Four Eyed Monsters
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Tour Spout | Sign up
Find movies you'll love

tmoney Blog

  • My Christmas Gift Selection: Beauty and the Beast (1946).

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Jean Cocteau’s 1946 masterpiece, La Belle et la Bête, (or as we know it: Beauty and the Beast), is a truly magical film. This is not a “children’s film” per se, but Cocteau makes an interesting plea with his audience. It is simple: to watch the film with the innocence of a child. Understanding this is crucial in breaking through the barrier of the cynicism Hollywood has invoked in us all. I do not have to explain the story of Beauty and the Beast as I assume most people have seen the 1991 Disney version, but I must stress, if you are expecting something along those lines, you are mistaken because this film is so much more. La Belle et la Bête is a work of art in every sense of the word. The sets and scenery are absolutely gorgeous, and the costumes are beautifully elaborate. But one of the most charming aspects to the aesthetic of the film are the simple yet stunning visual effects. These were the days before computers and special effects. Our ideas of what these effects should look like are tainted by the hyper-stylization of Hollywood, but do not forget Cocteau’s plea. Get lost in the magic and beauty of the film and I promise it will put a smile on your face. -Tyler P.S. The DVD includes a wonderful audio track by the fabulous composer, Philip Glass, who composed an opera, which was timed to coincide with Cocteau’s film.

  • The New World = My new favorite

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The New World  (2005)

    The latest film from acclaimed director Terrence Mallick was not extremely well received by critics. Many panned it as too slow moving, and without compelling narrative. I have to disagree. I find it too bad that so many film goers have such short attention spans that only a cause-effect narrative will hold anybody's interest. I was actually suprised I enjoyed this film so much. 1. I don't enjoy period pieces often. 2. It's about Pocahontas. 3. It has Colin Ferrel in it. Well 1. The film focused less on the period aspect, and more on the human element. 2. Pocahontas' name is never mentioned. 3. Collen Ferrel was phenomenal. This film was a piece of sheer beauty. Dialogue is only used when necessary, and voice over narrates most of the film. But this isn't story forcing dialogue like Platoon. It is poetic, beautiful and brilliant. If you have seen the David Gordon Green films, you know what I am talking about. The entire film resonated with the style of George Washington (even though Mallick created the style). The music is extremely tasteful (i.e. The film wasn't scattered with tribal beats and yelping). The cinematography is gorgeous. The entire film is just brilliant. If you are expecting another Titanic, look elsewhere. If you are expecting a highly romanticized Disney film, this is not it. If you can handle a highly philisophical, contemplative, deeply emotional film, watch The New World immediatly. I was blown away. I don't often call movies stunning masterpieces, but this film is.

  • Does anyone seriously like this film?

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Brazil  (1985)

    I have heard over and over how great Brazil is. Well I rented it today and unfortunately I despised everything about it. For starters, I couldn't buy into the entire aesthetic of the film. Nothing was futuristic about the sets. They just took cardboard, painted it to look like cities, and threw tubes and ducts all around to make it look like a mess. Then there was the acting. Everybodies performances were rediculous, and felt like Monty Python all over again. The comedy was absolutely out of place and terribly acted. Thirdly, there was nothing plausible, in fact they didn't even explain anything because nothing was explainable. I do not believe this film deserves any comparisons to George Orwell or Issac Asimov except for the fact that it is about "a futuristic world where the government controls everything". The film has not stood the test of time at all and feels rediculously dated. It feels like a cross between Willy Wonka, and the Super Mario Bros. movie. Yeah, I get the point. It's satire. It still sucked. And the dream sequences with angel wings and giant samurai didn't help make the film more "artistic", it just made the themes of the film too obvious. I'd call it more of a parody of science fiction than a satire.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<October 2006>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
24252627282930
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234


Categories
 


Advertisement