Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

usesoap Blog

  • 'Reading' is fun and mental

    3 out of 3 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Raising Arizona  (1987)

    True Romance  (1993)

    12 Monkeys  (1995)

    Fargo  (1996)

    Meet Joe Black  (1998)

    The Big Lebowski  (1997)

    The Ladykillers  (2004)

    I can envision moviegoers exiting “Burn After Reading” with the same befuddlement some have stated upon witnessing Joel and Ethan Coen's Oscar-winning “No Country for Old Men.”

    In fact, the directors are gracious enough to have one of the characters (a hilariously deadpan J.K. Simmons) say it for them: “So just what have we learned from all this?”

    His fellow C.I.A. officer squirms and kind of shrugs.

     

    I could sense the audience grumbling in agreement.

     

    But I could not join my fellow patrons in their dissatisfaction, for “Reading” was as unexpected, meandering, and precision-crafted as any of the brothers' comedic outputs. And it was a hell of a lot of fun.

     

    In fact, if I may commit an act of heresy amidst my fellow film-loving friends, I had more enjoyable time here than on my initial viewing of “The Big Lebowski.”

     

    While it may fall in the middle of the Coens comedic library (wedged above “The Hudsucker Proxy” and slightly below “Fargo” -- with “Raising Arizona” being the pinnacle, and “The Ladykillers the nadir), it's worth it if only for the inspired insanity they allow from their cast, better known for its dramatic endeavors.

     

    Those who seek sleek narrative construction in a Coen Brothers film are more likely to find an Oscar on the shelf of Larry The Cable Guy. For they have spent the latter part of their careers rearranging the blocks of structure, repeatedly flipping the bird to cinematic expectations.

     

    They make it clear that in “Reading” we are not entering the world in which you and I dwell. It is far distanced from the harsh realism that soaked “No Country.” Sure, they look like humans we may recognize, but they are more akin to live-action cartoons.

     

    John Malkovich plays an uptight C.I.A. Desk monkey named Osbourne Cox who is unceremoniously dumped from his rather slight job within the agency. In a profanity-filled tantrum, he stomps out, threatening to burn things to its foundation with a scathing tell-all. Unfortunately, Cox is but a mere Dilbert-esque drone whose words ring rather hollow to an indifferent employer.

     

    Things are no better at home, either. His zamboni of a wife (Tilda Swinton) icily plows over his every statement, paving over it with her own dilemmas, like, did he pick up the right cheese for the evening's dinner party. She wants things picture-perfect, for one of the guests in Harry Pfarrer (played by George Clooney), a married, philandering Treasury employee proud of the fact that he's never fired his gun in 20 years of service and an apparent connoisseur of hardwood floors.

     

    As their affair deepens, Cox's wife secretly begins amassing information from her husband's various accounts to hand over to her divorce lawyer. The information is compiled on a compact disc that gets left on the floor of Hardbodies Gym, which had the misfortune of having Chad Feldheimer (played by Brad Pitt) and Linda Lidzke (played by Frances McDormand) as employees.

     

    Chad, with hair piled high like an encroaching tidal wave, gets it into his whiffle-ball-like head that this disc's owner must be really important because there are lots of numbers and codes and stuff located within (to Chad, a disc of Sudoku puzzles would be equally confusing). Linda, who longs for a series of expensive plastic surgeries to battle time is more than happy to be his accomplice in trying to extort cash for the found information.

     

    The series of events that unfold are, at turns, hysterical, violent (sometimes simultaneously), irreverent and irrelevant.

     

    It's the enthusiasm in which each actors attacks his or her role that stokes “Reading's” flames. McDormand is so caught up in her attempts at vanity, she's blind to a fellow employee who not-so-subtly longs for her; Clooney successfully hides his striking features under a number of obnoxious tics and crippling paranoia; Malkovich is at his arrogant best, referring to his self-indulgent musings of life at the agency as his phonetically correct “mem-wah.”

     

    But from the moment he bops onto the screen about 20 minutes into the picture, there is no mistaking that this is Pitt's picture. When confined to such dramatic mush as “Seven Years in Tibet,” “Meet Joe Black” and “Legends of the Fall,” the actor can come off as a stilted mannequin, hired more for marquee value. But throughout his career, in smaller roles such as “True Romance,” and “12 Monkeys” when he's able to let his freak flag fly, Pitt's a comedic tsunami. Nowhere is it more evident than in “Reading.”

     

    Chad is a man so blissfully unaware of just how over his head he is when he hatches his plot, it's surprising that he even remembers to wear pants in public.

     

    What you may not find in “Reading” is something that neatly wraps up it's tale in a traditional fashion. For some, this will be unforgivable, but for those who happily vibe along with the cast until, quite literally, the book is closed on this tale, they will find the eccentric comedy is just the right shade of black.


  • Method Men and 50 Cent

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dick Tracy  (1990)

    Midnight Run  (1988)

    Sea of Love  (1989)

    The Untouchables  (1987)

    Analyze This  (1999)

    Meet The Parents  (2000)

    Showtime  (2002)

    Godsend  (2003)

    Hide and Seek  (2005)

    88 Minutes  (2008)

    Rocky Balboa  (2006)

    Righteous Kill  (2008)

     

    “What are you gonna do? Wheel me out on the 'Geraldo Show' as some freak of the week?” posits a character of the new cop thriller “Righteous Kill.

     

    Wait a minute, Geraldo?

     

    Are you sure that's the pop-culture reference you want to stick with?

     

    Were there licensing problems with Morton Downey Jr? Arsineo did not return calls?

     

    Yes, “Righteous Kill,” arriving in theaters in 2008 is hopelessly mired in elements of two decades ago. For that was an era when stars Al Pacino and Robert DeNiro were at their bankable best: DeNiro followed his larger-than-life turn as Al Capone in “The Untouchables” with the definitive mismatched-buddy film “Midnight Run.” and Pacino was burning up the screen with Ellen Barkin in “Sea of Love” and about to chew on mouthfuls of scenery in “Dick Tracy.”

     

    Had “Kill” been released at that point and time, their union would reach a fever pitch (and drummed up a better box office than its third-place finish this week at theaters).

     

    I am not suggesting the two are past their prime, as I think both have much to contribute to cinema in their twilight years. But instead of slumming through atrocities like Pacino's “88 Minutes” or cheapening their legacy as DeNiro repeated has in both “Analyze This” and “Meet the Parents” and their sequels, they should find a film with more subtle nuance and reflection, just as sexagenarian Sylvester Stallone did in “Rocky Balboa.”

     

    “Righteous Kill” in not that movie. In fact, the title of Pacino's previous film, “Two for the Money,” seems more fitting.

     

    It's an adequate enough vehicle -- stable, drives well – but handles with the thrills of a mini-van.

     

    Pacino and DeNiro are the bizarrely named crime-fighting duo Rooster and Turk, respectively.

     

    After decades on the force, they lament “ones that got away” -- the rapists, drug-pushers and murderers who, by a loopy legal system, squiggle free and return to the streets to commit more crime.

     

    In recent days, though, a serial killer has been dispensing vigilante justice, and a number of perpetrators the cases in which Turk and Rooster oversaw are winding up dead.

     

    Is it a cop, fed up with the system methodically finishing the job the justice system could not seem to do? Is it a lone-wolf groupie who's just trying to lend a hand to the haggard officers? Is it a vengefu... No, it's a cop. The film says so repeatedly within the first 20 minutes. We even see a videotaped confession and the words of the killer.

     

    Of course, a film of this nature live or dies by its last-minute “gotcha” and so “Kill” plods along to its inevitable ending zinger. It may be a twist, but it's not a surprise, as the audience is given a roughly 33.3 percent chance of guessing the limited suspect lineup.

     

    Supporting characters, as expected, are but window dressing – and there's not much light escaping through these panes. There's Carla Gugino as DeNiro's way-too-young love interest (Pacino already had a shot this year at being a mack granddaddy in director Jon Avnet's “88 Minutes,” in which every female within a one-mile vicinity was drawn to him as though he excreted some strange musk). Fitty Cent (here going by his thespian name of Curtis Jackson) may actually end up “Die Tryin'” to be an actor, because he certainly isn't going to “Get Rich” from it.

     

    John Leguizamo and Donnie Wahlberg also stop by to fill out various police-force stereotypes.

     

    And in the center rest DeNiro and Pacino, who have moments where they appear to enjoy one another's company, but there was more electricity generated in the brief five minutes they spent across the diner table in “Heat” than any scene in “Righteous Kill.” Hack director Avnet does little to punctuate the proceedings with anything else.

     

    The film is slightly above most of DeNiro's latter-day output (“Hide and Seek,” “Godsend,” “Showtime”), but with video stores stocked with decades of iconic work from these two Method men, the real crime would be bypassing them for this protracted “Law and Order” episode with two very special guest stars.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<September 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
31123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829301234
567891011


Categories
 


Advertisement