Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

unclefestering Blog

  • We are dust, nothing more

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    28 Days Later  (2003)

    Sunshine  (2007)

     

    Sunshine is such an impressive throwback to the almost lost thinking man’s genre of Science Fiction that you can almost forgive it’s final act. The combination of director Danny Boyle and Cillian Murphy is as potent as it was in 28 Days Later.

    The lives of six billion people rest in the hands of eight, fraying crewmembers. Taking place in the near future when the sun is rapidly cooling due to an unexplained phenomenon; the movie starts with the spaceship, the Icarus II, hauling a bomb the size of Manhattan to the sun in an effort to restart the star. This is the second and final attempt. The first ship that was sent seven years ago never completed the mission. All of the remaining fissionable material on Earth was mined to make this last bomb.

    The crew is beginning to come apart as the movie starts. They are about to enter the dead zone where radiation from the sun will cause too much interference for messages to be sent to home and they won’t receive any either. When Capa (Murphy) uses all the time left sending a message to his family, a fight breaks out between him and the second in command Mace (Chris Evans). The fight gets settled by the ship’s doctor (Cliff Curtis) who is developing a seriously dangerous addiction to sun bathing.

    The women of the ship are holding things together slightly better. Corazon (Michelle Yeoh) spends most of her time in the ships gardens, the source of food and air. Rose Byrne’s Cassie is having a fling with Capa.

    Once they enter the dead zone, Mace picks up the signal of the original Icarus, parked in an orbit between the Sun and Mercury. After a vote the crew decides to deviate from their original course and try to use the other ship’s bomb as a backup to their own. In addition they want to solve the mystery of what happened to the other mission.

    The navigator makes a serious mistake when he changes the ships course and several critical systems fail. Now the other ship is needed for its resources as much as it’s bomb.

    The tension, the look and the feel of the movie to this point are flawless. The crew members are becoming victims of their own psychological flaws and these take a toll on the others. As the more rational members are forced to sacrifice themselves in attempts to save the mission, it leaves the lives of every one left behind on the Earth in the hands of the less stable members.

    At this point the movie, just as the movie is getting to its most interesting ideas, is goes off the rails when Boyle introduces a boogeyman out to stop the crew of the Icarus II. The whole concept of the character is to be a real physical threat as opposed to the psychological danger that the crew pose to themselves.

    The look and feel of the movie is top rate. You get a real physical sense of the spaceship’s layout. The space suits used by the crew have a pretty unique look. They reminded me of Kenny from South Park drifting in space.


  • A tense and exciting thriller

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    13 Tzameti  (2006)

     

    13 Tzameti is a really interesting film for several reasons. It is a modern take on the film noir genre. But in addition to the usual red herring and mcguffins that fill film noir, this movie has borrowings from Kafka. It is a very interesting movie that deserves more than just the word of mouth praise and festival circuit showing that it has gotten.

    Director and writer, Gela Babluani is himself an immigrant to France from Georgia, the eastern European country not the southern state, and combines both the film legacy of France with an outsider’s view of the country to really make this thriller special. It was a smart move to film this movie in black and white, although that may have been a purely budgetary decision. It is very crisply photographed and reminded me of why black and white films really stand out over color when they are done right.

    George Babluani, the director’s brother, stars in the movie as Sebastian, a poor immigrant day worker struggling to help his family make ends meet. He starts out working on the roof of an older man’s house in a rundown, seaside town. The man, Godon (played by Philippe Passon), don’t have the money to pay Sebastian. Instead he promises that he will have a way to make a lot of money very soon and will pay the young man out of that. Soon afterward, a letter arrives for Godon and the older man kills himself by overdosing. Sebastian sees his chance and steals the letter.

    The police who have been watching Godon’s house and his friends become suspicious of Sebastian and begin to follow him. Sebastian follows the cryptic instructions of the letter and manages to dodge the police in the process.

    Once he meets his employers he learns that he has gotten himself into a competition where he must kill others or be killed himself, while his sponsors and others bet on the outcomes of these high stakes, multiplayer version of Russian Roulette. He cannot get away from the duels without the people running the show and his own reluctant sponsors killing him. He isn’t sure of the rules and isn’t sure if he will ever make it out alive. The casual cruelty of the game is shocking not only to Sebastian, but to many of the other players in the game.

    The movie is shot and plotted in a fairly realistic style, which like the best Kafka stories, starts out in unambiguously safe territory. Like Kafka and Hitchcock, Babluani’s movie slowly ratchets up the tension with subtle hints of danger until Sebastian is in too deep to turn back. This movie is like the best of fairy tales, the most innocent of objects, a letter, entreats him into the dark forest where dangers he never imagined lie in wait. Once he leaves his town, almost none of the characters he meets reveal their names. Even the police, who might in other circumstances be thought to provide safety, exude menace.

    The movie plays with the idea of thrusting Sebastian, who although he refuses to admit it, starts out trapped in the social and economic position in the town and how that societal trap spring on him in the real trap that he falls for on the lure of easy money. Like the character the view feels trapped by his circumstances and can only hope that he will find a way out of the problems that beset him on all sides.

    Gela Babluani is remaking this movie. I always think that it is a poor choice when directors decide to remake their first movies with bigger budgets. Let’s hope that if more people do see that version some will be inspired to look for the original.


  • We can turn this world to rust!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ringu  (1998)

    The Ring  (2002)

     

    Tetsuo is a strange movie. The plot, what little there is, is simple. But the imagery is fantastic. This movie is a disjointed surrealistic, industrial nightmare. Or it is what Trent Reznor sees every time he closes his eyes.

    It is hard to describe the plot without making this movie sound stupid. A metal fetishist (director Shinya Tsukamoto) runs into the street after shoving a steel cable into his leg. He is hit by an oncoming car. The driver of the car only called Salaryman (Tomorowo Taguchi) is seen the next morning shaving when his razor touches a small wire sticking out of his cheek. From that point on his flesh begins to be replaced by various machine parts. At first he tries to hide his condition, but quick just starts to fight the transformation and his own desires.

    At one point he finds a woman and attempts to have sex with her, only to discover an important part of himself has been replaced by a drill bit. The metal fetishist returns from the dead also as a part machine monster and battles with the Salaryman until the two eventually merged into one creature.

    Now, from that description the plot sounds simple. But it is presented in a mix of flashback, stop motion images and sped up action that you absorb most of the images and sounds while your brain slowly pieces together what is going on. All this to a heavy industrial beat.

    The plot itself isn’t as important as the visual ideas this movie presents. And for the record, they are presented briskly at just over 67 minutes. The movie is violent and frightening, but oh so compelling to watch.

    Tsukamoto manages to achieve some amazing effects and images with a startling low budget. As I mention above, this movie is clearly an influence on the alternate industrial music of the 1990s. You can see where Nine Inch Nails steals both little and big from this movie. It is also a clear influence on the Japanese horror genre. You cannot watch any version of Ringu (or the American poor man’s remake, The Ring) without seeing where this movie has had a clear impact.

    What is the final message of the movie? That we have lost all connection to the natural world around us? That we have become completely absorbed by the consumerist culture around us? That we are all cogs in the machine with even our most basic urges turned against us? That you shouldn’t have sex above the slowly dying body of your hit and run victim? This movie is about all that and more.


  • Everyday since then has been a gift

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Monsoon Wedding  (2002)

    The Namesake  (2007)

    There is a great surprise in the heart of The Namesake: that Kal Penn can actually act as something other than a stoner. The movie becomes something a shambling bear by the end, but it has a poignancy that is a hallmark of the assured and gracious hand of director Mira Nair.

    The movie tells two interwoven stories: that of Ashima (played by Tabu) who follows her husband from warm and supportive India to the Cold and lonely New York City and that of her son, Gogol, who grows up between the world of possibilities that America offers and the world of tradition represented by India.

    They are both forced to learn how to find the world of support that is around them, but one they have never tapped into before, but their paths are going in different directions. Ashima has to learn the value of independence, while Gogol learns the value of family.

    One of the saving graces of this movie is the long silences when the characters don’t talk to each other but manage to say everything. From love and joy to disappointment and frustration so much of this movie is communicated in it silences. These silences can show complicated and conflicting messages. As she did in Monsoon Wedding, Nair shows the culture clashes between traditional and modern life rather than have the characters talk about them.

    Tabu plays the part of Ashima well. She shows how a cosmopolitan Indian girl goes from being self assured in his family to lonely and frightened in America. Through the movie she gradually regains that assurance in a subtle way so that in the end when she asserts her personality you can see how she’s grown into her new role as the head of the family.

    Penn also shows his talent in a way that he could never have in the overly talky Harold and Kumar Go to White Castle. Unlike his mother, Gogol is comfortable in both the Indian world and the American one. While he is adept at living in both worlds, Gogol’s key frustration is clearly that everyone, both Indian and American try to define him as their stereotypical perception of what he should be.

    The movie is a little rushed at the end with Gogol’s marriage but it also quietly reflects on the movie’s beginning and shows us how far these people have traveled.

    As is frequently mentioned in the movie, Gogol is named after his father’s favorite Russian author. This movie made me want to read that author like few others have.


  • Would you keep that racket down? I'm trying to iron, here!

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Hairspray  (1988)

    Hairspray  (2007)

    Hairspray puzzles me. Why remake a movie like this? Why randomly keep some elements of John Water’s 1988 version and jettison the ones that actually develop the plot? I really don’t understand this Hollywood trend of taking a good movie converting it into a musical and then turning the musical back into a movie? Is there an example of this working out, ever?

    This is the basic plot of the movie: Tracy Turnblad (Nikki Blonsky) wants to become popular in high school by dancing on the Corny Collins Show, a local version of American Bandstand. But because Tracy is overweight and unpopular, the student council rejects her. Tracy gets thrown into detention, where all the black students are dancing. They teach her how to dance better. She gets on the show, but gets into trouble when she tries to promote racial integration. She then decides to work to get both black and white kids dancing on the stage at the same time.

    John Travolta puts in a drag performance as Tracy’s mother Edna. Why? Because in the original movie, John Water’s favorite transvestite, Divine, played the role. So when it was turned into a stage musical, Harvey Fierstein played that role. Apparently the director thought that it had to be played in drag. But there is nothing clear in the movie why you would make that casting decision. As for his acting, this is one of Travolta’s worst performances. He came up with an accent that has never seen the light of day within a hundred miles of the city. He chews his way through every scene like it is an extremely fatty ham.

    Christopher Walken manages to put in a fairly decent performance, despite weak material. He tries to add depth to his role as Tracy’s caring but but somewhat clueless father.

    Michelle Pfieffer does a good job as the evil, racist, overbearing mom who is also the station manager that keeps her daughter on the top of the show.

    As for the rest of the cast, (Zac Efron, Brittany Snow, James Marsden and Queen Latifah) they just walk through their cardboard roles without trying to inject any kind of life into them at all. Queen Latifah does manage to get one line of her leaden dialogue delivered as a laugh, but it is such a rarity that it sit there out of place.

    The music and dance scenes of this movie are the most disappointing elements. The strange but authentic early 60s one hit wonders that filled the original film were ditched for generic songs that could have been pulled from or dropped into any mediocre musical of the past 20 years.  As for the dancing, I was hopeful that since the director was also the choreographer the dancing would be a highlight. Sadly, that never comes to pass. The dancing is almost treated in a second hand fashion.

    The movie also goes pretty far in sanitizing itself and removes all of the subversive elements that made the original so quirky and interesting. The beatniks who give Tracy her sense of style and second hand hits of pot are gone. All the hints that Mr. Pinky, the dressmaker, was a chubby chaser are ditched. The dance off featuring Tracy in a dress covered in fabric cockroaches is also missing.

    Did anybody really need a movie in 2007 to say that racism is wrong?


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2008>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
25262728293031
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293012345


Categories
 


Advertisement