Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

usesoap Blog

  • 'Mummy' Issues

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

     During a climactic battle scene in “The Mummy: Curse of the Tomb of the Something or Other,” Brender Fraser's charactrer, What's His Name, bellows: “I really hate mummies.”(At least, I'm pretty sure he said, “mummies,” as there was nothing prior to this that would suggest he said “mommies,” as there was no strained parental issues of his discussed in this film.)

     

    Regardless, I could not agree agree more, Brenden.

     

    “The Mummy” is not so much a film as it is a marathon for the senses, testing the threshold your eyes and ears can endure.

     

    When it's not busy reminding you of earlier, far better films, it's pounding your peepers and pummeling your drums into submission.

     

    It's difficult to look past its flaws, for the mere conception of this film is one – a story as lifeless and dry as an empty sarcophagus, this third “Mummy” can't even muster enough credibility to pass its non-computer-generated cast as believable.

     

    For example, the 27-year-old actor Luke Ford is apparently the college-aged kid of 39-year-old Frasier and 41-year-old Maria Bello, who plays Fraser's wife. The younger actor's rather difficult time trying to squelch his Australian accent only adds to the fact that he does not bare even a passing resemblance to the other actors. Except, of course, he shares the same crow's feet.

     

    The film opens heavy on exposition, as if anyone really cared about that going into a “Mummy” movie. Talk of “collections of mystical secrets,” “the Eye of Shangri-La” and “eternal youth” are stiltingly read while generic shots of battling armies flash before us.

     

    Then, we are treated to a shot of our now-retired hero, Indi... er, Rick O'Connell (played by Fraser), unsuccessfully fly fishing in one of those sad, slapsticky, I-can't-deal-with-retirement montages that serve as filler in films such as these.

     

    “The Mummy” films have always been a pale copy of the “Indiana Jones” franchise, but in a summer in which Dr. Jones himself makes a (rather flat) return to the screen, Rick's re-entry into the adventure fray seems superfluous. There's even a shot where he stares at his old leather adventurin' jacket that's supposed to echo the iconic sight of Dr. Jones picking up his dusty fedora again. While watching, all we can think was, “Oh, is that what he wore?”

     

    A car chase, countless bad puns, an army of undead, CGI- rendered (CGI standing for crappy, generic images), a countless loud, bland scenes later, and all is wrapped up and forgotten before pushing open the theater's exit door.

     

    Fraser, as always, is a champ, completely comfortable with the fact that the majority of his co-stars are mere pixels, and he still manages to make the most of his “Raiders” - light role.

     

    Rachel Weitz, who smartly bailed on this outing, has been replaced by Maria Bello ( “A History of Violence”) as Rick's British wife. While some critics have bemoaned the former;s absence, can they really say “The Mummy” films were such paragons of adventure solely because of her textured performance? At this point, I think she could have been replaced by a Colorform with little difference.

     

    As mentioned earlier, the decision to advance the age of the son, last seen as a precious scamp in “The Mummy Returns” seven years ago, is rather awkward and jarring any time he shares the screen with his “dad.”

     

    Action sequence after action sequence lifts bits from other films and appears edited with a ceiling fan, allowing shots strewn about in random order. The final battle with an ancient undead terra cotta army (really, how threatening can an army be when its mere name suggests patio furnishings?) is routine and uninspired. The weapon-weidling skeletons only harken back to Ray Harryhausen's stop-motion animation of “Jason and the Argonauts.” But in the caffeinated hands of director Rob (“The Fast and the Furious”) Cohen, the memories are fleeting before it's on to the next strained attempt at humor or peril.

     

    With the sun setting on summer cinema, we can only hope that we've seen the last of this sort of generic, bombastic, seizure-inducing form of film, and we can wrap this “Mummy” up and entomb it with its anxiety-inducing box office brethren as we await the more deliberately paced films of the fall.


  • A 'Swing' and a miss

    2 out of 2 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Juno  (2007)

    Swing Vote  (2008)

    You gotta hand it to Kevin Costner.

    The one-time pretty boy of the silver screen sure isn't afraid to let it all hang out in his most recent screen roles, sporting mid-life muffin tops around the midriff, allowing his thinning mane to sprout from his noggin like some nest of a crazed blue jay, and wearing each wrinkle on his face with pride.

     

    In “Swing Vote” his latest role is that of Bud, a slovenly mess of a man who eschews politics and world issues for a hearty game of foozball and the foamy beverage that shares his name.

     

    He's like “comedian” Larry the Cable Guy with half an IQ point. And without the overtly hostile racism and homophobia.

     

    It seems the fate of the free world rests in his beer-soaked mitts, as a technical glitch allowed a razor's-edge election to be determined by a single ballot.

     

    Is that a chad hanging, or is he just happy to see us?

     

    Setting off a media maelstrom, Bud is besieged by reporters, camera crews, paparazzi and even the candidates themselves are soon courting the man for that all-important vote.

     

    Both incumbent Republican president (played bu Kelsey Grammer) and Democratic contender (played, ironically, by staunch Republican Dennis Hopper) are tossing aside every electoral promise they've made, and changing their party's entire structure in order to suck up to Bud.

     

    The Republicans are now the environmental party and the Democrats are in the pro-life camp in order to appeal to Bud's supposed views (even if he really doesn't have a firm stance on anything).

     

    This is where “Swing Vote” makes its most fatal error in a film filled with lesser ones along the way. It attempts to emphasize the civic duty of voting, but negates that by giving us candidates willing to whore out their entire campaign, their entire belief system in order to win.

     

    Sure, each candidate's PR man (Stanley Tucci is Grammer's Rovian henchman and Nathan Lane is Hopper's craven servant) are pulling the strings, but that just makes the candidates even more pathetic. Do we really care who wins when either politician is so quick to pander in order to get seated. It's this characterization that leads to voter apathy in the first place.

     

    The cameos from political pundits in “Swing Vote” will likely mean nothing to those who fall into Bud's base (“Golly! I think that there's Arianna Huffington, founder of Huffington Post!” “Well I'll be! Git a load of Tucker Carlson without his little bow tie, Vern!”). And the supporting actors (Grammer, Hopper, Tucci, Lane) are too thinly scripted to provide any real interest.

     

    This leaves the majority on Costner and his on-screen daughter, newcomer Madeline Carroll. Carroll comes across as the only-in-the-movies pre-teen, with a Juno-sized intellect, and demonstrating more responsibility than any of her adult co-stars, despite being surrounded by poverty, alcoholism and drug addiction. It's a fine effort, but she really won't be stealing the crown from Little Miss Sunshine any time soon.

     

    Costner tries to increase the voltage with his megawatt smile, but his buffoonery and slapstick are hard to fully laugh at when you consider just what a selfish, irresponsible oxygen-waster his character truly is. He does not deserve a daughter like his, he does not deserve the fawning media, and he certainly does not deserve his own movie.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<August 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456


Categories
 


Advertisement