Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

thefilmpanelnotetaker Blog

  • dinomonster’s animated short "Corporate Whore" finalist at SXSWclick Festival

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    On the Ropes  (1999)

    I am very excited to announce that Contributing Notetaker A.M. Peters' short film Corporate Whore is a finalist in the 2007 SXSWClick Festival, a year-round initiative created to showcase short-form storytelling via mobile devices and the web presented by South by Southwest (SXSW) Conferences & Festivals.



    Corporate Whore is one of 15 finalists in the festival, and one of three finalists in the “Animate It” category. To view Corporate Whore, got to http://sxswclick.com/watch/corporate_whore/ and to vote for it in the Popularity Contest, go to http://sxswclick.com/vote/. You can vote once daily until midnight on Friday, July 27th. Jury winners in each of the five categories, including the Grand Jury Prize winner, will be announced August 1st.

    Corporate Whore is a stop-motion animated short film that tells the story of a female professional. Strictly crafted with elements found in an office setting such as PowerPoint slides, photo copies and fluorescent lighting, this film is perfect for when you’re feeling penciled in.

    Peters’ first foray into stop-motion animation was with her 2005 Two Boots Pioneer Theater Short Film Slam winning Jack Quack: The Path. The short also made its way around the festival circuit including Indie Memphis and was also a finalist on Kevin Smith’s MoviesAskew.com.

    Peters is currently in post-production on NO Cross, NO Crown, a timely and engaging feature documentary that examines whether New Orleans’ music and culture will survive the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina.

    dinomonster films is Peters’ indie film banner, which produces feature films and documentaries, as well as music and corporate videos offering a fresh style and perspective on characters and culture. Peters also worked as the assistant to Academy Award®-nominated director Nanette Burstein (On the Ropes) on her upcoming documentary American Teen for A&E Indiefilms.
    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

  • POV 20 - "Revolution '67"

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Revolution '67  (2006)

    On Saturday, I saw an important documentary at the Museum of the Moving Image (MMI) called Revolution '67, about one of the many riots that took place in several urban areas throughout the U.S. in the 196os, this one in particular in Newark, New Jersey, where racial tensions, economic disparities and political corruption were among many other elements that lead to the tragic days in the summer of 1967. According to a press release, "After six days, 26 people lay dead, 725 people were injured, and close to 1,500 people had been arrested." Revolution '67 is a production of Newark-based husband-and-wife filmmakers Marylou Tibaldo-Bongiorno and Jermone Bongiorno. They document the account of various people from all sides of the story who lived through the tragic days with animated charts of statistical data and re-enactments. Revolution '67 will air on the PBS television series P.O.V. as part of its 20th season on July 10. Check your local listings.


    (Left to right: Revolution '67 Filmmakers Jerome Bongiorno & Marylou Tibaldo-Bongiorno with MMI's David Schwartz)


    On a side note, after the Q&A, I spoke with Marylou and Jerome outside the museum where I talked with Marylou about one of the other cities where riots ensued during the '60s mentioned in the film, that being Rochester, NY, where my father grew up and my late grandmother worked at the city's public library. I told Marylou that my family has a collection of books from the city's late historian, which I have yet to read, and I'm interested to find out if they talk about the riots that occurred there. I plan to look through these books next time I go home to visit my family.

    And on an even less related, but not too far between note, Marylou introduced me to her friend Luci, who I recognized from somewhere, and so I asked Marylou if the guy Luci came with was Scott, she said yes, and I realized they were Luci Westphal and Scott Solary of Good Hard Working People, the folks that shot The Reeler TV videos during the Tribeca Film Festival. Big thanks to their friend who gave me a lift back with them to Brooklyn.

    My notes from the Q&A follow.



    Astoria, NY
    June 23, 2007


    David: (Marylou) grew up in Newark. What did you know of the riots of 1967?

    Marylou: I don't have a memory of it. I was only four years old. I grew up in the shadow of city that was scarred, but the events that took place were palpable.

    David: What did you learn from making Revolution '67?

    Marylou: It was very much an eye opener. It wasn't just about a single day. It stemmed back several decades.

    Jerome: Before making the documentary, we made a short film at NYU called "1967" about a black sniper shooting at vigilantes. We thought it was true. People asked us to re-examine the facts of the events.

    David: What did you learn from going back in history?

    Marylou: Went back as far as slavery. Never heard of bank redlining before. This put everything into an economic perspective.

    David: Can you talk about the music choices in the film?

    Jerome: The music was very important. It added inspiration. We used a lot of jazz, because Newark is a big jazz town.

    The music is eclectic, from all over the world. It made for a hard job for Jerome to edit the film.

    David: How long was the process of making the documentary?

    Marylou: It took us four years. Every interviewee led us to someone else.
    David: In the film, you show a map of other cities where riots occurred in the 1960s. What's this film saying about that?

    Marylou: There were 150 cities in 1967 alone. 3,000 altogether in the 1960s. We're trying to get the federal government to help situations in cities where there's poverty, which is a big issue.

    David: Can you talk about how the documentary is being adapted into a narrative feature film? What will be different about the narrative version?

    Marylou: Before the documentary, we made a short film at NYU. Spike Lee was my teacher. The script for the feature has been written, and Spike Lee is the executive producer. The narrative version will have more characters.

    Audience Q&A

    Q: Where did you get the archival footage from? Were there any problems getting it?
    Marylou: Just the cost. Most of it is from ABC News, because we negotiated a rate with them instead of having to go to many other networks. Also got some footage from Internet Archive, which has free images in the public domain. Got some photos from the Library of Congress and National Archives, all free. The footage of the National Guard in Newark in '67 firing at an apartment building was from Universal Newsreel.

    Q: How did you get funding?

    Marylou: We started modestly. Received grants from the New Jersey Historical Commission for $3,000. Did some grass roots efforts in Newark with local corporations there. First was with Prudential. ITVS came in later with a larger grant, then P.O.V. came aboard as a co-producer.

    Cynthia Lopez (VP of P.O.V. in audience): You can go to the "for producers" page at pov.org and pbs.org to learn about ways to apply for public funding.

    Q: How has the Newark community accepted the documentary?

    Marylou: People have been really emotional. At other screenings in Newark, there really haven't been any Q&As. People talked more about the anger they had in an open dialogue. Some people suggested the film should be shown in schools. The Mayor of Newark will have free screenings of it in the Central Ward.

    Q: Did you have an idea of what you wanted the story to be about before you began?

    Marylou: It changed a great deal. It started out all being chronological, but then became more epic by adding more dimensions.

    Jerome: What's on screen was our own education of what the riots meant.

    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

  • Silverdocs 2007 - "The Gates" (Companion notes from June 10th's Maysles Films Program at BAM)

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grey Gardens  (1975)

    Following up on my notes from June 10th's Maysles Film Program at BAM with Albert Maysles (Grey Gardens), I would like to include the below notes from a Silverdocs Q and A with Antonio Ferrera, co-director of The Gates, as a companion piece. I was so moved by the presentation at BAM last week that I just had to see "The Gates" at Silverdocs. I missed it when it premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival. But before I present my notes, here's my review:

    The Gates is an incredibly engaging, dramatic work of documentary filmmaking with footage spanning more than 25 years of artists Christo's and Jeanne-Claude's struggle and ultimate victory to display their work of art entitled "The Gates" in New York City's Central Park from filmmakers Antonio Ferrera and Albert Maysles. A most dramatic and clever edit occurs at the beginning of the film when we see Christo and Jeanne-Claude as they were in 2005 and all of a sudden, they're back in 1979 as they prepare to talk with the then Parks Department Commissioner Gordon Davis, who turns their exhibition down. The duo take their presentation to various communities throughout New York City from Harlem to NYU, each time getting dissent from skeptical residents where a major argument was that they were going to destroy a piece of natural art by putting their own art over it. Christo's and Jeanne-Claude's response was that Central Park is man-made. Finally, in 2005, mayor Michael Bloomberg approved their exhibition, and in February of that year, "The Gates" went up for two weeks. I happened to see "The Gates" in person, and I personally didn't know what to make of them at the time. Whether or not one agrees that they were a beautiful work of art, one can't help but to admire how they brought an entire city together. Perhaps that is what the art really is, and that is exactly what is captured in the documentary The Gates. The last half-hour of the film shows the two weeks in 2005 when people came to Central Park. The filmmakers capture their natural reactions, excitement and confusion so beautifully.

    Photo courtesy of Silverdocs.


    The Gates - Q and A with co-director Antonio Ferrera
    SILVERDOCS AFI/Discovery Channel Documentary Festival 2007
    June 16, 2007

    Q: Can you talk about the editing decisions? How much footage was there?

    A: 400 hours of the actual event [the two weeks in 2005], about 200 hours from the preceding year, and 30 to 40 hours from 1979. We had access to a lot of great sensibilities. Captured the journey for the audience. Spent two years editing the film from 2005-2007, myself and Matthew Prinzing. I lived in the park for 16-17 hours a day. The story is all about the light.

    Q: Did you find the original people who were against "The Gates" in 1979?

    A: We hung out with Gordon Davis, who originally turned it down, but turned out to be one of its greatest advocates.

    Q: Did Christo and Jeanne-Claude make any money from "The Gates"?

    A: The drawings go toward the final work of art.

    Q: Did Christo and Jeanne-Claude adjust the opening of "The Gates" because of the snow?

    A: What ever happened, happened. It was incredible. It was just mother nature and our discipline to capture it.

    Q: Will Christo and Jeanne-Claude do any art exhibitions in the Washington, D.C., area?

    A: As soon as you tell them an idea, they don't do it.

    Q: What are your thoughts on David and Albert starting the shooting and you finishing it?

    A: It's a long story. It was a whole archaeological job.

    Q: What was your decision not to showcase Christo and Jeanne-Claude once "The Gates" were fertile.

    A: At a certain point, the expression has to take the foreground. I was scared I wouldn't be able to pull it off. We don't interview subjects. An example is the scene with the Trinidadian kids sitting on a rock in Central Park just talking about "The Gates." You can't interview shit like that. You just listen. I remember 9/11 when everyone looked up in horror. At "The Gates," everyone looked up in delight.

    Q: What was the decision behind not showing in the film the taking down of "The Gates" in Central Park ?

    A: We wanted to capture that feeling when you left the park.


    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

  • Sundance at BAM - Maysles Film Program

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Grey Gardens  (1975)

    I went to the Brooklyn Academy of Music (BAM) on Sunday for the Maysles Film Program, a special showcase curated just for Sundance Institute at BAM. Documentary filmmaker Albert Maysles presented clips from his and his late brother David’s archive spanning from the 1950s to a sneak peak of Albert’s latest project In Transit.

    Excerpts screened included:
    Russia, Moscow (1955-57), Yanki No! (1961), Untitled (1959), Showman [Outtakes] (1963), Carl Sandburg (1963), Anastasia (1962), What’s Happening! The Beatles in the U.S.A. (1964), With Love From Truman (1966)/Meet Marlon Brando [Outtakes] (1965), Off to War [Vietnam] (1965), Salvador Dali’s Fantastic Dream (1966), MGM Showreel (1966), Mother (1966), Gimme Shelter [Outtakes] (1969), McGovern (1972), Muhammad Ali in Zaire (1974), Grey Gardens [Outtakes] (1976), Maysles For Hire (1980’s and 90’s) and In Transit (work-in-progress).

    Watching these excerpts play one after the other was like being a fly on the wall in a time machine of popular culture and politics in the 20th Century, but it’s not the history that you learn in school or see on the news. It’s unparalleled access to the little behind-the-scenes, candid moments from the lives of everyday people to celebrities. And how’s this for DVD commentary, without actually needing a DVD player: During the segment from Yanki No!, Albert spoke out, “I’ve taken most of the narration out because it was so full of propaganda.” If you were not lucky enough to view the program live and in person with Albert yesterday, it would be great if an actual DVD of the program was released, or perhaps an airing on PBS.

    Before and after the presentation, Albert said a few words. Below are my notes from his talk.


    Albert Maysles. Photo courtesy of BAM.



    Maysles Film Program
    Sundance Institute at BAM
    June 10, 2007


    Before the Program:

    Albert began before the program saying that this is the most exciting time of our lives for documentaries. Suddenly, documentaries are emerging as more popular. It’s inevitable that it would happen. There’s a place for both fiction and non-fiction. There is a potential for cameras to pick up real life with out commercial people from Hollywood. It’s surprising that TV networks’ policies simply don’t take the work of independent filmmakers. Albert’s films are different because of the access. Most of his and his brother’s feature films are available through the Criterion Collection.

    Albert pointed out that in 1955, he departed a career in psychology and got a visa to go to Russia to film the people there. It was important to know who these other people were that we might have engaged in warfare with. You get to see bits and pieces of impressions of the people.

    Other clips Albert was about to show include a film about Anastasia from the Bolshoi Ballet. Excerpts from films of Truman Capote and Salvador Dali. A taste of his autobiography with a glimpse of his mother being sworn in as the president of Jewish women’s organization. A glimpse of George McGovern, the candidate for President of the U.S. in 1972. Albert said he might be the perfect guy to go with the perfect candidate to reveal his real character. Albert said, “Damn it! Why isn’t mass media working this way?” And finally, a glimpse of “In Transit,” where Albert traveled on several different trains in several different countries recording stories of the people traveling on them.


    After the Program:

    Albert told the audience that now they’ve had a glimpse into the past and the future. The image that touched him most was of his mother.

    He then spoke of a friend who made a film about the war experience and showed it to The History Channel, but they didn’t accept it because it was too personal. Albert said we have to break through this nonsense. It’s about time we witness life like it is. There’s a whole world around us and lots to film.

    Albert mentioned that when he shows his films to the subjects in them, they’ve had surprising reactions. He once he mad a film of a poor family in the South. It was a very loving and true story. He showed it to the grandmother of the family in the film who said, “well, that’s the truth,” but then asked, “can you make it longer?” And when Capote watched his own film, he came out crying.

    In documentary filmmaking, Albert said there’s a wonderful word called “random.” That’s what goes on. He and his brother were a two-camera crew. You have to be interested to do a heart-to-heart story and ask yourself, can you really tell the truth? “I believe it,” he said. You might not be able to capture it all, but when you see something on the screen, it becomes your experience. That’s why he wanted to make his new film “In Transit.” One of the stories of a woman who travels to Philadelphia to see her mother in nearly 20 years.

    “As you might have guessed, I’m excited about what I do,” Albert said. Albert’s family now lives in Harlem, where the Maysles Institute teaches kids 8 to twelve years old how to use cameras. Some of the children’s parents are in jail and send their films to their parents. This has taught them self respect.

    There was only time for one question from the audience. The question asked: What made you make the transition from psychology to documentary filmmaking? Albert’s answer: Psychology is a kind of science that you everything until you find a truth. Before he started filming in Russia, he was given two pieces of advice that he didn’t follow: 1) Use a tripod and 2) follow a point of view. “Thank goodness I didn’t follow them,” he said.

    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

  • The Creators Series: Participatory Filmmaking - June 10, 2007

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sin City  (2005)


    On Sunday, I attended a panel discussion titled “Participatory Filmmaking” presented by Tribeca Enterprises newest venture Tomorrow Unlimited. The panelists not only talked about their projects, but also to showed portions of their projects to the audience.

    Panelists:
    Martin Percy – Interactive Filmmaker, MovieActive.com
    Matt Hanson – Film Futurist, A Swarm of Angels
    Chris Doyle – Multidisciplinary Artist, 50,000 Beds

    Moderator:
    Jeremy Boxer – Director of Programming, Tomorrow Unlimited


    Percy’s Presentation
    On Martin Percy’s company’s website, MovieActive.com, there's what's described as Percy’s “interactive live-action work.” The sample Percy presented was “A Conversation with Sir Ian McClellan.” Percy said that every 13 year old in the U.K. has to learn a speech from Shakespeare’s Richard III. The interactive live-action work asks and answers questions about Shakespeare to the viewers. It’s a living video. More like a conversation and less like a lecture. Percy also did a piece for Tate Modern, which allows young people to not only come to the physical gallery, but also to the website. On the website, you can click on a piece of art that’s at the gallery. It’s trying to use live-action video to model a natural experience. Online, you can take your time viewing the art. The experience is best for single users with a broadband connection. It’s a lot harder to do this, for example, with a lot of people in a cinema, but not impossible. One example of a larger cinema audience is The Bunnysaver Challenge. On the screen is a host who asks questions to the audience and the audience sends a text message on their mobile phones, and the results are shown on screen. The problem before this was that people don’t believe sending text messages will work until they see it on screen. With cinema, it’s much more difficult to make it interactive, but there are huge opportunities for filmmakers by using digital cinema and broadband.

    Hanson’s Presentation
    Matt Hanson is the creator of A Swarm of Angels, which is described as “
    a groundbreaking project to create a £1 million film and give it away to over 1 million people using the Internet and a global community of members.” Hanson said he wanted to make a feature film that wasn’t done the normal way. Hanson described several elements that formed the basis of A Swarm of Angels:

    - The Blockbuster is Dead
    - The End of Celluloid – a digital manifesto
    - User-Generated Content, ie. YouTube
    - Bridging the Divide – filmmakers like Robert Rodriguez’s Sin City and Steven Soderbergh

    Hanson asks, how do we move forward? The answer: A Swarm of Angels, which is an “open-source” film licensed under Creative Commons. Hanson terms this sort of filmmaking as “crowd sourcing,” meaning creator-led and member-powered. It relies on the collaboration of all of its members. The collaboration is managed through tools, facilities, languages, rules and incentives.

    Finally, Hanson described the level of phases, or amount of members, that can be involved in A Swarm of Angels:

    - Phase 1: Proof of Concept – 100 members
    - Phase 2: Early Development – 1,000 members
    - Phase 3: Advanced Development – Up to 5,000 members
    - Phase 4: Pre-Production – 25,000 members
    - Phase 5: Filming – 50,000 members

    Doyle’s Presentation
    Chris Doyle is a multidisciplinary artist in Brooklyn. Three years ago, he created a concept called “Leap” where people contributed to the project. 11 videos of people at the end of New York City subway lines showed people jumping up and down. Chris edited all of the jumping people together. This was a way to get involved with people in a direct way. He wanted to make a video that would engage people.

    Doyle did another project in Tennessee. He set up a structure with students doing work in a library late at night. He gave them headlights and a camera to shoot themselves doing their work. The next day, he edited the material, and would project it onto the side of the library the next night.

    For 50,000 Beds, Doyle was approached by contemporary artists in Connecticut who were interested in a collaborative project. He submitted a proposal where hotel rooms would be used as studios. The end result was 45 artists in 45 hotel rooms, three venues, and one show. He had no idea what he was going to get. The interesting thing was he had to give up a certain amount of authorship. The end-product is a physical project or an installation.

    Moderator Questions:

    Boxer: How have you found the experience of building a framework that allows flexibility for collaboration?

    Percy: If I shoot video and you watch it on TV and didn’t get more out of it without interactivity, then I’ve failed. Flexibility is absolutely crucial.

    Hanson: A new process is being developed through the Internet. There’s a weird paradox. As a filmmaker, I’m giving a lot of control to the audience, but I’m the center of the power process.

    Doyle: Opinion overlaps with Percy and Hanson. There’s an interesting tension with authorship. I am the director, but ask for input from all people. I am the creative director of the project as a whole.

    Boxer: Because of the Internet, your projects have come to creation. Can you talk more about this?

    Hanson: It’s about bringing like minds together and building a network effectively. How can you get the network to build a global community? You’re giving away a lot of power, but getting a lot in return.

    Percy: Interactive videos began in the 1970s, but the Internet, and Broadband, more specifically, has changed everything. Think about the fundamental approach for making digital media on the Internet.

    Audience Q&A:

    Q: If there is a profit involved, where is it coming from?

    Percy: The Tate Modern piece is part of an advertising campaign. It’s discreet branding or in other words enlightened sponsorship as the source of funding.

    Hanson:
    The concept came from the frustration of getting my work funded through normal means. Had to look at other funding sources. I had a business management degree instead of going to film school. A Swarm of Angels is funded by a £25 subscription fee.

    Doyle: 50,000 Beds was funded through grant sources like the NEA and Connecticut Commission on Culture & Tourism.

    Q: Is there a future for non-linear films. What is the future without having gatekeepers?


    Hanson: My project is about creating a linear film and distributing it in a linear fashion on any screen, but there’s a non-linear aspect because people can re-mix it.

    Percy: Reflect on though processes in a natural more though-provoking way.

    Doyle: 50,000 Beds unfolds not just linearly, but also spatially.

    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

  • Brooklyn International Film Festival 2007

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]

    Brooklyn International Film Festival

    Opening Night
    Friday, June 1, 2007




    Contributing notetaker A.M. Peters and I attended the opening night festivities of the 10th annual Brooklyn Independent Film Festival (BiFF) at Steiner Studios in the Brooklyn Navy Yard. Jad Abumrad, host of WNYC's Radio Lab, introduced the night's films which began with the shorts Raymond and Dog Days, followed by the feature Made in Brooklyn, "a film about the neighborhood" with "four stories woven together by a cute little girl selling lemonade on a corner." The cast includes Michael Rispoli, Peter Dobson, Costas Mandylor, Vince Curatola and Richard Portnow. Luca Palanca wrote and produced the film that was directed by Gregory Alosio, Sharon Angela, Jeff Mazzola, Joe Tabb, and Palanca. When the film was over, Palanca said during a Q&A, "It's fitting we premiered here because it was a Brooklyn film."

    After the screening, I met filmmaker Nimrod Amitai outside of Steiner Studios. Amitai's short film Golden Wedding screen at BiFF on Monday, June 4 at 1pm and Wednesday, June 6 at 3:30pm at Cobble Hill Cinema.


    Nimrod Amitai (Director, Golden Wedding, and girlfriend)

    Stanley Cuba After Party
    Saturday, June 2


    Nicole Taylor and Jerry Less, who appears as Robert in Stanley Cuba


    I missed the screening of Stanley Cuba at BiFF today, as I was watching the new David Gordon Green film Snow Angels, which was part of the Sundance Institute at BAM. (Click here for notes from the Q&A). Luckily, I was able to hop over to the Stanley Cuba after party in Cobble Hill where I met up with A.M. and her roommie Boris Cifuentes, who worked on the film. Directed and written by Per Anderson, Stanley Cuba is described in its synopsis as "A rectangular black obelisk, intellectual property lawyers from hell, the most gratuitous lesbian kiss ever, five Brooklyn bands, aesthetic transcendence through selling out, something about Stanley Kubrick, and Mike Birbiglia." Also at the party was actor Al Burgo. I also ran into Jerry Less and Nicole Taylor whom I worked as the publicist on a reading of the play "L.O.L." last year that Jerry directed and starred Nicole. See picture above. Nicole next appears in a reading of the play "Cattaraugus Crick" at the Workshop Theater Company on June 10th.




    Originally posted on:The Film Panel Notetaker - Miss a panel discussion? Don't worry! We took notes for you.

 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<June 2007>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
1234567


Categories
 


Advertisement