Movie news on your iPhone today!
Advertisement
Sign in
Username   Password         Forgot password?
Wanna join? Sign up
Find movies you'll love

The_MOW Blog

  • A great use of the original pilot footage

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    "Star Trek" was meant to be pretty different than what we know it as today. NBC didn't accept the first pilot Gene Roddenberry presented, but the network gave him another chance. "The Menagerie," a two-part episode early in the first season, combindes footage from the original pilot to help develop the backstory of "Mr. Spock" (Leonard Nimoy).

    Ship's log, Stardate 3012.4 to Stardate 3013.1: The "Enterprise" is ordered to divert to "Starbase 11" by "Capt. Christopher Pike" (Sean Kinney), the former commanding officer of the famed Starship. However, when "Captain Kirk" (William Shatner), "Spock," and "Dr. McCoy" (DeForest Kelly) beam down to the Starbase, they discover "Pike" was horribly injured, unable to speak, or move.

    However, it turns out that a member of the "Enterprise" crew, who served on the "Enterprise" under command of "Pike" takes his former commanding officer without his consent to "Talos IV," the reason for the only death penalty still on the books in the "United Federation of Planets." That crewmember is now the ship's First Officer "Spock".

    The first thing you should know is that you are actually seeing two actors as "Pike". First is Kinney, who interacts with the rest of the cast as the wheelchair-bound "Pike". The other is Jeffery Hunter, who originated the role in the original series pilot seen in the images the "Enterprise" receives from the forbidden planet. Kinney was picked for his eerie resemblance to Hunter, who refused to be a part of the show from insistence of his wife who reportedly called her husband a movie star and not a television star after screening the original pilot.

    Another thing that will stand out is the drastic differences of "Spock" in the original pilot, and the way we know the character now. Not only are their obvious differences in the way the character looks, Nimoy portrays the character drasticaly different in the original pilot.

    Most of the episodes are the footage from the original pilot. The scenes in the conference room where the court martial of "Spock", who kidnapped "Pike" (with very good intentions that are revealed at the end of Part 2) are meant as filler to mostly set up the footage. Because of the filler scenes, this doesn't give guest character "Commodore Jose Mendez" (Malachi Throne) any room for development, which is not really needed.

    Like "Mendez," most of the cast in the original pilot footage are not developed. Mostly because, until the original pilot was finally aired in syndication years later, we only see a little of their adventure in the original pilot story.

    The performances are real good in this episode. Shatner, Nimoy and Kinney, who sits motionless with his mouth open the entire time stands out most in my opinion. Also, the make-up for the injured "Pike" is done pretty nicely, and it does look like there are radiation burns on Kinney's face. In the original pilot footage, Hunter and many other performers do great jobs in their performances.

    Another thing that viewers will also notice is that the rest of the cast has almost nothing to do. Unlike The Next Generation where the episode of a main storyline and a secondary one, the original series only has one storyline in each episode.

    These episodes could be a good starting point for new fans since it deals with the development of one of the best known characters in the entire franchise. These episodes, which is sold as one episode on VHS, is also one of the Must-Haves for fans of the series and franchise.


  • Pretty good episode with a surprise ending

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Ship's Log, Stardate 4040.7: The "USS Enterprise" has discovered the wreckage of the "SS Beagle," a Class-4 stardrive survey vessel which went missing six years years prior, with no sign of survivors. "Captain Kirk" (William Shatner) orders a course be plotted that follows the track of the debris back to where it originated from, a "Class-M" (Earth-like) planet.

    Once in orbit, the "Enterprise" intercepts an old-style television transmission of Roman Empire Era Gladiator Games featuring a crewmember of the missing "Beagle" crew, and witness his death.

    "Kirk," "First Officer Spock" (Leonard Nimoy) and "Cheif Medical Officer Leonard H. 'Bones' McCoy" (DeForest Kelly) beam down to planet surface and first encounter a group of runaway slaves hiding in a cave. One of these slaves is a former Gladiator known as "Flavius" (Rhodes Reason) who has converted to a religion the Landing Party believes to be worshipers of the sun.

    After the Landing Party and some of the slaves are captured somewhere near the slave hideout, they are taken into the city where they find the captain of the "Beagle", "Capt. R.M. Merrick" alive and closely working with government official "Proconsul Claudius Marcus" (Logan Ramsey). The three soon find themselves in a television studio, with "McCoy," "Spock" and "Flavius" star in the televised Gladiator games as "Kirk," the "Proconsul" and the "Capt. Merrick," who is renamed "Mericus."

    Now the Landing Party has to escape and get back to the "Enterprise."

    This episode is perfect for non-fans interested in the Roman Empire, as it is filled with references to famous names in the history of the once biggest Super power on Earth. There are also some references to the way of life of ancient Romans with the Gladiator games and slaves. Even the title of the episode is in reference to the Roman Empire.

    Another thing viewers will notice is the sets and wardrobe. There are lots of Roman Empire style furniture, art and columns. The wardrobes of the inhabitants of the planet are memorable, from the slave shirts with three links of a chain near the collar to the Roman-esque outfits of the "Proconsul" and "Mericus." Both of their costumes use darker shades in coloring than what is usually seen on the show. Other performers wear obvious late-1960's style clothing to help make it appear that the planet's version of the Roman Empire is in the 20th Century.

    There isn't much character development, but there is just enough to help build the story nicely. The characters are nicely written however, as is the dialogue.

    All the performers do a good job with their characters, especially the ones playing the religious slaves when referencing the religion their characters follow.

    There are numerous references to the "United Federation of Planet's Prime Directive," which states non-interference in cultures less advanced. A unique concept known as "Hodgkin's Law of Parallel Planetary Evolution" is referenced by "Spock, but in reality, this "law" was made-up by the writers of the series for budgetary reasons so that the prop and set departments wouldn't have to come up with something new for the series.

    One thing that certainly stands out is the relationship between "Spock" and "McCoy" that is helped by the strong performances of Nimoy and Kelly. This episode is certainly used to help develop the love-hate relationship between the two characters. One thing that stands out even more is the surprise ending referencing the religion of the slaves on the planet. In my opinion, this surprise ending will probably raise an eyebrow more than any other episode's ending.

    Like I said earlier, Ancient Roman Empire buffs may like this episode due to the numerous references to the ancient empire. However, this may not be the perfect episode for new viewers since the main cast is pretty well established.


  • Not even close to one of John Wayne's best

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Sagebrush Trail  (1933)

    Escaped convict "John Bramt" (John Wayne) has been chased out west by a couple of lawmen. After giving them the slip, "Brant," who did not do the crime for which he was serving time for, joins up with an outlaw gang who have been on a crime spree.

    What the gang doesn't realize is that the man they know as "Smith" is doing whatever it takes to thwart the gang's criminal efforts as he and one of the outlaws (Lane Chandler) compete to get the attention of the young daughter (Nancy Shubert) of the local shopkeeper (Henry Hall).

    I believe this is the first John Wayne movie I've seen in its entirety, and I am somewhat disappointed. The story itself is pretty typical of Westerns from this era, and is pretty predictable.

    One thing that sticks out is the audio quality. In many outdoor scenes, you have to strain to hear the dialogue when there are other, much louder sounds in the scene. It is painfully obvious that natural sounds are used and no sound effects are used to sweeten the audio. Another problem is that the audio quality has not aged well. Much of the prerecorded music sounds quite muffled.

    Another problem is the that many of the interiors are obviously movie sets. The gang's hideout appears quite cramped, and the rock walls in the "mine" are obviously fabricated.

    There are some weak performances in this film, even from Wayne. Many times in this film it sounds like they aren't trying to make the dialogue believable.

    The movie was edited in a terrible way. At the start of the movie, the director opted for extremely brief scenes to set up the story. There were also a lot of sudden close-ups of performers as they delivered their lines. The cinematography, as a whole, was not done well at all in fact.

    The fight scenes were also done pretty poorly. Many of the punches appeared to have landed on their intended target a lot more softly than the target reacted. The fights were also contained in a small area at times. They are some of the worst fights I've seen filmed.

    None of the scenes truly stood out. The outdoor scenes didn't even use any shots that made you say "Wow, that's beautiful," in fact. The movie lacked any scenes that are memorable at all.

    Character development is seriously lacking in this film. None of the characters, minor and main, are developed enough to either care for or hate. They are also one-dimensional. At least 99% of the characters are completely forgettable.

    Personally, I would watch this on television when there is absolutely nothing else on that is worth seeing. I wouldn't even add it to my movie collection unless I was a hard core John Wayne fan to complete my collection of his films.


  • Flimsy plot, but amazing special effects

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Twister  (1996)

    "Jo Harding" (Helen Hunt) lost her father to an F5 tornado, the most dangerous of its kind. Now she is a scientist out to find out what makes these bad boys tick.

    While out with her team, she runs into her soon-to-be ex-husband, "Bill" (Bill Paxton), who left the storm-chasing biz to work as a weatherman. "Bill" is pretty much an expert of how a twister reacts, and can tell what it's about to do by just looking at it. However, what he wants is for "Jo" to complete signing their divorce papers.

    While having some small-talk, "Jo" reveals to "Bill" that she had built a new tornado examination device that he designed, but never brought out of the planning stages himself. The machine, which has small plastic balls filled with sensors, was nicknamed "Dorothy," named after the character from "The Wizard of Oz."

    Then the predictable happens -- a tornado touches down, and "Bill", along with his new love Melissa (Jami Gertz), join in on the chase. However, they are not alone, as a competing group of storm-chasers, with a much bigger budget, is also chasing the same storms.

    When it comes to the story itself, there are many plot holes. First off, the other team is obviously the bad guys when we first meet them -- heck, even their cars are the villainous black. Personally, I'm surprised they aren't given black hats to really make it obvious.

    Another thing that is obvious is that "Bill" and "Jo" still care for each other. It would have been nicer if one was presented as one is still in love with the other, while the other slowly realize they are still in love.

    A huge problem with this story is character development. "Jo" and "Bill" appear to have the most development, but the rest have little to none. I didn't connect to any of the supporting cast, nor did I connect with the two lead characters at all. Between the frequent tornadoes, there was ample opportunity to develop the characters, but those were totally missed.

    The performances from the cast, with exception of the bad guys who are poorly developed and not really seen long on-screen, are pretty good. The team the movie centers around gives the audience a pretty good feel of their relationship as a team. I felt as if these people have known each other for quite some time.

    What truly carries this movie is the incredible special effects, which are better for a sound system like the ones in movie theaters. They are quite believable storms thanks to the use of high-powered fans for the wind and the computer graphics. They really nailed the power of tornadoes in this film.

    The rest of the visuals are not as memorable. Most of the film's scenes take place in the cabin of the cars used by the team members. They also have shots taken from the air where there is nothing around for miles except crops or trees.

    The director, Jan de Bont was handed a script with a weak plot and incredible special effects and a pretty good cast. However, all he could produce was a special effects movie.

    This movie would be best viewed in wide-screen format, and stereo surround-sound. Only the special effects makes this film worth seeing, and that is the only reason I can recommend it.


  • A thought provoking film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    12 Angry Men  (1957)

    A young man (John Savoca), who is a minority, is on trial for the murder of his father, which he says he didn't commit. Both sides have presented their cases, and now it's in the hands of the jury of his peers.

    Each men believe that the boy, who has a criminal record, is guilty. However, one man of the jury, known only as "Juror #8" (Henry Fonda, who also served as the movie's producer) believes the boy is possibly not guilty. Now, he must convince the others of the jury that there is reasonable doubt in the boy's guilt.

    One of the first things that you will notice is that there are only three sets in this film. Two of which, the courtroom and the jury room bathroom, are only seen briefly. The other room is a cramped jury room which appears to be a few flights up because of the obvious matte painting outside the room windows. Because of the use of a small, rectangular set like the Jury Room, this pretty much hampers the camera angles. It's pretty obvious that the walls, and items in the room, had to be moved around for some camera angles.

    The director did do a good job with the camera angles. The director was able to come up with some angles to aid in what little drama there is in the movie.

    Each of the performers were really good in their roles, possibly due to rehearsing for two weeks prior to the start of filming. It is hard to tell which of the cast members really stand out from the rest, but each have their moments where they do. I guess you could say Fonda does, mostly because he has to play the one juror who is uncertain of the guilt or innocense of the defendant. Jack Klugman was a bit disappointing, in my opinion, but he did have his moments.

    Another slight problem was the development of characters. The only way we get to know anything about them is when they offer a little about their pasts in private conversation and during deliberations.

    None of the scenes really stand out, mostly because the vast majority of the picture takes place in one room, which looks pretty accurate. However, the scene in the bathroom where some juror's try to get "Juror #8" to see their side, and get him to change his vote, is probably the most interesting scene.

    There is little action in this movie, unless you count the more heated arguments as action. There is also some drama, and a few suspenseful moments in this film.

    I strongly suggest that you imagine yourself as a juror who believes the defendant is guilty. You will truly appreciate the performances, especially Fonda's, then. It may also aid in the suspense of the film as you listen to the arguments, and presented with the evidence. It may also be interesting if you see Fonda as the defence attorney, and the other jurors as the prosecution.

    I have seen this film twice in the last week on Turner Classic Movies, and have to say that I wasn't disappointed in anything each time. This could be a good first-choice rental, or a solid choice for your second if your first choice is not available. Also, if you have a classic movies collection at home, I think this may be a good addition to the collection.


  • A cute, fairly silly film

    Was this review helpful? [Be the first to tell us!]
    Under discussion:

    Mars Attacks!  (1996)

    Recently, the Hubble telescope took pictures of a fleet of spacecraft heading to Earth under a flag of peace. The lead spacecraft, with the Martian Ambassador, lands in a Nevada desert in what can only be called a media circus, but the unexpected happens -- the martians pull out their weapons and start shooting.

    The first thing you will notice is the incredible cast. One performance that stands out is Jack Nichelson, who plays two roles. He is near perfect as the President of the United States, and the other, more minor role, is very funny. Another performance that makes this movie special, even if it's not that big of a role until near the end of the film, is of the late Sylvia Sidney as "Grandma Norris," and only because this is her final role before her death three years after "Mars Attacks! release.

    Another thing that really stands out is the design of the aliens. That are made with interesting colors, and flawless motion. The only problem I had with the aliens was the annoying voices they were given. However, they are fairly good comic relief at times and are pretty enjoyable. Another special effect that works is the spaceships, which are obviously a nod to the 1950's movies of the same genre.

    One problem with this film is there is some problems with character development. This is because that the cast is just a little too large to help expand their characters. There are also some pretty lame performances, but I do believe that they are intentionally poor. Some of the roles may have worked a little better if they were cameos -- especially Danny DeVito, whom I thought wasn't that great in a role that is pretty much like any other role he's done on the silver screen. Also, in my opinion, many of the performers in this film were pretty much wrong for their parts. One of those was Glen Close as the First Lady, which was obviously a comedic role, but her performance fell flat. Another thing I notices is that many performers were over-the-top, but they looked more like they were trying a little too hard to make their performances believable.

    The movie is filled with some very silly moments, with lots of really good chuckles. Like I said earlier, the aliens are pretty funny, and some of the performances are equally chuckle worthy. Nichelson, in his smaller role as a high stakes gambler, is simply hilarious. Many of the comedic moments are thanks to the over-the-top performances that are pretty bad by design.

    One thing that is pretty stupid in my opinion is the ridiculous surprise ending that is meant for a laugh. For me the surprise ending, discovered by two characters that you'd least expect, the surprise ending produced a good groan and a really good eye-roll.

    I am not a Tim Burton fan, but he did a good, not great, job at direction. He was able to direct a couple of real good battle scenes with lots of action and special effects. He also directed, as a whole, a good tribute to 1950's alien invasion movies with over-the-top performances, some of which didn't work in my opinion.

    To sum things up, "Mars Attacks!" would be a good, solid second choice the next time you go to to your local rental place. It also might be a pretty good addition to your collection if you are into a cheesy comedies.


 

Like what you're reading?

Subscribe
Search
  Go

Browse previous
<May 2009>
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
262728293012
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31123456


Categories
 


Advertisement