Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

usesoap Blog

  • Is it OK to be a straight male and enjoy 'High School Musical 3?"

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dirty Dancing  (1987)

    Newsies  (1992)

    Roman Holiday  (1953)

    West Side Story  (1961)

    Xanadu  (1980)

    Footloose  (1984)

    Shag  (1988)

    "High School Musical" represents everything I despise about the corporate juggernaut known as Disney: Flawless teens seemingly air-brushed by nature, ready-to-market characters prepared to franchise into every imaginable direction (stage play, television series, dolls, ice show, dolls, recording contracts, etc.), and a story you can set your watch to.

    It's also pretty darn fun, gosh darn it.

    I realize that the majority of the target audience of 'High School Musical 3: Senior Year' could not give two shakes of Zac Efron's hips as to what my opinion of the film is. So this review go out to all the parents out there.

    If there is a female child dwelling in your home and who is old enough to form a complete sentence, chances are good she knows of the juggernaut knows as "High School Musical" (or 'HSM' if you wanna b, like, hip). Chance are, too, that you have a musical number or two lodged in your cerebral cortex as it played on an endless loop in your DVD player, or as your child practiced some third-rate karaoke version of it in front of any and all reflective surfaces within your home.

    For this, their third outing, the East High Wildcats are in their freshly scrubbed final year in this homogenize high school, and the doubts and fears of life outside the hallowed halls are now front and center in the minds of leads Troy (Efron), Gabrielle (Vanessa Hudgens), Chad (Corbin Blue), Taylor (Monique Coleman), and Sharpay (Ashley Tisdale). As with any plot in a film with "musical" in the title, the teens plans to put on a group show, much to the dismay of the the self-absorbed Sharpay, who wants a one-woman show for her finale.

    And while it may feel like a cheap money-grabbing ploy to splash the big screen with this third installment, considering the first two films were squished into the confines of the small screen where their ratings shot through the ceiling, but considering the emotional resonance of high school's senior year, it seems rather fitting.

    It does not hurt that the cast don't seem phased by their universal omnipotence in the rooms of pre-pubescent girls and give each number their all. But the most inspired bits of this outing are compliments of director/choreographer Kenny Ortega.

    Ortega has lent his moves to movies since 1980s roller disco camp classic "Xanadu," and whose career since has busted some moves ("Dirty Dancing," the under-appreciated "Newsies") and lost its grooves ("Shag" or "Salsa," anyone?) -- and he's next set to direct the remake of the 80s equivalent to "HSM," "Footloose" in 2010) -- but he finds his groove early here and channels his inner Fosse. He never misses an opportunity to toss in a nod to musicals past, from the faux-tough "West Side Story" orneriness of "The Boys are Back," to the Busby Berkely-inspired "A Night to Remember," and even the spinning room of "Roman Holiday" for good measure.

    It's not a far cry from the "put on a show" mentality of Judy Garland and Mickey Rooney so many decades ago.

    And as a parent of a young daughter who adores "Singin' in the Rain," it's a tad refreshing to witness another musical that can be easily inserted into the DVD player without fear of her emulating the pelvic thrusts of so many other hungry starlets in the current pop stratosphere.

    The only time "HSM3" trips on its stage is when it attempts to shoehorn its newest batch of fresh-faced cast members (poised and ready for their "High School Musical 4" debut, coming to a TV near you in 2009). They possess little of the mile-wide charisma of Efron or Tisdale's catty histrionics.

    It's a fitful send-off to seniors so squeaky clean, they make "ABC's Afterschool Specials" look like Larry Clarke's "Kids" by comparison. It's a cheery, chipper finale so wholesome it may leave calcium deposits in its wake, but so gleefully in love with its own power of positivity, it happily earns its tasseled mortarboard.


  • [review] Uncounted: The New Math of American Elections

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]

    I review films professionally for a small paper that is situated in a primarily liberal oasis adrift in a very conservative county,

    In my reviews, I keep my politics close to the vest (but, honestly, anyone who reads between the lines can easily see my stripes).

    In private, though, I consume documentaries such as “Uncounted.” “Outfoxed,” “Iraq for Sale,” “Uncovered” and “Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Prices” have captivated me, as I look forward to each new film released by Robert Greenwald's Brave New Films company.

    In a political year such as this one, I digest far too much information than my recommended daily allowance suggests, but I turn into a news junkie, compulsively checking the net for breaking stories, impulsively signing up, volunteering and donating to causes (I'll see you at the voting booth on election day!), and filling my mp3 to the brim with political talk shows of the day (full confession: I shed a tear of happiness when my favorite radio pundit Rachael Maddow landed her own gig on MSNBC after Keith Olbermann).

    As compulsive as I am, I still manage to keep reality in check when I view these films, and wear my best reporter's cap when disseminating the information coming at me (that's what a Journalism degree does to you).

    Two years back, I stumbled upon a a lengthy piece from Robert F. Kennedy Jr. called “Was the 2004 Election Stolen?”, published in Rolling Stone ( a link to the piece is found here). It's a lengthy but essential piece, especially for anyone who is concerned about the current political climate in this country. His follow-up piece “Block the Vote” was released this week and is a worthy successor.

    I mention all this because I feel that it is an integral companion piece for “Uncounted.”

    The David Earnhardt-directed documentary covers the same turf as the Kennedy piece on the 2004 presidential election and the numerous inconsistencies in the voting practices in this country's more economically depressed and minority areas.

    Yes, the film leans far to the left, but then when is the last time that you have heard of election fraud coming out in favor of the Democrats? (Don't throw me that tired ACORN voter “registration” rubbish either, for that is completely different than “election” fraud).

    For the politically strident, the film is not an easy watch, and for those who suffer from malaise at the thought of voting, this could cause you to recoil on your couch until November 5, when it's way over.

    But if you are even the least bit concerned about just what happens after that button is pushed or that level is pulled, “Uncounted” will cause much discomfort and maybe, just maybe, motivate you to leaf material that will help you get involved and, to quote Mahatma Gandhi, help “be the change we want to see in the world.”

    With the election only days away, “Uncounted” could not be more timely viewing and I promise it will give you more chills than any horror movie marathon in your house ever could.


  • Scare Tactics 2008

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Green Mile  (1999)

    Slither  Production Year

    Cloverfield  (2008)

    Quarantine  (2008)

    (Note: This is actaully written as part of my newspaper review column, whose readers may not be as obsessive about their horror films as members of the Spout community, but I felt I would include it nonetheless)

     Let's face it, the current economic news is far more terrifying  than any feature that can grace the big screen right now.

    For horror devotees, there's the never-ending “Saw” franchise making its fifth trip to the multiplex this weekend. And there is really only one other legitimate fright flick for it to contend with (and no, “Beverly Hills Chihuahua” and “W.” don't count). The film is “Quarantine,” which I will get to later. But first, may I suggest a few more economically friendly ways to get your scare on this season of the witch by suggesting some DVD titles that you may have overlooked.

     

     

    For the discernible horror fan, it's always a tough trip to the video store, where, through the magic of Photoshop, DVD covers hold promises that the crappy films inside could ever keep.

    Fear not, for I have sifted through mounds of gore guano and will provide you with a few under-seen flesh-crawling flicks that are created with style, substance and sufficient scares.

     

     

    “Them (Ils)” (2006): Forget “The Strangers,” the Liv-Tyler-headlining film released this week on DVD (actually, that's unfair, for that film does create a palpable atmosphere). The similar plot of “Them” is the standard couple-stranded -in-an-isolated-locale horror theme. But after about 15 minutes of setup, the film rarely stops to catch its breath, as a young couple relies on their wiles to elude a faceless tormentor (or tormentors?). Clocking in at less than 90 minutes, the film zips by at a frenetic pace, and while the French-made film does have subtitles, the numerous bumps, creaks, crashes and screams that pump through your surround sound need no translation.

     

     

    Slither” (2006): For those who enjoy a few more chuckles to lighten the mood between scenes of terror, “Slither” is an homage to those fantastic alien invasion films of the '50s, updated with a millennial sensibility. Director James Gunn lovingly recreates a world of icky aliens, intentional humor and genuine scares. Also, look for a wonderful cameo from Gunn's real-life wife Jenna (“The Office”) Fischer.

     

     

    “Rogue” (2007): It's hard to convince scare skeptics to give a chance to a giant killer crocodile movie, but why are they so willing to embrace a 30-foot shark as one of the best films of all time? I'm not placing this on the same level as “Jaws,” of course, but I am saying that there are a number of effective flourishes in this film that merit it a spot on your rental list. A group of tourists in Australia get cornered by a rather rabid reptile with a taste for human flesh. “Rogue” earns its scales for treating its characters as more than just croc chum and leaving us to wonder just who will bite it next.

     

     

    The Mist” in black and white (2007): Director Frank Darabont has been one of the most beloved screen collaborators of author Stephen King's work. “The Shawshank Redemption” and “The Green Mile” consistently rate at the top of King's page-to-screen transfers. And while you may have witnessed this film in its brief theatrical run, or even caught it on DVD, you have not really “experienced” it until you watch it in its monochromatic glory, which is available on the two-disc collector's edition. Creating the overall mood of a classic B-movie monster movie from the '50s, the film's CGI-created creatures appear seamless, the shadows are more ominous and the overall tone just a little moodier.

     

     

    And finally, if you still enjoy your jolts surrounded by a roomful of strangers, there is a rather effective alternative to “Saw” still playing in local theaters.

     

    Based on a much-more-effective Spanish film called “[Rec]” (as in the “Record” button) that is not yet available on DVD, “Quarantine” is still the next best thing for a fun-filled fright night.

    The plot focuses on a young reporter spending the night in a firehouse for a story, and she certainly gets one when the station is called to a disturbance in a nearby apartment complex.

     

    While there, she and her cameraman capture its residents succumbing to a strange virus that causes them to be cordoned off from the general public. Even though the film is structured similarly to the single-camera style of “The Blair Witch Project” and “Cloverfield,” it does not fall victim to the “shaky-cam” shots that induced nausea for so many viewers.

     

    While the film feels more polished than its Spanish predecessor, it is still provides a number of worthwhile creeps and jolts.

    Purists may want to steer clear, though and wait for the DVD release, as this version is almost a shot-for-shot remake. But if you are wary of having to face Jigsaw for yet another go-round at the theater this Halloween, than “Quarantine” has more than enough bite.

     


  • 'RocknRolla' : Ritchie's rich return

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Swept Away  (2002)

    Revolver  (2007)

    RocknRolla  (2008)

    With “RocknRolla” we are officially out of new threatening aquatic creatures for cinematic bad guys to dip their foes into.

     

    Sharks. Piranhas. Electric eels. Ill-tempered mutated sea bass. All of these little fishies have occupied a tank or two, used for a criminal dunking booth as a form of persuasion in films. Lenny Cole, the chief villain of Guy Ritchie's new crime caper is also a proprietor of such a nefarious aquarium.

     

    So what does he choose to stock in his pond of persuasion?

     

    Crawfish. Yes, that Louisiana delicacy that is little more than an overgrown Sea Monkey is what Lenny uses to taunt his victims.

     

    It's (hopefully) meant as a lark in Ritchie's assured return to form after misfiring with the disastrous “Swept Away” (starring wife Madonna) and the befuddling “Revolver.” “RocknRolla” creeps back into the underworld where he is most comfortable, populating it with yet another round of entertaining, three-dimensional, two-bit, one-track-minded ruffians who inhabit it.

     

    Lenny (played by Tom Wilkinson) is trying to score a real estate deal with a younger, leaner Russian “businessman” (played by Karel Rodan), but is soon realizing his way of lawlessness is slowly giving way to a more harsh, bitter brand of criminality.

     

    Meanwhile, his middling thugs get mixed up in the fracas, testing allegiances as well as each other's patience.

     

    One Two (played by “300's” Gerard Butler), Mumbles (played by Idris Elba), Handsome Bob (played by Tom Hardy), Archie (played by Mark Strong), and Johnny Quid (played by Tony Kebble), are all crossing paths and cracking skulls -- sometimes their own – in an attempt to pad their pockets with payoff.

     

    A scheming accountant (played by Thandie Newton) and a pair of seamy music executives (played by Jeremy Piven and Ludicris), also figure into the scheme.

     

    Through the thick British accents, it might be difficult to catch each and every line lobbed onto the criminal battlefield, but the film is immediately more discernible than his thoroughly confusing trip to Kabbalah-land, “Revolver.”

     

    Some may see “RocknRolla” as the director falling back on a crutch, cinematically. But it is a crutch that has served him well, and the director seems to have done some maturation in the years since he rocketed onto the landscape with “Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels” and its follow-up “Snatch.”

     

    This film doesn't feel as hopped-up and antsy, allowing more exposition with some rather engaging characters. One scene in particular takes a Hitchcockian foot-chase – one that would typically be wrought with hyperkinetic editing and a thundering soundtrack – and adds an amusing twist to its conclusion that is as realistic as it is comical.

     

    The cast is primed and ready to groove with Ritchie's signature vibe, happily contributing moments of appropriate over-the-top histrionics and awkward humility, especially Wilkinson, Butler and Strong.

     

    Ritchie breaks no new ground as a director, with his visual flair on full display. But he has grown substantially as a writer, which elevates its gallery of goons to more than Tarantino-esque tough guys.

     

    The cast of “RocknRolla” can stand confidently beside the motley crews he's previously assembled on the screen.


  • [review] Clean: The road to recovery

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Clean  (2004)

    Say what you want about addiction, but for many who have suffered or are still suffering from it, it is mere luck of the draw. For Emily (played by Maggie Cheung), the protagonist of Clean, the hand she was dealt was a losing one as her struggles with heroin envelop her very sense of self (rock star, wife, mother). 

    Her existence lies at the needle’s end.

    It is not only monetarily costly, but one emotionally as well, as she loses her husband Lee to an overdose, and, subsequently, her young son Jay (played by James Dennis), who lives with Lee’s parents (played by Nick Nolte and Martha Henry) after her custody is revoked.

    It would be easy to dismiss her a good-for-nothing druggie, but Albrecht (Nolte) , now  thechild’s leagal guardian approaches matters much more rationally. Perhaps it is because of his son’s death and the fact that he is now facing the mortality of his wife (who is hospitalized in the final stages of cancer), but the film’s title “Clean” may also refer to the slate on which Albrecht wants to start things in an attempt to mend what’s left of those in his life.

    When he calmly whispers to his wife, “Someday we won’t be here. And she is the boy’s mother,” you can sense his compassion out of necessity.

    Albrecht scans the woman, peeling the hardened layers to look for redeeming qualities in the mother of his grandchild. While Cheung won the Best Actress award at Cannes for her role in 2004, it was Nolte’s supporting part that really resonated. Perhaps it was Nolte’s own storied past, but it was almost as though he was looking inward for that essence of goodness.

    And as the film works steadfastly toward its conclusion, there’s that final shot…sure to be the proverbial sand-drawn line that will divide audiences of the film. It is open to interpretation, which, personally, are the endings I love. I remember as a child reading books and then creating further situations/adventures/ etc. for the characters. It is an eccentricity I have sometimes after a particularly effective film-going process, one which contains characters about whom I cared.

    In ‘Clean,” I continued the story of the characters in my head long after I finished the film.


  • Preaching to the choir

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    D.C. Cab  (1983)

    Borat  (2006)

    Religulous  (2008)

    “The Christian God can easily be pictured as the same god as the many gods of ancient civilizations.”

    “Question with boldness the existence of God."

    “My mind is my own church.”

    “Let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can be maintained without religions.”

    “I think vital religion has always suffered when orthodoxy is more regarded than virtue.”

    These all may seem like the inflammatory ramblings of the Right Wing's favorite whipping boy Bill Maher, and not quotes from our Founding Fathers (Thomas Jefferson, Thomas Paine, George Washington and Ben Franklin, respectively. Look it up.). But they serve sort of the thesis statements for Maher's documentary “Religulous.”

     

    Now whether you wish to take theological advice from a former actor whose previous cinematic body of work includes the Mr. T opus “D.C. Cab” and “Cannibal Women and the Avocado Jungle of Death” is your own call.

     

    The topic of religion has been a frequent target for Maher's “Real Time” talk show, and he makes no attempts to conceal his disdain for organized religion of any kind and the harm done to humanity in its name. In “Religulous,” he sets out on a global nomadic quest in an attempt to understand why his belief in non-belief is so marginalized.

     

    He has hired “Borat” director Larry Charles to accompany him on this religious crusade...( hmm, maybe “crusade” may be the wrong word when talking about Christianity... how about “deity safari?”). Maher overturns stones of such fringe-dwelling pit-stops of faith as a Trucker's Chapel, The Creationism Museum and a “gay conversion” center as well as attempting to tackle the big boys such as the Mormon Tabernacle and the Vatican.

     

    Maher's past as a comedian comes in handy throughout, as his wit certainly cuts through some of the deeper discussions. But his trademarked snark is exactly what may cause the film to fail to convert anyone who does not already worship at Maher's altar. He is not aided much by Charles, who edits the film that often leaves it open to criticism that he is stacking the deck in his star's favor.

     

    Granted, many of the subjects are far out of Maher's comedic league, and it is doubtful that he needed any help decimating certain guests who willfully jam their own feet in their mouth.

     

    The results are frequently hilarious, make no mistake.

     

    But by choosing this filmmaking method, Charles leaves Maher wide open to the oft-cited criticism of Maher's smug, self-satisfied delivery is too off-putting to welcome new members to his congregation, which is obviously the film's intent.

     

    And if that does not seal the deal, Maher's strangely serious polemic rant at the film's conclusion certainly will. As Maher himself begins the film, he admits that he “does not know” the answers, but preaches to the masses just like so many of the religious charlatans he spent the past 90 minutes railing against, with absolution and certainty.

     

    “Religulous” does open doors to conversation, which is always healthy. But when you preach with condescension that your view is the only valid one on the table, you sound exactly like those you mock.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678


Categories
 


Advertisement