Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

unclefestering Blog

  • I'm not dead. Am I?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Dead Man  (1995)

     

    Dead Man stars Johnny Depp as a mild mannered accountant who travels to a western company town in the 1880s and after a series of altercations, he is running from the law while he is slowly dying. I have to say that this movie is a very different experience than the usual Jim Jarmusch series of sporadically connected episodes. Here he tells a fairly linear story. So your enjoyment of this movie might hinge on your opinion of what to expect of Jarmusch and of a Western.

    Johnny Depp is great in this very restrained role the character has his own quirks, but these serve to illuminate the charter, rather than build the character. He is William Blake, who has come to the town of Machine for an accounting job, but when he gets there, finds out that it is already filled. He gets into an argument with the boss of the company and town (Robert Mitchum), who throws Blake out of his office at gun point. Blake goes to drown his sorrows in the local bar and meeting the town whore. After a quick tangle, her boyfriend (Gabriel Byrne) bursts into the room in an unholy rage. A shoot out ensues leaving the hooker and her boyfriend dead and Blake gravely wounded.

    Blake is hunted by the local lawmen and townspeople. He travels into the wilderness with only an Indian named Nobody as his companion. Nobody thinks Blake is the reincarnation of the romantic poet.

    Jarmusch doesn’t present the Old West in a romantic light. With his usual, deliberate pace, Jarmusch debunks the myths of the Old West as a place of independence and freedom. The stark subject matter is lightened in places by Jarmusch’s sense of humor, but it is a much darker movie than his usual wont.

    The stark black and white cinematography plays beautifully in this movie. The thousands of shades of gray that pop on the screen bring attention to the grittiness of both the town and the countryside. Both are stark and in their own ways beautiful. It is well scored by Neil Young. The electric guitar grunge builds into a haunting melody that conveys the starkness of this vision of the west. Both those elements heighten this movie experience.

    Jarmusch is also well served by a number of well known actors. In addition to Depp and Mitchum, who adds an incredible sense of menace in his few scenes, Gabriel Byrne, Lance Hendricksen, Albert Molina, Steve Buscemi  and Billy Bob Thornton all turn in extremely strong performances.

    Another place where this movie departs from Jarmusch’s usual style is its graphic use of violence. The squeamish should be aware that Jarmusch doesn’t shy away from showing violence, and its consequences as well as the causal way that many of the characters seem to be unaware of just how disturbing their actions are.

    The deliberate pace and Jarmusch’s in experience with telling a linear story sometimes show as this movie has a tendency to drag in several places during its 2 hour running time.


  • You are so good you made the Mathmos vomit!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Barbarella  (1968)

    On Golden Pond  (1981)

    Monster-in-Law  (2005)

    Barbarella often get knocked for being a bad movie as if it was supposed to be taken seriously. The movie is a campy, sci-fi, sex romp that takes equal shots at the conventions of both the 60s Sci-Fi and sex romp films. Don’t take it seriously. You probably shouldn’t watch it sober, but it is worth watching for the wide-eyed innocent wantonness that Jane Fonda manages to project in the lead role.

    Now first off, I’ve never really been a fan of Jane Fonda’s acting ability. She single-handedly wrecks On Golden Pond, and is shrill and unfunny in Monster-in-Law. Fonda’s limited acting abilities actually work for her in this movie. Her then soon to be ex-husband, Roger Vadim, didn’t ask for her to do deep method acting, but used her stilted line delivery to his advantage. He also uses the hammy performances of the other actors to the movies advantage. Barbarella walks a very fine balance of camp and crap and slips on each side at points along the way, but manages to keep that balance for much of the movie.

    The plot doesn’t really make much sense and is really only an excuse to get Barbarella from one psychedelic set piece to the surreal next one. Milo O’Shea plays Durand Durand, a scientist who has left Earth for a distant planet where they will let him build the ultimate weapon. Barbarella is sent by the president of Earth to bring him back. She crash lands on the planet Lythion and is attacked by tiny toy doll robots with snapping jaws that manage only to destroy her clothes (a common occurrence in this movie). She is rescued by a hunter who, after they have sex, takes her to meet Professor Ping, who along with all the other good people are slowlybeing turned to stone. Ping sends Barbarella onto the evil city of Sogo with a blind angel. There she meets the Great Dictator, the ineffective resistance leader and Durand Durand.

    The climax comes (so to speak) when she is put into a giant orgasm-inducing organ (the musical kind) to be pleasured to death.

    This movie is truly a product of its times. It hasn’t aged well from the perspective of fashions and style. It is all done in high 1960s counter culture psychedelia. Despite this, there is a certain charm to the unique visual style that feeds into the humorous aspects of this movie. For example, Barbarella's spaceship has the exterior design of a beach toy and the interior decoration of the Playboy mansion. (You'll never see anything like this in Star Trek!)

    Many people complain that the movie is antifeminist because Jane Fonda spends a lot of the movie with little clothing on and what clothes she does manage to wear are equally parts ridiculous and revealing.

    What I find truly revolutionary is that the movie celebrates women’s sensuality. Barbarella never pays any kind of moralistic price for enjoying sex. In fact, her enjoyment of sex is what saves her in the end. Also she is able to defeat the villains of the movie without any real help from the men who constantly surround her in this movie.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
27282930123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement