Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

vhsparrow Blog

  • Exumed from 1981!

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Dead and Buried  (1981)

    Wow, wow, wow -- I guess this movie *is* as obscure as I expected if there's only an All Movie Guide summary of it up here. First of all, credit is due to where I discovered ‘Dead & Buried‘, on the Video Nasties Project, which is a blog created by some fellow named Ben who has the temerity and no doubt the stomach to pursue the 79 B-movies that were banned by the British Nanny State after the invention of the VHS player in 1979.

    A list of all 79 of the ‘banned’ movies is available here, but as we all know, just because something is banned it doesn’t mean that college kids and high schoolers aren’t going to figure out a way to smuggle the item home from the Continent or that long summer vacation in the US.

    For some reason, each of the 79 movies on the VNP list got the dander of right-wing British pols like Mary Whitehouse, a member of the British equivalent of America’s Moral Majority. Importantly, Whitehouse was interesting in prohibiting all sorts of morally degrading crap like cannibal zombie movies and morally ambiguous stuff like ‘I Spit On Your Grave‘ (1978). Well, the Video Recordings Act 1984, which was entirely irrelevant by 1997 — just in time for DVDs.

    Anyway, ‘Dead & Buried‘ a/k/a ‘Dead and Buried’ (1981) was written by Dan O’Bannon and Ron Shusett, the screenwriters better know for their 1979 hit ‘Alien‘. I should add here that Shusett and specifically O’Bannon were responsible for several other big genre his of the ’80’s, including John Carpenter’s ‘Dark Star‘(1974), ‘Toral Recall‘ and ‘Return of the Living Dead‘ (1985), so O’Bannon’s B-movie water-into-wine chops are pretty formidable, given that he was inspired by the dross of ‘Queen of Blood‘ (1962) and ‘It! The Terror from Beyond Space‘ (1958).So essentially ‘Dead & Buried’ is the Shusett-O’Bannon take on the small New England town of Stephen King’s ‘The Fog’ (1980) or the seaside community of H.P. Lovecraft’s ‘Dagon‘, ‘Dead & Buried’ takes the high concept of the bucolic locale one step further.

    More to the point, ‘Dead & Buried’ is a strange sort of mash-up of ‘The Stepford Wives’ and some sort of zombie movie. While that may just be a huge spoiler, the pleasure is in the execution of the thing and the pleasure of watching the whole thing play-out. The only thing that hurts Dead as a film is the 27 years of twist-ended films that have been made since 1981. As a writer myself, I can’t help but to watch Dead today and reflect on the numerous ways in which the story might be updated for contemporary audiences.

    Dead stars James (’Ironside’/'Melrose Place’) Farentino as Sheriff Dan Gillis and Jack Albertson as the town Coroner-Undertaker. The typical sort of seaside horror-drama gets set up when a number of visitors to the scenicPotter's Bluff keep turning up dead, only to have their bodies disappear from the morgue. For genre fans, the movie features early performances from both Robert Englund and Prince of Darkness‘ Lisa Blount.

    It’s not quite a classic but it’s a necessary film for any self-respecting horror buff to investigate. It’s definitely a movie that warrants a second look, if not a remake.

    Is it 'lost' or just 'forgotten' if I'd never heard of it before?


  • A Good Start, But A 'Missed' Opportunity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Now don’t get me wrong, here — ‘The Mist‘ (2007) was adequately executed, beautifully shot and well cast, but Frank Darabont ought to have done more to haul the premise of Stephen King’s novella out of the ’50’s.

    I used to be a King fan way, way back and read a good few of his books back in my junior HS days. I even followed some of his adaptations for a while — his adaptations from other people’s ideas and other people’s adaptations of his work — but that was before Frank Darabont started making his filmazations.

    From the commercials that advertised the movie last fall, it looked as though ‘The Mist’ was going to be a King-remake of John Carpenter’s ‘The Fog‘ (1980), which seemed entirely unnecessary and redundant to me, considering we’d just had a widely panned ‘Fog’ remake in 2005.

    Lo and behold, ‘The Mist’ was based on a 1980 novella — early, as far as King’s career is concerned — and not necessarily one of his more apparent/glaring ripoffs, since ‘The Fog’ only appeared on screens in 1980. That, and the ‘mist’ in this case inexplicably provides cover for extra-dimensional insects and flying lizards, as opposed to the ghosts of dead pirates. King’s ‘inspiration’ for ‘The Mist’ was more likely one of the old EC comics — you know, the ones about zombies and coprophages — that created an uproar among politicians and lead to the creation of the Comics Code Authority.

    Where ‘The Mist’ falls down is the writing — with all of the crappy, Red-State themed teen-slasher ‘Deliverance’-type flicks we’ve seen over the past couple of years and the ‘War on Terror’ fear-mongering, you’d think that Darabont could mine something more involving than this Cold War-inspired invasion flick. But that’s precisely where Darabont leaves it, with a Twilight Zone-type twist ending, rather than a resolution of the many Red State vs. Blue State conflicts that he creates on the central set-piece of his supermarket.

    As an end calculus, I think that Darabont opened up too many worm-cans: He may have been faithful to the King novella, and masterful about eliciting the conflicts between his supermarket protagonists — hats off to Macia Gay Harden as the crazy church-lady — but the insects, the scifi element and the implied social commentary (or lack thereof) just didn’t hold together at the end.

    That, and he kills off both Alexa Davalos’ and Andre Braugher’s characters too early.


  • Well worth watching again

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Minority Report  (2002)

    With the Eliot Spitzer bust and talk of the NSA’s ‘Total Information Awareness’ program back in the wind, I was compelled to take another look at Steven Spielberg’s ‘Minority Report‘.

    I’d seen the movie and written another review of the movie back in 2002 and wasn’t so impressed with it — I felt that Spielberg had taken the Philip K. Dick material and slicked it up just a bit too much. When Ridley Scott adapted ‘Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep‘ (cf. Blade Runner’ (1982)), he made an exerted attempt to ground his story in a world we’d understand, a polyglot, super-ethnic place that had felt the pre-millenial bleed-in from Hong Kong and other portions of east Asia. Even if Minority Report is set in D.C., it feels as though Spielberg’s future is a bit too squeaky-clean, a Googie architecture for the early 21st century.

    That’s not to say that Spielberg and his gang of futurist consultants didn’t present us with a compelling vision of the future, with his mag-lev superhighways and reconfigured cityscape, the world of Minority Report looks more line the year 2554 A.D. rather than the intended 2054. We’re still nowhere near the place where the police are able to use jet-packs as personal accessories.

    There are interesting details in MR that I wish I’d paid greater attention to the first time, specifically the Precogs’ relationship to the illegal drugs - neuroin - that Tom Cruise’s John Anderton procures on the ‘back-streets’ of a very shiny, futurist Washington, D.C. Apparently the Precogs are all some 21st c. version of crack-babies that have been rehabilitated enough to make their precognative birth-defect useful to the larger society.

    Since production on Minority Report started on March 22, 2001, there’s no way that Spielberg and company could have anticipated 9-11, much less incorporated its effects into Scott Frank’s script.

    But the National Security Agency’s Total Information Awareness program seems to be very much the stuff that Spielberg’s Precrime Division of the Justice Department was after — however, rather than use precognitives to divine their subjects, the Bush II Justice Department uses credit information and unlawful wiretaps.

    The operative motivation in Information is guilt-by-association — Total Information Awareness — renamed the ‘Terrorism Information Awareness Program’ after Total tested poorly — assembles financial information, telephony and the movement of individuals as a digital surveillance package. In short, there are already computers out there tracking your ‘movement’ when you purchase your lunch with plastic, when and whom you telephone, and who calls you and the movement of your EZ Pass™, when you need to pay tolls, not to mention the alarms that go off if you attempt to transfer more than $10.000 to another entity.

    As a former D.A., Sptizer should have known all about anti-money laundering restrictions and the ramifications of asking Ashley Dupré to transport controlled substances across State lines for him. The fact of the matter is that the NSA, the FBI and Homeland Security already use a collection of invasive tools that make Clinton’s partisan problems with FISA seem quaint by comparison.

    So, the Bush Administration has invented their own version of a Precrime Division and promoted the NSA officers formerly in charge of it to senior positions at the Pantagon and the CIA. Bravo to those unreasonable searches that the Constitution was supposed to protect us from. Philip K. Dick, a drug-addict and paranoid schizophenic somehow predicted the future. Just sayin’.

    But, to return to the matter of the film, it must be said that Tom Cruise’s star-power damages this film somewhat, since the story literally grinds to a stand-still whenever he isn’t on screen.

    Besides all of the lavish production values, what’s also to be admired in Minority Report is the always sturdy Neal McDonough and Lothario-in-real-life, Colin Farrell. If any of their gravity could have been injected into the plot-important scenes between Max van Sydow and Kathryn Morris, specifically the Agatha and Anne Lively subplot it would have helped the flagging 3rd act. More energy, enthusiasm or even musical emphasis might have some breathed life into final 30 minutes, which goes flaccid after Farrell’s Witwer is ::SPOILER::.

    Even though it’s now 6 years old, Minority Report is well worth seeing again.


  • Wondorous Credulity

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    So, Delroy Lindo. 13 years ago he was the one shining moment — an uncredited cameo in the otherwise execrable adaptation of Michael Crichton’s ‘Congo‘ — forget that Crichton has become a flack for the anti-Global Warming lobby. Hats off to Laura Linney and Dylan Walsh there and all, but Delroy stole your movie, even though his participation there was limited to all of 5 minutes of screen-time.

    16 years ago, he was West Indian Archie in Spike Lee’s award-winning ‘Malcolm X’ (1992) adaptation, but what has he done between then and now? ‘Clockers’ in 1995, ‘The Devil’s Advocate’ in 1997, ‘Gone in Sixty Seconds’ in 2000, ‘The Core’ in 2003 and ‘Domino’ in 2005 — sure he’s been working, but in each one of those roles, he’s been relegated to supporting roles rather than the front-and-center position that one would think that he’d have earned by now.

    And 3 weeks ago, you can imagine my chagrin in seeing him on the cover of ‘Wondrous Oblivion’ (2003), appearing in what appears to be a family picture, supporting some white kid.

    From badass to lovable Cricket instructor, Lindo’s career reads like Michael Chiklisin reverse, so you can imagine my reluctance to uncan and spool this film.

    Fact of the matter, Wondrous Oblivion isn’t that bad of a film. What the film concerns is an awkward moment in British history — the early ’60’s — when South London became integrated — when Jewish immigrants (refugees, really) became the neighbors of West Indian immigrants in one of the Thames’ poorer quarters. When one group of ethnics takes up residence in anothers’ traditional neighborhood, there are always tensions, and so it goes with Oblivion.

    Here, Sam Smith plays young, Jewish David Wiseman, whose grandparents escaped the Holocaust to relocate in England. David’s mother, Lillian, is married to Victor, 20-30 years her senior as a matter, one assumes, of economic security. David is a cricket fan who obsessively collects cricket paraphernalia, though he has no skill at the game and is relegated as the scorekeeper at his grammar school. Enter into this picture Dennis Samuels (Delroy Lindo) and his family, not to mention his two young daughters (Leonie Elliot as Judy and Naomi Simpson as Dorothy) . It also turns out that Dennis also a cricket fanatic and no sooner than moving in next door to the Wisemans, he constructs a netted practice-area in his backyard.

    Of course, David’s father and the xenophobic, working-class people of David’s Brixton neighborhood take umbrage, such that hate-mail is followed by other threats while Dennis teaches David to play a proper game of cricket. This is all fairly by-the-numbers stuff that we’ve seen in movies as formulaic as ‘The Karate Kid’ (1984) and ‘The Bad News Bears’ (1976) and ‘My Bodyguard’ (1980). The thing that makes this film a bit more palatable is the examination of racial tension and the picture we get of South London during that period.

    I sort of appreciate the effort to create some sort of cultural outreach here, but ultimately, the effort stretches credulity somewhat, here. In the real world, Dennis Samuels would be making an effort to keep David away from his daughters, for fear of some sort of collateral damage by association, since local racists would be as likely to assault his girls as well as young David, especially if they were seen together. This Mister Miyagi nonsnse is better suited to greeting cards than movies that might be seen by impressionable children. There's also a suggestion of romance here, between Dennis and David's mother that's best left unspoken.

    Making a notable contribution to this film is the music — authentic ska, courtesy of Judy and Naomi, without which, this would simply be another by-the-numbers, coming-of-age and learned racial tolerance film.

    This one gets an extra star just becasue Lindo is in it and young Leonie Elliot turns in a memorable performance.

    Rating: ★★★☆☆


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<April 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930123
45678910


Categories
 


Advertisement