at home.  Sergeant Stamps (Derek Luke) even starts to befriend the local romantic interest, Renata (Valentina Cervi), while trying to keep the untamed and crude Sgt. Bishop (Michael Ealy) at bay.

    But as luck would have it (further confusing the situation) a band of Partisans rolls into town, lead by "The Great Butterfly" Peppi (Pierfrancesco Favino) and also the vaguely familiar looking Rodolfo, and their German prisoner, who just so happens to be the one who let the boy flee the massacre at St. Anna.  (Ironically that's probably a better name for the movie!)  This massacre is a pointless bit of on-screen carnage that serves no purpose really, except to make us squirm, as the Nazis gun down an entire village of men, women, and children.  Yes, its complete with bayonets and babies.  Spike, WTF.

    But back to the plot, are you confused yet? Yeah, more head scratching ensues.  The allied command wants a German POW, and so our heroes and the Partisans come to an agreement to take the prisoner to allied command.  But Rodolfo is in fact a German collaborator, and kills Peppi, and ultimately allows the Nazis to walk into town and totally blow away everyone, except for the boy and Hector, who now has "the head."  He goes home, and at his trial is suddenly represented by a very expensive lawyer.  He apparently jumps bail and goes to a caribbean island, where he meets up with the boy again in a touching but confusing reunion....

    ...but the biggest head scratcher of all, for me, is why oh why, Spike, did you have to turn this into "a black thing."  Throughout, we have to have the segregation issue of the war shoved down our throats like its some kind of medicine that will make the whole thing better.  The entire Louisiana diner scene is just so out of place and forced as to be laughable. 

    And the amount of confusion and plot points that go nowhere and mean nothing only muddy the waters further.  A few cases in point:  The cub reporter, the entire marble head plot device, the scene with the Nazi art dealer... Hell, the seemingly compassionate German commander, the entire St. Anna bit, ALL of it that doesn't take place in Italy during the war.

    Is this a case of a complex and meaningful book pared down into a shadow of itself on screen?  I've not read James McBride's novel, but it would certainly seem that way.  So many hints at stories that could have been....  I may have to read it just to find out.

    But my biggest gripe, Spike, is that if you wanted to make a film which honors the men of the 92nd, you should have done that.  You could have done that without wrapping it in this bizarre package, and without all the strings attached.  Facts are facts.  1944 was still a time of blatant racism and segregation in America, all the whining about it now doesn't change the fact.  It also doesn't change the fact that the men of the 92nd fought and died along with everyone else, even if it was "a white man's war" as is stated throughout the movie.  Like most of them had a choice either?  Come on.

    Miracle at St. Anna is a confusing mess that will problably leave you a bit pissed off.  Well, that's something that Spike tends to do anyway.  Oh, and in case you missed it, the guy Hector shoots in the Post Office is the Nazi collaborator Rodolfo.  Yeah, if you're not paying attention, you'll miss it.

    Miracle at St. Anna (2008) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<December 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
30123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement