Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

The Reeler on Spout

  • Lugacy Talks Dawson and Descent

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Descent  (2007)

     

    ReelerTV paid a visit to Tribeca Cinemas earlier this week to talk with filmmaker Talia Lugacy, whose dark rape-revenge tale Descent is one of the festival's most anticipated, controversial titles. Co-produced by and starring Rosario Dawson, the film screens today and Friday, followed each day by a Q&A with Lugacy, Dawson and co-writer Brian Priest.

    Watch this and more Tribeca coverage on ReelerTV

     

    Discuss Descent and all of Tribeca's titles at Spout.


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

  • Half Moon Over Tribeca

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Half Moon  (2007)

    The Premonition  (2006)

    Black Butterfly  (2006)

    The Matrimony  (2007)

    Ismail Ghaffari and Hedieh Tehrani in the strange, compelling Half Moon

    By Vadim Rizov

    A long time ago I caught Bahman Ghobadi's A Time For Drunken Horses, easily one of the most miserable films I've ever seen. Not only were the characters orphaned Kurdish kids (that is, orphans within a society itself orphaned and oppressed by surrounding territories), one of them was a deformed dwarf. Something must've changed since then. I missed the intervening films, but Ghobadi's Half Moon isn't just stranger than most Iranian films dare to be, it's outright bizarre by any standard.

    A group of Kurdish musicians set out to perform in newly liberated Kurdish Iraq, having labored for seven months to get the permit. Things predictably go from optimism to worst-case scenario in record time, but for very odd reasons. Lead musician Mamo (Ismail Ghaffari) makes a pit stop along the way to collect his female vocalist Hesho (Hedieh Tehrani). She's no ordinary singer, though, but one of female singers exiled to a city on territory forbidden to civilians where the women apparently spend all day singing in voices which sound like one human singing. Forget even the sheer impossibility of this scenario; the sight of the women standing in what looks like an ancient Mesopotamian village and singing together before breaking out into a spontaneous musical number is indelible.

    Half Moon is full of similar weird flights of fancy that justify Fellini comparisons, and eventually the dream sequences become practically incomprehensible. At bottom, though, Ghobadi is still the same miserable bastard I was acquainted with in 2000, and understandably so -- the plight of the Kurds is enough to depress anyone -- but at least he can no longer be accused of beating his audience into emotional submission. Half Moon is by turns alternately rich and strange and, occasionally, didactic and/or indecipherable. The results are uneasy but mostly compelling; Ghobadi might yet become important as more than the world's token Kurdish auteur.

    The premise for The Road to St. Diego is almost too cute to tolerate in summary form, let alone contemplate seeing. Young Argentinian "Tati" Benitez (Ignacio Benitez) is so obsessed with soccer star Diego Maradona that, finding a tree root in the forest that resembles Maradona’s face, he makes a statue out of it and sets off on a road trip to deliver it to his ailing idol. Oh, and it's a mockumentary. Yet unbearable whimsy turns out to be in low supply in Carlos Sorin's film, which taps into a low-key vibe reminiscent of the slept-on The World's Fastest Indian. Both films set out to affirm the fundamental goodness of human nature by placing a character on a quest at the mercy of the kindness of strangers without ever getting burned. But it works; even for incorrigible cynics, it would be hard to deny the appeal of star Benitez, whose perpetual goofy smile and open disposition take the edge off of an obsession that's just off the tip of the kind of madness that makes muttering recluses out of people. (Like the entire cast, Benitez is a non-professional actor, and the attendant benevolence surrounding all the characters might have something to do with that.)

    Sorin intends some kind of parallel between the modern cult of celebrity worship and the previous power of the church (still a stronger -- and more benign -- influence here than in any American film), but whatever it is doesn't really come off. What's left is a series of low-key-funny but never mawkish encounters delivered briskly and competently. It's a much-needed respite from a festival that -- like all festivals, really -- prides itself upon challenging rather than immediately gratifying audiences.

    The Premonition is a very bland, very boring film for 80 minutes before its lead character suddenly starts hallucinating (or maybe not) and takes the film to a whole different level of mediocrity, one where things aren't just boring but completely inexplicable as well. Actor Jean-Pierre Darroussin's directorial debut finds him also essaying the role of a lawyer who, disgusted with his comfortable bourgeois life, moves to a lousy apartment complex and sets up shop. His wife (Anne Canovas) divorces him, his family (including Hippolyte Girardot, also in the festival’s Lady Chatterley) practically disowns him, and he no longer works for the firm, but he seems to be finding some kind of personal satisfaction and absolution. All of this changes when casually giving some free legal advice to a desperate would-be divorcee (Ivan Franek) leads to being deemed his lawyer when the man -- apparently unhappy with the tediousness of the legal system -- takes a shortcut and tries to murder his wife instead. A daughter (Amandine Janin) in severe shock is left behind, and the lawyer decides to take her in.

    It might be easier to feel some kind of reaction to or interest in Darroussin's character if he inspired any emotion besides irritation. As it is, how seriously can you take a character who muses to himself, "I should write poems -- poems no one will read"? The last 20 minutes make it impossible to suss out whatever the intended effect is, but that turns out to be less a bold move and more a bigger mistake than what's come before. Well-shot and paced in exactly the kind of middlebrow way that gets films labeled "very French," The Premonition is blandly watchable -- and that's it.

    The Ballad of Esequiel Hernandez is a kind of unofficial companion piece to Tommy Lee Jones' The Three Burials of Melquiades Estrada, which used the disgraceful incident analyzed here as a jumping-off point for a much better film. Jones is the dispassionate narrator of this baseline competent video documentary, which is in three basic parts. The first third attempts to give some background on Hernandez and humanize him, then abruptly shifts into a hardcore analysis of the incident. Hernandez –- an 18-year old US student living on the US-Mexico border in Redford, Texas –- was shot to death by Marines on drug patrol duty on May 20, 1997. The Marines claimed Hernandez was firing at them, but pretty much all the reasonable evidence suggests, damningly, that Hernandez was shooting innocently at rocks to divert himself while goat-herding and the Marines panicked, not realizing that no one –- not even a suspected drug-dealer –- can see men in camouflage from 200 yards away. The Marines opened fire, Hernandez died –- and a grand jury exonerated them. The film’s analysis of the incident is painstaking and convincing; the attempts of the final third to get some kind of emotional reaction from the people involved is a mere anticlimax.

    Here's the thing: Apparently in some people's minds you can either make a formally well-crafted film, or you can make create a muckracking public-service document that, by virtue of the evidence on display, is “important” and thereby excused for sloppiness of execution. This is frankly a load of crap, most recently disproved by Spike Lee’s When The Levees Broke. Passionate anger is not the best reason to make a movie, and the film seems to have been made without any regard for the medium; the result would make an equally convincing book. Even the film’s actual argument is of limited value: The Hernandez incident is important not just because an innocent person died, but because border patrols seem to have learned nothing from it. The film settles for a brief shot of George W. lurking sinisterly in the background of daddy’s inauguration and then a card announcing that #43 has ramped up border patrols to an extent unprecedented since Hernandez’s death. Not good enough; at least Jones’ fictional version had a real sense of place in its location shooting. Aside from the central breakdown, this film is just washed-out video and people crying in the lens, and that’s just not enough. It might essential viewing for scholars of the subject, but that’s hardly the festival’s place to decide.

    The festival’s nadir so far arrives in the form of Black Butterfly. Francisco J. Lombardi’s film surely gets some kind of speed record for quickest turn-around time between the collapse of a repressive regime (in this case, the presidency of Peru’s Alberto Fujimori under the guidance of his criminal advisor Vladimiro Montesinos) and the making of movies about it, but otherwise there’s nothing new here. A dreadful feeling of familiarity comes with the opening, where a cynical gum-chewing journalist (Magdyel Ugaz) crosses paths with the fiancé (Melania Urbina) of a recently murdered judge. The journalist, of course, drinks to numb the pain of political disillusionment while the widow weeps and screams “Why?” repeatedly. Eventually, the widow helps the journalist regain her idealism, enlisting her in the quest for revenge.

    Every moment is telegraphed with unbearable portentousness, every possible subtext hammered home emphatically. Example: The journalist’s name is Angela, and the drunk widow announces at one point “Angela, you’re my angel.” Yes, she is. Solemn to the point of ridiculousness, the film screams about the cowardice of people who don’t stand up to an evil regime with the confidence of creators who know they are now safe to say such things. The Fujimori regime may indeed have been as awful as the film makes it seem, but what’s on display is virtually identical to every single film ever made about life under similar conditions. Worst of all, the actors are powerless to help, delivering completely predictable conditions seemingly tailor-made for Oscar clip reels. Excruciating.

    The only reason The Matrimony isn’t as bad as Black Butterfly is that it’s shorter. Audiences of midnight movies are notoriously unselective (Toronto once offered up Saw as a closing night piece), but The Matrimony is dismally bad in ways that aren’t even funny. It’s a Chinese ghost story, ha ha: Boy (Leon Lai) loves girl (Bingbing Fan), girl gets run over by truck and dies, girl returns to haunt husband and new wife (Rene Liu). Hua-Tao Teng’s film has some of the worst CGI I’ve ever seen, and its scares –- arriving every three minutes or so with comforting regularity –- can easily be predicted by whenever bass rumbling enters the soundscape. Loud, sudden noises are the order of the day, and the cheap jolts are barely a cut above the American remake of Pulse. Even the twist ending sucks; it’s not even a full twist, just merely nonsensical, and there’s not a single memorable set piece, even as camp. The only thing holding The Matrimony back from being truly unbearable are its occasional, lush recreations of ‘30s China: a trip to an old movie theater is a rare glimpse for American audiences of a history we have little access to. Still, the price of this set decoration versus the price of actually sitting through the film is way too high.

    Discuss these and other Tribeca titles at Spout:

    Half Moon
    The Road to St. Diego
    The Premonition
    The Ballad of Esequiel Hernandez
    Black Butterfly
    The Matrimony


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

  • Auteil's Napoleon Dynamite

    1 out of 1 people found this review helpful. [What do you think?]
    Under discussion:

    Napoleon and Me  (2006)

    Jerabek  (2007)

    Vivere  (2008)

    The Workshop  (2007)

    Daniel Autiel as the iconic French emperor in Napoleon and Me

    By Michelle Orange

    There’s a vague Last King of Scotland vibe to Napoleon and Me, Paola Virzì’s fleet-footed costume drama, although no one -- thank Christ -- is strung up by his nipples, and Daniel Auteuil foregoes Whitaker’s frothy flash for a creepy calm as Napoleon. The idealistic counterpart in question is Martino (Elio Germano), a young writer living on the Italian island of Elba in 1814, when Napoleon arrives there in exile. Enraged not just by the presence but the prevalence of the former Emperor (most of the Italians welcome him like a god), Martino decides it is his destiny to assassinate him while he has the chance. That chance gets a lot better when Napoleon enlists Martino to be his “librarian,” which includes following the little man around while he dazzles the dopey locals (who are hoping N. can help bring about their own economic miracle) and writing down each pearl of wisdom that falls from his lips.

    Virzì keeps one eye on the ridiculous at all times, and in addition to the spectacular set direction and period detail, that lightness propels the tacitly prickly relationship between Napoleon and Martino toward its darker culmination. Monica Belluci makes a brief, hysterical (literally) appearance as an aging countess who keeps Martino as her concubine, and the supporting cast functions as an able troupe of clowns -- sad, happy and angry. Auteuil and Germano take different tacks on the process of sussing one another out, and the decision to trust never quite gets made.

    Crossing the border up to Germany is another European film that seems to have worked visual wonders on a tight budget. Vivere is writer/director Angelina Maccarone’s fourth film, and she plays with narrative and perspective in a way that only superficially resembles that of her countryman Tom Twyker’s calling card, Run Lola Run. Twenty-four-year-old Francesca (Esther Zimmering) became the head of the household when her mother left 10 years ago; driving a taxi by day, she comes home to serve as weirdly surrogate wife to her shambled dad and mother to her snippy teenaged sister Antoinetta (Kim Schnitzer). The first segment of the film is told from Francesca’s perspective as she chases after her sister, who has followed her singer boyfriend to Holland on Christmas Eve, and picks up a spaced out car accident victim named Gerlinde (Hannelore Elsner) on the way. The same events are repeated three times, from each woman’s experience of them, with key pieces of the story being added each time. Christmas has never looked worse (i.e. better) than it does in bleak, beautiful Rotterdam, and the art direction, both on location and inside taxis and hotel rooms, creates a raw, compelling aesthetic that helps its female leads pull off some tricky (sometimes too tricky) material.

    Although the Armenian/Russian conflict in 1994 may not be one that has stayed within the consciousness of most Americans, A Story of People in War and Peace , Vardan Hovhannisyan’s document of both the battlefield and the aftermath for some of the fighters could not be more relevant. A journalist covering the battle for a key piece of territory in the mountains of Karabakh, Vardan became disillusioned with the press agencies he was working for and struck out on his own, camera in hand. The footage he shot over five days of foggy, forest warfare is intercut here with that of his present-day attempt to track down the soldiers he met in the field. What is strange about the shaky, dank conflict footage is how movie-like it seems in its representation of combat, right down to the haunting, director’s dream faces of the soldiers; it is an apt reminder of the reality behind what we so often digest as entertainment.

    Although we get little sense of the conflict, the pride and determination of the Armenian fighters, many of whom left their civilian lives to fight for their land, has a stirring, quiet ferocity. As Vardan remarks, some of the surviving soldiers turned out to be casualties of peace, as the struggle didn’t end when the guns were laid down. One man named Felo, a fisherman who couldn’t bring himself to kill a chicken before the war, speaks with a devastatingly direct eloquence about the dreams that kept him going during the war, but that he has failed to realize. Those striking Armenian faces in Vardan’s early footage are almost unrecognizable now -- even they can’t find themselves in the pictures they are shown -- but the memories are crystalline. I was surprised by humbling impact of this small, loving documentary and its delicate articulation of the legacy of war.

    That legacy is explored in somewhat less delicate, if no less affecting detail in Jerabek, Civia Tamarkin’s portrait of a Wisconsin family dealing with the 2004 death of their son, a Marine in Iraq. The Jerabeks are what I would imagine a solid, Midwestern family would be: three sons, a Vietnam vet dad, soft and supportive mom and a hunting pastime that has resulted in the unnerving presence of stuffed animal corpses around the house. Tamarkin traces the family back to the time leading up to their eldest son Ryan’s enlistment (he watched war movies as part of his “training’) and his subsequent death in Ramadi and then returns to the present, and the youngest son Nick’s burgeoning desire to become a Marine himself -- infantry division, like his brother. The sharply edited reconstruction of the insurgency attack that took Ryan’s life contrasts with the doleful peace of the Jerabek homestead in Hobart. Ryan’s squadmates recall that day (which saw 12 Marines killed) as the turning point -- after that they gave up on helping the Iraqis -- and the Jerabeks do as well; “I think our family has given enough,” the mother says, even while donning the family uniform of a Marines T-shirt. It is as close to a political statement about the war as this film is willing to make.

    Leaving all traces of dignity in the dust, we head to the West Coast for a pair of identity crisis documentaries that feature self-recorded on-camera diaries, along with formal psychiatric sessions. Apparently we have reached a point where mere exhibitionism isn’t theraputic enough for its practitioners; we now have to watch exhibitionists actually have therapy. Alexis Arquette: She's My Brother and The Workshop are both bad reality TV shows being fobbed off as documentary fare. The former is the tiresome chronicle of LA transsexual Alexis (brother to Rosanna, Patricia and David) hedging on whether or not to have sex change surgery. Some neat Arquette home movie montages are marred by gross leveraging of family issues in the aforementioned therapy sessions. The Workshop follows Jamie Morgan (apparently an ‘80’s pop obscurity) into white-haired creepo Paul Lowe’s “radical self-help workshop” along with a bunch of California crunchies who may or may not also be members of an alien sex cult. Minds are blown, weird breathing exercises happen, and everyone’s clothes come off within minutes of sign-in. Truly an orgy (I’m sorry, “sensual sharing group”) of obscene self-obsession, there’s nothing even remotely erotic about these boneheads groping lazily at each other under the guise of self-discovery. Blecch.

    Discuss these and other Tribeca titles at Spout:

    Napoleon and Me
    Vivere
    A Story of People in War and Peace
    Jerabek
    Alexis Arquette: She's My Brother
    The Workshop


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

  • Devil Thrives in the Details

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Bubble  (2007)

    Palo Alto  (2007)

    One of the many Darfur atrocities haunting the dcoumentary The Devil Came on Horseback

    By Eric Kohn

    Activist causes take kindly to the documentary format because it provides an immediate venue for expression. Sign all the petitions you want, but at the end of the day, the power of image wins out. So it goes with The Devil Came on Horseback, which explores the horrific genocide of Darfur by letting the visuals tell the story. In fact, gut-wrenching stills and video of natives who suffered at the hands of the government-armed milita group Janjaweed don’t only lead the narrative -- they dictate its existence. Consistent in its method and indisputably well-made, The Devil Came on Horseback could do for Darfur awareness what An Inconvenient Truth did for global warming.

    Directors Annie Sundberg and Ricki Stern keenly follow the experiences of US Marine Capt. Brian Steidle, a hardened fighter whose position in the area as the village massacres began to increase in frequency gave him a unique angle on the unfolding disaster. Steidle was sent by the United States to keep watch over the region’s ceasefire between opposing communities (“How do you monitor a ceasefire?” he asks), but they equipped him not with a gun but a camera. Unable to help prevent the Janjaweed attacks in Darfur (his reports on the events were repeatedly ignored), Steidle headed back to the country and shared his exclusive photographs with The New York Times, instantly raising national awareness of the events abroad. He became a momentary hero, appearing on talk shows and giving speeches, driving home the message that the country has a duty to get on the ground and restore order to the fragile African region.

    No sooner did the flurry of attention climaxed, however, than the backlash came hard and fast, replete with government cover-ups and denials from all concerned parties. Steidle remains on message, but the responsible parties have kept him marginalized. Sundberg and Stern use Steidle as their anchor, combining his narration with footage shot in Darfur and in the United States to craft a timeless narrative: Mr. Smith goes to Washington, but he can’t make it to the Senate floor. One of the most receptive audiences to Steidle’s speeches, interestingly enough, comes from Jewish communities. It takes an experienced eye to recognize a Holocaust in action, apparently.

    A narrative that’s destined not to please some Jewish communities, My Father My Lord aims to reflect them. Israeli filmmaker David Volach tells the intimate story of a strictly observant family in an ultra-Orthodox community, primarily using a fly-on-the-wall approach to unveil a life of insular behavior dictated by tradition. Unlike the heartwarming portrait of faith-based redemption in a Hasidic family at the heart of last year’s moderately acclaimed Israeli drama Ushpizin, Volach’s direction has a much more subversive angle: Using stark realism, he critiques the championing of spiritual conviction over practicality. Around the third act, an older couple loses a loved in a tragic accident, and the husband tries to hide from his grief through spirituality. It’s a feeble effort. But Volach never condescends to his subjects’ way of life; instead, he allows the drama to provide a vessel for his ideas, and he gets the job done.

    Clearly shot on the cheap despite its skillful execution, My Father My Lord suggests the style of early American neorealism. It wouldn’t be fair to consider this representative of all Israeli filmmaking, however; if Volach gives Israel its John Cassavetes, then Eytan Fox is the country’s Richard Linklater. Fox has always made movies that have immense international appeal, using standard storytelling methods to reveal Israel’s intricate social dynamic in ways that few others have attempted in the past. The headline-making Yossi & Jagger told the taboo-breaking tale of homosexuality in the Israeli military. Walk on Water, a thriller of sorts, interrogated the ethics of Zionism. His work comes to the Tribeca Film Festival this year with The Bubble, a Slacker-esque peek at the revolutionary tactics of the nation’s youth. A small band of friends spend much of the movie hanging out in Tel Aviv, doing drugs, having sex, whatever. The big reminders of the specific setting arrive whenever a bomb goes off, leading the protagonists to pick up their phones and struggle to make sure their friends are uninjured (not always the case). Fox uses a light touch with his dialogue, giving his characters vulgar but lovable idiosyncracies. He boldly implements wit in an increasingly bleak storyline, but he seems to imply that entertainment-based activism is a naïve form of expression. “Let’s dance instead of shoot!” declares a young woman, attempting to organize a rave to oppose Israeli treatment of Palestinians. Like, totally.

    Touchy Jewish viewers imbued with Zionist proclivities will probably feel uneasy in The Bubble, but they’ll find some common ground in The Last Jews of Libya. Although indisputably slight at 50 minutes, Vivienne Roumani-Denn’s documentary tells a compelling personal tale of struggle and survival in the face of certain extinction. The North African community of Sephardic Jews is miniscule after World War II, but the small band of families that remain intact find a way to flourish. Using narration by Isabella Rossellini, Roumani-Denn uses plenty of archival footage to give her movie the appropriate time traveling effect.

    If that’s too heavy for you or something, Dirty Sanchez offers a wildly crass alternative to familiar documentary content. Essentially Jackass Goes to the UK, this comically grotesque round-up of vignettes follows the exploits of several performers intent on enacting the most unsettling acts they can muster up the energy to endure. They begin by giving themselves justification -- sort of. The devil tells the boys that they must enact the seven deadly sins in order to satisfy his satanic desire. Cue the gross-out moments: These guys are nothing if not intense in their brashness, nailing themselves to wooden planks, drinking their extracted fat, driving hooks through genitalia, whatever. After a while, it’s not nearly as funny as much as it is mercilessly (and numbingly) grotesque, but anyone who can relate to this shamelessly beer-guzzling mentality is sure to find themselves in heaven.

    It’s the fury of youth culture that allows movies like Dirty Sanchez to find an audience. But the chilled out interaction of suburban youth is so last year, which is something that Palo Alto seems to misunderstand. A low-key story about several disgruntled teens wandering around California in between romances and aimless soul-searching, the series of conflicts and sexual incursions look good on paper, but that’s hardly enough to bring the material to life. The filmmakers appear too earnest in their willingness to bring their memories to life. Put it this way: Nostalgia alone doesn’t dictate good movies.


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

  • Still Life, Tribeca's Masterpiece

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    The Tree  (2006)

    Still Life  (2006)

    To Die A Little  (1967)

    Hellfighters  (2007)

    One of the stiller moments in Jia Zhang Ke's Still Life

    By Vadim Rizov

    Unless something miraculous happens, Still Life will be Tribeca's designated masterpiece and, with any justice, competition winner. Not that it'll really benefit at this late date; even after winning the Golden Lion at Venice and screening at a plethora of other festivals, Still Life still has no American distributor. Surprising, given that Still Life is a lean 108 minutes and classifies as relatively accessibly for Jia Zhang Ke, whose previous films have such inviting IMDB genre tags as "ennui" and "disenchantment."

    A tip: The characters are not the story. Han Sanming (as a miner named Han Sanming) arrives in Fengjie after having been gone for 16 years to find his ex-wife, only to learn that the entire area has been flooded as part of China's massive Three Gorges hydroelectric program (ongoing since 1993, to be complete by 2009, and forcing the relocation of more than 1.2 million people in the process). Sanming broods, smokes, asks desultory questions and settles down to work at demolishing buildings as part of the gruntwork for the Three Gorges. Like Apichatpong "Joe" Weerasethakul, Jia eventually turns away entirely from Han to set up a second, rhyming story about another quest for a long-lost person, only this time starring people with far more money.

    The tension between the poorer and richer parts of the story give a comprehensive tour of the people surrounding the Three Gorges project from both the top and bottom. Still, don't look to the deadpan actors for much help: Still Life is a comedy of sorts, but so dry that it makes Kaurismaki and Jarmusch look like panderers. Life resides mostly in Jia's perfect frames, which take in crumbling buildings, poorly dressed workers, and occasionally -- with flabbergasting timing -- a whole building wall collapsing out of nowhere. Jia even improves on his previous film The World by offering not just good framing but the occasional human comic interlude, like the random townie obsessed with Chow-Yun Fat who lights his cigarette with a burning paper to imitate "Brother Fat's" inimitable cool. For a movie that should be depressing by virtue of its subject, it's oddly euphoric.

    The Sugar Curtain is one of those movies you emerge from relieved it wasn't any worse. A movie which aspires to glorify the apparently idyllic '70s and '80s in Cuba -- and pauses exactly once to acknowledge that maybe things weren't perfect across the board -- certainly has the potential to be pretty poisonous. Somehow, in her interviews of contemporaries, director Camila Guzman Urzua only found one person willing to admit that maybe people who were political dissidents didn't have as great a couple of decades as everyone else.

    Still, it's hard to fault Urzua for wanting to highlight an underexamined subject and even harder to argue with a bunch of people unrelated except by friendship who still share exactly the same impression of a time and place. For those who got along and didn't ask questions, it seems, Cuba was a haven of literacy, progressive artistic thought and copious snacks at school. It still is at least one of these things: the last time anyone checked, Cuba was rocking a 97 percent literacy rate, but everything else seems to have gone to shit. Urzua -- who moved with her family to Cuba in the '70s from Chile and then left in 1990 -- finds person after person who compares the good old days to the current state of things, and concludes that an economy based around tourism and money sent from abroad by relatives might not be in the best shape to create a socialist utopia. Snark aside, Urzua's impulse to create a lyrical elegy for the past clashes mightily with attempts at cogent political analysis: the result is a film that hamhandedly focuses on images of decaying playground to symbolize all that's been lost. Footage of schoolchildren yelling "We shall be like Che!" to start off their school day almost makes up for it, but not quite.

    Made in 1967, Alvaro J. Covacevich's To Die A Little was an immediate casualty of the Pinochet takeover -- banned and thought lost, recently rediscovered. Still, the movie's not an intentional political flashpoint, and its importance shouldn't be exaggerated in the name of liberalism. An odd mixture of seemingly verite documentary footage with a loose, nearly avant-garde narrative framework, the movie suffers from clunky, didactic moments like an interminable montage of an impoverished village whose sole point is seemingly that poverty sucks. Covacevich also intercuts between a bird in a cage (never a good idea) and a man working in a bank. Some of the images are indelible; a Chilean nightclub where people swing-dance to "Jump And Jive" and watch a striptease is particularly memorable. Still, at $18, To Die A Little hardly justifies the price of discovery.

    To Die A Little is preceded by the deceptively named Memories Of Sayat Nova, a half-hour assemblage of footage excised from Sergei Paradzhanov's oblique classic The Color Of Pomegranates. The constantly embattled Paradzhanov had his hallucinatory, near-incomprehensible barrage of images hacked up by the USSR, and Paradzhanov's editor Levon Grigorian has found a lot of what was cut. Some of the images are just as astonishing as anything in the film, but Grigorian pulls off an even neater trick: While narrating the footage (intercut with some contextual shots from the film), he explains much of the extant film's formerly impenetrable symbolism. The result is essential viewing for Paradzhanov fans and a neat introduction for anyone who hasn't encountered him yet; Paradzhanov works image by image rather than linearly anyway, so this cut-and-paste assemblage hardly seems like a desecration.

    As far as documentary trends go, Hoop Dreams spawning a bunch of imitators is one of the more innocuous ones. There's still plenty of fertile ground to plow at the intersection of American race relations and sports, and Hellfighters seemingly takes Spike Lee's appearance in Hoop Dreams as a jumping-off point. Spike came in to warn the kids that white society only cares about their sports abilities and not their intellect or lives, and coach Duke Ferguson of the Harlem Hellfighters announces early on that his real purpose in coaching is to hopefully help the kids get into college on athletic scholarships, possibly their only real option.

    Hellfighters minimizes the well-edited game footage, not even showing the team in action until the 25-minute mark. The main conflict here isn't the team vs. the world, it's Duke vs. his team. PSAL, the organization which monitors high school athletic teams, forces the Hellfighters to repeatedly forfeit games for improperly filed paperwork. Duke -- a former college and pro athlete -- believes such difficulties are endemic of widespread racism and antipathy towards Harlem; his charges are more skeptical about where he sees racism. Duke also takes the bizarre position of not calling any plays, allowing the quarterback to manage the game; as Shawn Lewallen (one of 4 assistant coaches fired by Ferguson for disagreeing with him) points out, that's insanity not allowed at any level of play. Still, Duke insists that this method prepares the kids for adult responsibility. Seemingly everybody also has an overblown idea about what football represents - American society, suggests Duke - or what it prepares young men for (apparently, it helps you learn how to treat women). While Hellfighters doesn't delve as deep into the many questions it raises as it could, it's a zippy, entertaining doc for people who can't get enough of these things.

    The main attraction of the endearingly named Cao Hamburger's The Year My Parents Went On Vacation is the opportunity to get three cliches for the price of one. A combination of the Young Child Lives Through And Misunderstands Turbulent Political Times, Sports Unite A Divided Nation and Grumpy Old Man Bonds With Cute Child sub-genres, the film tries to look back at Brazil 1970 through those three crowd-pleasing genres and comes out bland if engaging. Young Mauro (Michel Joelsas) is dumped at his grandfather's doorstep when his parents have to beat a hasty temporary retreat from the country; there are rumblings about Communism in the background, but nothing specific. With bad timing, grandfather has passed away that very day, and Mauro finds himself under the reluctant wing of neighbor Shlomo (Germano Haiut). Mauro's Jewishness, previously a non-factor in his life, becomes very much a big deal in his newly religious surroundings.

    Still, the religious angle turns out to be pretty much a non-factor for the movie, seemingly just an excuse to integrate cute shots of heavily bearded Orthodox Jews cheering on Brazil through the World Cup. For good measure, Hamburger throws in some brief segments about the sexual awakening of pubescent boys, but the movie proceeds mostly on auto-pilot, mixing and matching gentle but non-suffocating childish whimsy with moments of sadness and glimpses of Brazil's totalitarian government in action. The result is a laid-back crowdpleaser that never pushes too hard, never integrates all its disparate elements, and never really affects the audience.

    The Tree is a documentary about a tree that, of course, is not about a tree. Documentarian Gustavo Fontan returns home to find his parents Julio and Maria arguing over the fate of the tree in their front yard. Maria says it needs to be torn down, Julio disagrees. That's about it as far as plot goes, but Fontan isn't really interested in that. The Tree is a mood piece in which the tree becomes a metaphorical repository for all the things that have disappeared from the aging couple's life. More than people or places, Fontan cares about abstract visual textures, and The Tree struggles valiantly to take small fragments of daily life and make them strange and new. With a few memorable exceptions - notably a close-to-the-floor shot of washing water flooding over floor tiles and filling in the cracks - Fontan fails to create much of a compelling aesthetic, resulting in a bunch of murky high-def images that never add up to much. Lesson learned: Steer clear of any movie described as a "meditation" on anything.

    Discuss these and other Tribeca titles at Spout:

    Still Life
    The Sugar Curtain
    To Die A Little / Memories of Sayat Nova
    Hellfighters
    The Year My Parents Went On Vacation
    The Tree


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

  • Black White + Gray Area

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    (L-R) Sam Wagstaff and Robert Mapplethorpe, the subjects of Black White + Gray

    By Michelle Orange

    That fact that Tribeca is filled with what are essentially competent television biographies of figures who would never make it past a preliminary production meeting at A&E has both good points and bad. The good, of course, is that we get to learn of people other than those who sell advertising; Anita O’Day and Scott Walker are two on offer at Tribeca this year. But the bad is that the format is so tried and true that many filmmakers see no reason to deviate from it.

    Perhaps a sale to a television network is the goal for many festival directors, and who could blame them? Not one hour ago, after limping away from a six-hour movie marathon in a theater complex, I found myself contemplating a wall of boxed cinnamon buns beside an elderly lady at my local grocery store. She turned to me and said, “I remember when four of these were 99 cents -- we’d each buy a box and take them to the movies. When we’d leave the theater: Whoops! No more cinnamon buns!” I laughed and said it’s a good thing what you eat at the movies doesn’t count, and she said, “That was a long time ago, I don’t go to the movies anymore. Now everything is on TV anyway, why would I go to the movies?”

    Well, I don’t know that James Crump’s Black White + Gray: A Portrait of Sam Wagstaff and Robert Mapplethorpe is going to convince my C-Town crony to break her embargo; perhaps -- and perhaps ideally -- she’s right and it will end up on TV anyway. Crump has the format down, and Wagstaff, whose relationship with Mapplethorpe came in some way to define the lives and careers of both men, proves an apt and ample subject. The marquee handsome Wagstaff, a privileged, pedigreed WASP and “deb’s delight” in the 1950s, was secretly gay and not-so-secretly loathing his life in advertising. He returned to school to study fine art at NYU and got into curation during a time -- very different from today, it is observed -- when a museum curator or collector could function almost like an artist him or herself.

    Taking an interest in photography when others in the art community turned up their noses, Wagstaff quickly gained the reputation as a tastemaker and began amassing a collection of late 19th-century photography, a lot of it anonymous, with a special eye on the poignant and perverse (decapitations especially seemed to do it for him). When Wagstaff met Mapplethorpe in the early '70s, bells were said to ring and a match was made, though some commenters acidly note that the 26-year-old from Queens saw nothing but a cash cow. Patti Smith and Dominick Dunne make appearances, but even better is the peek into Wagstaff’s collection (ultimately he sold it to the Getty Museum), which brings to bear the film’s most interesting idea: that a collector can use his carefully selected pieces to construct something of a self-portrait. The sad coda is that both men died of AIDS, during the first and hopefully the worst assault of the “gay cancer” against New York’s art community.

    Speaking of New York’s art community: Ed Burns, everybody! Purple Violets is Burns' return to writing and directing following 2006’s terrible The Groomsmen, and returns us (i.e. me) to the impossibly shiny New York of Suburban Girl. In Black White + Gray, Sam Wagstaff is said to have lived in a penthouse apartment overlooking Washington Square park, where, one visitor notes with distaste, even a brief survey made it clear that it was a place where a lot of sex was being had. There doesn’t seem to be any sex happening in the agonizingly haute apartments of Patti (Selma Blair), Brian (Patrick Wilson), Michael (Ed Burns) and Kate (Debra Messing). All four went to NYU together; Patti and Brian broke up in Washington Square Park, Michael and Kate had sex there, and 12 years later the girls run into the boys at a swanky restaurant.

    Kate is married to a lout (Donal Logue, doing a cockney accent) and has given up on her once promising writing career; Patrick is a best-selling pulp fiction writer, longing for some highbrow credibility; Michael is a lawyer and Kate is a teacher. The story follows both couples (though mainly Patti and Brian) as they find their way back to each other citing unfinished business. The story is not bad, the bigger problem is that everyone but Burns is grievously miscast. Messing is actually terrific as a foul-mouthed, bitterly wronged woman, but it’s hard to get around the fact that she can’t credibly play 33 anymore, particularly beside someone like Blair, who has the body of a 12-year-old boy. And both Blair and Wilson could not be less believable as the madly gifted literary talents they avow each other to be. It’s not just the Banana Republic beauty and irritating collection of designer sweaters and boots; it’s the fact that neither actor can even pretend to have the crack -- to paraphrase a friend of mine who was paraphrasing Leonard Cohen -- that lets the light get in. Burns gets all the great lines and he makes the most of them, but none of the couples, particularly Logue and Blair, who are supposed to have been married for seven years, but most crucially Blair and Wilson, generate the barest fraction of the sexual energy I bet Wagstaff’s Washington Square penthouse was putting out on any given Friday.

    The Third Wave is volunteer worker Alison Thompson’s wrenching document of the time she spent in Sri Lanka following December 2004’s cataclysmic tsunami. Thompson, who also spent six months at Ground Zero following Sept. 11, and her boyfriend, Oscar Gubernati, intended to spend a week or two lending their services in the small village of Peraliya, where no organized aid had yet arrived, but ended up spending over a year trying to help the devastated local population rebuild. Much of the footage (including the seemingly endless task of corpse collection) is hard to take, but imperative nevertheless; Peraliya is one of countless villages that were forgotten in the relief efforts, and only two and a half years after one of the worst natural disasters the world has ever known, who now speaks of it? It is pointed out by frustrated Sri Lankan emissaries that much of the pledged international aid money simply failed to arrive.

    A ragtag crew of people from around the world ended up coming to Peraliya, and worked to build a school, a medical center, flagging down passing aid trucks for food and supplies on the fly. Thompson doesn’t shy away, however, from including the footage from about three months into their stay, when the local population and that of surrounding villagers began to turn on the volunteers, each one suspicious that they were not receiving as much as their neighbor. Dastardly human nature threatens to taint the morale and the work of the volunteers, and the problems in communication and flagging stamina are closely and unflinchingly observed, mainly by the Sri Lankan who manned the camera when Thompson’s nursing duties took precedence. In the face of almost unthinkable circumstances, almost unthinkable generosity prevailed; despite the tragic context, it will do your heart good to watch The Third Wave, to remember and maybe even to do some good yourself.

    The natural disaster of Afghanistan’s punishing drought is rivaled only by the unnatural disaster of the Taliban. While documentaries about this region and this regime began to flow forth after Sept. 11, narrative films are fewer and farther in between, with 2004’s Osama the last one before Zolykha’s Secret, Horace Ahmad Shansab’s humble, impassioned feature. Shansab follows an Afghan family trying to live quietly as the threat of the Taliban (and the ensuing international conflict) grows ever closer. It is a feeling almost akin to relief to see these stories finally being told by Afghans, in Afghanistan, where one worries that almost all aspects of civilized life, including art, are in jeopardy; it is a relief also to see Afghan life presented as something other than the Other. Though Shansab clearly has good storytelling instincts, the quality of the sound and images is very poor, and the performances tend toward stiffness. Given a little more time and, God willing, the means, he could be a key lifeline for Westerners into a country and a war whose ongoing difficulties have taken a back seat to those of Iraq.

    Steep and The Power of the Game trace the passions and the passionate devotees of extreme skiing and World Cup soccer, respectively. Steep features some truly unbelievable photography and the seemingly inevitable death of one of its subjects. There is a lot of wide-eyed exultation over the purity of the high one gets while skiing down or leaping off of 50-degree slopes, especially for the first time, but once the Americans got a load of the practice (and quickly commodified it), the dream became not just “I want to ski,” but “I want to be in ski movies.” The only rationale that made sense to me for putting one’s self in such peril was a love affair with gravity, its endless pull and when almost all of the men (only two women appear) who break bones like they're dinner plans say that the risks they take are worth it -- spectacular visuals be damned -- I still want to slap them.

    The Power of the Game is a Michael Apted affair, so we get to hear his vaguely bemused, British voiceover in between Up Series installments. This is a National Geographic production and, as such, seems better suited for television; I could even envision the commercial breaks in between disparate segments, which look at various countries competing in 2004’s World Cup in Germany. It’s a little airless but smoothly done, and while soccer is often lauded as the sport that does much to unite the world, it is as often shown to divide it as well. I can’t say I understand the fanaticism behind soccer any better for having watched it, but who could explain a phenomenon that inspires a band of Iranian women who, after arguing their way into a stadium to watch a soccer game that the government has banned them (and all women) from attending, hold up an Iranian flag and scream in support of their country?

    Discuss these and other Tribeca titles at Spout:

    Black White + Gray: A Portrait of Sam Wagstaff and Robert Mapplethorpe
    Purple Violets
    The Third Wave
    Zolykha’s Secret
    Steep
    The Power of the Game


    Syndicated Feed From:The Reeler

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
293012345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
3456789

Dig through the archives

Categories
 


Advertisement