Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

WarMovieBlog Blog

  • Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan (2007)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan (2007)

    ****.

    Few names bring fear into the hearts of men as much as "Genghis Khan" or as he was known to the people he led and the lands he ravaged, "Temudgin."  In Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan, we get a spectacular, if sympathetic, look at the rise to power of one of history's most infamous warlords.

    From his troubled youth, when he's thrust into power as a child and just as quickly overthrown by a member of his father's counsel, young Temudgin must fight his way up from nothing.  Escaping capture from this traitor Targutai (Amadu Mamadakov) he prays to the god of the sky, who seems to endow him with his powers.  As he reunites with his bride Borte (Khulan Chuluun), and a friend he made along the way, his leadership and stature become clear to everyone around him.

    He finally becomes enemies with said friend, Jamukha (Honglei Sun), who has teamed with Targutai in order to elminate Temudgin.  The battle scenes in Mongol are spectacular, with maybe a certain amount of Kung-Fu movie flair to them.  At times they can get a little grisly, and possibly over the top.  The scene early on where Temudgin caves in the guy's skull is probably the prime example.  Not for the weak, to be sure.

    He's captured and sold to a Chinese nobleman, who puts him on display as an animal.  Later freed by his wife, he returns to Mongolia to unite the tribes he fought against, and sets us up (I think) for the rest of this trilogy, which I cannot wait to see.

    The greatest thing about Mongol is not Tadanobu Asano's performance as the warlord, although it is excellent.  It's the simply breathtaking location shots.  Time after time they show you locations you never dreamed could be real.  It's just amazing.  The production team also went the extra mile in setting everything up.  From the costumes to the props, you -will- buy into all of it.

    And yet again, I have to change my position on the love story angle.  Here it is an integral part of the story.  His love for his chosen bride throughout is what drives him.  And the opposite is true, as Borte goes as far as becoming the wife of a Chinese nobleman, and mother to his child, in order to get to Temudgin and free him from his cage.

    Somewhat troubling throughout, though, is the sympathetic nature of the story.  I don't know about you, but I was always taught that Genghis Khan was a merciless killer and ravager.  The typical leader of "the mongol hordes", but it's clear that this is not that man.  Maybe the portrait will change if the rest of this story is told, I can't say.  But that "feeling" is continually in the back of your mind as you watch Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan.

    Mongol: The Rise of Genghis Khan (2007) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Guadalcanal Diary (1943)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Guadalcanal Diary (1943)

    **.oo


    Guadalcanal Diary
    is just one of those pictures you know they made with good intentions.  The problem is that it was just too early to be making a picture like this.  1943 saw the start of the Pacific campaign in WWII, and if they'd only known what they were up against, I'm not sure this movie would have been as "Gung-Ho" as it was.

    Based on the writings of war correspondent Richard Tregaskis, it follows a Marine squad as they set sail for Guadalcanal, and what happens to them there.

    As a preview of what would be facing the Marines as they went from island to island trying to rout the Japanese from their occupation, I suppose it's worth a look.  There's a lot of "dirty Jap" talk going on, which I suppose we have to allow them to some extent.  I can't help but think (having not read the book) that the war department had a certain amount of pull regarding what made it to the screen, knowing how things were then.

    Basically, they don't know what to expect.  From the seemingly empty beachhead at their landing, to the Japanese holed up in the caves, its all there.  The problem is that it all comes off as rather mechanical.  Like they're sitting there reading the book turning pages, "uh huh, OK now they have to do this..." or something.  I wish I could explain it better.  At times it gets a little monotonous, and a little silly.  Like when one of the squad takes a bullet to the belly and is back up on his feet a few days later.  I don't know about you, but that'd probably put me down a bit longer.

    Anthony Quinn makes an appearance as an upcoming private, but really doesn't deliver anything spectacular.  Neither does the rest of the cast, which also leads to a bit of eye-rolling and chuckling at some of the situations.

    I don't know, as a movie I wasn't too enamored with
    Guadalcanal Diary
    .  I'll give them points for effort, for pushing something like this out so quickly into the Pacific war.  But I can't help thinking this was pushed out so early purely as a typical war-time "propaganda" film, to try and get more boys signing up for the Marines.


    Guadalcanal Diary (1943) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Generation Kill (2008)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Generation Kill (2008)

    ****o

    I finally got around to watching all my DVR'd episodes of HBO's Generation Kill, based on the writings of Rolling Stone reporter Evan Wright about his embedding with the 1st Marine Recon Battalion in the first days of the Iraq invasion.

    I have to say, Generation Kill is a great look at the ins-and-outs of modern warfare, and the people fighting it.  In the seven part mini-series, which starts just before the invasion, and ends shortly after the fall of Baghdad, 1st Recon gets to experience the horrors of war, but mostly, they get to be a part of the cluster-f--k that was (and still is) Iraq.  Between the 'what are we doing here' angle, the internal politics of modern war are explored in great detail, from those in the squads, all the way up the chain of command.

    First off, this is no "Band of Brothers."  Let's just get that out of the way right now.  The guys here aren't given particularly high marks in their portrayal.  But lets face it, if you've been around a representative gang of guys like you'd find here....  It's pretty damn close to the mark.  But what they're doing is not meant as any sort of tribute like BoB was.

    From the wise-cracking Ray (James Ransone), the cool-under-pressure "Iceman" Brad (Alexander Skarsgard), the reporter (Lee Tergesen), to the average guys, including the level-heading Lt. Fick (Stark Sands).  These guys were just great at making me believe it.  All of them, with few exceptions.  Yeah sure at times Ray's character was a bit scripted and over the top, but the quirks and personalities given to each one of them were just brilliant.  Although I must admit to being a little skeptical of the characters in the first episode.  Thankfully they wound up mostly developed by the end.  You will recognize people you know in these characters.

    Then you go all the way up to the sad but accurate portrayals of the Rambo-wanna-be "Captain America" er, I mean McGraw (Eric Nenninger), the southern-accented "Marine Lingo" spewing Sarge, and the odd character of the by-the-book Col. "Godfather" (Chance Kelly)...  I'm not sure why the higher-up officers were portrayed in such a negative light.  (Maybe its not that far off the mark?)  Really the only one who seemed to have his shit together was Fick, and thank god we have guys like that.  The general WTF-ness of some of their calls really get you thinking.  And the scene where the Doctor calls out Captain "Encino Man" on that very subject is the icing on the cake.

    The action and battle sequences were just amazing.  Although as many have noted, there really aren't all that many of them, and some of them are painfully short.  That's OK, though, par for the course.  It can get a bit grisly at times, but not so much so to get you squeamish.  Really, they could have made it a lot worse.  They're done well enough that you fully buy into them, and they never go over the top as to become unbelievable, as can sometimes happen.

    It is a bit disconcerting the amount of, (thinking for the right word), disdain is shown to the troops' actions though.  Regardless of their motives, it seems like they always wound up killing some innocent person or child or villagers in the process.  Again, while there may be some truth to that, I think the point was made one too many times.  Especially in the last moments of the final episode, which seemed a little too much like the closing slides of "Redacted" for my tastes, yet it was still done in a somewhat more respectful light.  If you've seen the two sequences, you probably know what I'm talking about.  What separates GK from that fiasco is how the different characters react to it all.

    All of the details are just much too involved to get into here.  But other aspects of the story are worth talking about, namely the desire to do what's right versus following orders, versus the ingrained and trained nature of the Marines as warriors....  The countermanding of outlandish orders, the conflict between officers and enlisted men, the confusion and losses suffered from these actions.  Really I think is what's at the heart of Generation Kill.  Not having read the book I can't comment on the original author's intent, but here that seems to be the overarching theme... 

    ... that we as a military and a country need to figure out what the hell we are doing there.  From the early episodes where their mission was clear, to oust Saddam and "liberate" the country, to the last few episodes where it becomes clear to the men that "this isn't going to be over anytime soon."  And how right they were.

    I think I'm starting to ramble a bit.  Let's just close with this:  Generation Kill is a great portrayal of what's going on over there.  It's funny, it's complex, it's horrible, it's simple, it's decent, it's just plain indecent...  it's just a lot of different things.  Putting all together like they've done here is amazing.  The final scene with Wright leaving the base sort of says it all.

    Generation Kill isn't out on DVD yet, but I recommend it if you've not seen it yet.  I don't think the trailers I found really represent what the series is all about.  But here's one of them.




    Ah, found this 10 minute clip. Much better representation of the whole shebang, even if its only from one episode (IIRC).

    Generation Kill (2008) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • The Ship That Died of Shame (1955)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Ship That Died of Shame (1955)

    ***.o

    In yet another entry from this weeks "Books on film" theme :-D we get a treat from our friends across the pond.  The British borne The Ship That Died of Shame.  From Nicholas Monsarrat's book of the same name.

    In it, a retired MGB (Machine Gun Boat, took me a bit to realize what that meant) is repurchased by her former crew after the war to take on, shall we say, less honorable deeds than what she had been tasked with.  And quite frankly, she doesn't like it very well.

    After the war, Captain Bill Randall (George Baker) finds himself somewhat out of sorts with life.  He's left his former job and bought himself a boat repair business, which unfortunately just isn't doing well.  His wife was killed early on in the war, and he's become fairly down on his luck.

    At one of the local service reunions, his old shipmate, George Hoskins (Richard Attenborough) appears, and offers up a proposition, involving none other than the old girl "1087" as she's known.  They rescue her from her maritime graveyard and proceed to make a killing smuggling random goods back and forth across the channel.

    However, getting involved in such a business exposes them to some rather unsavory elements, which the greed-driven Hoskins weasels his way into, much to the dismay of old 1087.  She begins acting more and more strangely during their trips. As the cargo becomes more and more questionable, such as guns and other less harmless items, the gremlins start to manifest themselves in larger ways.

    Finally, they're tasked with smuggling a criminal from the continent back to England, and the old girl doesn't want any of it.  One thing leads to another and nearly leads to the death of them all. 

    It really sets that whole idea of the ship as "alive" quite well, I think.  I'm sure a lot of Navy men have felt that way about a ship from time to time, and if you've ever wondered what that's all about, then you definitely should watch this.

    I guess you could file this one more under the "Twilight Zone" than any war movie, although the opening scene is really quite good in that respect.  Overall it is quite a suspenseful picture, one I felt could have easily been attributed to the likes of Hitchcock.  Maybe not nearly as polished as he would have done, but director John Irvin comes really, really close.

    A littlle known gem, The Ship That Died of Shame shouldn't be passed over just because its "another old movie." 

    The Ship That Died of Shame (1955) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Hamburger Hill (1987)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hamburger Hill  (1987)

    Hamburger Hill (1987)

    ****o

    In May, 1969, Airborne troops were tasked with the awful duty of taking a hill from the North Vietnamese, in a battle which would become known as "Hamburger Hill" and documented in a book by Samuel Zaffiri, and then on film in this 1987 picture.

    I hadn't seen Hamburger Hill in a long, long, time.  And for some reason, the last time I did I remembered not liking it very well.  Well, this time was very different.  Maybe age and experience, maybe the myriad of pictures I've seen here have put some things into perspective, but Hamburger Hill is really quite the Vietnam epic.

    This film takes the typical Vietnam experience that you've seen before in pictures like "Platoon" and "We Were Soldiers", and amplifies it signifcantly.  From the mud, muck, and filth that our heroes live in back at the base, to the near endless death and destruction on the hill.  You will come away from this with that "sunk" feeling, as you realize how futile all of it is.

    The only real problem I think is that it takes itself a bit too serious at times.  Even in the "lighter" moments it wields a heavy hand.  Maybe "problem" isn't the right word.  If you've seen it, you probably know the feeling I'm trying to describe.

    Not only does Hamburger Hill succeed at presenting its message, but also spends a great deal of time on the issue of race in the military of the Vietnam era.  And surprisingly does it without coming off as "preachy" for lack of a better word.  You've got the seemingly out of place doctor, "Doc" Johnson (Courtney B. Vance) who seems to be a liaison of sorts between the black and white elements of the squad.  But it becomes clear by the end that despite all the rhetoric and discussion of race, it just doesn't matter.

    But, as is the case, you've got the usual Vietnam cliches to deal with.  The somewhat forced friendly-fire incident, the out-of-touch officer corps, the above mentioned racial tensions, the blood and guts, the punji stick traps....  You sort of have to expect it I suppose.

    Dylan McDermott and a young Don Cheadle are excellent in their roles.  Far better than I had remembered.  But again, that spectre of 'seriousness' seems to affect everyone in their portrayals.  Like the director was shouting out 'remember, you're not enjoying this' or something.

    One particular element of the film that I do remember, and still think reverberates as an overarching theme, is the destruction of Hamburger Hill itself.  At the beginning it appears as a lush, green thing of beauty.  But by the end is laid waste into a burnt and broken, smokey, desperate wasteland.  Somewhat like the guys who left there alive.

    Hamburger Hill (1987) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

  • Flight of the Intruder (1991)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Flight of the Intruder (1991)

    **.oo

    I really wish I could nail down what Flight of the Intruder is trying to be.  I think the problem is it tries to be too much, and fill too many different 'roles' as a movie that it never really succeeds at any of them.  If that makes any sense.  Maybe another case of good-book doesn't make quite such a good movie, I'm not sure.

    What you've got is a Vietnam-era Navy A-6 Intruder pilot, Jake "Cool Hand" Grafton (Brad Johnson) who loses his bombadier/RIO in a mission and starts to get the feeling that his number is up soon.  He gets paired up with the quirky legend and long-timer "Tiger" Cole (Willem Dafoe) and things start to go all over the board.

    On one hand I think this picture tried to be another "Top Gun", that seems to be clear.  Otherwise they wouldn't have thrown in the brief and useless love story/encounter with the single mother Callie (Rosanna Arquette.)  at the end of the supposed-to-be comical trip to town. At least that's what it felt like to me.

    Then there's the whole "lost wingman" bit, and the "hooa!" take on everything.  Danny Glover's role as the carrier CO reminds me of that guy from Top Gun as well, you know.  But then it starts to morph from just another Top Gun remake into something else entirely. 

    Now Cole and Grafton decide to explore the "lets make Vietnam mean something" route, and plan a rogue mission to make a bombing run into downtown Hanoi.  WTF?  Forget that they're breaking every rule in the book here on what amounts to a suicide mission.... 

    ....which they end up botching and just barely returning from in their shot up A-6.  So briefly we foray into the realm of military courtoom drama, as the pair are (rightfully) court martialed, but then let off the hook just as Linebacker II starts up.  Sigh, make up your minds guys?!

    THEN, they get orders to make a full out bombing run at enemy SAM positions in front of a B-52 run, and the Captain (yes, the Captain, why's he flying again?)  gets himself shot down and pinned down.  Well who should come to the rescue but Cole and Grafton, only to get themselves shot down.

    Now we're in some sort of revisit of Platoon, as Dafoe sacrifces himself so the Sandies can take out the anti-aircraft guns and the rescue choppers can get in.

    Sigh.  Bouncing back and forth from one thing to the next.  Don't get me wrong, parts of this film are really good.  The entire ending battle surrounding the downed A-6, the dogfight scenes, the bombing runs....  Taken piece by piece each bit is really quite good.  But slapped together sort of haphazardly as it is, it just doesn't make a lot of sense in the end.

    I'm sure a lot of folks like this picture, I'm not one of them.  Yeah its nice to see some awesome military aircraft action, but figure out what the story is!  Flight of the Intruder just has too many stray ends for me.




    Flight of the Intruder (1991) on Spout.com


    Originally posted on:War Movie Reviews and News

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement