Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

vhsparrow Blog

  • It's Sat on the Shelf Too Long...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    ripley_under_ground.jpgFilmed back in 2004, but left on the shelf for 3 years, ‘Ripley Under Ground‘ a/k/a ‘White On White‘ has been released on DVD in Europe.

    Barry Pepper plays Ripley as a rock-star - long hair, a close shave and charisma to burn – and the tone of the thing is far lighter than any of the previous incarnations - ‘Purple Noon‘ (1960),’The American Friend‘ (1977), ‘The Talented Mr. Ripley‘ (1999), ‘Ripley’s Game‘ (2002), etc.

    Some early reviewers have referred to it as a ‘comedy’, but it’s not, really. Unfortunately, the lighter tone actually hurts the film a bit, because this outing paints Mr. Ripley as less of a predator and sociopath than any of the Ripley films that have preceeded it.

    Apparently, this interpretation sprang from a comment that Ms. Highsmith made about the filmed interpretations of her novels. Highsmith apparently felt that previous movie versions missed the humor of her character and the droll wit of her dark plots. But the humor in this effort undermines whatever suspense the film might have held.

    Beside having freed Mr. Pepper from the short-haired grunts that he usually plays, the film really allows Alan Cumming and Claire Forlani to shine in ways that they usually aren’t allowed to when they are shoe-horned into American roles and American accents. She is officially excused from having participated in ‘Meet Joe Black’.

    It’s a good, but not great film. The delight was seeing Barry Pepper stretch-out in the kind of role he’s seldom given. I typically enjoy the Ripley films and novels for their psychopathy, but this was different enough to be enjoyable. If you come across it on cable or the Shanghai bootleg carrels try not to overlook it.

    *** out of *****

    Starring: Barry Pepper, Jacinda Barrett, Tom Wilkinson,  Alan Cumming, Claire Forlani, Ian Hart,  Willem Dafoe; Directed by Roger Spottiswoode  


  • One of the best, EVAR...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    I'll try to make quick work of this, but, IMHO, Richard Matheson's 'The Haunting of Hell House' is the best haunted house flick ever to have been made.

    As much of Matheson's work were tweaks on older, familiar stories, 'Hell House' is no different: 'Hell House' is something of a Mathesization of Shirley Jackson's 'The Haunting of Hill House', the same novel that became 1963's 'The Haunting' – but the Matheson version has an edge that Robert Wise was unable to bestow upon his creation. It was shot as a documentary.

    Yes, more than 25 years before 'The Blair Witch Project',  John Hough directed a film from a Matheson script that had been written as a documentary. And the documentary style wasn't a novelty in the UK as numerous other horror pieces had been done as faux-documentaries for the BBC. Much of Nigel Kneale's work for the BBC had been in documentary style, 'The Quatermass Experiment', 'Qutermass and the Pit' and 'The Stone Tape' each pushed the fine suspension-of-disbeleif envelopes becase they weren't set in dingy and soiled archaic settings, but rather they were put together on shoestring budgets, building compelling characters that the audience couldn't help but build allegience to; thus, when thing start to go wrong, it's not the cobwebs or apparations one's seeing in mirrors and such, only the subjectivity of the performers, selling their personal horror to the camera.

    This is my favorite Haunted House movie and has maintained that status for more than 20 years because it doesn't depend on special effects and such to get its point across. Much like William Freidkin's 'Exorcist', it earned its dinnerby placing modern, intelligent people in circumstances beyond their control,even if the parting shot of the film is more sci-fi than it is horror.

    Among the many treats of this movie are Roddy MacDowall, child-star turned 30-something thesp and  ex-pat Texan Gayle Hunnicutt in convincing, well-written parts.

    And unlike the Vincent Price movies that preceeded this, I'm not sure that there's a cobweb or a black cat featured andwhere in the production. As the features of the House's story start to add up, the film becomes nothing less than a straight-ahead nail-biter.

    ***** out of ***** 


  • Biopic or Soap-Box for Mental Illness?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    ‘You’re Gonna Miss Me’ (2005)You’re Gonna Miss Me‘ is a 2005 biopic on musician Roger ‘Roky’ Erickson (b. 1947) ,the former front-man of the groundbreaking, late ’60’s psychedelic band, The 13th Floor Elevators (1965-69). However, the way in which the filmmakers depict him, one would assume that Erikson’s creative life is behind him, which both untrue and unfortunate.

    Documentarian Keven McAllester does a satisfying enough job of tracking Erikson’s youth and early music career, before arresting his musical inquiry to dive into a disquisition on the singer’s mental illness and the 17 years he floated in and out of Texas’ Mental Health Care system and the care of friends and family.

    Apparently, Erikson discovered LSD in the early ’70’s and it triggered some nascent schizophrenia that Erikson had been walking around with his entire life. At this point - the 20 or 30 minute mark – the film becomes a bit too much like Terry Zwigoff’s ‘Crumb‘ (1994) and the filmmakers take too much of an interest in Erikson’s schizophrenia, twenty years of institutionalization and his eccentric family, specifically his Mother Evelyn and his brother, Sumner. And this is where the documentary seems to go wrong.

    If the movie was meant to be a proper portrait, the filmmakers ought to have spent more time on the music that Erikson made and the influence he has had, given that most people have likely never heard of The Elevators or recognize the influence that they had on American music, an influence that trickled into Jefferson Airplane or that of their sometime-collaborator, fellow Texan Janis Joplin.

    A case for Erikson and the Elevators’ influence could easily be made, given that they were the first psychedelic rock band. Current scholarship links the Elevators to Michael Stipe and R.E.M., The Jesus and Mary Chain and ZZ Top, while missing the likely influence they had upon acts like The Velvet Underground, Jefferson Airplane, Patti Smith, the Talking Heads and the American ‘Punk’ and ‘Emo’ movements during the ’70’s, ’80’s and ’90’s. Instead, it seems as though director Keven McAlester and his producers, Laura Boyd DeSmeth and Lauren Hollingsworth would rather use Erikson’s story as a springboard to discuss the inequities and difficulties of mental health care here in America, as they go into the homes of Roky, his mother and brother, to reveal some shocking details about the disorders each of them seem to share.

    The filmmakers then wrap-up their story create an inaccurate ‘happy’ ending, by depicting a middle-aged Erikson, moving from a State mental facility to the custody and Guardianship roles that have been given to his brother Sumner. What the filmmakers conveniently omit from their coverage is that Erikson has maintained something of a music career since 1995, despite his institutionalization. As part of his role as Roky’s legal guardian, brother Sumner has encouraged his brother to continued playing and organized an annual annual Ice Cream Social in their native Austin and that Roky has largely weaned himself of the many psychiatric medications he was dependent upon while he was a ward of the State.

    In this case, I wish the filmmakers had spent more time in the film talking about Erikson and his musical influence, rather than the Jerry Springer-style evocation of American Mental Health care and the traps that it creates. Though Erikson was a victim of that system it is neither the beginning or end of his story.

    *** out of *****


  • 'Celebrity' is the real drug...

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Clean  (2004)

    What happened to Linda Emery after the death of Bruce Lee? To Courtney Love after the death of Kurt Cobain? To Yoko, after John Lennon was shot by Mark David Chapman?

    Olivier Assayas' 'Clean' is a sobering look at one of these morning-afters. Maggie Cheung stars as Emily Wang, a Yoko-like ex-MTV celebrity trying to assist her husband/veteran rock-star stage his comeback on the eve of his accidental drug-overdose. Since she was also a drug-user, it is inevitable that the rock star's parents blame her for his death; Emily's son, Jay remains in his grandparents' care, so it is also inevitable that the boy's terminally ill grandmother is also reluctant to grant Emily any visitation rights.

    Like the 2 other films ('The Heart is Deceitful Above All Things' and 'You're Gonna Miss Me') I got from the Spout Mavens group the week before, this seemed as though it was going to be a boner – some child trapped in circumstances created by his/her parents, trapping the child in some untenable circumstance and scarring him or for the rest of their natural lives; thankfully, all three films departed the Speilberg matrix™ to concentrate upon the travails of the adults.

    In 'Clean', the story centers on Emily Wang trying to pick up the pieces of her life and make compromises that she never had to before – taking a salses job, selling off her property, making an effort to regain her son's trust, since her son, Jay has had his ear poisoned by the vengeful grandmother.

    For all of the 'Kurt and Courtney', 'Sid and Nancy' shenanigans we've seen hit the screens over the last 20 years, 'Clean' is a generally better film, because it is a film about survival and recovery, rather than a movie about a survivor jonesing for a dead partner and enabler.

    Unlike the biopics that this movie resembles, Emily's 'luggage' is quickly – perhaps too hastily – dispensed with. There is no 3rd act of regret, denial and memorabilia in the fireplace. TEmily's only twinge of regret is the stop-gap department-store job that Emily must take before her old friends take up her cause and offer her a few new opportunities.

    The film's reward if that it might be possible for a celebrity to shake off the spotlight and live free of fame's methamphetines. That's not a bracing lesson for most of us, but it's an welcome alternative to many of the fall-from-grace stories that we've been sold over the years.

    *** out of *****


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2627282930311
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30123456


Categories
 


Advertisement